Gateway Portable MP3 Player
dcsmith writes "Gateway has announced the Gateway Digital Audio Player, a 1.5-ounce USB device that also provides portable storage and voice recording. The device is curently available in a 128MB model priced at $129.99, with a 256MB model priced at $169.99 scheduled to debut on 14 August." The Gateway store has a picture. No mention of DRM.
A decent MP3 player, 128MB with FM/AM tuner, tends to run between $100-130 USD: iRock 830
So basically, this Gateway offering is no more impressive then your run-of-the-mill 128MB MP3 player. All it adds is voice recording and the ability to use it for portable storage (which is handy, but at only 128-256MB doesn't impress me enough to buy it). However, you could buy a 20GB portable USB HDD and any other 128MB MP3 player for about $250 USD all together, which is only $80 more then their 256MB model.
Verdict:
A. For $170 you can get a 256MB MP3 player with a voice recorder.
B. For $250 you can get a 128MB MP3 player and a 20GB external drive.
C. You could just buy a 20GB MP3 player for $240 USD: Archos Jukebox Recorder 20
...until the blurb includes "ogg vorbis."
Every company under the sun makes an el cheapo MP3 player. Even Nike!
Why this is frontpage news? Is it the size or is it the fact that is records voice as well? I'm not trolling, really honestly trying to figure out what the supercool part is.
"Look! There! Evil, pure and simple from the Eighth Dimension!" --Buckaroo Banzai
What Product Manager OK'd this?
Imagine, People at Gateway actually sat around a table with a white board in a conference room someone that probably smelled like day old coffee and stale garlic bagels, and thought that this functionality, at these prices (!) would launch Gateway competitively into the MP3 player market.
It makes the mind hurl...
"oohhh... I didn't know Schopenhauer was a philosopher!"
looks like a repackaged version of creative's muvo, which means it uses its own proprietary USB key that has the controls on it. why can't someone make a little mp3 player that is basically the buttons and headphone jack into which one plugs an ordinary USB-keydrive? that way one could keep a couple keydrives around and swap them.
so Gateway products have two categories. Gateway recommended and Gateway not recommended.
The article doesn't mention DRM because there isn't any to speak of. The device shows up as a drive letter and any MP3 or WMA in the music folder is seen by the player. It doesn't even ship with any special software aside from a voice file converter and an icon editor... pretty decent.
nonsig. unsig. desig.
Why spent $170 for 256 megs of space? I can spent less than double and get a faster transfer (firewire compared with USB 1.1) and 10 gigs of space with an iPod. That just doesn't make cents. An iPod is a much better deal.
The appeal is the size. Look at it, it's 128mb and 1.5 ounces. It's so super light, it could actually be put into your pocket without a big square lump. I haven't seen a lot of MP3 players, but this looks to be one of the smaller ones out there. And the fact that it can double as your geek-kit-driver-holder is pretty neat.
Im not even a mac fan and ide rather buy an ipod.
I'll take a look at this as soon as it gets to 5 gigs in capacity.
If it gets to 10, then I'll really start paying attention, and start comparing it to the iPod.
But sheesh. If you've experienced a player with capacity measured in gigs, then it's hard to seriously consider devices that are measured in (albiet high) megabytes.
256 megs? I couldn't fit more than 3 albums and a few big audiobooks on that. Which is still a lot, I guess... But still not nearly as wonderfully flexible as my 15 gig iPod.
Helluva lot cheaper though!
no thanks
These are Gateway customers we're talking about. Basically, people who have no idea how to buy a computer or computer accessories. When a friendly Gateway sales representative says "would you like to throw in an mp3 player for just $129.99?", lots of people are going to go for it.
--
the strongest word is still the word "free"
Honestly, what good is 128 meg? This is barely a CD or 2 at high quality MP3.
Compare this to the original iPod with 5 Gig of storage.
Seems like it's only good for short trips to the gym but not much else.
- Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
There are TONS of other small mp3 players like this... it's really nothing new...
0 06RVH3/104-5806291-7855108?v=glance&me=ATVPDKIKX0D ER
2 000/R eviews/product/read_product/1,7235,3310,00.html
RipFlash http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B00
Irock 520
http://hardwarecentral.dealtime.com/dealtime
Sony NW MS9
http://sudhian.dealtime.com/xPR-Sony_NW_MS9
The list goes on and on...
Just search google... Like I did....
A friend of mine called from 2000 looking for a state of the art mp3 player. Even at 1.5 ounces the shipping is going to be hell.
-a
"The plural of anecdote is not data." -- Roger Brinner
I have one of the original 5GB iPods and still enjoy it very much. I could not imagine having anything less than 5GB in an mp3 player because I don't want to deal with changing out tunes every other day. As far as size is concerned, smaller size is better to a point. Like the palm OS watch, smaller can be bad. The size of the iPod fits nicely in my hand, it's easy to access everything and the weight is substantial - giving a sense of quality. I always thought the palmV was about the best form factor for the same reasons.<br><br>Don't even get me started on my disdain for Gateway in general... 3 family members have been disappointed to various degrees with their quality and service. Just my .02!
Can you do impact sports with one? Even running isn't recommended. For me, and many others, one of the biggest uses of a portal player is for running. While there isn't anything fantastic about the Gateway player it is in a different class than the ipod. Hard disk based players and flash based players shouldn't be compared on storage...
One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
This looks very much like the Cenodyn Gruvstick. Apparently the internals of the Gruvstick are in a ton of products, I wonder if that ist he case here.
The Gruvstick is a great MP3 player, for what it is worth (replace the headphones that come with it though).
Did you read the pages you linked to? They all say Gateway 2000 (the computer maker) lost, and Gateway.com (The "little guy") won. I couldn't find anything online about Gateway 2000 "stealing" the domain. I couldn't find anything about how they ended up getting it, either. Anyone know what happened? I would suspect they may have bought it from him, but your guess is as good as mine.
666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
This is much better than my $100 CD MP3 player that holds 700MB at a cost of $0.20 per media and has never skipped even while jogging, thanks to loading songs into cache RAM and spinning down! /sarcasm
I don't understand why so many people are comparing this to hard drive or CDr based mp3 players. It's like comparing SATA Hard drives to DDR Memory. Sure, the hard drive based players are a "better deal", but only if you're willing to cart around the extra weight, and aren't the clumsy type.
Personally, I prefer my car deck that plays mp3s from CDr's, because I don't need to listen to music when walking from my car to my home or office (yes, I know, I should jog/bike/walk more, sue me). But I can't compare it's price or features to any other type of player.
666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
Well, I was just waiting for you to tell me when it was over...
Seriously, this is nothing that you (or anyone else, for that matter) can decide or declare and make it so. It is for the market to decide. There's no timetable for when Vorbis must catch on. And it doesn't necessarily mean one must win and the other lose. All there needs to be is sufficient interest in the format to make it compelling for player makers to include the codec for Vorbis along with their MP3 support (etc.). It might never happen, but it certainly won't if you simply decide it won't and quit.
I agree it is tiring to see the same old things over and over on Slashdot when this comes up. That includes post such as yours declaring that Vorbis "didn't make it." Sorry, not your call to make.
This looks like the MP3 player I just got for AU$200 (US$130). Teh only place I listen to MP3s anymore is in the car and for some reason the car has a cassette deck. I've got a cheap walkman to cassette adapters but it makes me wonder why someone hasn't made an mp3 player the right size to fit in a car radio. With the right sensors, you could trun the tape direction control into a skip to the next one, and turn off when the caspin stops spining. That way I could take the MP3 player in to the house, load it full of stuff and when it was in the car, it would work like a smart cassette.
Math time, kids!
128/1.5 = 85 MB per oz
10240/5.6 = 1826 MB per oz
Oh, but it's cheaper, you say?
128/129 = ~ 1MB/$1
10240/299 = ~ 34MB/$1
Thanks for playing. The Gateway player is just Yet Another Mp3 Player; the non-hard-drive players are all pretty damn small and light. Some are cheaper than this, too. And no DRM.
I agree with the other posters- it's completely yawn-inspiring, and reminds me of all the other suspcious stories we've been seeing recently...like that Tivo-like unit that randomly got three paragraph's worth on the front page for no apparent reason. When are slashdot editors going to realize they're being taken advantage of?(I'm politely assuming they're not doing product placements).
Please help metamoderate.