Slashdot Mirror


New Deep Ocean Creatures

An anonymous reader writes "NORFANZ was a recent expedition that went really deep into the ocean in the search for new species that live in the largely unchartered waters of the Tasman Sea. Check out the site and some very cool pics."

82 of 216 comments (clear)

  1. That Giant Rattail.. by Papatoast · · Score: 4, Funny

    closely resembles one of the 'sea monsters' that lived in/near The Core in Phantom Menace. Shame it didn't eat Jar Jar....

    --
    We were somewhere around Barstow on the edge of the desert when the drugs began to take hold. - HST
    1. Re:That Giant Rattail.. by l810c · · Score: 2, Funny

      Would you rather have that or Mr. Burns three eyed fish on your dinner plate?

  2. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    To assist with down load time, we have reduced the number of images in each photo page. Your favorite image may have moved to a new page, but no images have been removed

    I have a feeling someone isn't going to be very happy when they get to work this morning.

    1. Re:heh by Blue+Stone · · Score: 2, Informative

      They don't understand the concept of thumbnails.
      The pictures are reduced in dimension but not file size, and do not link to the full-size image.
      Maybe it's a side effect of the bends, or something.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
  3. also of interest by pubjames · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you like this stuff, read this recent news story:

    Giant sea specimen baffles scientists

    1. Re:also of interest by tbmaddux · · Score: 4, Funny
      Giant sea specimen baffles scientists
      Bah! If you don't understand it, blow it up, dude! Would have been perfect for the 4th.
      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
    2. Re:also of interest by Trigun · · Score: 4, Informative

      It turned out to be a rotting corpse of a giant sea squid.

    3. Re:also of interest by Trigun · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here's the RedNova article on it.

    4. Re:also of interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm quite angry at the continued use of the word "baffle" in headlines regarding this fleshy anomaly. You see, when I first saw it on cnn.com last week, I thought it said, "Giant sea creature BATTLES Chilean scientists." Now that would be pretty fucking cool. Not that a fucking huge part of some weird creature isn't also pretty cool, it's just not as cool as a battle between a bunch of scientists and a living weird creature.

    5. Re:also of interest by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Funny

      I dunno, it sure looked like a giant "specimen" to me, if you know what I mean...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    6. Re:also of interest by sbszine · · Score: 3, Informative

      You might also like to read the slashdot story.

      --

      Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

  4. Beasts by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nothin' better than new beasts. And sea-beasts are the most interesting beasts of all!

  5. A very important question remains... by shik0me · · Score: 4, Funny

    How do they taste?

    1. Re:A very important question remains... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I suspect a lot of these fish taste like a catfish from the ultimate of muddy waters. Very earthy. Anything that feeds near a vent probably tastes like rotten eggs from the sulfur.

    2. Re:A very important question remains... by tuffy · · Score: 3, Funny
      How do they taste?

      Like chicken, surely.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  6. Deep sea crab by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did you see the size of that? I'm just imagining how that would taste dipped in clarified garlic butter right now...

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  7. Collecting specimins of ultra - rare fish? by Negadin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the page: "Before our cruise, these were the only two records of this rare fish in the world. Its rarity lead to it being formally recognised as threatened. In one short trawl at around 90 m deep near Ball's Pyramid, we collected three specimens and excellent fresh photographs taken by Kerryn Parkinson."

    With only two records of a fish in existance, you then "collect" three specimens to keep?

    What happens if you never see them again?

    1. Re:Collecting specimins of ultra - rare fish? by l810c · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are lots of 'rare' fish in the deep ocean. I don't think they are endangered, just hard to find in such an inhospitable place.

    2. Re:Collecting specimins of ultra - rare fish? by Azghoul · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You do have a point. However, if there were only 5 or 10 on the planet, they weren't long for this earth anyway. Gene pool and all that...

    3. Re:Collecting specimins of ultra - rare fish? by Mantrid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think there's much of a problem - during random trawling they pulled up 3, given the size of the ocean, and the minute percentages actually checked, odds are there's tons of those buggers down there. And if we did remove the last three, well the species didn't have much hope anyways! It's not like they set out to find three endangered fish and pull them to the surface.

      And I'm afraid that being pulled to the surface is a one-way trip. So once they were discovered there wasn't much to be done.

    4. Re:Collecting specimins of ultra - rare fish? by Becquerel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It doesn't take much stats knowledge to work out that if you have say...

      3 trips on which you might expect to find the things

      A volume of sea in which they might exist of several 1000 km^3

      And a net that can trawl 100 m^3 with big holes in it

      That the probability of knowing anything about the species can be calculated to be ... Jack all.

      It's daft to put it on the endangerd species list, because you haven't got a clue whether it is or not.

      --
      My spelling isn't bad, I'm evolving the language
    5. Re:Collecting specimins of ultra - rare fish? by bbc22405 · · Score: 2, Informative
      And I'm afraid that being pulled to the surface is a one-way trip.

      The previous poster is hinting at why they kept all three specimens. Let me make it more plain. By the time the fish were found in the net, they were as good as dead, if not dead already.

      When fish with swim bladders are brought up from depth (90m is deep enough), this gas-filled bladder expands grossly, giving the fish fatal internal injuries. For example, the bladders of these fish from 90m would swell to about 9 times the volume that they were at depth.

      Fish brought up from great depths, even if they lack swim bladders, can die from what is essentially The Bends, i.e. dissolved gas within their tissues fizzing out of solution. (They can die from other things as well.)

    6. Re:Collecting specimins of ultra - rare fish? by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny
      What happens if you never see them again?

      At least you'll remember how they tasted.

  8. Unchartered? by JDevers · · Score: 2, Funny

    So the Tasmanian sea doesn't lease itself out too much?

    I'm thinking that should be uncharted, as in no charts have been drawn up mapping it...

    1. Re:Unchartered? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I'm thinking that should be uncharted, as in no charts have been drawn up mapping it..."

      Kiff (sighing): "It's not uncharted, captain, you lost the chart". (Futurama)

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  9. Funky Evolution by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's some funky stuff going on down there. Like the dating habits of the Humpback Anglerfish.

    "For me, this bizarre fish (the size of a tennis ball) is one of the most fascinating creatures in the deep sea. It has it all, its black, has big savage teeth, little nasty pin eyes, a big flabby stomach ready to fit in anything it can catch (irrelevant of size) and a rod lure off the top of its head with a glowing tip to coax in stupid prey. It doesnt stop there: its flesh is watery, its bones are very light (barely coated by a thin layer of calcium carbonate) and it can barely swim (theres not much of a tail). This animal just hangs mid-water waving its little lure and waiting to chomp. And this is only what the female looks like! The male is completely different. Hes very small and looks like a black jellybean with fins. He has no lure, has big eyes, huge nostrils and a fairly small mouth with curved hooked teeth. His body is made of strong red muscle for swimming long distances. Why the difference? Shes looking for food, hes looking for her. She releases anglerfish-type perfumes into the water and he spends all his time swimming around looking and smelling for her. When he eventually finds her (in the dark), he latches on to her side (with his hooked teeth) and drinks her food-rich blood in return for producing the sperm she needs when it comes time to release her eggs."

    Or the Mossish ( Caulophryne jordani )

    "Like other anglerfishes, males are very different. They are small and have simple fins. In this species, the male latches on to the female and doesn't let go. Their skin fuses and he stays as a permanent pimple with eyes, drinking blood and making sperm."

    1. Re:Funky Evolution by Trigun · · Score: 2, Funny

      In this species, the male latches on to the female and doesn't let go.

      Man, where can I get a job like that?

    2. Re:Funky Evolution by Rinikusu · · Score: 5, Funny

      Proof positive that being a nice, sensitive guy who listens to girls' feelings and wants and desires only gets you put into the "gay" zone while being a parasitic leech who only uses girls for food and fucks gets all the play.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    3. Re:Funky Evolution by patricksevenlee · · Score: 2, Funny

      When he eventually finds her (in the dark), he latches on to her side (with his hooked teeth) and drinks her food-rich blood in return for producing the sperm she needs when it comes time to release her eggs." "Like other anglerfishes, males are very different. They are small and have simple fins. In this species, the male latches on to the female and doesn't let go. Their skin fuses and he stays as a permanent pimple with eyes, drinking blood and making sperm."

      Sounds like some human spouses I have met! :)

  10. Disgusting by Sabalon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not only do I not like seafood, but looking at underwater life just turns my stomach.

    The fish don't bother me, but the crabs and other oddball forms are just too weird. Everything is either spiny or gooey.

    Blech!!!

  11. Speaking of New Sea Creatures... by Talking+Goat · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...I heard about this over the weekend. Giant something or other... Looks like it has been one hell of a week to be a marine biologist, eh?

    --

    + G to tha Izzo, A to tha Tizee, Talking Giz-oat, Ya'll Bettah Feel Me... +
  12. Shrimp by seen2much · · Score: 4, Funny

    I see they discovered the goblin shrimp, but did they discover this species

    --


    "Beware the squirrels"
  13. Actually... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Informative

    "How do they taste?"

    Check out some of the older fish determination guides: some of them actually have information on the tastiness listed with each fish. These won't be in the guides though.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  14. New creatures indeed by Scurrility+Extempore · · Score: 5, Funny

    Incredible! Finally, an authentic photograph of Cowboy Neal!

  15. Old by tsa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think one of the reasons why these creatures look so weird is that they may have had the most time of every type of creature to evolve. The deep sea is not affected by ice ages and warm periods that have a large influence on the surface of the planet, so the enviromnent in which these creatures evolved may have been virtually undisturbed for many millions of years.

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Old by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My first reaction to your comment was to post something saying how you were totally wrong, but then I read it again, and it's an interesting point.

      Are you saying that this environment has existed in its curent state for so long that the species living in it have had more time to adapt to more and more specialised niches within it?

      Whereas on land, where you get ice ages, meteorite strikes, etc, every so often, species have to adapt quickly, so therefore, in the long run, the less specialised species are at an advantage?

      If you were saying that, then I agree with you.

    2. Re:Old by nietsch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not quite right. the temperature may be somewhat constant, but that does not mean that the environment does not change. Think about the influx of nutrients that comes from land, or the amount of oxygen or coarbondioxide that is dissolved in the water. Now pour some changing ocean currents in the mix because the north atlantic and pacific are partially frozen over. That does have some influence doesn't it?
      If your argument were right, we'd still be fishing up tribolites.

      --
      This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    3. Re:Old by tsa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What I understood from the various documentaries that I've seen is that nutrients from above do not play a very large role in the food circulation in the deep sea. And the watertemperature in the deep sea is always 4 degrees C because water has its highest density at that temperature. But I'm as much a layman in these matters as the next person I must admit.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    4. Re:Old by Sgt+York · · Score: 3, Informative
      Nutrient flux to the bottom plays a huge role in the deep water ecosystem. With no light, there is no photosynthesis, so the bottom of the food chain difffers from what we are used to. If there is a vent nearby, the creatures that feed off it's heat & chemicals form the base of the food chain. If there is no vent, the only source of food is the manna from above. Animals that die and sink, feces, solid runoff from shores, etc form the bottom of the food chain. Detritus fills the place of plants, scavengers take the place of herbivores, and predators, well, they're still predators.

      It is conceivable that at times of massive kills at the surface (comet/asteroid strikes, climate change) the flux of food increased rapidly. This would give rise to a brief period of intense growth, coupled with an increase in the diversity in each species. Once the feast is over, there will be a massive die-off (i.e., selection event) as the scavengers, then predators starve.

      --

      There is a reason for everything. Sometimes that reason just sucks.

    5. Re:Old by NoData · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1) If you subscribe to most modern accounts of biogenesis, there was likely a single source for the origin of life (or at least the life from which every living thing today evolved). So, every living thing has had just as much time to evolve as every other.

      2) If by "longest time" you mean time in a constant environment, please see all the other posts in this thread on how land ecology impacts deep sea ecology. Furthermore, keep in mind the earth's tectonics which are particularly violent in the Pacific. Volcanic activity has tremendous impact on deep sea life.

      Things evolve to adapt to their (ever-changing) enviornments. These creatures' environments are very unlike ours. It has nothing to do with time on earth or environmental stability.

    6. Re:Old by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, he was saying they look this way because they're much more highly evolved than any other species on the planet. Sure, it looks ugly and crazy to us, but we just don't understand their superpowers. They will reveal them in time.

      And I, for one, will welcome our new ichthyoid overlords!

    7. Re:Old by wombatmobile · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I think one of the reasons why these creatures look so weird is that they may have had the most time of every type of creature to evolve.

      No, all creatures have had the same time to evolve. On Earth, that time is estimated to be 4.5 billion years.

      Some creatures may have experienced a lot of change during the period, and others relatively little, but we've all been evolving for the same amount of time, my friend.

    8. Re:Old by tsa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's not entirely true. Reptiles have been around much longer than mammals and so have had more time to evolve. Many types of creatures that have lived in the Earth are now extinct. So not all types of animals have had the same time to evolve. On the surface of the planet evolution is hampered by mayor disasters every few million years so the creatures living there have less chance to reach a high level of specialization than those deep sea fish in my opinion.

      --

      -- Cheers!

  16. Haven't we come a long way! by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 4, Interesting
    At risk of sounding like a tree hugger, I have to say that the cool factor of the pictures is somewhat diminished by the fact that these creatures are .... well .... dead. I was kind of expecting to see some nice photos of the animals in there natural habitat where they would generally look a lot better. It would be ironic if one or more of the specimens turned out to be extremely rare, consequently making these the first and last photos of a potentially endagered species.

    "To seek out new life and new civilisations...and grill them with a knob of butter and a sprig of parsley. Mmmmmm."

    --
    Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
    1. Re:Haven't we come a long way! by dcmeserve · · Score: 2, Informative
      I was kind of expecting to see some nice photos of the animals in there natural habitat where they would generally look a lot better.

      Yeah, me too.

      But of course, then I remember the possibility that the use of floodlights that far down can also be damaging: any light-sensing organs on any creatures down there are going to be extremely sensitive, and will likely be fried by the amount of light needed to take a picture (with standard equipment).

      So yes, a picture of one of these critters swimming/floating in their native habitat would be nicer than seeing them dead on an examination tray. But it's not so nice to know that the picture shows a creature that has just been permanently blinded by the very fact that you are looking at it.

      - sigh -

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
  17. Be Careful by Stargoat · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    1. Re:Be Careful by Lane.exe · · Score: 2, Funny
      Ia Ia Cthulhu ftaghn...

      --
      IAALS.
  18. Wonky eyes? by burgburgburg · · Score: 5, Funny
    In the description of the Jewel Squid:
    Firstly they have wonky eyes, the left eye is always much larger than the right.

    If they're going to throw technical jargon like that at us, I'll be completely lost.

  19. Dude...that's just crazy. by jvmatthe · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Read up on fishes here: http://www.oceans.gov.au/norfanz/CreatureFeature.h tm

    Especially the last one, known as the Jewel Squid. This just boggles my mind. And I quote:
    The common name comes from the scattering of small iridescent spots over the undersides of the body, head and arms. These are tiny directional light organs like tiny car headlights. When the squid is hanging at a 45 angle, all the light organs aim down and produce just enough light to cancel out the silhouette of the squid against the weak light from the surface above. They can even adjust the lights for different depths or time of day.

    It's almost difficult to believe that such a creature exists, much less was the product of random gene bit-flips over millions of years. Not that evolution isn't a reasonable theory (one which I happen to believe) but this is one of those crazy outcomes that seems so difficult to accept.
    1. Re:Dude...that's just crazy. by mediahacker · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Wanna go really cazy??? :-)

      Photophores originated from colonies of phosphorent bacteria that were living in the fish. This eventually evolved into a differentiated tissue that was light-emitting.

      The optical mechanism of these photophores can be quite complex too - it is expensive (metabolically) to turn the light on and off so iris-like shutters have evolved for some species...

  20. For those so inclined by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 4, Informative

    to own a "coffinfish", a species very close in look and character can be had easily. The marine fish is known as a "frogfish" and are highly interesting creatures to keep in a dedicated reef-tank.

    Just FYI

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  21. underwater habitats by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It really surprises me how many people think of the world's water simply as "The Ocean", like it's one homogeneous thing that has the same contents everywhere. I'd expect that it would be even more varied than surface life, since different pressures, temperatures, currents, light levels, seafloor materials, salinity, and other fluid contents would vary greatly from location to location, and since depth allows for many ranges of habitats (and life forms can float at a certain depth easier than they can equivalently in air) we'd have more to look at than we could possibly ever figure out entirely. I'd think that we'd be tripping over new life forms every time we looked anywhere intently or anywhere we hadn't gone before.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:underwater habitats by 3Bees · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I'd think that we'd be tripping over new life forms every time we looked anywhere intently or anywhere we hadn't gone before.

      Not just the oceans, either. Biologists are only able to identify something on the order of 70% of the fish sold in markets near the mouth of the Amazon.

      --
      "I think we should tax people who stand in water! " - Mr. Gumby
  22. For you lynx users... by mofochickamo · · Score: 5, Funny
    I used aalib to convert some images to ASCII. Here they are:

    >===@ (Angler)

    |==\=> (Glowing Antenna Thingy)

    8==============> (errrr...)

    --
    Honk if you're horny.
  23. Re:Opened can of sea spam by scottennis · · Score: 5, Funny

    I read somewhere that the big blob that washed up on the coast of Chile was one of Pamela Anderson's old implants.

  24. True story... by kiwimate · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's a popular tourist/holiday spot up north in NZ called the Bay of Islands. One of the most popular towns is Paihia. There's a small aquarium on the main strip, which contains only sea creatures that were found in the local region.

    My wife and I went in there one day, and as we walked through the front door a very nice chap introduced himself, said he was the owner, and to feel free to ask him any questions we might have. We started walking around, and soon decided we wanted some more information about a particular fish, so asked him, and he obligingly answered our question. He then followed up by telling us, "By the way, that fish is also quite tasty to eat. You want to cook him up with just a splash of lemon juice, and he'll be beautiful". He then started pointing out other fish in that tank, telling us which were no good to eat and exactly how to cook the ones which were good to eat.

    That guy very kindly gave us a full guided tour of the whole aquarium (it was a slow day) -- including his own personal cooking suggestions for every single tank in the place.

    1. Re:True story... by daeley · · Score: 2, Funny

      Keep that guy away from the zoo and, dare I say it, public swimming pools! ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  25. I made the mistake... by CompWerks · · Score: 2, Funny

    of reading this article while eating my lunch

    --
    If you can read this sig - the bitch fell off.
  26. In honor of Jacques Cousteau... by Alien+Being · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm reading every post with a french accent.

  27. Fangtooth pic by hether · · Score: 3, Informative

    The BBC had this story a week or two ago: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3017078.stm and http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3034520.stm

    I didn't see the picture of the fangtooth on the link provided in the story above so wanted to share. Perhaps I just missed it? A couple of the other pics are different too I think.

    --

    Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
  28. Re:the devil by eclectic4 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was thinking the same thing. I saw a bunch of guys showing the "things" they killed.

    I would have much rather seen images of them in their habitat. Creatures from the deep sea just do not look the same dead and surfaced. They're flat, discolored, etc... have you ever seen a squid laying on the floor of a boat? It's jelly body look like a blob, not the magnificant creature it "was" swimming in it's habitat, so I'm not sure why showing us images of dead deep sea creatures was the preferred method of display here. I'm sure there were some great underwater shots of the same creatures...right?

    I watch those deep sea exploration shows and they will find 2-3 new species of sea creature every dive. They say that the deep sea has more species of animals undiscovered than all known species to date, terrestrial life included. We know more about space, and the planets in the solar system than we do about life in the deep sea.

    It's all very cool stuff.

    --

    "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
  29. Wait it's....can it really be... by Basehart · · Score: 2, Funny

    Spongebob Squarepants

  30. Cyrano was real, though. by Medievalist · · Score: 4, Informative

    In the Pacific Spookfish caption it says:

    "In the USA it is known as a Long-nosed Chimaera while in Europe they use the common name Cyrano Chimaera, named after the fictional French character Cyrano de Bergerac, who had a very long nose"

    Savien Cyrano de Bergerac (1619-1655) is not a fictional character.

    I emailed this nitpick in to the website, with a few details of de Bergerac's biography. Perhaps it will be fixed anon.

  31. Hey, isn't that... by PSaltyDS · · Score: 2, Funny

    I know I've seen him somewhere... Isn't PHOTO 10 a spokesman for SCO?

    I want to die in my sleep, like my dear old great-grandad... not like all the screaming wusses in the car he hit!

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. - Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
  32. So Giger was abusing nature's copyright by theolein · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Take a look at this friendly little sample and ask yourself where H.R.Giger really got his inspiration for our friends, the aliens, in the Aliens movies series.

    1. Re:So Giger was abusing nature's copyright by Wirr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually this isn't his inspiration - although he may have drawn from that one too.
      The real model was a kind of predatory shrimp.
      That shrimp catches jelly-fish empties out everthing it doesn't need and anchores itself in the remainder which it uses to hatch its eggs.

  33. New tape of squid by singularity · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, this is not about the large piece of blubber that they found on the beach.

    This article has pictures and a video of a very cool new large species of squid. It seems to fly through the water with wings, and has cool alien-like arms coming off the rear of it.

    Amazing that is has been spotted in four different oceans, but no one has seen it before. It says a lot about how much we do not know about the oceans.

    --
    - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
    1. Re:New tape of squid by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow! this is cool, its like a bird!!!

      You have to dig to find the actual movies though.

      If thats too much hassle, heres the Lazy link to the Supplementary Material :).
      Have fun!

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  34. As fisheries are wiped out, fishermen go deeper. by Medievalist · · Score: 5, Informative


    For example, the formerly plentiful Patagonian and Antarctic Toothfishes (known in the restaurant trade as "Chilean Sea Bass" despite being amazingly ugly deep-sea dwellers) are well on their way to being fished to extinction.

    Like many large fish, they have a long reproductive cycle, and thus are easily driven to extinction by modern fishing methods. Not that the fishing industry as a whole isn't fishing pretty much everything to commercial extinction, but they can do it a lot faster to species that take a long time to become reproductive adults.

  35. Blue Planet - Seas of Life by phildog · · Score: 4, Informative
    If you find this stuff at all interesting, I urge you to check out the 8 part miniseries Blue Planet - Seas of Life. These originally aired in the US on the Discovery channel (I believe the BBC was the first), but you can still get the DVDs from the merchant of your choice. I'm not sure the 2nd four episodes are on DVD yet.

    The Discovery Channel Website doesn't indicate that these will air again anytime in the near future. You will also note that the Discovery Channel's web strategy is severely lacking because there is no way to have them notify you when it is coming on again. Or are they just being obscure because they reap more profits from DVD sales?

    But I digress, this series kicks ass. It doesn't focus solely on the deep-sea critters, but rather casts a wide net. If you saw this show and were not completely freaked out by the presence of crazy brine pools at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico, you aren't very curious about the world you live on.

    --
    slashsearch.org - slashdot search. powered by google.
  36. Alien Face Hugger by Nova+Express · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is it just me, or does the Anemone Hermit Crab shown in the second picture on this page look rather like an immature form of the Alien Face Hugger? Obviously H. R. Giger is a Tasmanian marine biologist in his spare time...

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  37. Regarding the fact that collected fish are *dead* by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    --I would love to see photographs of these animals underwater as much as the next fellow, but it doesnt sound as if they are equipped with anything but trawling equipment. From what I gathered of the article their camera merely rides on a trawl line and records what is more or less beneath it. Also consider that with collected specimens you are able to obtain much data, including a clear idea of how the creature looks, that isn't reasonably possible taking photographs in pitch blackness at 1500 meters

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  38. Light based cloaking device by anagama · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "When the squid is hanging at a 45 angle, all the light organs aim down and produce just enough light to cancel out the silhouette of the squid against the weak light from the surface above. They can even adjust the lights for different depths or time of day."

    Scroll down for the picture of a Jewel Squid.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  39. The Sea is one scary place by Punk+Walrus · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ... about three quarters of the planet is covered by water
    ... most of it is unexplored
    ... we're not aquatic

    I'd say the odds are against us.

    I used to know a guy who lived in Guam who told me about some of the scary stuff locals would find in trawlers. Most were tiny fish, but a few were big enough to give a trout a run for its money. One of the stories he used to tell me:

    I was sitting up high on some hills, overlooking the deeper waters. I was watching some sport fishermen who were in the process of catching a huge great white shark. It must have been almost a ton in weight. After an hour, they managed to subdue it, and since it was almost the size of their tiny sport boat, they couldn't haul it onboard, and so they dragged it behind them, and had a beer. While it was dragging behind their boat, some huge, dark shape started to follow them. Then the carcass of the shark was yanked down sharply, and then only the head of the shark bobbed back up. You also saw part of its tail drifiting away. I don't know what the hell it was, but in ONE BITE it ripped oout most of the middle of the shark, which meant its jaws must have been over five meters across. I will never swim in the open ocean as long as I live after seeing that shit.
    And now, neither will I. He also said some people he grew up with caught a deep sea ribbon fish (oarfish?) that was over 40 feet long. He said he didn't care what anyone said, that thing was a sea serpent if he ever saw one.
    1. Re:The Sea is one scary place by Blitzshlag · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Nothing like big fish stories from a guy you used to know from Guam as guidelines for dictating the way you live your life.

    2. Re:The Sea is one scary place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      More like I was getting high on some pills

      Who the hell could catch a "huge" great white shark on a "tiny sport boat?" Those things are massive and incredibly strong, it wouldn't tire so easily, especially one that "must have been almost a ton in weight?"

      By any chance did you get this story confused with the time you may have flushed down a very traumatic shit in a scary place while you were high on some great white Guamanian cocaine?

  40. Shocking observation! by Ospeovedizer · · Score: 2, Funny
    I especially liked the description of the large deep-sea crab:
    In low light levels, red looks black, so it would blend in well in the darkness.

    In other news, scientists have discovered that, with low enough light levels, green, blue, pink, white, and mauve all look black! The scientists involved are currently waiting for a government grant to test such properties on the elusive plaid.
    --
    "We demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!" - Vroomfondel, H2G2
  41. I love this attention! by The_Mighty_Squid · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm getting a lot of press today!

    --
    -- No Comment
  42. Is anyone else afraid? by aliens · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I recently saw in Popular Science I believe scientists who were going to use computer simulations to show people what the ocean looked like off of San Fran 100 years ago versus today (100 is what I remember). Just one tiny picture was all I needed to see.

    Overfishing is a serious problem. I don't think people really understand how few of the popular fish are left out there.

    Are we going to end up harvesting plankton a la SOylent Green?

    It's not a question of wether Nature can bounce back, she can, and rather quickly, but the fishing has to stop for a bit. Unfortunately shortsighted people will continue to push for more fishing lanes.

    The flip side of this is that fishermen have to eat and survive too. It's not as simple as telling them they can just up and get a job in an office.

    So my question is, before I goto google for a bit, does anyone have any links to helpful sources for the preservation of our Oceans? It has to be done, and there has to be some way of keeping the fishermen paid. Does it require government subsidies? Perhaps, they'll step in way before a company offers to pay fishermen to stop fishing.

    --
    -- taking over the world, we are.
    1. Re:Is anyone else afraid? by Suppafly · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are we going to end up harvesting plankton a la SOylent Green?


      Soylent Green is people, not plankton.

    2. Re:Is anyone else afraid? by nadaou · · Score: 3, Informative

      So my question is, before I goto google for a bit, does anyone have any links to helpful sources for the preservation of our Oceans?

      Yes.

      Check out the PEW Oceans Commision's final report, released last month. Everything you want to know, without the spin.

      "Scientists, fishermen, conservationists, elected leaders, and business officials unveil recommendations to avert decline of ocean wildlife and collapse of ocean ecosystems"

      http://www.pewoceans.org/

      --
      ~.~
      I'm a peripheral visionary.
  43. Re:As fisheries are wiped out, fishermen go deeper by Rorschach1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sea Bass extinction? That's easy to avoid... just strap some freakin' "lasers" to their heads.