Slashdot Mirror


Keeper of the Objects

cEnTiBeE writes that this is "not about the Matrix," but rather about Near Earth Object tracking. "It's accomplished by a staff of 2.5 people watching to see when any 'vermin of the sky' plan to pay earth a visit. This piece titled Keeper of the Objects is in the August '03 issue of Scientific American."

9 of 144 comments (clear)

  1. How many people? by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 5, Funny
    It's accomplished by a staff of 2.5 people...

    2 and a half people? Cool. I wonder what the midget does.

  2. The scary asteroids. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny


    The scary ones are where the scientists watch them for a week, and only see the size grow, with no apparent movement across the sky.

    1. Re:The scary asteroids. by Jahf · · Score: 5, Funny

      Off-topic but ... Reminds me of a model rocket I launched once. Darned ejection charge didn't fire. It flew straight up ... and up ... and I was watching it from below going "wow". Then my brain clicked and said "it is getting bigger, MOVE". About 1/2 a second later it buried itself about 6" into the ground exactly where I was standing. I looked at the other camp counselor who was with me, she was dumbfounded, and we quietely herded the children (who were behind and under a protective barrier) off to the next activity. Always good to know that anyone can come close to winning a Darwin if they give themselves half a chance.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  3. Short Staffed by PktLoss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If only they got 1/10th of the budget of the hollywood films.

    There are only a few things that hollywood does get right with respect to science, and this in particular.

    1. We are presumably now at the first time in history that something could be done to avoid such a cataclysimic event.
    2. Early detection is the key, It is far easier to deflect something millions of miles away, than it is when it is 4 minutes from impact.

    I would place the protection of our planet from those things that would kill us all, as far more important than ensuring people didnt cheat on their taxes, and arn't sneaking booze in on the airplane, but, I dont choose where the tax dollars go... yet.

  4. McDonald's comparison by xihr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Remember, the total number of people involved in watching the skies for potential Earth impactors is fewer than the staff of one shift of a modest McDonald's restaurant.

  5. Re:Joy by russ_allegro · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually there is a lot more than 2.5 watching the skies. The Minor Planet Center takes data from amatuers as well as their own automated telescope. It is true that the MPC keeps and processes the data. Although ametuers are known from time to time to do their own orbital calculations.

  6. this guy should run for president... by ravenousbugblatter · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "we have to do more than the dinosaurs."

    I'm glad this guy has a good grasp on the subject, since most people don't seem to realize asteroids probably represent the most immediate threat of extinction to the human species. He should exaggerate a few more threats, so that someone actually starts contributing money to finding out ways to prevent the impact of an asteroid. All current /.ers will be dead by the time a big asteroid probably hits, but we should still have a plan.

  7. Actual Frequency of Impact by thelandp · · Score: 5, Informative
    There's a relationship between asteroid size and predicted frequency of impact.

    10m - every 1-5 years

    100m - every 1000 years

    1km - every 100,000 years

    The Tunguska blast of 1908 was a roughly 100m asteroid, hitting land.
    If it had been an ocean impact, it would have produced significant tsunamis.
    On the remote chance it had landed right on top of a large city, then the city would be completely gone.

    A 1km asteroid would wipe out a moderate US state, or create tsunamis that travel to most of the globe. Either way it would affect the climate due to dust clouds.

    The observational population census for Earth crossing objects is only complete for objects in the 8-kilometre diameter range (such as 1627 Ivor) or larger. The detection completeness for 1 kilometre range is estimated to be in the region of 12%.

    (further reading is here)

    Maybe it's worthwhile upping the budget so we can track all of them down to 1km ?

    --

    -- the only thing we have to fear is really scary things
    1. Re:Actual Frequency of Impact by bravehamster · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Tunguska blast of 1908 was a roughly 100m asteroid, hitting land.

      Kinda a' nitpick, but the Tunguska object didn't hit land, it was an air-burst. That's the reason there isn't a huge crater there now. It flattened all the trees for hundreds of square miles, but in the very center of the blast, no crater. Stumped a bunch of scientists for a good long while. Air-burst detonations have a larger area of immediate effect (i.e. flattened by the blast wave), but their global effect is less than ones that actually impact. Either way you get lots of knocked over trees and some pretty sunsets.

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!