Protecting Cities from Hijacked Planes
Kong99 writes "A group at UC-Berkeley has proposed Soft Walls to stop hijacked planes from entering a protected airspace. Interesting read especially since they claim it is 'hack' proof."
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
Plane tries hard to fly into zone but soft walls keep it out
I'm sold!
-Lucas
Oh, I get it. Planes will have to use an evil bit if they plan on crashing into a skyscrapper or something.
.sig
I thought this was solved by NOT allowing curbside luggage check-in.
--
"Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
In other news, shipmakers have launched a new 'un-sinkable' ship today, and dubbed her 'The Titanic'...more to come...
-- p06 "On religious wars: They're essentially wars over whoo's imaginary friend is better"
That's the BEST way to find bugs. Simply promise the world that it's HACK PROOF. When there's some published loophole, they fix it. Then comes round 2 of "This versions' HACK PROOF".
How else do you encourage hackers to take their skills on something normal debuggers wont find? You make it a challensge and openly state it's the best secure.
I can just see it now... "I can't let you do that Dave"
yes, I read the article
I'm not drunk, I just have a speech impediment. And a stomach virus. And an inner ear infection.
Left, right, left, right, up, down, up, down, left pedal, right pedal, barrel roll left, hit the autopilot button, and BLAMMO, the names of the dev team are scrolling over the inflight movie.
Sounds like a recipe for air sickness bag sales!
--
My other computer is your IIS server.
No no no, this technology would only impose soft wall restrictions on planes flown by terrorists with the intention of crashing into buildings. It would even feature a special subconscious scanning algorythm that would know if the pilot was a terrorist, even if he didn't know it himself!
/t
i mean, if you're going to live in a fantasy world, it might as well be a good one, no?
#!/usr/bin/english
The devil you say! Those darn whiny pilots and their "control" and their "not dying in screaming terror because their controls have beem r00t3d"!
Raindance is right you know. Nobody will fly planes into the twin towers ever again.
...a group at Bellevue has planned soft walls for anybody crazy enough to believe something "can't be hacked".
For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
Oh, I mean that's why terrorists have been able to bring the air traffic control network down by hacking into it.
Yeah they have! I've seen it in a movie. Die hard something or other.
Norris/Palin 2012
Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
A little box on every plane with GPS co-ordinates of prime terrorism targets? Seems like a wealth of valuable info for some loon with a couple of ICBMs to spare.
Most writers regard truth as their most valuable possession, and therefore are most economical in its use - Mark Twain
> enter room
This could be dangerous. Are you sure?
> Y
Are you REALLY sure?
> Y
Are you REALLY, REALLY sure?
> Y
I could tell you weren't really sure. You turn around and walk away. Telegrams from all over the galaxy arrive praising your prudence...
Autopilot: "I could tell you didn't really want to avoid that oncoming jumbo jet by turning left into a no-fly zone. Have a nice afterlife..."
The difference between the stock market and your monitor, is that there aren't hundreds of thousands of people who would like nothing better than to crack into your monitor.
I play Nerd-Folk!
On tractor trailers.
Waiting for ad.doubleclick.net...
The difference between the stock market and your monitor, is that there aren't hundreds of thousands of people who would like nothing better than to crack into your monitor.
I was thinking of trying it. Are there 99,999 likeminded slashdotters out there?
What do you do when your airplane says, "I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that."
--
Vote for your hopes, not for your fears - Vote Third Party