Peer To Peer Meets Manufacturing

Crashmarik writes "Small times has an article detailing UCB advances in desktop manufacturing. They raise the possibility for effectively downloading physical objects through the net. We have allready seen the reaction "Property Holders" over downloading music, what is the likely upshot of being able to copy physical objects. More importantly what are the implications for our society as we move out of an age of scarcity to an age of plenty ?" Great article - the author of it also won The Foresight Institute's prize in communications for 2002.

Comments

I wonder

[mjmalone]

How much they're gunna charge for the ink...

Whole new meaning to adult entertainment online

[192939495969798999]

How long will it be with this system in place until you can download the most ungodly of things from adult entertainment sites? EEEEW!

Slashdot 20 years from now

[daveo0331]

We'll all be complaining about the CIAA (Car Industry Association of America), CBAA (Coffee Brewers Association of America), BBAA (Beer Brewers Association of America) etc etc etc

Re:Slashdot 20 years from now

[radja]

but why would you want the recipe to bud light?

Re:Slashdot 20 years from now

[richie2000]

but why would you want the recipe to bud light?

Because it's the cheapest one to replicate? You just run some tap water over a can of Real Beer(TM) and drink the resulting fluid. Make sure the can is clean first and remember to not open it, that will ruin the unique Bud flavor.

One step better

[m00nun1t]

I already downloaded a piece of software from a site and as soon as I ran it a cupholder appeared from my PC!

remember "All Tomorrow's Parties"?

[mblase]

I'm holding out* for the day when we can go to the corner 7-11 and order up a beautiful woman, right through the nanobot replicator.

* Dear God, no, not in that sense.

Re:remember "All Tomorrow's Parties"?

[micromoog]

I'm holding out for the day when we can go to the corner 7-11 and order up a beautiful woman

You can do that today at the corner of 7th and 11th.

Let me be the first to announce...

[Lord_Slepnir]

Let me be the first to announce the open-source Car project. I'm currently on version 0.2. We have the chasis mostly bug-free, with occasional glitches on an Interstate network. Seat-Belts are available on the nightly builds, but aren't supported yet. You'll still have to use a closed-source engine module, and we're not planning on adding it until version .5 when we have the chasis, firewall, and fuel system components some-what bug free. I've heard some people saying that they've been able to use the engine module from the Open-Source-Lawn-Mower project, but it will only work under light loads. For now, I have to get back to developing the lights module. BTW, we're looking for someone to design a module-hot-swaping system, similar to linux.

p2p Cadillac

[AtariAmarok]

Oh great. Instead of the RIAA wondering about those songs on your hard disk, you'll have the NAM (National Association of Manufacturers) getting after you because you have 60 full-sized plastic Cadillacs downloaded from Repster in your back yard.

No it�s from bbspot!!

[PEdelman]

And it was intended as a joke...

Obligatory Book Reference 2: HHGTTG

[scrawny]

what happens when we want tea? we get

'...a plastic cup filled with a liquid that was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea.'

Re:Wrong word, bro

[Nugget]

Errors like this are pardon parcel with someone having learned the language from speaking and not from reading. This is slashdot, after all, and we're not looking for people to post pullet surprise quality comments, but it is discouraging to see people make mistakes like using the wrong word. The original poster could of used a dictionary or thesaurus to avoid that mistake. For all intensive purposes your words are the only measure that others can use to judge your credibility. You loose credibility if you can't form a coherent and compelling argument. This is the affect of writing poorly.

So, to the original poster I say this: "Your a idiot."

Read.