Inside Electronic Voting Machines
Alien54 and several other people wrote in about a couple of stories published in a New Zealand webzine: an examination of an electronic voting system, and some less interesting political speculation about it. Diebold voting systems are in fairly wide use, and apparently provide zero security to keep election officials from writing in whatever election totals they want.
We should have a slashdot poll about this. :)
And then rig the results.
Diebold voting systems are in fairly wide use, and apparently provide zero security to keep election officials from writing in whatever election totals they want. :)
Obviously the ones used in Florida
--
[tinfoil_hat]In the near future we will be given ballots containing RFIDs which will tie the voter to the vote. mwahahahaha![/tinfoil_hat]
Trolling is a art,
It's not a bug, it's a feature!
Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
... to tabulate the votes of the supreme court? Those are the votes used to selec..., er elect the pres...
"Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
Yeah, there's a security flaw in the voting program. Yeah, they didn't configure their servers correctly. Yeah, their math is funky...
And the Republicans did it?
Give me a break...
There's so little difference between politics and jihad lately...
Try this cool Slashdot method I've developed:
1) THINK
2) THINK AGAIN
3) POST!
4)
with less than half the population deciding it's important to vote, I don't see how it would really matter.
Find 99% of 18 year old's SSNs, enter into voting machine, instant winner.
Politicians here have to spend lots to get the dead to vote... but they manage to turn out year after year. How failful to their citizenry after they're gone...
(From the article - emphasis mine)
At the county office, there is a "host computer" with a program on it called GEMS.
GEMS receives the incoming votes and stores them in a vote ledger. But then, we found, it makes another set of books with a copy of what is in vote ledger 1. And at the same time, it makes yet a third vote ledger with another copy.
The Elections Supervisor never sees these three sets of books. All she sees is the reports she can run: Election summary (totals, county wide) or a detail report (totals for each precinct). She has no way of knowing that her GEMS program is using multiple sets of books, because the GEMS interface draws its data from an Access database, which is hidden.
What's next? NASDAQ running off of Access?
"And this is my boy, Sherman. Speak, Sherman." "Hello." "Good boy."
ssh george@vote.gov -p 2943 ..
gore4.vote
Password:
Last login: Tue Jul 8 19:13:54 on goatse.cx
[vote:~] george% ls -a
.
gore.vote
gore2.vote
gore3.vote
bush.vote
gore5.vote
[vote:~] george% rm gore*
[Process completed]
Hey, I live in Chicago, and if the dead can vote, so can the illiterate!
I believe they use "La Pluma y el Papel"
Thank you, thank you, I'll be in town all week