Slashdot Mirror


Deploying License-Free Wireless Wide-Area Networks

Grant Willey writes "Deploying a License-Free Wireless Wide Area Network? Want to learn the intricate details from an authoritative expert who has personally designed and installed hundreds of license-free outdoor broadband wireless networks? This book isn't just for WISPs (wireless Internet service providers), this book is for you!" Read on for Grant's review of Deploying License-Free Wireless Wide-Area Networks from Cisco Press. Deploying License-Free Wireless Wide-Area Networks author Jack Unger pages 352 publisher Cisco Press rating 8 reviewer Grant Willey ISBN 1587050692 summary This is an information packed publication designed to assist you with the planning, installation, and maintenance of wireless WAN's.

This information packed publication is designed to assist you with the planning, installation, and maintenance of wireless WANs. You'll receive help with many commonly faced deployment challenges including site surveying, antenna evaluation and selection, overcoming real-world obstacles, solving noise and interference problems, maximizing available bandwidth, and working safely with tower structures and wireless gear. And, if you're presently pursuing a wireless technology certification such as Planet3's CWNA, CWNI, CWSP, etc, this book isn't written as a study guide, but it does provide vitally important information to help you earn these respected certifications.

Whether you're an experienced LAN/WAN professional or are new to the field and looking to "get your feet wet," this book will enrich your knowledge and possibly open new doors of opportunity for you. Being an experienced LAN/WAN professional with 19 years of experience and dozens of certifications, I thank the author for not filling the book with dry-humored jokes, useless "real life" experiences, and confusing diagrams/ illustrations. This book is grammatically correct, technically accurate, focused, and very helpful whether you're pursuing wireless certification or not. Beginner and experienced networking professionals will appreciate the "vendor neutral" content of the book. The book is published by Cisco Press, but contains no specific references to CISCO brand hardware/software. I believe this makes the information even more useful to technicians and installers who work with varying vendor equipment. While many concepts and methodologies are the same, this book is true to its name and offers little help in the way of assisting you with indoor WLAN deployments. The wealth of useful information contained in Appendix B, "Wireless Hardware, Software, and Service Provider Organizations" is absolutely priceless and much appreciated.

Here's how the book is organized: Chapters 1 and 2 are an introduction to wireless WANs and explain wireless technology fundamentals. Chapters 3-5 dive into network architecture, conducting site surveys, and selecting appropriate antennae. Chapters 6-9 discuss actual equipment selection, installation, interference resolution, and the provision of broadband wireless Internet access. Chapter review questions are located at the end of each chapter and serve as a "pop quiz" to reinforce key concepts and technologies covered.

Comparing this book to others is relatively easy. I haven't found any other publications dedicated to the planning, installation, and maintenance of wireless WANs! While there are a plethora of theoretical RF and wireless technology books already in print, no single publication dedicates its content to explaining the technologies like this book does. In addition, I appreciate the author's strong emphasis on installation and technician safety -- an area not many authors seem to write about. This book will not bog you down in theoretical RF discussions, but rather allows you to learn through the introduction of real-life examples, explanations, and suggestions based on the author's actual installation experiences.

The book contains no CD-ROM or marketing material. Published in March 2003 (prior to the now finalized 802.11g standard), the book primarily covers 802.11a and 802.11b technologies. Both Mr. Unger and Cisco Press deserve a round of applause!

You can purchase Deploying License-Free Wireless Wide-Area Networks from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

72 comments

  1. Chapter 8 by mikeophile · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pringle's cans.

    1. Re:Chapter 8 by Trigun · · Score: 0

      Funny AND relevant.
      And short, what more can you ask for in a comment?

      Oh yeah, substance. Still, that's 75%, well above the bar here.

    2. Re:Chapter 8 by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 2, Informative

      To the modderators:

      The Pringles Can thing was a joke reffering to an older article. it was one that involved boosting the signal of a wireless network using pringles cans. The chapters 6-9 are about choosing the hardware for your wireless LAN.... making sense now? good.

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
  2. two things bother me in the review... by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whether you're an experienced LAN/WAN professional or are new to the field and looking to "get your feet wet,"

    I really don't care if he has 19 years experience, I still think that statement makes the book look terrible. In my experience, nearly ALL books that shoot to the entire spectrum of readers fail miserably.

    Comparing this book to others is relatively easy. I haven't found any other publications dedicated to the planning, installation, and maintenance of wireless WANs!

    Great, so we are going to read a book that tries to cover everyone from Joe to Expert *and* this guy (with 19 years experience) hasn't seen another book like this?

    Just my worthless .02

    1. Re:two things bother me in the review... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      It's only 350 pages. I know all good computer books run to at least 900. It also has no CD, another fatal mistake.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  3. Deploying license-free wireless wide-area networks by Mensa+Babe · · Score: 0, Troll

    Before you deploy any license-free wireless wide-area network I have one word: Do not do it. A friend of mine has been busted for doing exactly that.

    --
    Karma: Positive (probably because of superiour intellect)
  4. I don't understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This book is grammatically correct, technically accurate, focused, and very helpful ...

    I read Slashdot. I'm not sure I'm familiar with what this sentence (fragment) means.

    1. Re:I don't understand. by marktwen0 · · Score: 1

      Um, that's not a fragment. It just ends with a compound adjective in the predicate nominative. Check the grammar section of any freshman composition textbook for verification. Or, disbelieve and flame. By the way, "I watered the garden, it was very dry" is a comma splice. "Unfortunately, water usage" is a fragment.

  5. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  6. Self-contradictory by Enigma2175 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I thank the author for not filling the book with dry-humored jokes, useless "real life" experiences...

    ...but rather allows you to learn through the introduction of real-life examples, explanations, and suggestions based on the author's actual installation experiences.


    So you thank the author for not filling the book with "real life" experiences, then you applaud him for including real life examples. Let me make sure I'm reading correctly... real life experiences-bad. Real life examples-good. What is the difference between the two?

    --

    Enigma

    1. Re:Self-contradictory by Trigun · · Score: 2

      I think that he means that the author leaves out the anecdotes and crap which he thinks is funny, but others just groan and hope to meet the author in a dark alley for some hot baseball bat-to-forehead action.

      Kind of like all my posts.

    2. Re:Self-contradictory by SugarKing · · Score: 0

      He likes real-life examples, just not the useless ones. Like the example I just gave.

      Wait, what am I talking about again?

    3. Re:Self-contradictory by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      I think a "real-life example" [as the review uses it] would indicate a generic example that would be found in life. The generic and therefore broad nature would allow for a more general descriptoion that and hence an understanding of the concepts, so as they may apply the general knowledge to a wider variety of situations. Where as a real-life experience would tell us how to do one thing very well, but only in those specific circumstances.

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    4. Re:Self-contradictory by andcal · · Score: 1

      I do see the potential contradiction there, but I also see another possibility that seems pretty reasonable:
      Perhaps the "useless 'real life' experiences" her refers to are, in fact, real-life experiences that just happen to be useless for the subject of whatever book they are found in.

      The real-life experiences that the reviewer liked in this book may only differ from aforementioned useless real-life experiences he mentioned by usefulness.

      --
      --something witty
    5. Re:Self-contradictory by HughsOnFirst · · Score: 1
      "real life" experience

      By looking both ways when I crossed the street, I avoided getting run over.

      real-life example

      A friend of mine did not look both ways when crossing the street and was crushed to a pulp not unlike a large uncooked pizza by a cement truck going the wrong way against traffic.

      I think the difference is that the "real life" experiences are in the first person, and the examples don't need to be. By necessity most folks experiences are somewhat limited compared to the range of possibility. I.E. , if you get crushed to a pulp, the incident won't get written up as a first person experience
      .

  7. Amazon Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Buyer Beware! This book is GREAT...!,

    "Reviewer: Grant Willey from Laurel, Delaware
    Whether you're an experienced LAN/WAN professional or are new to the field and looking to "get your feet wet", this book will enrich your knowledgebase and possibly open new doors of opportunity for you. Being an experienced LAN/WAN professional with 19 years of experience and dozens of certifications, I thank the author for not filling the book with dry-humored jokes, useless "real life" experiences, and confusing diagrams/ illustrations. This book is grammatically correct (except for 2 spelling errors), technically accurate, focused, and very helpful whether you're pursuing wireless certification or not. Beginner and experienced networking professionals will appreciate the "vendor neutral" content of the book. The book is published by Cisco Press, but contains no specific references to CISCO brand hardware/software. I believe this makes the information even more useful to technicians and installers who work with varying vendor equipment. While many concepts and methodologies are the same, this book is true to its name and offers little help in the way of assisting you with indoor WLAN deployments. The wealth of useful information contained in Appendix B, "Wireless Hardware, Software, and Service Provider Organizations" is absolutely priceless and much appreciated. The book contains no CD-ROM or marketing material (kudos!). Published prior to the finalized 802.11g standard, the book primarily covers 802.11a and 802.11b technologies. Both Mr. Unger and Cisco Press deserve a round of applause!
    Disclaimer: This is an honest review - I do not benefit from it in any manner."

    Sound Familiar!!??!!
    Why is he posting this all over the internet... HE WORKS FOR THE F'ing PUBLISHER!!!

    1. Re:Amazon Review by Trigun · · Score: 1

      You should have stayed logged in. Now how are we going to know where to send the deerstalker cap, magnifying glass, and deep-bowled pipe?

      Aside from that, nice piece of detective work!
      Hizzah!

    2. Re:Amazon Review by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 2, Informative

      Before someone marks the AC comment as insightful, let me say that the Grant Willey review is under CUSTOMER reviews. And why shouldn't he post the same review here as he did on amazon? Helps people to make decisions on the book and gets it noticed on /.

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    3. Re:Amazon Review by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Because maybe this "Grant Willey" persona was sneaky enough to pose as a customer? Those cunning marketers know everything, don't they?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Amazon Review by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1

      More and more "book reviews" are becoming less and less review-like and more and more marketing. Wasn't there a book "review" some time ago that introduced the word marketectual? It was aimed at marketing software products or something and every piece of review on here was loaded with acronyms, buzzwords and various hi-tech sounding catchphrases.

    5. Re:Amazon Review by cpfeifer · · Score: 1

      Reviews I write go to multiple sites (/., amazon, etc). Who cares, as long as it's the case of the same person writing the same review in each place? If you plagarize another person's review, that's another story.

      --
      it's not going to stop until you wise up, no it's not going to stop. so just give up.
    6. Re:Amazon Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you ever think that the review is being posted "everywhere" because it's really a good book? Not everyone shares your narrow opinions!

    7. Re:Amazon Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am the Grant Willey that wrote the review, and I THANK deadsaijinx for hitting the nail on the head. As I said, this is an honest review. My aim with the multiple posts IS to get people to make an informed decision. I don't work for the publisher. People have bashed this review to death. All I was trying to do was get the facts out about an amazingly good book.

  8. Maybe I don't get it by cnkeller · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The more interesting part of the problem is the backhaul. Great, you set up a couple of access points and provide access to your entire apartment building or neighborhood. What's the backhaul connection? DSL? T3? Unless you're talking about provisioning something on ther order of OC3 or a DS3 you have the potential of bottle-necking pretty quickly. The bandwidth has got to come from somewhere. That's why I believe the 802.16 spec is the last-mile answer, not WLAN. We've addressed that problem, has anyone else?

    --

    there are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots

    1. Re:Maybe I don't get it by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      Jeez, if I thought the review was a thinly disguised commercial...the parent post is quite obviously one.

      P.S. I never hear anyone but marketing guys call it "backhaul".

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Maybe I don't get it by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Okay, so now there is no difference between 'backhaul' and 'last mile'? you marketing guys have all the answers, huh.

    3. Re:Maybe I don't get it by CaptainFrito · · Score: 1

      Yes, we at MediaCell, Inc, have. Years before beamreach. See US Patent 6,377,782. Try not to be so arrogant.

    4. Re:Maybe I don't get it by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      That's why I believe the 802.16 spec is the last-mile answer, not WLAN. We've addressed that problem, has anyone else?

      Can I afford to buy your gear to setup 10 homes along a 1 mile stretch of rural road? That's why I'm looking at WLAN, but I'm not opposed to alternates.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  9. 900 MHz by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Interesting
    What about WANs that use 900 MHz? Those higher 802.11x frequencies are very common, but when faces with a lot of trees, hills, etc you want something that has less signal loss through obstacles. The equipment is definitely available.

    I am surprised that the book does not cover this technology because the spectrum is license free (at least in Canada and the USA) and it has a lot of potential for Wider Area Lans in hilly, forested, wooded areas like my own.

    1. Re:900 MHz by general_boy · · Score: 4, Informative

      The author and I worked together in 1997, just as he was starting to transition from 900 MHz to 2.4 GHz equipment. At the time he was seeing some pretty serious interference problems with 900 MHz in the south SF bay - presumably due to the boom in 900 MHz cordless phones. Rest assured he has a lot of experience with that band, so I don't know why he wouldn't write about it, unless he doesn't consider it viable for modern installations.

      One interesting thing about 900 MHz is that although the free air path loss and absorption by vegetation is indeed lower vs. higher frequencies, it's also more difficult to deploy antennas with gains like you find in the 2.4 and 5.7 GHz bands. I'm talking mostly about point-to-point deployments. In designs I've done, the system loss (calculation of amount of energy arriving at the remote receiver), assuming antennas of reasonable size, was almost the same for 900 or 2.4. One significant advantage of 2.4 is an 83 MHz band to play with vs. a 26 MHz band on 900. I wouldn't say that kind of equivalence applies to 5.7 though, due to the environmentally-related fade factors starting to really kick in.

      I have a lot of respect for Jack and his commitment to wireless, and hope his book sells a gazillion copies. He's a fellow ham radio operator and knows the RF side far better than most wireless LAN/WAN people I've met.

  10. Copied Article? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Look at the first review on Amazon for this book:

    http://www.booksmags.com/books/shop/pd1587050692/

    It appears to be identical to this slashdot article.

    1. Re:Copied Article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's also the same as the one review for the book at BookPool.com. I wonder if this is a guerillia marketing campaign by the author or publisher.

  11. Re:Deploying license-free wireless wide-area netwo by karnal · · Score: 1

    "Do not do it" is four words, and to be picky, a period.

    --
    Karnal
  12. i can't believe it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is a new low for Slashdot. The Amazon repost issue aside, this "review" reads like the copy from the book jacket. It barely even touches on what's actually in the book, instead rambling on about how great it is. Do the editors actually read this stuff?

  13. Security? by markv242 · · Score: 1
    Does the book cover security at all? I haven't yet met a wireless network my version of AirSnort didn't like.

    Until there is a reliable method of securing a wireless network, I would recommend that nobody set up any more detailed of a network than a couple of access points. You're just inviting people to pirate your bandwidth.

    1. Re:Security? by yack0 · · Score: 1

      How does your version of AirSnort like FHSS networks?

      --
      -- There is no sig line, only Zuul.
  14. I recommend ydi's training course by luciusism · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For the best wisp related training, i highly recommend ydi's course.

    http://www.ydi.com/support/training.php

    1. Re:I recommend ydi's training course by m0rphm0nkey · · Score: 1

      From the YDI training page (i.e. sales pitch plus) After lunch, one-on-one time can be scheduled with Michael Young, a YDI Account Manager or Sales Engineer to assist you in designing your specific wireless systems.

      While I'm not sure where one gets a degree in sales engineering, I do have some information about where to get the only currently accredited Bachelors Degree in Wireless Engineering


      caveat emptor="BEWARE THE SALES ENGINEER"

  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. Re:parent is funny, dammit ! by WTFmonkey · · Score: 1

    No shit. -1 pedantic to anyone who replied to that.

    Oh, wait.

  17. Do not miss this chance of a lifetime! by fermion · · Score: 5, Funny
    GET RICH QUICK!

    this book will enrich your knowledge and possibly open new doors of opportunity for you
    Don't waste you time working for someone else! For only $99 I will send you a kit that will bring you tens of thousands of dollars every week.

    Being an experienced LAN/WAN professional with 19 years of experience and dozens of certifications
    I did the hard work so you don't have to. Guaranteed wealth!

    Comparing this book to others is relatively easy. I haven't found any other publications dedicated to the planning, installation, and maintenance of wireless WANs!
    Do not trust imitators. This is the only real original Get Rich Quick plan.

    This book will not bog you down in theoretical RF discussions, but rather allows you to learn through the introduction of real-life examples,
    No previous experience necessary. Just follow the examples and you can soon could be living a big house, driving a big car, and hiring 3 big hookers every night to play on your bed while you sit impotently on the couch watching.

    The book contains no CD-ROM or marketing material. Published in March 2003 (prior to the now finalized 802.11g standard), the book primarily covers 802.11a and 802.11b technologies. Both Mr. Unger and Cisco Press deserve a round of applause!
    You know you can trust us because we know complicated industry acronyms.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  18. Chapter 11 by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

    Business Plan.

    --

  19. Re:Deploying license-free wireless wide-area netwo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    one word: Do not do it.
    That's four words.
  20. Re:Deploying license-free wireless wide-area netwo by bigpat · · Score: 1

    one word: Do not do it.

    That's just funny


    Maybe MensaBabe was just testing us

  21. This is a must for any wireless bookshelf. by Agent+Green · · Score: 3, Informative

    I got this book a few months ago, and it was one of the best books I've purchased. For a book from Cisco Press, there is almost no mention of specific Cisco products, which was surprising...but freshing in a way.

    Granted, it's weaker in the areas of security and such, but it is pretty heavy on RF theory and all those things you need to make any license-free WWAN work.

    Security and stuff is important as anyone here will likely agree to, but that is really better covered in dedicated books on the topic. In short, this is not a general book about wireless networking. It is techincal and there's a lot of useful information for people who are above the noob level of wireless looking to install outdoor wireless link.

    The best part of the book, IMHO, was the antenna theory portions, math, and formulas that were included. The author is a ham radio operator (as am I) and he defintely know what he's talking about.

    A very good job, and worth every cent paid.

    --
    // Agent Green (Ian / IU7 / KB1JQO)
    // IEEE 802.3: All 10base Are Belong To Us
    1. Re:This is a must for any wireless bookshelf. by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      I'm not so much interested in the book, but could you give me some information on your wireless bookshelf?

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  22. Re:Maybe I don't get it - OBVIOUSLY NOT by common_sence · · Score: 1
    What's the backhaul connection? DSL? T3? Unless you're talking about provisioning something on ther order of OC3 or a DS3 you have the potential of bottle-necking pretty quickly.

    A DS3 and a T3 are the same thing genius.

    In most corp. networks the local access layer is Fast-E, connected to a T1 Interenet pipe, so what's the difference?

    Regardless of access speeds, the connection to the Internet will most likely always be a bottleneck. Wi-Max only increases the speed of the local access, not the "backhaul".

    Get your facts straight and stop trying to sell your crap here.

    --
    sig? No thanks, I don't smoke.
  23. Re:Deploying license-free wireless wide-area netwo by yack0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Busted? By whom? For what?

    The laws surrounding it are rather simple if you just know a few things about how to calculate the signal strength between points (or point to multipoint).

    Was your friend busted by:
    The FCC?
    His ISP he was sharing bandwidth from against his AUP?
    His employer for sharing bandwidth without their knowledge?

    Given a decent population density, a WISP can certainly be a viable solution, especially in moderately dense rural areas - like old town centers with decent business districts - where the DSL companies and cable modems have not yet tread. And to save money for point to point links - nothing beats paying once for hardware and never paying monthly fees forever.

    --
    -- There is no sig line, only Zuul.
  24. One more word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How high do you have to be able to count to join mensa?

    I know that you're supposed to be a genius to become a member of Mensa, but the members I've met/read certainly haven't impressed me.

  25. Explain? by Mensa+Babe · · Score: 1

    Before you deploy any license-free wireless wide-area network I have one word: Do not do it. A friend of mine has been busted for doing exactly that.

    Explain?

    What do you want me to explain? I have a friend. He has built a wireless wide-area network. He has done it without a license. He got busted. End of the story. What else could I possibly explain?

    --
    Karma: Positive (probably because of superiour intellect)
    1. Re:Explain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before you deploy any license-free wireless wide-area network I have one word: Do not do it. A friend of mine has been busted for doing exactly that.

      Explain?



      What do you want me to explain?
      I have a friend.
      He has built a wireless wide-area network.
      He has done it without a license.
      He got busted.
      End of the story.
      What else could I possibly explain?



      Got busted for drugs while building a wireless WAN??? I guess Mensa has been lowering its standards....
    2. Re:Explain? by pyrote · · Score: 1

      I'm with the trolls... we are curious what he was actually charged with. this is a free country and rules tend to be violated before someone is "busted".

      Was he simply amping up some off the shelf hardware, flooding the other 802.11 networks in the area off the dial? or was it broadcasting above the legal power outputs?

      Last time I checked, if the signal is below the FCC regulated limits one could technically get away with it by directing the signal with something like the pringles can project. it's not an amp, but a reflector.

      if the hardware was un-modified, I can see him 'getting busted' for exceeding the transmit range, but more likely it's for a unidirectional amped system. This was my project for 3 weeks from now, so any details on not 'getting busted' would be helpful.

      I dont mean to be annoying, but we just need more info.

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
  26. Re:Deploying license-free wireless wide-area netwo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe MensaBabe was just testing us
    no way man! you mean that she has a better sense of humor than you have? and that now SHE is the one who laughs at YOU? unpossible! no way!

  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. Free air path loss myth by dtmos · · Score: 1

    It's a myth that the free space path loss increases with frequency. The free space path loss is independent of frequency. Think about it: If the path loss of electromagnetic radiation increased with frequency, we'd never see any light from the sun--at 500,000,000 MHz, it'd be severely attenuated!

    The effect often seen is due to the antennas used, not the frequency of operation. WLANs often use resonant dipole antennas. Such antennas have constant gain with frequency; a 900 MHz resonant dipole has the same gain as a 2.4 GHz resonant dipole. However, the 900 MHz resonant dipole is physically larger than the 2.4 GHz resonant dipole. The 900 MHz resonant dipole can therefore collect more of the incident electromagnetic energy than the 2.4 GHz resonant dipole. Said a different way, the effective area of the 900 MHz resonant dipole is greater than the 2.4 GHz resonant dipole. The sunlight thought experiment works here, too: A larger solar cell collects more of the incident electromagnetic energy (sunlight) than does a smaller cell. In fact, the effective area of dipole falls inversely with the square of the frequency of operation.

    There are antennas that have a constant aperture with frequency. The parabolic dish is one example. Its effective aperture remains constant (a function of the physical size of the dish), but its gain increases with the square of the operating frequency. Two radios using parabolic dishes would find that the apparent "path loss" actually decreased with increasing frequency. If they then switched to resonant dipole antennas, they would find the apparent "path loss" increased with increasing frequency. If one used a dipole and the other used a parabolic dish, they would find the apparent "path loss" independent of frequency.

  29. Give me the book, I'll do a real review by drwho · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I've been doing this stuff for not quite 19 years but enough to tell BS from the real thing. Will somone post a link to a bittorrent of this thing, so I can download it, read it, and review?

  30. Re:Deploying license-free wireless wide-area netwo by Interrupting+Cow · · Score: 1

    Mensa must have lowered it's standards.

    --
    in terminus illic est tantum opes
  31. Unbelievable by sbszine · · Score: 1

    If we had the article moderation feature that so many people are after, this would be modded as a troll in seconds flat : )

    --

    Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

  32. Parent is very accurate by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    As soon as you're not in free space, though, high frequencies tend to get aborbed faster.

    For example, one brand of high-quality coaxial cable loses 3.7 db per 100 feet at 900 MHz. At 2500 MHz, it's up to 6.5 db per 100 feet.

    Similar things happen when there are buildings, trees, people, and other obstructions. It's analogous to what happens when you're a few hundred feet from a stereo and you mostly hear the bass.

    It's the difference between propagating through free space, like the vacuum between the earth and the sun, versus propagating through an absorbing medium (trees, coax, whatnot).

    Again, the parent post is quite correct, and properly qualifies the analysis by saying "free space path loss".

  33. GREAT MODERATION! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the original post is 0:troll and this shit is what? score:2? that's just great! jeez...