Slashdot Mirror


New Deep Ocean Creatures

An anonymous reader writes "NORFANZ was a recent expedition that went really deep into the ocean in the search for new species that live in the largely unchartered waters of the Tasman Sea. Check out the site and some very cool pics."

18 of 216 comments (clear)

  1. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    To assist with down load time, we have reduced the number of images in each photo page. Your favorite image may have moved to a new page, but no images have been removed

    I have a feeling someone isn't going to be very happy when they get to work this morning.

  2. also of interest by pubjames · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you like this stuff, read this recent news story:

    Giant sea specimen baffles scientists

    1. Re:also of interest by Trigun · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here's the RedNova article on it.

    2. Re:also of interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm quite angry at the continued use of the word "baffle" in headlines regarding this fleshy anomaly. You see, when I first saw it on cnn.com last week, I thought it said, "Giant sea creature BATTLES Chilean scientists." Now that would be pretty fucking cool. Not that a fucking huge part of some weird creature isn't also pretty cool, it's just not as cool as a battle between a bunch of scientists and a living weird creature.

  3. Funky Evolution by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's some funky stuff going on down there. Like the dating habits of the Humpback Anglerfish.

    "For me, this bizarre fish (the size of a tennis ball) is one of the most fascinating creatures in the deep sea. It has it all, its black, has big savage teeth, little nasty pin eyes, a big flabby stomach ready to fit in anything it can catch (irrelevant of size) and a rod lure off the top of its head with a glowing tip to coax in stupid prey. It doesnt stop there: its flesh is watery, its bones are very light (barely coated by a thin layer of calcium carbonate) and it can barely swim (theres not much of a tail). This animal just hangs mid-water waving its little lure and waiting to chomp. And this is only what the female looks like! The male is completely different. Hes very small and looks like a black jellybean with fins. He has no lure, has big eyes, huge nostrils and a fairly small mouth with curved hooked teeth. His body is made of strong red muscle for swimming long distances. Why the difference? Shes looking for food, hes looking for her. She releases anglerfish-type perfumes into the water and he spends all his time swimming around looking and smelling for her. When he eventually finds her (in the dark), he latches on to her side (with his hooked teeth) and drinks her food-rich blood in return for producing the sperm she needs when it comes time to release her eggs."

    Or the Mossish ( Caulophryne jordani )

    "Like other anglerfishes, males are very different. They are small and have simple fins. In this species, the male latches on to the female and doesn't let go. Their skin fuses and he stays as a permanent pimple with eyes, drinking blood and making sperm."

    1. Re:Funky Evolution by Rinikusu · · Score: 5, Funny

      Proof positive that being a nice, sensitive guy who listens to girls' feelings and wants and desires only gets you put into the "gay" zone while being a parasitic leech who only uses girls for food and fucks gets all the play.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  4. New creatures indeed by Scurrility+Extempore · · Score: 5, Funny

    Incredible! Finally, an authentic photograph of Cowboy Neal!

  5. Wonky eyes? by burgburgburg · · Score: 5, Funny
    In the description of the Jewel Squid:
    Firstly they have wonky eyes, the left eye is always much larger than the right.

    If they're going to throw technical jargon like that at us, I'll be completely lost.

  6. underwater habitats by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It really surprises me how many people think of the world's water simply as "The Ocean", like it's one homogeneous thing that has the same contents everywhere. I'd expect that it would be even more varied than surface life, since different pressures, temperatures, currents, light levels, seafloor materials, salinity, and other fluid contents would vary greatly from location to location, and since depth allows for many ranges of habitats (and life forms can float at a certain depth easier than they can equivalently in air) we'd have more to look at than we could possibly ever figure out entirely. I'd think that we'd be tripping over new life forms every time we looked anywhere intently or anywhere we hadn't gone before.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:underwater habitats by 3Bees · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I'd think that we'd be tripping over new life forms every time we looked anywhere intently or anywhere we hadn't gone before.

      Not just the oceans, either. Biologists are only able to identify something on the order of 70% of the fish sold in markets near the mouth of the Amazon.

      --
      "I think we should tax people who stand in water! " - Mr. Gumby
  7. For you lynx users... by mofochickamo · · Score: 5, Funny
    I used aalib to convert some images to ASCII. Here they are:

    >===@ (Angler)

    |==\=> (Glowing Antenna Thingy)

    8==============> (errrr...)

    --
    Honk if you're horny.
  8. Re:Opened can of sea spam by scottennis · · Score: 5, Funny

    I read somewhere that the big blob that washed up on the coast of Chile was one of Pamela Anderson's old implants.

  9. Re:Dude...that's just crazy. by mediahacker · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Wanna go really cazy??? :-)

    Photophores originated from colonies of phosphorent bacteria that were living in the fish. This eventually evolved into a differentiated tissue that was light-emitting.

    The optical mechanism of these photophores can be quite complex too - it is expensive (metabolically) to turn the light on and off so iris-like shutters have evolved for some species...

  10. In honor of Jacques Cousteau... by Alien+Being · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm reading every post with a french accent.

  11. Re:the devil by eclectic4 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was thinking the same thing. I saw a bunch of guys showing the "things" they killed.

    I would have much rather seen images of them in their habitat. Creatures from the deep sea just do not look the same dead and surfaced. They're flat, discolored, etc... have you ever seen a squid laying on the floor of a boat? It's jelly body look like a blob, not the magnificant creature it "was" swimming in it's habitat, so I'm not sure why showing us images of dead deep sea creatures was the preferred method of display here. I'm sure there were some great underwater shots of the same creatures...right?

    I watch those deep sea exploration shows and they will find 2-3 new species of sea creature every dive. They say that the deep sea has more species of animals undiscovered than all known species to date, terrestrial life included. We know more about space, and the planets in the solar system than we do about life in the deep sea.

    It's all very cool stuff.

    --

    "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
  12. As fisheries are wiped out, fishermen go deeper. by Medievalist · · Score: 5, Informative


    For example, the formerly plentiful Patagonian and Antarctic Toothfishes (known in the restaurant trade as "Chilean Sea Bass" despite being amazingly ugly deep-sea dwellers) are well on their way to being fished to extinction.

    Like many large fish, they have a long reproductive cycle, and thus are easily driven to extinction by modern fishing methods. Not that the fishing industry as a whole isn't fishing pretty much everything to commercial extinction, but they can do it a lot faster to species that take a long time to become reproductive adults.

  13. Light based cloaking device by anagama · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "When the squid is hanging at a 45 angle, all the light organs aim down and produce just enough light to cancel out the silhouette of the squid against the weak light from the surface above. They can even adjust the lights for different depths or time of day."

    Scroll down for the picture of a Jewel Squid.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  14. The Sea is one scary place by Punk+Walrus · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ... about three quarters of the planet is covered by water
    ... most of it is unexplored
    ... we're not aquatic

    I'd say the odds are against us.

    I used to know a guy who lived in Guam who told me about some of the scary stuff locals would find in trawlers. Most were tiny fish, but a few were big enough to give a trout a run for its money. One of the stories he used to tell me:

    I was sitting up high on some hills, overlooking the deeper waters. I was watching some sport fishermen who were in the process of catching a huge great white shark. It must have been almost a ton in weight. After an hour, they managed to subdue it, and since it was almost the size of their tiny sport boat, they couldn't haul it onboard, and so they dragged it behind them, and had a beer. While it was dragging behind their boat, some huge, dark shape started to follow them. Then the carcass of the shark was yanked down sharply, and then only the head of the shark bobbed back up. You also saw part of its tail drifiting away. I don't know what the hell it was, but in ONE BITE it ripped oout most of the middle of the shark, which meant its jaws must have been over five meters across. I will never swim in the open ocean as long as I live after seeing that shit.
    And now, neither will I. He also said some people he grew up with caught a deep sea ribbon fish (oarfish?) that was over 40 feet long. He said he didn't care what anyone said, that thing was a sea serpent if he ever saw one.