Is Louder Better?
GoodNicsTken writes "Rip Rowan over at prorec.com did an
analysis of 5 different Rush CD's released from 1984 to 2002. The results show a definite trend in the recording/mastering style from each album. Rip contends that louder is not necessarily better as the record execs believe. The artist however, is often left with little choice in the matter."
Now that is one tough, durable fellow. I would have split my own head open with a .44 slug by the start of the third album.
Air Supply, now there was a real band! ;)
'nuff said! ;-]
"Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
Did anyone else shudder at the thought of 5 Rush Limbaugh CDs?
no comment
Well, it's one louder, isn't it? It's not ten. You see, most blokes, you know, will be playing at ten. You're on ten here, all the way up, all the way up, all the way up, you're on ten on your guitar. Where can you go from there? Where?
RRRRR, matey.
Rip Rowan recounts rummaging Rush recordings.
Best Windows Freeware
And don't forget that every Canadian decibel is almost two American decibels.
> One example is the song "Here Comes the Pain" on Slayer's latest album.
> I can barely make it past the intro because it simply sounds so terrible.
Probably that's why it's called "Here Comes the Pain"..
No, of course louder isn't better. What rock 'n' roll music clearly needs is more cowbell.
All you need to do is to get the TK421 modification for your amp and everything will sound much better.
my sig
I took it all for granted; how was I to know?
There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
Starting to get spooky, isn't it.
As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.