Slashdot Mirror


Following the Spam Trail

An anonymous reader writes "MSNBC's Bob Sullivan doggedly follows a spam trail from Alabama to Argentina to find out who actually benefits from spam. The beneficiaries aren't necessarily the pasty faced, high school drop out industrial spammers we have gotten to know, but well known companies."

13 of 232 comments (clear)

  1. Get Spammed Thru An Anti-Spam Article! by webguru4god · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you look towards the bottom of the MSNBC page linked in the story, there is a form that allows you to submit your spam stories, which asks for your name, hometown, phone number and e-mail address. Now what does MSNBC need with that information, in relation to your experiences with spam? Seems fishy to me...

  2. Statement of the obvious by Gherald · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The beneficiaries aren't necessarily the pasty faced, high school drop out industrial spammers we have gotten to know, but well known companies.

    Wow, like we hadn't figured that out already.

    All commercial advertising, SPAM included, benefits companies.

    Individual spammers are just pawns like their more respectable counterparts in the legitemate marketing industry.

  3. Obviously by dragonfly_blue · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Someone must be benefitting if they can afford to make me this kind of offer.

    Greetings,

    We need a vendor who can offer immediate supply.

    I'm offering $5,000 US dollars just for referring a vender which is (Actually RELIABLE in providing the below equipment) Contact details of vendor required, including name and phone #. If they turn out to be reliable in supplying the below equipment I'll immediately pay you $5,000. We prefer to work with vendor in the Boston/New York area.

    1. The mind warper generation 4 Dimensional Warp Generator # 52 4350a series wrist watch with z80 or better memory adapter. If in stock the AMD Dimensional Warp Generator module containing the GRC79 induction motor, two I80200 warp stabilizers, 256GB of SRAM, and two Analog Devices isolinear modules, This unit also has a menu driven GUI accessible on the front panel XID display. All in 1 units would be great if reliable models are available

    2. The special 23200 or Acme 5X24 series time transducing capacitor with built in temporal displacement. Needed with complete jumper/auxiliary system

    3. A reliable crystal Ionizor with unlimited memory backup.

    4. I will also pay for Schematics, layouts, and designs directly from the manufature which can be used to build this equipment from readily available parts.

    If your vendor turns out to be reliable, I owe you $5,000.

    Email his details to me at: info@federalfundingprogram.com

    Please do not reply directly back to this email as it will only be bounced back to you.

    Anyone else get this one? =P

    --
    Free music from Jack Merlot.
    1. Re:Obviously by Arker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Several times. I couldn't figure out what the scam was so I did some googling. Apparently the guy sending them out is a bit... different. He really seems to believe that some time-traveling bad-guys ruined his life and caused him health and other problems. He seems to believe there are actually many time-travellers on earth at the moment, and wants to get a machine so he can travel back in time and undo the horrid stuff they did to him as a child.

      Numerous folk have corresponded with him and he's made the deal many times, but somehow the bad guys always seem to nab his seller at the last moment. Poor guy.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  4. what I want to know is.... by inode_buddha · · Score: 4, Interesting

    how many "middle men" are in the typical spam food chain, playing the percentages. Extra bonuses for network names, IP addys, hosting providers, etc. And also, why don't these large companies have the balls to just do it directly, themselves? /me thinks they are much like the Wizard of Oz, in this regard.

    --
    C|N>K
  5. fighting back by gclef · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm becoming more and more convinced that the only effective way to fight back is to spam the spammers. Not via email, but via their customer databases. Take the example of from this article: the spammers get paid for every lead they generate. But, if just 1% of the people who got the spam went to the site and *lied* about their identity, and their interest, the value of the list containing their info would go down so much as to make it worthless. Even if .1% of the people did this, it would dramatically reduce the value of such customer lists. That's the only way to stop spam, from what I can see: make it no longer economically viable.

  6. MSNBC Got lots of people canned by Cade144 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    According to the story, it seems like MSNBC was responsible for the termination of at least three business relations between "Legitimate" companies and spammers.
    If only more news outlets traced their spam the same way, it could put a dent in the demand for spam.

    Who am I kidding? Those spammers, er "lead generators" will go right back to work, selling to anyone who will buy, no questions asked. As long as businesses will pay for personal information, there will be plenty of weasels to sell it to them.

  7. SPAM will end when... by ansak · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The really telling remarks came in the final paragraph:
    "The only thing that's going to make spam go away is if people do not respond," he said. "When e-mail first started, you could send out 50,000 e-mails a day and make money. Now you have to invest a lot of money and time, you get a return rate of less than one-tenth of one percent. One day it will become so you can't send enough to make any money. And that's the only thing that will stop spam."
    0.1% and it's still profitable... sheesh! Won't it be nice when it becomes 1 part in a trillion and the race comes of age in e-mail usage.

    and it's always about the money...ank

    --
    Still hoping for Gentle Treatment...
  8. Microsoft & others want to spam too - legally by leoaugust · · Score: 4, Interesting

    as this was a a mortage related spam - aka respectable spam - as opposed to the unrespectable spam like "enlarge ..." spam, it is not too off track to show how the big corporations are lobbying for the ability to send spam directly rather than thru these layers ...

    It is also very interesting that the big companies like Microsoft are paying lobbyists for laws that shall allow them to send spam, on the pretext that if only their spam is identified as spam it is no longer spam. I might give my email id to a Microsoft division, and then without my permission it is available to all the divisions of microsoft - even if I have no interest in all their products save one for which I gave my email - so isn't all the unrelated email they send me now spam ???

    What the big companies want to do is to send spam themselves, but prevent others from sending it. All knowing that spam is dirt cheap tool for sales, but there is only so much spam a consumer can take before the backlash hurts all spammers ...

    it is pure and simple application of game theory - when it becomes lucrative enough for the politicians, they will step into it too ...

    --
    To see a world in a grain of sand, and then to step back and see the beach where the sand lies ...
  9. Fight spam by replying to it? by owlmon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The article describes how "affiliates" get paid for supplying information gleaned from people who respond to spam e-mails.

    This suggests that the economics of spamming could be disrupted rather easily if large numbers of folks would helpfully supply the information that the spammers seek.

    Think about it. What would happen if every time a slashdotter got a spam, he responded with all the personal information (randomized, of course) that the spammer requested? The article used the example of a web form that the spamee was invited to fill in with his mortgage information.

    A perl script could generate a lot of fills to the web form in a short period of time.

    In the short term, affiliates would make extra money by selling truckloads of (phony) personal information. But within a few monthes, the large companies that pay for that information would wise up. That's when the spam economy would start to suffer.

    This strategy is only interesting to those of us that have good spam filters in place. I'm getting very good results with bogofilter now. I believe that I could "survive" the major spam wave that would result if I employed this strategy. But this strategy would be a lot more effective if I had some company.

  10. English translation - Pick up the phone. by MisterMoney · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Registrant Organization: Zonda Sistemas S.A..
    Address: Callao 1253
    City: Postal Buenos Aires
    Postal Code: 1024
    Country: Argentina
    Telephone: 4803-3824
    Fax: 4803-3824
    Main Activity: Systems

    Responsible Person: Alberto Meyer Robert
    Address: Callao 1253
    City: Postal Buenos Aires
    Postal Code: 1024
    Country: Argentina
    Telephone: 4803-3824
    Hour Contact: 10-18

    Date of recording: 20/01/2003
    Organization Administrator: Zonda Sistemas S.A..
    Address: Callao 1253
    City: Buenos Aires
    Postal Code: 1024
    Country: Argentina
    Telephone: 4803-3824
    Fax: 4803-3824
    Main Activity: Systems

    Tecnicnal Contact: Alberto Meyer Robert
    Address: Callao 1253
    City: Buenos Aires
    Postal Code: 1024
    Country: Argentina
    Telephone: 4803-3824
    Hour Contact: 10-18
    Fax: 4803-3824

    Servants of Name of Dominion

    Primary Servant of Names:
    Name: ns.super-zonda.com
    Direction IP:

    Secondary servant of Names:
    Name: ns1.super-zonda.com
    Direction IP:

    Third Servant of Names:
    Name: ns2.super-zonda.com
    Direction IP:

    Fourth Servant of Names:
    Name: ns3.super-zonda.com
    Direction IP:

    personal note - i kinda like the sound of 'Primary Servant of Names' over 'name server one'.

  11. Use of FormFucker to spam spammers' web sites by Huusker · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The only effective way to fight back is to spam the spammers. Not via email, but via their customer databases.

    There is a utility called FormFucker which spams web forms.

    It analyzes the web form and then makes 1000s of submissions using realistic-looking but fake names, addresses, zip codes, telephone numbers, credit card numbers, etc.

    Note that use of FF is very controversial, as many consider it fighting-abuse-with-abuse.

  12. Spam, the Mob, and RICO by gbulmash · · Score: 4, Interesting
    A number of years ago, back when Sanford Wallace was still the self-proclaimed spam king, I did a little detective work... locating his mother's phone number.

    I'd started building an anti-spam site (I was going to call it "Spamintology") and I was planning to launch it with the number up front, suggesting that people call her to tell her what a bad boy her son was.

    But I didn't. Because after the visions of glory, I had visions of my own mother's phone ringing off the hook as spammers called her to complain about me. And that's when I cancelled my plans for the site.

    These spammers are often criminals, and always scumbags. If you really start to hurt them, hit them where they live, you risk them trying to hurt you back. That's why I decided to abandon my crusade, because I wasn't so altruistic as to put myself and my family in the line of virtual fire for the sake of zinging Spamford.

    Some spam will be stopped by current anti-spam laws under proposal, but the only way to truly stop spam is going to be to take it out of the hands of the FTC and put it into the hands of the FBI. Spam will slow when we see spammers on the evening news, walking into federal courthouses to defend themselves against RICO charges like John Gotti.

    If we put together an FBI Anti-Spam unit on par with the FBI's Organized Crime unit at its height, we'd see spam decrease and the nightly news would be entertaining again... for a while.

    - Greg