State of the Onion 7

My experience by m00nun1t · 2003-07-17 00:43 · Score: 5, Insightful

I read this first page, thinking "this is quite amusing". I think got to the bottom, and saw it was 11 pages long. I don't think I've *ever* read something 11 pages long online in my life. The end of page 1 he's on about deconstructionism. I skip randomly to page 7. First paragraph:
"Let's take another look at the pink tennis court. I mean, the universal architectural diagram. It really isn't quite as universal as I've made it out to be. First, let's get rid of the pink."

This is the thoughts of the man behind perl. This explains a *lot* about perl.

--
Read reviews of shopping cart software

Re:My experience by Mesozoic44 · 2003-07-17 01:50 · Score: 4, Insightful

Well - I'm not fond of Perl (although I do see its power) but I did hear this talk at OSCON and it was one of the most playful and thoughtful talks I've heard in a while. Not thoughtful as in George Steiner's musings on postmodernism - but thoughtful in that he was teasing and suprising the audience so that they were completely engaged. It was sort of like watching a magic act where rabbits were being pulled out of hats at unexpected angles. I think what you're missing in the written text is the timing and tone of voice that he used - sorry you weren't there. It was fun.
This explains a *lot* about perl. . I thought the same thing in two ways: (1) Perl is a motley and this shows why; (2) Perl needed someone like Wall for the community to form. Constructing both a language and community is more like performance art than an exercise in BNF. In general the audience enjoys the performance when the performer is also engaged - and I suspect he was having a blast.
If you like your philosophy written more seriously - please take some Tristan Tzara as an antidote.

Re:seriously by Branc0 · 2003-07-17 01:09 · Score: 5, Insightful

why doesn't he aknowledge that Perl has reached its goals long ago and give up development..

Maybe because the goals evolve has the language evolves..

--

rm -rf /home/leia

Hmmm by gowen · 2003-07-17 01:21 · Score: 5, Insightful

Dry, funny, in touch with hacker culture, informed, astutely political, funny, broadly educated, an enthralling speaker, a brilliant coder and funny again...

Larry Wall is everything that Eric Raymond believes himself to be.

--
Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.

Re:Hmmm by Artifex · 2003-07-17 04:41 · Score: 4, Insightful

Larry Wall is everything that Eric Raymond believes himself to be.

They're rather more like the Wozniak and Jobs of the computer worl- oh, wait, guess I can't say that. I'll say it anyway.

Seriously, though, both of these guys are very important to the present and future of computer programming. However, they fill different niches, much like the two Steves. They're not in direct competition. They're both visionaries, but one is more apt to build tools and the other is more apt to evangelize, in order to see their visions come true. I don't know these guys in real life, but I would be surprised to find any enmity between them, which I'd expect to find if one of their egos got deflated by the other's abilities.

A guy tried to impress me once by saying he once worked for or with ESR in some fashion. He couldn't explain exactly what he did or learned from the experience, so I treated it as starry-eyed syndrome or self-ego-building and ignored it. After all, when you work for an evangelist, your time is spent pushing the vision. It's hard to easily point to projects being done now and say that the Cathedral and the Bazaar and Magic Cauldron essays were directly responsible, but their perceivable impact will build over time. Oh, and there's something about him and open source, too, (whatever that is)...

The people I actually look up to when it comes to programming, on the other hand, almost always know perl, or at least feel inadequate if they don't. While it's not hard, learning it is an indication that you're serious about what you're doing. Larry's tools incorporate his ideas about how things should be done, (or that there's really not any one way some things have to be done, actually) and that invites quicker uptake on the part of people just trying to get things done.

(I'm only a dilettante, myself, but even I've been affected by Mr. Wall, anyway - my worthless claim to relevance, when I futilely try to impress people with name-dropping, is that I emailed Kibo when I was a kid asking about his usenet-searching script, and he told me this Larry guy had a new language, and I should talk to him for details on how to parse it. If only I was as willing to learn at the time as Larry always has seemed to be, to teach! Which is yet another trait he seems to share with Mr. Wozniak.)

--
Get off my launchpad!

Re:seriously by Ender+Ryan · 2003-07-17 01:23 · Score: 5, Insightful

Seriously, why the hell was the parent modded +5 insightful? Unbelievable....

Languages evolve, and that's all there is to it. Should development of C, C++, PHP, Python, Ruby, etc. be stopped because they have acheived their initial goals?

No, of course not. Let them evolve, as they all have done and continue to do.

--
Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden

Enough with the flames already by Christianfreak · 2003-07-17 01:23 · Score: 4, Insightful

Geez as open-minded as people on Slashdot claim to be, anytime something different comes along let the flames fly!! You don't have to like Perl, but why flame Larry for that? How many of you built a an extremely popular programing language from the ground up. I mean surely Perl must have gotten something right or growing numbers of people wouldn't have used it for the last 14? years and ported it to more platforms than I can count.

Sure Larry can be a bit eccentric but he's mildly amusing and he has some really good ideas about language design that challange the current ones. He's also willing to learn from good ideas from other languages (Creating a VM for example for multiple languages to target to).

And another thing, the whole "You can't read Perl or figure out old programs" bit is getting old. You can do that in ANY language. You can also follow some generally accepted formatting rules and your code will look just fine and be readable by any halfway experienced coder.

Rant off.

--
The Anti-Blog

Re:seriously by skryche · 2003-07-17 01:25 · Score: 3, Insightful

why doesn't he aknowledge that Perl has reached its goals long ago and give up development.

Maybe he likes developing Perl.

Why expect anything else? by JSkills · 2003-07-17 01:27 · Score: 5, Insightful

When it comes to these "State of the Onion" speeches Larry Wall gives, he always has a theme. And what he does is actually makes the theme of the talk more prominent than anything he is going to say about the Perl language. Note the first sentence of this year's speech - he says Perl is ok, and now that he's got that out of the way, onto his theme.

Larry Wall is clearly a genious, and actually has a huge range of interests aside from software. One year, he talked about chemistry. The last time I was at the Open Source conference, he talked about music (and demonstrated his abilities in playing about 30 different instruments). I can still remember the puzzled look on many people's faces and some even getting up and leaving. So this year, the theme is jokes ...

For the harcore Perl person, I guess the key is to look carefully for anything related to the future of the language in between all the silliness. Maybe he's trying to tell everyone there are a great many things to life outside programming. More likely he's just got a twisted sense of humor. I found the best thing to do was to kick back and enjoy it for the entertainment value - a relatively tough concept when you're not seeing it in person and only looking at a printout though :-(

unintentionally insightful by abulafia · 2003-07-17 01:48 · Score: 4, Insightful

You've unintentionally nailed a fairly deep truth about both Larry and Perl.

Both are very, very amusing/accessible, and very complex.

If you skip around in an attempt to "get" either of them, looking for an executive summary, you end up walking away scratching your head, because neither was "designed" (although Larry would have no trouble with that word, I do) that way. They both evolved (and now I'd really wonder what Larry would say to *that*).

But if you give a little time towards trying to understand them, both are hugely rewarding, make you think, and have proven themselves extremely useful.

The "peeling an onion" metaphor is is especially apt - there's always something new to learn.

--
I forget what 8 was for.

Re:seriously by teromajusa · 2003-07-17 01:51 · Score: 3, Insightful

Guess this poster (and a few people with moderation points as well) doesn't realize that thats pretty much what they're doing with Perl 6. They're not throwing out the whole language, but they're cleaning up some of the syntax, improving object support and redesigning the engine itself.

Larry funny? by Manax · 2003-07-17 02:45 · Score: 3, Insightful

I'm suprised, but I didn't really find it that funny, or that informative. Most of the humor struck me as quite sophmoric. Which, in turns, suprised me that many on /. think he is funny, then didn't suprise me quite so much....

Perhaps his prior "State of the Onion"s are better... can't say I've read them.

I don't know Mr. Wall, but from the way others gush about him, I suspect he is an interesting fellow, and I certainly love Perl... but his humor doesn't appear to be his strong point. :(

His talk really could have been only 10 seconds:
o The movers of the world tend to be the unreasonable.
o Deconstructionism is about understanding and breaking down "oppressive" memes.
o Postmodernism is about using a common word to mean its opposite.
o Perl5 is done, a new Perl 5 based on Parrot will be called Ponie and will be the transition step to Perl 6, which will also be based on Parrot. (Which everyone who cares about Perl already knew anyway.)

If this a typical "State of the Onion", I hope the organizers cut him down to those ten seconds sooner, rather than later...

--
"Why should I be content to simply live in this world, when I, as a human being, can CREATE it?" - Oertel

.Net competitor? by AnEmbodiedMind · 2003-07-17 03:34 · Score: 3, Insightful

This is pretty interesting... It looks like they are making a sort of "Common Language Runtime" out of Parrot, and letting it run various languages on top of it.

I found it interesting that Larry didn't mention how this is positioned (philosophically, or technically) in relation to .Net which is offering a similar sort of framework.

I guess one big difference here will be that you probably wont have to compile your programs, even down to byte-code - it will just do it on the fly. (At least it seems that it will be that way, given the current nature of perl)

What could be cool though would be being able to call code from python, perl, php, java, and whatever from within your app (which could be in any of these languages too). But I guess that is just the whole .Net buzz anyway - Theoretically at least.

13 of 230 comments (clear)