Slashdot Mirror


Office Surveillance: Locating And Tracking 802.11b

securitas writes "The NY Times recently ran an article about locating and tracking users of 802.11b WiFi networks in three dimensions using triangulation (Google) with multiple base stations. The goal is to create context-aware networks that can allocate bandwidth and provide location-based services such as uploading relevant information to a PDA. The article can be seen in a new light when coupled with the growth in workplace surveillance of employees by corporate executives (Google / short version at IHT) and the associated practical, ethical and legal problems. Interlink Networks 802.11 wireless detection and tracking white paper (PDF)." (This seems as good a place as any to mention Kensington's handheld 802.11 detector; they claim it to be the only such device on the market today. This is the cheapest detector I've seen; have the others all disappeared?)

12 of 120 comments (clear)

  1. Kensington WiFi detector by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Features and Benefits

    The only WiFi detector on the market today

    Completely hassle free -- no more booting up your notebook to find a WiFi signal

    Instantly detects WiFi networks with the press of a button

    Three lights indicate signal strength


    Messrs Kensington, could you make a version that

    1) doesn't require me to push a button to detect WiFi networks (i.e. works continuously)
    2) has a connector for an external antenna and an optional car lighter plug to power it
    3) has a 4th led to indicate if the network uses encryption or not ?

    I believe such a device would sell very much better. Thank you.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Kensington WiFi detector by JamesP · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have another couple of requirements too:

      1) doesn't require a computer to access web pages
      2) has lots of internal memory and automatically download all my MP3
      3) Connects to slashdot and checks any new articles
      4) if it's encrypted, automatically tries to infiltrate itselt
      5) costs less than $10

      thank you...

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  2. How well does this work in indoor environments? by pv2b · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The signal gets weaker as it passes through walls. Therefore, the signal strength can not be easilly be correlated to a distance from the base station for purposes of triangulation.

    Triangulation traditionally relies on measuring distance through signal strengths and so is limited to an outdoor environment, where the signal loss per kilometer can be predicted with much greater accuracy than in an indoor environment.

    The article is short on technical details -- did they somehow also enter a 3D-model of how the building weakens radio signals, and use that in order to create three 3D-shapes at the point of intersection the transmitter can be located? Just like traditional triangulation, but with weirder shapes than simple spheres...

    Perhaps a better way would be to use "ping" to check the travel times, rather than the signal strength, compensating for any delays imposed by TCP/IP-stacks and hardware etc. Is this even possible, or is the Signal/Noise ratio just too low?

    1. Re:How well does this work in indoor environments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Almost.

      TRIangulation works exactly as you say (except the tri means 3 measurements only). Multiangulation uses >3 measurements in the same way.

      When you have ranges (i.e. distances as derived from signal attenuation), it's called lateration. Trilateration == 3 ranges. Multilateration == >3 ranges.

      However, triangulation is commonly used when lateration is meant, just because people are more familiar with the term.

  3. Simpler solution by stefanvt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the article they mention the use of this in a hospital to push patient information to a handheld the doctor is carrying when doing rounds.

    Instead of triangulating (requiring more power) wouldn't it be simpler and possibly quicker to outfit each bed with e.g. a rfid tag?

    This seems an overly complex solution to a, relatively, simple problem.

    The rfid would also be a plus when the patient is being transfered in his bed (from his room to the or)

  4. Pretty stupid approach by dg1kjd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is a pretty stupid approach from the communications theory point of view. 802.11b frames contain a pretty long preamble in front of the packet header and data payload. This preamble (basically 11-bit barker sequences convolved with a prn-sequence) have excellent autocorrelation characteristics since they must be used for time and frequency syncronization at the RX station.
    By cross correlating the received signal with the (known) barker sequence at all three base stations precision would be increased drastically as it would be possible to measure the actual time lag (->way) the signal took to the receiver.

    1. Re:Pretty stupid approach by pv2b · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Moderate parent up.

      At risk of being moderated as redundant here, I'll just attempt to clarify this.

      Finding positions through time measurements is much more practical in a wireless solution than using directional antennas, mostly since you don't want to get the packet loss incurred by using a rotating directional antenna, although it might look cool. :-)

      Signal/Noise ratio measurements, that the people mentioned in the article is doing, is problematic becuase the unpredictable nature of radio wave signal weakening (I don't know the technical term), although they seem to have tackled that problem to some degree of accuracy.

      However, the speed of light is constant never mind how weakened the signal is, making it an excellent way to determine distance from the base station. This is in essence what GPS does, and also why it needs to carry along precise atomic clocks.

  5. Slightly OT, but here's a nice OSS tool... by pen · · Score: 5, Informative

    AirTrafis a 100% passive packet sniffing tool for the wireless 802.11b networks. It captures and tracks all wireless activity in the coverage area, decodes packets, and maintains acquired information associated by access points, as well as detected individual wireless nodes. It dynamically detects any access points in the area, finds association between wireless clients and access points, and builds information table for each packet that is transmitted via the air. AirTraf is able to maintain packet count, byte information, related bandwidth, as well as signal strength of nodes.

  6. Not that new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Positioning in office environments using WLAN really isn't that new. Microsoft did it in 2000 with the RADAR system (http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/bahl00radar.html), and loads of people have tried since.

    There are two approaches to it:

    1. Use signal strength to estimate range and then multilaterate. This usually does a poor job because you can't match distance reliably to signal strength because of wall attenuation etc. Also, most WLAN systems quantize the signal strength into a few bins. :-(

    2. Pattern recognition. Have a calibration phase where you put the device in lots of positions around the office, measuring the signal strengths to various stations. Record all this. Then try to match what you're seeing to this database of strengths to localise yourself. Problem is, the radio environment changes VERY easily, so you need lots of points in calibration. Plus, if the environment changes, so do the signal strengths!

    The best I've seen for a WLAN system achieved accuracy to about 2 metres. That used quite a few WLAN dase stations, too. And they had a fair error on that too - enough that you wouldn't be able to guarantee which office you're in...

    Location indoors is a tricky business. It's an active research area. The best so far is based on ultrasonics (the Bat system at (www.uk.research.att.com/bat). UWB looks good too (www.ubisense.net).

  7. This has been around for a while by Jarit99 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The same discussion seems to be popping up every 6 months or so. Check out what companies such as Ekahau and BlueSoft are offering.

  8. The other detectors by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny
    This is the cheapest detector I've seen; have the others all disappeared?

    They were tracked and located.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  9. Prices and usefulness by v1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Following the links, Kensington doesn't list an MSRP or sell it directly, but the other links indicated the "going rate" for the toy is $22.00, and I think that's well within budget for a computer toy.

    It could really use an external antenna though. If it had this, (or if the unit itself exhibited some amount of directional reception?) then it would be much more useful to find the actual location (down to say, which building on the storefront) the hotspot was at. The closer bench gets the better connectivity!

    Maybe someone will post a hack shortly that shows how to jurry-rig an antenna port on the little bugger. I'd also like to "me too" a previous post that suggested an external power connection. Just keep the puppy sitting on your dash whilst driving around town until the green lights start climbing up.

    Was anyone able to spot where these could be bought at? (this really looks like something ThinkGeek would carry)

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.