Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

RFC: Alternate Ports Fix For Older FreeBSD

Posted by Hemos on from the update-install-correct dept.

Dan writes "For those of you running older versions of FreeBSD (prior to 4.7), FreeBSD's Joe Marcus Clarke has an alternate fix for the recent port install problem people were seeing. This fix involves adding a new port, pkg_install, which is a snapshot of the -CURRENT pkg_install code. This port can change periodically as new pkg_* features are added that bsd.port.mk depends on. Joe is also looking for testers for this fix."

23 comments

  1. Grammer by xombo · · Score: 0, Funny

    It's we're not were, silly editors.

    1. Re:Grammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's grammar not grammer silly grammar troll. Why waste +1 bonus on this??

    2. Re:Grammer by xombo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That was so funny, even I laughed, if I had mod points right now, I'd mod you up :P

  2. ARGHGHGHGHG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    And I just upgraded a bunch of machines to 4.8 so I could upgrade the Apache port. NOW you tell me!

    Oh well they needed it anyway (4.5).

    If I was paying money for this, I'd demand a refund! ;-)

  3. You forgot.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The

    Bozo

    who posted the parent article.

  4. Cant' be found. by dsb3 · · Score: 1

    I took a look at the new port pkg_install ...

    The file pkg_install-20030714.tar.bz2 that is referenced cannot be found on any of the freebsd FTP servers.

    Ho hum.

    --

    Slashdot? Oh, I just read it for the articles.
    1. Re:Cant' be found. by dsb3 · · Score: 1

      It's fixed, if anyone else was interested...

      --

      Slashdot? Oh, I just read it for the articles.
  5. Trolls are the majority by vesamies · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Any one get the feeling most of the BSD users here are trolls, i'd have guessed beasties. Well, maybe prior 4.7 FreeBSD is not the most exiting thing to chat about...

  6. Good grief. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either make world, get a better friggin' computer and update to a newer version, or apply your own friggin patches. Frankly, I can't think of any good excuse for sticking with pre 4.5 FreeBSD.

  7. Cool Beans by craig2787 · · Score: 1

    I think supporting older versions of FreeBSD important, to keep older systems secure and up to date (where they can be...).

  8. Re:problems with BSD by RinkSpringer · · Score: 1

    Flame, but I'll bite anyway ...

    If you read the MANUAL, which you didn't, you would turn on a technique called Soft Updates, which *WILL* speed up your disk I/O. And even *if* it takes 20+ minutes, you've got either a broken disk or a broken system...

    Futhermore, if your Netscape isn't working, it's probably because you didn't bother to set it up properly. I use Mozilla a lot, and once it's loaded, it works like a charm and damn fast too.

    I've used *BSD for a long time now, and it has been the most stable and responsive OS I have *EVER* used. And it _does_ beat Linux very much. I've ran both FreeBSD 4.7 and Gentoo Linux 1.3 on my Athlon XP 2200+ with 512MB RAM, and FreeBSD is much more responsive than Linux was.

    To finish, there are a load of reasons why people chose FreeBSD and not something else. But mind you, it's usually a person's taste. If you don't set FreeBSD up in a decent way (not that it's hard, just RTFM), you can wonderfully tune it ... and much better than Linux, in my experience anyway.

    Anyway, just my 0.02 euro's. Couldn't let this flame war continue ...