Slashdot Mirror


Surgery Using A Sunlight Scalpel

Makarand writes "Research conducted by Israeli doctors has shown that it is possible to use concentrated sunlight instead of lasers to perform surgery, providing a safe and low cost alternative to laser treatment. In their experiments sunlight was transported into the operating room from outside using a system of optical fibers. The concentrated rays - containing several watts of energy - were then used in the experimental surgery conducted on rats." Here is Wired's similar story.

14 of 59 comments (clear)

  1. Confirmation by kinnell · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can verify that this is indeed feasible. I have myself performed exploratory operations on a number of ants and other selected insects using concentrated sunlight.

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    1. Re:Confirmation by cpeterso · · Score: 4, Funny

      When I was a kid, I attempted numerous cryogenic experiments on bees. I froze them in my freezer and would then try to wake them using sunlight or the microwave. Here are my results:

      Bee in microwave 0-5 seconds: no change in behavior
      Bee in microwave 5-10 seconds: rapid movement
      Bee in microwave 10+ seconds: no movement/game over

      I now regret my mad science experiments (there were many others), but at least I can share the scientific results with others. Let not those bees die in vain...

  2. Cloudy days. by Spudley · · Score: 4, Funny

    All fine and dandy... until the sun goes behind a cloud right at the critical moment! :-o

    --
    (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    1. Re:Cloudy days. by MImeKillEr · · Score: 3, Informative

      AFAIK, winter = cold season.

      Wrong. Winter is defined as (from dictionary.com)

      "The usually coldest season of the year, occurring between autumn and spring, extending in the Northern Hemisphere from the winter solstice to the vernal equinox, and popularly considered to be constituted by December, January, and February. "

      Generally, its understood that winter (in the northern hemisphere at least) is the time when the earth tilts on its axis and the northern hemisphere is furtherst from the sun.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  3. "Oops" by rylin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now that everyone's used to the BOFH, let me introduce the BSFH (Bastard Surgeon From Hell)..

    Blaming someone's critical conditions on sunflares, anyone? ;)

  4. Re:Weather permitting... by tsa · · Score: 3, Funny

    To prevent the influence of the clouds you can build a tower that is higher than the clouds. But then you can only operate during the day. So you also need some mirrors in orbit to reflect the sunlight from the other side of the earth into the tower. Because of the earth's rotation you will need to be able to move the mirrors so that they keep reflecting the light towards the tower. Then you have a system that is cooler than lasers, so nerds will flock to your hospital making you rich like Donald Duck's uncle! Hehehe!

    --

    -- Cheers!

  5. Are the lasers a significant cost? by TheLink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just curious - are the lasers a significant cost or are they outweighed by the costs of the people controling and maintaining the laser, and the systems involved in assisting the control (intensity, focus, width etc). Would a consistent light beam be necessary for surgery and if it is, would maintaining the consistency of a sunlight beam be cheaper?

    Personally I believe this is just a "party trick".

    If you don't have access to a laser, are there compelling reasons to pick the sunlight system over a scalpel system?

    --
    1. Re:Are the lasers a significant cost? by Indomitus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Wired article listed the laser machines at $10,000 and the sunlight machine at $1,000. The sunlight machines are new and so I'd imagine the prices will drop as more of them are sold so the price difference will only get more in favor of the sunlight machine.

      I'm not a doctor but I believe there are many surgeries that are difficult/impossible to do with scalpel instead of a laser (many cancer removals for example). For poor areas (many of which happen to be in sunlight rich areas) this is a good way to get those surgeries done without having to buy the laser system.

  6. Slashdot! by ClosedSource · · Score: 3, Funny

    Where else can you start a conversation on advances in surgery and end up arguing over the definition of winter?

  7. That was my idea! by Gyl · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Of course I wasn't going to do surgery with it. I was thinking take the Keck telescope (10 m diameter), aim it at the sun, attach fiber optic cable at the focus, cut down a forest (being a gentle example of what to do :)

    A quick google search reveals high power lasers of 100 W another quick search shows: ~250 W/m^2 as solar power reaching earth's surface. A circle of diameter 10 m, 78.5 m^2. Giving almost 20,000 watts. hehehe. Assume you loose half of that in mechanics, it's still 10,000 watts!

  8. great! by TwistedSpring · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does this mean I can fix my ghastly vision by staring at the sun instead of going in for all that expensive laser surgery?

  9. Several watts? by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Granted the article is light on details (no pun intended) but why does the power source need to be the Sun? Why not use the same combining/collimating /focus method but draw the power from one or more conventional incandescent lamps?
    Yes, I realize that Sun == free, and electicity != free. Howsabout the Solar version for subsaharan Africa where reliable power is rare but sunlight is not, and we'll take the 1/10th-the-price-of-a-laser incandescent one here in North America where the opposite is true.

    --

  10. suitable for all laser applications? by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Funny

    But can we have sharks with frickin' sunlight concentrating devices attached to their heads?

  11. Re:Danger Wil Robinson! by reverseengineer · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Is this sounding like a good way to get skin cancer to anyone else?

    No, because the idea is to aim the beam at tissues that you want to destroy, such as tumor cells. Ideally, the targeted cells will be vaporized, so whether or not UV light induces mutations in them is a moot point.

    I do personally love the ironic possibility of using a beam of focused sunlight to destroy a melanoma caused by too much exposure to sunlight, though.

    --
    "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."