Slashdot Mirror
NASA Mars Rover Opportunity Lifts Off
Joost Schuur writes "At 11:18 PM EDT on Monday, Opportunity, the second of 2 NASA Mars Exploration Rovers took off aboard a Boeing Delta 2 Heavy rocket after several delays and begun its 305 million mile trip to the Red Planet, where it will join its sister vehicle Spirit, which launched June 10th. Spirit and Opportunity will land on opposite sides of Mars, travelling up to 40 meters a day, and use a series of instruments to search for water, including the Rock Abrasion Tool, which will grind into rocks to give scientists a peak inside. Things are going to get crowded next January in orbit, as both NASA missions join the European Mars Express mission also launched this month and the Japanese Nozomi probe, which would finally complete its troublesome 5 year journey. Those stuck on Earth can take advantage of the closest Mars opposition in 60,000 years and watch with a telescope, or follow the images provided by the International MarsWatch 2003 group."
On the 7th of August there will we a Webcast on "Mars Exploration".
Apple iProduct. Non importa cosa sia, lo comprerete!
planetary.org
Discovery.com
Some of the context is redundant, the first link is the most informative.
Beware blue cats moving at
I guess as the others pointed out, you were referring to Columbia and STS-107.
Actually I am pretty sure this mission has been in the books for quite sometime. Especially since Earth and Mars are supposed to be in the closest configuration with respect to their orbits. A trip to Mars right now will take approximately 7-8 months and the two rovers(Spirit and Opportunity) should get to Mars by January.
Also, its not just NASA which has used the current orbit position as an advantage; the European Space Agency(ESA) and the Japanese Space Agency(NASDA i think) have also launched their respective payloads to Mars.
About Venus, I doubt if NASA will come out with a program. A whole load of factors , not the least scientific goes into allocating budget to programs. And especially right now, I would think it would be really hard for NASA to convince the govt., to fund a program to Venus. The question of selling it to the public ranks high up there among the criteria and seems tough to me.
The Red Rover Goes to Mars Spacecraft DVD
A Planetary Society produced mini-DVD will fly on each Mars Exploration Rover spacecraft, mounted to the lander petals as shown here. These DVDs are designed to engage and involve the public in numerous ways. After landing on Mars the rover will capture an image of the DVD before driving away from the lander.
Each DVD carries nearly four million Mars enthusiasts? names collected by NASA. Each DVD also includes engaging designs leading to other activities. Each DVD?s engaging design includes the ?Astrobot? LEGO mini-figure representation in the middle, magnets to collect dust, colors to study color appearance under a Martian sky, LEGO brick representations to engage kids, and secret codes around the outside to be decoded from images on Mars. Astrobots Biff Starling and Sandy Moondust (one on each DVD central oval) are LEGO minifigure representations suited up for space. Their job: tell their stories to the world through a series of entertaining online communications between themselves and the ground available via the Web.
The DVD is made of silica glass rather than plastic so that it can withstand the high temperatures necessary to sterilize it of Earth microbes before it is sent to the Martian surface. Also, the silica glass has a much longer lifetime than typical commercial DVDs?in fact, the silica glass DVD could last more than 500 years. The DVD will remain on the lander as a time capsule for a future generation.
The DVD assembly?s base, the simulated LEGO bricks, and the central oval are made of machined and anodized aluminum. The aluminum parts are separated from the silica glass DVD with Delrin pads. Delrin is an inflexible polymer that is very tough and heat resistant.
The entire assembly, which weighs 69 grams, has been subjected to a battery of tests designed to simulate the extreme environmental conditions of the journey to Mars: temperature cycling from 125 to 60 degrees Celsius, exposure to vacuum, high-speed random vibration, and shocks of 4,000 times the acceleration of Earth?s gravity.
The Planetary Society, in collaboration with the LEGO Company, provided the DVDs to NASA for the Mars Exploration Rover mission. Visionary Products, Inc. implemented the DVD mounting assembly, Plasmon OMS donated the silica glass DVDs and data etching, and the magnets were donated by the Danish magnet team who also have other magnets on the spacecraft.
Visceral Psyche Films
There are Venus missions under study now. The leading one is called the Venus In-Situ Explorer.
See http://spacescience.nasa.gov/missions/concepts.htm
Helium balloons want to be free.
It is a problem, but at least they saw it coming. it's not only those craft, also a bunch of other important missions need a lot of attention, Cassini/Huygens, The cometchasers, et.c. are al nearing important phases of their mission. Last thing i read somewhere, it that they built an extra telesope (radio) in Spain (IIRC) So, it'l be a lot of juggling, and timing tings to the max but i guess they're ready for it. (well, let's hope so, Interplanetary /.ing wouldn't look too good, after al that work and money invested...
Is it me or did the above post make no sense at all? Without RTG, how are we supposed to explore the outer planets, eh? Without nuclear reactors, how are we supposed to send manned missions to the surface of Mars, Europa, and Titan, eh? There's already radiation in space, a few small nuclear reactors won't hurt anybody.
I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
Mars is much more likely than Venus to have had life in the past. There are definite indications of water, past and present, and while life would be difficult on the surface, just underneath is a definite possibility.
There is virtually zero chance of life on the surface of Venus, and it's way too hot for any kinds of lakes other than, say, lead. Ammonia, which evaporates at room temperature even on Earth, is right out. However, there is a benign zone in Venus's upper atmosphere, deep enough to avoid nasty radiation from the Sun but high enough to be temperate, that might possibly host life.
Sorry, should have made that more clear. The 7% increase is a one-time thing, but it should probably be adjusted for inflation if necessary.
Incidentally, this would bring NASA's budget up to the level of spending during the Apollo program, adjusted for inflation, of course.
I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
Also remember that Spirit and Opportunity are going to opposite sides of the planet, so generally only one will use the DSN at a time.
When my family and I were visiting KSC a few weeks ago, to hopefully watch this launch :-( my wife pulled me over to a video screen that was playing a really well done simulation of the launch/flight/landing that underlined the elegance of the methods used for each stage of the trip to mars. It's really nice watching the various parts fall away and new goodies deploy for each part of the trip.
. ht ml
a ti on.html
After a quick search on the web once we got home, I found lesser quality versions of the film.
A couple are here:
http://athena.cornell.edu/the_mission/rov_video
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/video/anim
I think the animator's site had the best quality one, in MPEG. I think his name is Maas.
If you like eye candy, this is sort of a factually based minds-eye type video. I think it's really good CGI, but I'm no expert.
I'd read about the mission, and spinning the probe up for the big burn, and reeling out weights to spin down, etc, but it's not until I saw it on the screen, that the grace and elegance of all the solutions to the various problems of sending this probe to mars really hit me.
Seeing this film makes me feel good about paying my taxes.
It costs more to send a shuttle up in orbit then to send a probe 300 million miles away and land on an alien planet.
The two rovers are sent for 800 million, each costing 400 million that way. Shuttles still cost 500 million per launch. This doesn't count any of that extra stuff, like repairs and maintenance that need to happen. Also the cost of building these shuttles are not in that 500 million number, often shuttle trips will cost more.
Besides will men really be that much better at examining red rocks then a probe. Also those rovers are hardly autonomous, we control them from here.
With that said, i'd really wish nasa was given the budget it needs, at least $30 billion. I mean although they're budget has really decreased over the years inflation has caused that $15 billion to be worth less and less every year. They really need to build some better probes, and work on IMPROVING space travel with new ships/planes/vehicles rather then using old expensive tech over and over again.
Hmmm... Pie...