Slashdot Mirror


Lycoris Announces Desktop/LX Tablet Edition

penguinrenegade writes "Lycoris has announced the release of a new Tablet Edition of their popular Desktop/LX Operating System. There are several screenshots in the tour, and it looks like a really polished system, including some of the things that you'd really need in a Tablet, like the virtual keyboard, actually working. It appears according to one page that there are already Tablets in production by some manufacturer, too. So much for Bill Gates and his vision of only Microsoft on a Tablet, eh?"

22 of 190 comments (clear)

  1. Why? by UTaimSRC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just because Microsoft created the TabletPC does not mean that it needs Linux as the competition. The TabletPC will fail without Linux's help because there is a very small niche for the product.

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What's wrong with the concept of the TabletPC?

    2. Re:Why? by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "because there is a very small niche for the product."

      Small niches can be very successful. Apple is doing just fine thank you very much.

    3. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I can think of plenty of uses for tablets that beat a regular computer/laptop any day.

      And for your just sitting back surfing the web I'd take a tablet any day if I could just afford one.

    4. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      "Small niches can be very successful."

      If and only if they do not compete in any meaningful way with the market dominator... Just like apple, thank you very much ;)

  2. Well? Where can we get one? by mrklin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't you know /. ers require immediate gratification!?!

  3. Not bad for a complete ripoff by FusionGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... of Windows XP Tablet Edition.

  4. Re:Listen UP - low cost is more important than spe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    a) because they cost more than that to make
    b) because companies exist to make profit, not practically give stuff away
    c) because people will pay more than $400

  5. Why is why? by fm6 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Why are you so sure the tablet PC is doomed? It's just a slight evolution of the laptop concept -- and laptops are pretty popular. Sure tablets are overhyped and most of the "features" are useless, but that's true of a lot of products. Doesn't mean the basic idea isn't sound.

    I, for one, am looking forward to the day when I can recline on my couch and surf the web or read an ebook with the same ease I now read a paperback. Yeah, you can do that with a laptop, but it's awkward. You don't always need a keyboard.

    1. Re:Why is why? by UTaimSRC · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The TabletPC is a stripped down version of an entry level laptop that also costs several hundreds more. There is nothing wrong with the concept of TabletPCs but untill they are priced accordingly they will not sell. I for one, is in the market for a laptop so I could bring it to my classes. I was highly considering the TabletPC but for an entry level (800mghz, 256 MB RAM, 8MB Video Card, WiFi) I could get a top of the line Sager Notebook (3 GHZ, etc...).

  6. Touchscreen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Touchscreens suck for Tablets. I've been using a Toshiba Tablet PC since March and love that the screen is not sensitive to TOUCH, but only activated by the special PEN. That means when I rest my hand on the "page" to write in the journal the screen doesn't erroneously respond to that pressure as it does on those (cheaper) models which are touch sensitive. Also, when I flip my pen around it is recognized as an eraser. That, with the real-time feedback, makes it feel so much like writing on paper that I brush the "eraser shards" after erasing. When I use those other Tablets that are touch sensitive, I'd hate it.

    Please tell me Lycoris' Tablet supports WACOM pads...

  7. Re:Windows XP Ripoff by webguru4god · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Is that a bad thing? Lycoris primarily caters to customers who have no Linux experience whatsoever, and are looking to learn or use Linux as their primary operating system. If Lycoris' Tablet OS looks and acts like Windows XP, it reduces the learning curve for new users, and helps them get better acquainted with Linux. Besides, it's still KDE and the end user can customize their desktop however they wish, Lycoris is just giving new users a friendlier environment.

    I think a lot of people complain about the way in which many distributions copy Windows XP for their default UI's, but I think it is a great step towards helping the user become accustomed to using Linux.

    Besides, there isn't a law that dictates you have to use Lycoris...If you really want a Linux tablet PC I'm sure there are other projects out there, or that it would be pretty easy to customize a distribution to run on a Tablet PC.

  8. Disposable computers - via C3 small FF like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A via eden system for $150 + external hard drive or flash card would fit perfectly.

    Upgrade every other year for whatever system is about $150.

  9. Whiny Little Condensending Trolls. by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1, Insightful

    We went through all this crap back when Lycoris released build 43 and finally got attention as a viable contender for the Linux desktop market. Half the damn posts where "3ww, 100k$ 1|k3 Wind0z3! T3h sUx0r!" Get a grip, its just KDE2 with a similar picture as the default background. The most it comes to copying windows is by arranging its "control panel" to look similar to Windows XPs.

    What? Do you pricks think everyone should only have a term? Maybe run a tablet with 1 key so you can input commands in oh so 133t binary? If you want to bang your head against the wall and jerk off to your command prompt, use the approprate distro and let the people that like to actually use a GUI have one that works for them.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
  10. Re:We who? by getling · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is not meant as a flame, but take it as you will.

    Why do /.ers feel the need to have the herd mentality about products and politics especially? Are that many people coming here to have their opinions spoon-fed to them that they have to have a stamp of approval on products WE think are good (or reject those that WE feel are bad)?

    Whatever happened to reading sources and forming a coherent opinion all your own?

    Or am I expecting too much?

    --
    "Life is tough but we're tougher. You only get what you give, so give all that you've got." --Tony LaRussa
  11. The free software myth. by mindstrm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Free software is not about what you think it is about. It's about freedom for the software itself.

    Free software is not about giving away software for free. If you can take free software, and bundle it in such a way that you have an edge, and can make money off it... that's great. Go for it.

    Yes, Lindows did do a lot of work to make linux get out there into people's homes. They have a deal with a MAJOR outlet to sell lindows preloaded on pcs. That sounds good to me.

    It's not the job of everyone who works with open source to "promote open source". Not everyone is a holy crusader.

    Lindows has caused a lot of people to use linux who otherwise wouldn't, becuase of how their products are sold. They abide by the licenses of the software they are given, and found a way to profit from it. That's not something to complain about.. and frankly, all the complaining every time someone makes money off open source while still complying with licenses is what gives open source a bad name.

    Do I think lindows is technically a great feat? Hell no, but I don't see anything wrong with what they are doing. If you release something under GPL, you should not be upset when someone takes it, packages it, and sells it. Your license, after all, permitted it.

    If the authors did not want people to sell or use their products in this manner, the licenses would refect that fact.

  12. Re:Tablet PC's & Rock & Roll = Fad-tastic by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ehh... may not quite THAT bad, but you're close.

    I think a properly done tablet PC would take hold in special markets (such as package delivery), where the devices used now are much more limited than a full-blown PC.

    (Look at the wireless slabs carried around by UPS drivers, for example. Sure, they get the job done pretty well - but I bet much more information could be presented to a driver if it was an actual tablet PC. Perhaps, an instant display of package tracking results for the current customer the driver is doing a daily pick-up for?)

    Generally though, I agree. Tablet computing is a solution in search of a problem -- and it's got just enough "cool" factor to convince retailers it's worth trying to sell, time and time again.

  13. Now I can finally switch my tablet to Linux! by rayd75 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because all I've been waiting for is a crappy on-screen keyboard that takes up 60% of my 10 inches of screen real-estate. Long gone will be the days of handwriting recognition that is unthinkably accurate (after a week of training).... Now I can switch to Linux and peck at 2mm buttons with a stylus that is accurate to half of that at best. Way to go!

    Seriously, I'm afraid that this falls into the category of products that make "Joe User" think that Linux (+GNU) is a cheap knock-off of Windows. I mean, the functionality is truely useful but it really doesn't warrant the creation of a separate product. To do so only puts its shortcomings in the spotlight.

  14. Re:Linux GUI Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    > If Windows is the bad (not that I'm saying it is) why do all Linux apps try to emulate it.

    Windows is 'the bad' in lower case. Microsoft is THE BAD, and they're the reason why Windows is 'the bad'.

    Windows done by a company that cared about its customers, and not its own no-dividends-for-15-years stock price, would be a much better product.

    XP's pretty reasonable (except for the default Fischer-Price theme), it's the company behind it that has folks mad/hateful as hell.

  15. Re:Listen UP - low cost is more important than spe by EvanED · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >>a) Bullshit. The average laptop is only worth about $250 in parts bought in bulk. Tablets are only slightly more expensive due to the touchscreen. But the form factor reduces the cost.

    You can barely even get an LCD monitor for $250 retail (lowest LCD price on pricewatch is $196 for a 14"), let alone the motherboard, processor, hard drive, battery, CD/DVD drive, keyboard, trackpad, case, power adaptor, and RAM. I know things are a lot cheaper in bulk, but I don't see them becoming cheap enough to justify your $250.

    >>b) Companies exisiting for profit is the worst approach. They should exist for the customer. We should be their masters, not the other way around.

    Then move into a commune.

    >>c) Because people have no choice but to pay more than $400. If a company got wise and decided to make a laptop for $300, they'd make a killing because everybody and his brother would buy one. Even if the quality wasn't as high. Smart people are more concerned with cost than anything else. The sheep who pay too much for a status symbol are just idiots. Sounds like you just might be an idiot.

    IF such a company would make a killing, I'm sure that you could start it. We'll see how you do. You sell $250 worth of stuff at $300 and we'll see if you sell enough to make it worth your time and the risk.

  16. You should take a look at the MSFT Tablet... by Osrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The ability to play with the UI using just a pen does not equal a Tablet PC.

  17. Re:Im interested... by benjamindees · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is a WineX add-on for games.

    You can download a copy at LinuxISO.org.

    I'd have to say that I've tried Lycoris and I'm rather impressed with it. It seems to be somewhat picky about what hardware it works with, but otherwise it is a fast, no-nonsense desktop. There is one well-chosen app for each task you could need, and the menu layout is simple and straightforward. I think they were even using Mozilla as the default browser before RedHat was. Everything is designed to look and work like, say, Windows 98; so it is an easy transition for almost anyone. The install is also very quick and easy; this is the one that lets you play solitare while it's copying files. There aren't really any installation options; you get the default install, but it will all fit on a 1gb disk.

    The only thing I can't really gauge is whether it would be as easy to upgrade/modify as a distro like Lindows that is based on Debian. Lycoris originally didn't offer development tools for download, but I think their new version has them. I would be somewhat worried, though, about the long-term financial viability of some of these smaller desktop distributions.

    I also used to think their productivity pack was something like AbiWord and Gnumeric because of the goofy pictures on their site, but I read somewhere that it is a modified version of OpenOffice.org.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"