Surgery Using A Sunlight Scalpel
Makarand writes "Research conducted by Israeli doctors has shown that it is possible to use
concentrated sunlight instead
of lasers to perform surgery, providing a safe and
low cost alternative to laser treatment.
In their experiments sunlight was transported into the operating room
from outside using a system of optical fibers.
The concentrated rays - containing several watts
of energy - were then used in the experimental surgery conducted
on rats." Here is Wired's similar story.
I can verify that this is indeed feasible. I have myself performed exploratory operations on a number of ants and other selected insects using concentrated sunlight.
If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
All fine and dandy... until the sun goes behind a cloud right at the critical moment! :-o
(Spudley Strikes Again!)
Now that everyone's used to the BOFH, let me introduce the BSFH (Bastard Surgeon From Hell)..
;)
Blaming someone's critical conditions on sunflares, anyone?
To prevent the influence of the clouds you can build a tower that is higher than the clouds. But then you can only operate during the day. So you also need some mirrors in orbit to reflect the sunlight from the other side of the earth into the tower. Because of the earth's rotation you will need to be able to move the mirrors so that they keep reflecting the light towards the tower. Then you have a system that is cooler than lasers, so nerds will flock to your hospital making you rich like Donald Duck's uncle! Hehehe!
-- Cheers!
Just curious - are the lasers a significant cost or are they outweighed by the costs of the people controling and maintaining the laser, and the systems involved in assisting the control (intensity, focus, width etc). Would a consistent light beam be necessary for surgery and if it is, would maintaining the consistency of a sunlight beam be cheaper?
Personally I believe this is just a "party trick".
If you don't have access to a laser, are there compelling reasons to pick the sunlight system over a scalpel system?
Where else can you start a conversation on advances in surgery and end up arguing over the definition of winter?
A quick google search reveals high power lasers of 100 W another quick search shows: ~250 W/m^2 as solar power reaching earth's surface. A circle of diameter 10 m, 78.5 m^2. Giving almost 20,000 watts. hehehe. Assume you loose half of that in mechanics, it's still 10,000 watts!
Does this mean I can fix my ghastly vision by staring at the sun instead of going in for all that expensive laser surgery?
Granted the article is light on details (no pun intended) but why does the power source need to be the Sun? Why not use the same combining/collimating /focus method but draw the power from one or more conventional incandescent lamps?
Yes, I realize that Sun == free, and electicity != free. Howsabout the Solar version for subsaharan Africa where reliable power is rare but sunlight is not, and we'll take the 1/10th-the-price-of-a-laser incandescent one here in North America where the opposite is true.
--
But can we have sharks with frickin' sunlight concentrating devices attached to their heads?
No, because the idea is to aim the beam at tissues that you want to destroy, such as tumor cells. Ideally, the targeted cells will be vaporized, so whether or not UV light induces mutations in them is a moot point.
I do personally love the ironic possibility of using a beam of focused sunlight to destroy a melanoma caused by too much exposure to sunlight, though.
"FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."