Perl 1.0?
James A. A. Joyce writes "The title says it all. There's a tiny blurb over at dev.perl.org.
Download Perl 1.0 here, for all of those nostalgics in the Slashdot audience! It's only 263KB, so why not give this piece of 1980s computing history a try?"
so why not give this piece of 1980s computing history a try?
Because I can't actually do anything with it?
so why not give this piece of 1980s computing history a try?
Or yould do as the C programmers do and still be left in the 70's.
I submitted this story almost 20 years ago!
Do you even lift?
These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.
There still isn't a switch statement you know... Well, not in perl 5 anyway. There'll be one in perl 6.
(oh, 5.8 has "use Switch;", but that's cheating)
All the power of QBasic, the readability of assembly, and the flexibility of DOS batch scripting...
(Apol. to all the offended nostalgics :)
Q.
Insert Signature Here
If you've actually *USED* Python, you'll find that it's a benefit, not a problem. Enforced readability through the language is good. You should stick to a coding style anyway when you're working on a large project with several people (something you may not have done if you've no significant commercial programming under your belt).
Having Python choose that style for you is a terrific readability benefit compared to something like Perl. It makes decyphering other people's Python code very very easy. It may not be exactly what you like - but I think it's a big win in the long run.
What will you complain about next? Having to use squiggly brackets in C? Having to press enter on the command line?
As someone who uses perl quite a bit, using this 1.0 gave me a line I've seen before only in my nightmares:
Aaaaaggghh! Must ... have ... warnings ...
There are certainly hashes in Perl 1. See hash.[ch], for example.
Did you file a bug report for your Makefile issue? Richard Clamp is maintaining this version.
how to invest, a novice's guide