Slashdot Mirror


SCO Announces Final Termination of IBM's Licence

ickle_matt writes "SCO have announced the final termination of IBM's UNIX license, despite Novell telling them they can't. Interestingly enough there's a new set of "stolen code" figures in the release - 'approximately 148 files of direct Sequent UNIX code to the Linux 2.4 and 2.5 kernels, containing 168,276 lines of code. This Sequent code is critical NUMA and RCU multi-processor code previously lacking in Linux. Sequent-IBM has also contributed significant UNIX-based development methods to Linux in addition to the direct lines of code specified above.' "

3 of 807 comments (clear)

  1. contents of letter notification sent by SCO to IBM by cswiii · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    helo IBM
    ehehh1!1 j00 R t3h 0wn3d!!11
    u will nevar figuor out who t00k u down!!
    LEENUX SUX!!

    SCO

    ps NYEAH!!1

  2. Re:Official notice of your Poor Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    PoorPost Form v. 0.1

    Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.

    [] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
    () You post simply used M$ instead of MS
    () You went back to beating the Windows security dead horse
    () You made a tired SCO joke
    () You made a Jon Katz joke (who?)
    () MS blowz, linux rules (or a variant)
    () You made an unoriginal joke about Slashdotting (servers turning to powder, melting, etc.)
    () Other (please comment here: )

    [] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it
    is neither of the three. This is because:
    () You stated the obvious
    () You simply tossed out lots of five-dollar words
    () It was in response to a poorly-written post or troll
    () You copied text from a previous post that really might have been one of the three I's
    () You simply criticized Microsoft without making it funny
    () It is bloated with unnecessary technical claptrap
    () All you did was pose questions (like a stoner)
    () All you did was pose questions (like a lawyer)

    [*] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
    () You are an asterisk who has, knowing the story's release time in advance, pounceposted to get first p0st and get modded up early
    () You are one of the editors and are getting your ass kissed
    () One of your fans has weighed in for you
    () One of the editors has blessed it with an "underrated"
    () You created a long, dumb ass form, showing you have nothing worthwhile to do with your life.
    (*) You merely copied the parent post and added nothing but a minor tweak.

    [*] Additional comments:
    Go die.
    Thanks for posting! Better luck next time! :)

    ( This form is currently in alpha and probably should never be used again as it was a very stupid idea. )

  3. Re:Matching Source code found!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    PoorPost Form v. 0.1

    Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.

    [] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:

    () You post simply used M$ instead of MS

    () You went back to beating the Windows security dead horse

    () You made a tired SCO joke

    () You made a Jon Katz joke (who?)

    () MS blowz, linux rules (or a variant)

    () You made an unoriginal joke about Slashdotting (servers turning to powder, melting, etc.)

    () Other (please comment here: )

    [] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it
    is neither of the three. This is because:

    () You stated the obvious

    () You simply tossed out lots of five-dollar words

    () It was in response to a poorly-written post or troll

    () You copied text from a previous post that really might have been one of the three I's

    () You simply criticized Microsoft without making it funny

    () It is bloated with unnecessary technical claptrap

    () All you did was pose questions (like a stoner)

    () All you did was pose questions (like a lawyer)

    [*] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:

    () You are an asterisk who has, knowing the story's release time in advance, pounceposted to get first p0st and get modded up early

    () You are one of the editors and are getting your ass kissed

    () One of your fans has weighed in for you

    () One of the editors has blessed it with an "underrated"

    (*) You created a long, dumb ass form, showing you have nothing worthwhile to do with your life.

    [*] Additional comments:

    Go die.
    Thanks for posting! Better luck next time! :)

    ( This form is currently in alpha and probably should never be used again as it was a very stupid idea. )