PKWare Files a Patent Application for Secure .zip
prostoalex writes "The battle of ZIP formats might intensify as PKWare filed an application with USPTO to obtain a patent on its Secure Zip technology, which pretty much involves archiving with strong cryptography. If the patent gets granted, PKWare will license its algorithms for other software manufacturers. A representative of Aladdin Systems summed it up: "The good thing about the .zip file format was that you knew you could send it to everyone. Now that's getting broke.""
but I want a secure zipper. So many people are trying to get into my pants it's outrageous.
WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
Doesn't PGP already compress things before it encrypts? (Adds to the difficulty in decyphering it..)
http://www.remix.net/
It's good to see Aladdin Systems are demonstrating their lossy text compression technology by saying that the ZIP format is "getting broke" rather than "getting broken"
</tongue>
Indeed.
United States of America, good ol' backers of world peace.
seems like a familiar story to me.
I write code.
Funny, it sounds like either they already reverse engineered the pkware zip encryption, or established their own encryption.
I wonder how many times users will complain to company xyz (that is using pkware encryption for their products) about their files not working in winzip, before company xyz will drop their pkware proprietary encryption in favor of winzip's published (and functional) encryption.
Everybody, start using the (open source) 7-zip instead.
No kidding. It amazes me that a lot more people don't use this - It handles all the major formats (zip, tar, gz, bz2, cab, no "sit", though) better than the "native" program for them does, and hey, open source to boot. And, its "7z" format really does get 10-30% better compression than even bzip2.
Gotta agree with the other response to you, though - the interface needs MAJOR work. It doesn't "look" bad, but feels very counterintuitive. Hell, if they totally eliminated the psuedo-explorer-esque look and just let me drag-and-drop, I'd consider it perfect.
You're partly right. StuffIt was the main compression format until OS X came along, but it's not the only format that preserves resource forks.
Today you'll mainly see .dmg (disk image) format, which features compression, optional encryption, and preserves resource forks. Also common are .pkg (a compressed installer, which can include files with resource forks) and .tar.gz files (I don't think they preserve resource forks).
And some folks still use Stuffit .sit files.
No, I don't want to explore the Recycle Bin.