Slashdot Mirror


Surviving Slashdotting with a Small Server

S.BartFarst writes "Our little departmental server has been slashdotted twice in the last year and survived! Implementation of a two-headed redundant hardware scheme using linux virtual server and backup and failover capabilities enhanced by the linux high-availability tools has produced a nifty low-cost solution. Gotta love those little white boxes! (also having a university-supplied BIG PIPE doesn't hurt). More interesting is the documentation of the apparent exponentially decaying attention span of slashdotters. Anybody else observed similar phenomena?"

18 of 307 comments (clear)

  1. Third Time's a Charm? by sweeney37 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Our little departmental server has been slashdotted twice in the last year and survived!

    Wait... is this a challenge?

    Mike

    1. Re:Third Time's a Charm? by bad_fx · · Score: 3, Funny
  2. Apparently... by yanbusa · · Score: 5, Funny

    They are asking for another test.

    --
    What's in a sig?
  3. Thou shall not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thou shall not survive thrice. You're insolence will not be tolerated. You'll servers will suffer a slashdotting not hence seen....

    1. Re:Thou shall not by Sethus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you sure this is the third time? I count five...

      [Arthur, King of the Britons] One, Two, Five!
      [Knight] Three, Sir!
      [Arthur, King of the Britons] Three!
      **HALLELUIAH**
      *BooM*

      --
      Posting with out proof reading since 2001.
  4. A.D.D. crowd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    More interesting is the documentation of the apparent exponentially decaying attention span of slashdotters.

    Well, I was gonna reply, but I forgot what the post was about.

    1. Re:A.D.D. crowd by macshune · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think the decaying attention spans of slashdot users has to do with the rise of modern media and the fast-paced moving images in the contemporary media paradigm. Further, I think that A.D.D. is the result of HEY!!! LET'S GO SWING!!!!!!

  5. A slashdotting? by Chmarr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just under 40,000 hits in the busiest day... this is a slashdotting? Come back when you get into the millions. :)

  6. Nope... by ryanvm · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anybody else observed similar phenomena?

    Nope. In our jobs they make us do work.

  7. The Slashdot worm. by caluml · · Score: 4, Funny

    Lets help them out.

    while :; do wget http://www.geology.smu.edu/~dpa-www/venus/mpeg/atl a1.mpg -O /dev/null -o /dev/null ; done

    Don't forget to fix the space in the URL.

    1. Re:The Slashdot worm. by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      i already posted mine before i saw yours. my solution was

      while true
      do
      wget --delete-after -m -p http://www.geology.smu.edu/
      done

      which has the advantage of not only hammering their bandwidth, but since it requests everything on the entire site, including images and many multiple mb files, then the server cant cache it all, and will have to read from the disk alot. also, since it deletes after downloading, it doesn't take up your precious drive space, lol.

      but nice to know another sick fucker had the same basic idea.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  8. Testing, testing... by Mish · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're just begging for a 'real' test... ... such as everyone downloading this:

    ar405eng.exe (5.41 MB)

    from their webserver :p

    5.41MB per slashdot reader should provide a test worth of such a fat pipe ;)

  9. Re:Here are the testing materials by in7ane · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mod the parent up!!!

    And download those MPEGs...

  10. Re:Clever, clever by ashitaka · · Score: 4, Funny

    Feel sorry for them on Monday morning though...

    Monday morning!!?? You're kidding, right?

    They have already noticed the "exponentially decaying attention span" of Slashdotters.

    By Monday morning this story and the site will be relegated to un-clicked graveyard of "Older Stuff"

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  11. exponentially decaying attention span? by jazman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not sure how you get that from the graph. For myself, I didn't know what the subject matter was, so I opened the window, went "ugh, geology", and closed it more or less straight away. Ok, perhaps this proves the point - for subjects I'm not interested in I have a short attention span, but this doesn't mean I have a SAS for everything.

    You get an exponentially decaying number of hits, yes, but how many of those are people doing exactly what I did and not staying, as opposed to those who stay a while because they find geology interesting?

    The last time you were /.ted, did the graph decay at the same rate or did it take longer to go down? If it took longer that would suggest shortening ASs, but then did you have anything of special interest up at the time? Bung some pr0n up there and see if the, er, bulge is a different shape.

  12. exponentially decaying attention by QEDog · · Score: 3, Funny
    "exponentially decaying attention span of slashdotters"

    It is called Geek A.D.D.

    --
    "There is no teacher but the enemy."-Mazer Rackham
  13. Re:Clever, clever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Commander Taco will repost it on Tuesday....

  14. Re:Probably a dumb question by limbostar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Slashdot doesn't serve much in the way of images -- most of the content is textual -- so the bandwidth doesn't fill up as easily as it would if they were serving movies.

    The server configuration is designed to handle the load, with multiple servers, load-balanced arrays, that sort of thing, whereas the people they link to are typically running on shared servers, or have only a single server.

    Slashdot uses cached pages to avoid hitting the DB on every page load (mostly for the front pages), whereas smaller sites can get away with making a direct connection and doing more processor-intensive queries. Until they get linked by a site like Slashdot, anyway.

    Slashdot's DB server is most likely of the 'fire-breathing god' variety, able to handle standard Slashdot traffic without too much difficulty. Smaller sites typically have the database server on the same machine as the webserver, and sometimes both are shared.

    In general, it's all a matter of configuration. When you run a moderately successful small site, you're generally prepared for the amount of traffic you have, plus or minus 50%. Traffic generally grows slowly, so you have time to make adjustments when things start to get tight.

    When Slashdot links your site, you get a huge influx of traffic to a site that is designed to handle a tiny fraction of that traffic. It leads to badness.

    It's like trying to put an elephant into your freezer. If you're prepared for it, you have a big walk-in freezer. But most sites only need a small half-height fridge to keep their beer cold.

    --
    this is a sig.