Slashdot Mirror


Security Update Fixes the Screen Effects Hole

jellomizer writes "Here is is. Available from Software Update. 'Security Update 2003-07-14 addresses a potential vulnerability when a password is required upon waking from the Screen Effects feature, which could allow an unauthorized user access to the desktop of the logged in user.' Now we can use our screen savers with the warm and fuzzy secure feeling."

11 of 94 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Versions by qengho · · Score: 4, Informative


    Anybody have any idea what files this updates and what version it updates those files to?

    This is what the package contains. I haven't installed it, so I don't know what the new versions are.

    Listing files for Security Update 2003-07-14
    ./System/Library/Frameworks/Security.framework/Ver sions/A/Resources/Info.plist
    ./System/Library/Frameworks/Security.framework/Ver sions/A/Resources/version.plist
    ./System/Library/Frameworks/Security.framework/Ver sions/A/Security
  2. Re:went witout a hitch by whee · · Score: 5, Informative

    This updates a system framework, which is likely in use by multiple, running, applications. The safest way to ensure everything is operating as it should is to require a restart. Had this been an update of something else, like a user-level application or daemon, then the restart would not have been required.

    You have to remember that this is an operating system for the masses and their desktops. I'm sure this update could've not required a restart, but what if something went wrong? Would your grandmother know how to make sure the current version of a shared library is loaded for her applications?

  3. Re:went witout a hitch by 47Ronin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Noone's forcing you to restart. I just opened up the Mac's Terminal.app and:

    % sudo softwareupdate SecurityUpd2003-07-14-1.0

    [wait for install to finish]

    Installing "Security Update 2003-07-14"... 98% 98% 99% 99% 99% 99% done.

    You have installed one or more updates that requires that you restart your
    computer. Please restart immediately. ...After that I just closed the Terminal. I keep on working and at the end of the day, if I feel like restarting I will. I will also upgrade my OSX webserver this way, and probably never restart it until a real major upgrade occurs.

    --
    Those who laugh at you for you having a Mac.. are the people who constantly call you to fix their PC.
  4. Re:went witout a hitch by Acrimonious+Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    For and update to an application library (Cocoa in this case), you don't really need to restart, you just need to quit all Cococa apps, this includes the Login Window. To accomplish this, do the following:

    1. download and install the patch. 2. log out, if you can. 3. type ">console" or maybe even ">exit" in the user name field of the login window. 4. once in the console, I believe a ctl-D will restart the login window.

  5. For those preferring to not use SU by blb · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apple's page for the update, if you prefer to download manually.

  6. I don't notice a performance hit by jnetsurfer · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't notice a performance hit while using the files in my home directory (I don't keep MP3s there however). You can monitor the amount of CPU that is being used decrypting files by checking the CPU usage of the 'hdid' process in top or the CPU monitor. But I encrypt my home directory (as you suggested) to protect my Library, financial records, my code, and the files for my business which I use all the time. My desktop (my download folder) is encrypted and I don't notice a performance hit while downloading. (I'm running a Dual 500 MHz machine, should you care)

  7. Re:It appears to by __aafkqj3628 · · Score: 4, Informative

    In which case, Apple should have named this patch as a patch to Cocoa itself instead of simply the screensaver.

    Trying to reduce the public's perception of the problem are we Apple?
    Just think, a Cocoa buffer overflow still isn't as bad as Windows' shatter attacks.

  8. Re:It appears to by gnuadam · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm not convinced there was ever a general cocoa problem.

    Obviously, there was the screensaver bug, and I reproduced that myself.

    Other people mentioned a problem with the login window. I've noticed before if I type an incorrect password it drops to a text-console. This is what people observed when trying to overflow the login window. It's certainly not an exploit.

    I tried overflowing text fields in safari and mail, without incident.

    If someone really found another app that was affected as the screensaver was, I'd really like to hear about it.

    Unless someone does, I'll give apple the benefit of the doubt. They fixed the problem, no harm no foul.

    --
    You say :wq, I say ZZ. Why can't we all just get along?
  9. Problem? by dissy · · Score: 4, Informative

    I dont really see this as that much of a problem.

    So instead you power cycle the laptop, hold down S durring boot to enter single user mode.
    At this point you do technically have root, although without a GUI.

    Change target accounts password, reboot, login.

    If you have a password set in openfirmware to prevent single user mode boots, I have to zap the pram 3 times and the password is gone.

    Granted this is a whole lot harder than breaking the screen saver, but still, any computer someone can get physical access to is not secure under any conditions.

  10. ...and... by djupedal · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is also a fresh iDVD software update today as well. Rumored to fix the "I don' wanna!!!" message...something about multiplexing :)

    No restart needed!!

  11. Re:restart by djward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just Hide it. Then it's out of the way but still in the Dock reminding you that you eventually should restart.