Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Latest Proposals for C++0x

Posted by michael on from the +++ dept.

CodeDemon writes "It looks like the ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG21 working group has made some headway in reviewing new proposals for the C++ language. The long anticipated upgrade for C++, C++0x, may be just around the corner. Head on over to check out the proposals yourself."

10 of 911 comments (clear)

  1. WHY DON'T THEY JUST CALL IT C++++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant
    1. Re:WHY DON'T THEY JUST CALL IT C++++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant

      actually it's C++;C++;
      ...or C^2
      ...or C*2.01
      ...or C+++ (since they're extending things)

  2. C++0x? by awtbfb · · Score: 0, Redundant


    How about upping the name to D?

  3. A better name by earthforce_1 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    would be c+=2, with source files using the .cp2 extension. Can't be any worse than C++0x.

    I think "D" is already taken.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  4. Re:It keeps going and going.... by Hard_Code · · Score: -1, Redundant

    c+=2

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  5. Re:Whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant

    I have not found any practical use for Pascal....

    Hey, neither have I.

  6. Re:It keeps going and going.... by pr0nbot · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How about ++c++ ?

  7. But ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant

    ... will it run on Linux?

  8. Re:c += 2 by Delphiki · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Why has nobody suggested ++c++?

    --

    Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

  9. Re:It keeps going and going.... by cait56 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    No 'C++' returns the current value of 'C', but then increments 'C', so that 'C' now has a higher value.

    An amazingly accurate self-assessment.