Slashdot Mirror


2191.78 Years for the RIAA to Sue Everyone

este writes "According to an article in the Inquirer, if the RIAA maintains its rate of lawsuit issuance, it will take more than two millenia for them to sue evey P2P file trader. The author accounts for many additional difficulties facing the RIAA in this daunting task."

24 of 636 comments (clear)

  1. When am I gonna get served? by JDark · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great.. with my luck I'll be served in the first 200 years.

  2. Prior art: by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jason Fox has them flummoxed.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  3. Excellent! by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Funny

    That means that everyone that their last name starts with a letter greater than B has absolutely nothing to worry about!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  4. Yes, I realize by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 4, Funny

    I realize it's just humor, but the point of the RIAA's suits is to deter people from using p2p under fear that they will get sued.

    But if there are 60 million p2p users, the probability of getting sued is pretty low, even if it does depend on the number of files you have shared.

    Perhaps the next version of KaZaA will have a suit-o-meter, that will actively display your probability of being sued by the RIAA ;)

  5. But won't most of the copyrights expire by then? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 5, Funny
    Last I checked the copyright termes were 90 years after the death of the artist. Oh god, they must be planning on keeping the Backstreet Boys in suspended animation.

    Should have read THAT on the contract before signing.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  6. Re:At that rate... by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the article: 219 years! They'd have to sue our great grand children!

    I wouldn't put it past the RIAA. Imagine how much money our grandchildren will have. They can pay it all in damages to the RIAA with interest.

    Maybe they will make vague SCO threats against our grandchildren telling them to pay for their grandparents licensing, or face litigation.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
  7. Re:It's the deterrent, stupid. by darien · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not about getting them all - - it's about nailing a few and scaring the rest

    Reminds me of my days in that co-ed dorm.

  8. Re:Sounds like a profit model to me... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 5, Funny
    On the contrary. Humans expire just like copyrights. What are they going to sue, the person's heirs?

    No wait, don't answer that...

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  9. Distributed Sueing ! by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 3, Funny

    In an unheard of move, the RIAA has decided to use a basic P2P scheme to have its law ordinance sent to everybody.

    A cascade chain of Court Letters will be sent from Lawyer branch to Lawyer branch and only the lasts in the distribution tree will have to send the letters.

    After the close observation, the RIAA has been put to court by Bittorrent inventor.

    Also, the Courts are looking at this apparent pyramidal scheme as a new, innovative way to collect money from unsuspecting lusers.

    See you later, this was AN, from Slashdot News Channel...

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  10. Re:Sounds like a profit model to me... by i8urtaco · · Score: 3, Funny

    And we had to program in the snow! Uphill! And every five minutes we'd have to give the hamster inside the power supply an electric shock to start his heart, but that was only after we kick started the backup motor!

    I'm sorry, I just couldn't resist.

  11. Re:Sounds like a profit model to me... by Rhubarb+Crumble · · Score: 5, Funny
    Thus the cases RiAA has would to deal with would grow exponentially every year.

    And so would the amount of damages they could (potentially) claim.

    Which basically means that the RIAA can stop publishing music altogether and just turn itself into a consortium of lawyers. After all, with infinite future income (from damages) guaranteed by Congress and Disney Corp., how can they lose!

  12. the solution is obvious by leekwen · · Score: 4, Funny

    this is obviously too much for one person to handle. we need to create a distributed network among kazaa network users.

    i will start by suing myself. you can help too by donating your spare cpu cycles towards our cause.

  13. Re:It's the deterrent, stupid. by Dutchmaan · · Score: 4, Funny

    So in essence the RIAA uses tactics of a police state... I'm sure glad they don't have influence in our government! (for the humor impaired that was tongue in cheek)

  14. Doing the math by borkus · · Score: 4, Funny
    Let's see -
    • 60,000,000 defendants at ten defendants per attorney is
    • 6,000,000 attorneys at an average height of 5'8" is
    • 33,960,000 feet of attorneys laid end to end or
    • 6,400 miles of attorneys laid end to end

    That's enough attorneys laid end to end to cover every sidewalk in New York.
  15. Let A Man Do The Calculations by tds67 · · Score: 5, Funny
    She said: "I pulled out my calculator to see just how long it would take the RIAA to sue all 60 million P2P music file traders at a rate of 75 a day. 60,000,000/75 = 800,000 days to subpoena each person or 800,000 days/365 days in a year = 2191.78 years to subpoena each person".

    Hey babe, let me show you how a man calculates all this: After whipping out my sliderule and factoring in the size of the aforementioned subpoenis', I come up with 2200.25, a much bigger number.

  16. I suggest an opt-out model... by jkrise · · Score: 5, Funny

    RIAA says: We sue the whole world for P2P misuse. Those who think they've been sued wronly, please opt-out by visiting the nearest court, depositing $5 towards opt-out costs and inform us over Kazaa er.. e-mail.

    Failure to opt-out would mean that you plead guilty, the penalty for which is 95% of all earnings, including future earnings, over the next 2191.78 years...

    PS: If you have paid our associate SCO, you have been automatically opted-out.

    Done.

    -

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  17. You'd be more believable by Microsift · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you weren't bragging about your past sexual conquests on a site whose subtitle includes the words "News for Nerds"

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
  18. Re:It's the deterrent, stupid. by BrynM · · Score: 4, Funny
    no, i just keep up with the flow of traffic! everyone else is doing it, why shouldnt i?
    You're stealing time! You can call it "saving time" or "being in a hury", but you are outright stealing! How are the county clerks and local legal system going to get fed? Just because everyone else is doing it doesn't make it moral!

    Sorry, someone had to give a mock anti-filesharer response.

    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
  19. Re:Sounds like a profit model to me... by Divide+By+Zero · · Score: 3, Funny

    Humans expire just like copyrights. ...which is to say, not at all. So when I'm about to die, I can be renewed in perpetuity? Cool.

    If the RIAA can milk recording artists for money well after the artist is dead, I should be able to, erm, liberate the music well after I'm dead. Not that I will die - I'll have my friends renew me.

    --
    Dare to Hope. Prepare to be Disappointed.
  20. Re:Article text by cheeseSource · · Score: 3, Funny

    They didn't include the extra day in a leap year in the calculation. That'll shave some time off...

    Fuck the RIAA and Mitch Bainwol

    --
    (Sponsored by cheeseSource for President 2012)
  21. How to profit from the RIAA by tekrat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just like with the terrorists, we should start a website for betting on who the RIAA will sue first. Then, if you bet on yourself, and place a good bet, you'll win enough money to finance your defense.

    It's a futures market for RIAA lawsuits, aka "America's New Economy".

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  22. Re:Why even try? by shane_rimmer · · Score: 3, Funny

    We're working on it. We just need more lions.

  23. 2200 years... by Quixadhal · · Score: 4, Funny

    That seems like about the right amount of time to finally play something original on the radio. I'll consider that a promise!

  24. Re:Sounds like a profit model to me... by ediron2 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Luckily for **AA, copyrights will still be in effect for all currently-protected songs even after 2000 years, thanks to the Son-of-SonnyBono Act of 2010, Bono-Back-from-Beyond (2055), I-was-a-teenage-mutant-ninja-Bono Act of 2173, and Bono-until-the-year-2525 Act of 2225.

    On the contrary. Humans expire just like copyrights. What are they going to sue, the person's heirs?

    No wait, don't answer that...

    RIAA: Who says copyrights expire!? Damn liar, step up and be seen!

    PS: Has anyone else ever chuckled at the irony of perhaps lobbying for copyright to be extended retroactively forever, just so Mickey Mouse (and Sonny Bono's estate!) could get the bejeebers sued out of him by the estate of the Brothers Grimm, et al? It'd force a reality-check on the lobbyists who are whitewashing congress with this belief that consumers are the only cheap-ass nigglin' thieves who want to use stuff without paying a royalty.