Slashdot Mirror


US Military Develops P2P Wireless Network Sniffer

Merlin83 writes "As being reported on The Register, the US Military is developing a new system for monitoring enemy battlefield communication. Called WolfPack, each node is a 6"x4" cylinder, launched by missile or dropped from aircraft. Once the node lands, it stands up, extends its antenna and contacts other nodes. The nodes can also jam cellular communications by transmitting a signal themselves. "

43 of 299 comments (clear)

  1. RIAA by sik0fewl · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would've thought the RIAA would've been ahead of the US military on this one.

    --
    I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
  2. Guess they've figured out how to get around these by luzrek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Considering how dependant the US military is on high tech communications, I'm guessing we are only hearing about this because they have figured out how to get around something like this. Anyone care to speculate on what that is?

    --

    Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

  3. Small and cylindrical? by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 5, Funny

    Radar Tech: Sir! The radar, sir! It appears to be... jammed!
    Dark Helmet: Jammed... Raspberry!

  4. Homebrew Cellular Phone Jammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Schematics and technical info here:

    Cellular Phone Jammers

  5. Can you... by hussain · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..hear me now? boom!

  6. P2P? by The+Bungi · · Score: 5, Funny
    [sgt] deploy the WolfPack
    [pvt] roger
    [pvt] stand by...

    aol_grl has joined #battlefield

    [aol_grl] h3y guyz!!!
    [aol_grl] 17/f/s
    [aol_grl] u wanna ch^7??
    [pvt] oh shit
    [sgt] get out of here bitch, we're trying to fight a war

    [aol_grl] aol_grl sends roses to sgt @-`,-`,--

    [aol_grl] dont b a poop mouth!!!

    [aol_grl] any1 now how2 make the mouse go faster??????
    [aol_grl] my pC is *really* sloooowwww
    [aol_grl] whatz wolfpack???
    [aol_grl] imagine a Beowulf cluster of those!!! hahahaha!!!
    aol_grl giggles madly

    sgt has left #battlefield
    pvt has left #battlefield

    [aol_grl]>>> guyz???
  7. Does it run Linux? by don_carnage · · Score: 4, Funny

    Each device, which runs on battery, should last approximately two months. When possible, devices can be recovered and reused. The cost of each is estimated at $10,000.

    $10,000??!! I bet there are plenty of Linux geeks around Slashdot that could do it for a fraction of that! ;^)

    1. Re:Does it run Linux? by avalys · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, let's see - it's a 6' by 4' metal cylinder, that has to be dropped from an airplane or launched and deployed from a missile into a possibly hostile environment (hot/cold/dusty/wet), yet still reliably remain intact enough to right itself on a surface that is most likely not flat, deploy its antenna and function for two months off a single battery charge.

      $10,000 sounds like a bargain.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Does it run Linux? by devphil · · Score: 4, Funny


      And the average /. reader is probably also cylidrically shaped, too, just like the canisters.

      When dropped from a height, if your first reactions are to stand up, contact other geeks, and begin finding local networks, then yes, Uncle Sam Wants You!

      --
      You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  8. Imagine a... by jaxdahl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    beowulf cluster of these! No. Seriously. Could you have a impromptu cellular network be put up, perhaps in the Niagara-Mohawk area if power goes out again and the cell-phone tower generators run out of fuel?

  9. Not a smart move by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wouldn't think that the US would want something like this to exist. Think what some of these could do in a large city.

    And they propose to drop them on the ground in unfriendly areas, where anyone can come along and pick them up!

    -1 Idiotic

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    1. Re:Not a smart move by krisp · · Score: 4, Funny

      Come on! this is the US military! Im sure they have some sort of safe guards against that sort of .. oh nevermind.

    2. Re:Not a smart move by homer_ca · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's not much secret about radio. Most HAMs could probably rig up a big dumb 800Mhz or 1900Mhz transmitter that'll kill cellular service for a big area. Then again we get shitty signal anyway, most people wouldn't think anything was wrong. They'd just drive another mile down the road until it worked.

  10. Why the limitation? by The+Old+Burke · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ..for monitoring enemy battlefield communication..

    Why limit the system to only battlefield? I mean if this works for the US Military it is also usefull in a more civill environment.
    The Army could license the technology to companies and earn in some of those tax dollars.
    This has happened before with a lot of tech and it could happen again. Just think about the possibilities in for example the fight against terror.

    --
    Proud patriot and republican voter.
    1. Re:Why the limitation? by bourne · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why limit the system to only battlefield?

      Because in a civil environment, we call devices that allow eavesdropping and jamming of communications "cell towers" and "central offices."

      Seriously, something like this is designed to intrude into an area of no control or hostile control. The civil scenario you describe is one where the authorities have control, and have laws requiring the telecom carriers to allow access to the infrastructure in certain circumstances. No need to drop pringles cans.

  11. Dare I say it? by ivanmarsh · · Score: 4, Funny

    WAN-mines?

  12. How Interesting by Brew+Bird · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Picture now that these devices are equiped not only with wireless, but also with infrared and motion sensors.

    Slave these to a smart 'expert' system, that creates a 'map' of the area over which they have been spread. Now you can 'see' when anyone intrudes into that area.

    Slave THAT to some artilery (or better yet, a jeep towed high energy rail gun ;) ), and you have just created a mine field that can be abandond without worring about hurting civilians afterwards.

    I wrote a high end overview of such a system for my technical writing class in 1989... As I recall, I got a 'D' for it, because my diagrams were not good enough. Ahh, I wish I could have had Visio back then!

    1. Re:How Interesting by MarcQuadra · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's also a miefield that can be taken out by a sharpshooter from 1KM away. All you'd have to do is shoot these things. I'm pretty sure they're not invisible.

      I think custom-camouflage would be good for this sort of thing. Just drop a bunch of these in individualized 'rock' shells that blend in in Afghanistan, etc.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    2. Re:How Interesting by Brew+Bird · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not if you can make them cheap enough that you can have considerable overlap in coverage.

      if your maximum p2p range is 500 feet, and you have dropped these sensors every 100 feet, it would take a sharpshooter a LOT of ammo to make a big enough hole in this thing to sneak through... and by then, someone has already noticed that sensors have started malfunctioning in a strange way...

  13. Moderators on crack by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Together, they are cheaper, less like a huge warm cock and a much less obvious target for enemy intervention than the aircraft-based systems used to jam or monitor communications at the moment.

    This is informative?

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  14. what is it? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 5, Funny
    Officer: "Sir, it appears to be an Imperial probe droid."

    Commander: "That's it, everybody, shut down Kazaa, the RIAA has found our base!"

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  15. I think I see the problem by vevva · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The countermeasure is surely too straightforward - send a bunch of kids out to collect them.

    Unless they are fitted with antipersonnel devices (looking unlikely given the current trend towards banning cluster munitions) they will make nice souvenirs of the conflict.

    2 days after they are released in the wild we'll be bidding for them on eBay.

  16. Seems like an unfortunate choice of name by mkweise · · Score: 4, Informative

    The term Wolfpack will forever be associated with the Nazi German Kriegsmarine.

    --
    Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the War Room!
  17. Re:Guess they've figured out how to get around the by chill · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Proprietary frequencies? (non-cellular standard)

    Digital communications with IFF that are ignored by the jammers? Like the pay-per-view stuff -- if your key code is correct, we don't jam you.

    Ultra wideband that doesn't rely on a specifig frequency.

    etc.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  18. Can I meet the man in charge of naming these? by metalhed77 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seriously, Operation Desert Storm, Tomohawk Missles, and now the Wolf Pack. Can't the army have more consumer friendly names with more pizazz.

    I nominate we rename it the Sniff 'n Shout. Or something in that vein

    --
    Photos.
  19. Funny how the US develops technology... by WegianWarrior · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...that seems to be mainly aimed at countering themselfs.

    Wait, don't mod me down just yet; let me elaborate on that. Basicly, you have two situations when in a military conflict: Either you are invading, in which cause you depend on mobile, wireless communication. Or you're defending, and that means most of the time relying on fixed lines of communication (fiberoptic cables buried deep in the ground is a favorite). Now, if you're using fixed lines of communications, you don't have to worry to much about these. Sure, some forms of landlines are radiates energy that can be detected by the 'wolfpack', but I've yet to hear about any armed forces worth it's salt that don't use encryption these days. If you're attacking however, you need to carry your own coms. Most armed forces don't roll in money the way the US forces do, so most forces has to rely on older equipment, like the good old AN/PRC-77. And those can't be affected by a jammer designed to knock out cellular transmittions.

    On the lighter side, how long until the troops use this P2P-network to share violent videos and hard porn?

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    1. Re:Funny how the US develops technology... by E-Rock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's all good and well, except that the first thing you do when you invade is destroy those fixed lines of communication. Even if these fixed lines are made impregnable, commands to the field still need to be transmitted to mobile units. I also wouldn't assume that the full details of what these units can do was laid out in the very brief news article.

  20. More questionable govt garbage (Pork?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Why is it that the people in uniform are ignored when they ask for some practical things like a newer fleet of air refueling tankers to replace the ageing fleet they have that is almost 40 years old, and they have to get tech toys that honestly would be useful only in urban battles in a first or second world nation, and not places like Afghanistan and the Iraqi desert? How would this have helped our people in Somalia? What about Yugoslavia? Even if we start in on a new country, it is likely to be Syria or Iran or N. Korea. If all this thing does is post a listening device and jam the signals, we have had that ability for the last 60 years.

    This looks like the results of a flashy bid for government dollars through a beurocratic bid system the values WOW glitz as higher than good ole useful application.

    1. Re:More questionable govt garbage (Pork?) by WegianWarrior · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Working in the norwegian armed forces myself - who has been trying to tell our politicans that a) running a defence costs money, b) doing a lot of operations overseas costs more, and c) we could really need more and newer fighters, preferable by 1997, and some new tanks, rifles, chemical protection suits and naval ships wouldn't be out of the way - I would say this has a simple reason.

      Buying 'more of the same' just ain't sexy enought.

      Nor does it look impressive. Telling your mistress that you signed a deal for a score of flying gasstation is not as cool as telling her you just signed a goverment contract to develop an airportable selfdeploying P2P network with cellular jamming capability.

      That, and we most not forget that the arnament industry in the western world is technologydriven. The defenceindustry comes up with something new and sexy, and off course the top brass goes along with it (see above for why). In the old eastern block, things worked (well, barly worked, but thats another matter) differently. The military went to the industry and said 'this is what we need, you have two years to come up with a solution'. Worked much better, at least as far as maintaining capabilities goes. A bit less so if your focus is on developing new capabilities thought...

      --
      Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    2. Re:More questionable govt garbage (Pork?) by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 3, Funny

      It will help us to fight off the inevitable alien invasion. Why do you think there is constant push for higher and higher tech weaponry even when the rest of the world has dropped way behind in weapons technology and R&D? It's 2012, man. That's when the fate of the mankind will be decided and we're gonna need every weapon the US military can devise.

    3. Re:More questionable govt garbage (Pork?) by bravehamster · · Score: 3, Informative
      The defenceindustry comes up with something new and sexy, and off course the top brass goes along with it


      Damn man, I thought I was cynical about the leadership during my time in service, but you take the cake. The *primary* concern of the majority of the people at the top is, and always has been, "Will this save our troops lives and/or kill more of the enemy?" Every other consideration comes after that, and if you think otherwise you're insulting the hell out of a lot of people who care deeply about the lives of the men under their command. Granted, there may be the occassional officer who thinks nothing of the lives under him, but these are a rarity.

      American troops are constantly told that they are the best equipped, most highly trained military force on the planet. Making sure that it's true is a big chunk of military morale, and is official policy. Having that equipment be "sexy" also helps with morale. Nothing is ever as simple as it seems, certainly not as simple as developing sexy military equipment to impress one's mistress.

      Give the brass *some* credit for not being total dipshits.

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
  21. Re:Guess they've figured out how to get around the by chill · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I forgot the painfully obvious one...

    The devices themselves are used as comm nodes for the U.S. military. They could forward encrypted, digital communications through the network they create.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  22. Rat Pack by Gefiltefish11 · · Score: 3, Funny


    ...The direct predecessor to the Wolf Pack system, entitled Rat Pack, was such a high-profile failure that the entire program was nearly scrapped. The Rat Pack system utilized a similar deployment methodology and communicated via high-profile meetings in Las Vegas lounges, overly-dramatic publicity stunts, and awful movies. Further problems with the Rat pack systems were encountered when the missle-deployment system could not function without shattering a glass eye that was critical to Rat Pack's functioning...

  23. Wow, I like it! by SharpFang · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just let them "bomb" you, pick it, hack it and have a cool wireless p2p box. Imagine porting Kazaa to these! :)

    Seriously, remembering times from IIWW when in occupied Warsaw people commonly made grenades from dud bombs, that thing with some technology applied, could provide great means of communication network for the enemy :)

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  24. smart dust by wannasleep · · Score: 5, Interesting

    this seems the complement of the smart dust .
    The smart dust was supposed to be a 1 cube mm sensor with some computational power that was also supposed to transmit signals. I also recall that it was supposed to cost very few $ (one?). Clearly, you do not need parachutes for it and you can just deploy thousands on the battlefield or whatever you want to spy on. I don't know if these can send such a strong signal, but I believe that if you deploy enough of them you could. And being much smaller and many thousands, they would be much harder to get rid of. However, I haven't heard of smart dust in a while. Maybe they have perfected it and started using it. Or maybe the project just died.

  25. Re:Life is starting to remind me more and more... by pontifier · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Of science fiction!

    Vernor vinge wrote about these things in his story "Fast Times at Fairmont High"

    In his story they were super small and sprinkled around to create a robust network. the only problem was cleanup when they went bad.

    --
    -John Fenley
  26. groovy by Biomechanoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    The nodes can also jam

    I was going to buy their music but after listening to it I think I will download it from KazAa in stead.

  27. Re:Guess they've figured out how to get around the by gregoryb · · Score: 4, Funny

    If someone else has similar jamming devices, doesn't the military's "workaround" involve pinpointing the device and then hitting it with a missle??

    Seems that they dealt with the GPS jammers Iraq was using by following this method in the past war. I've been unable to find references for that particular action, but I seem to remember discussing it in my signals class last spring.

  28. I'd steal em by photon317 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Units can stay powered for up to two months in the field, and can be later collected and re-used. Each node costs around $10,000.


    If I were a low-income thug and the US military invaded my country and sprayed the land with these things, I would probably run around and pick them up for resale. They start at 6x4 inches, but then they extend fins and an inflatable antenna, which should make them pretty easy targets to spot. And I bet to foreign military hands, they're worth more than the $10K they cost the US military. All things considered I could probably feed my family for 10 years by picking up 5 of them or so and selling them on the black market.
    --
    11*43+456^2
  29. Hmmm I know which country should get them first by mikerich · · Score: 4, Funny
    Any chance the US military could drop a couple of million coast to coast across the United States? Might get a decent mobile network that way.

    They could even claim it was 'field testing'.

    Best wishes,
    Mike.

  30. it WON'T impair US forces' communications by blchrist · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The military is not going to deploy something that will disrupt its own ability to communicate on the battlefield.

    from the article: without hindering US forces' own communications systems. Clearly the DoD thought this through a little more than most people here give them credit for.

    IMO this is a really cool project. All the people complaining about the gamma ray "nuke" should be happy about this method of disrupting communications without bombing things.

  31. OpenSource Version by mustangsal66 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've got the case design down pat...

    WeebleWobbles...

    They're self righting... "They weeble and they wobble, but they don't fall down"

    I even have the project name down:
    WWWWF

    (WeebleWobbles with WiFi)

    Who's With Me???

    --
    Why worry? Each of us is wearing an unlicensed "nucular" accelerator on his back.
    Sig changed for readability by G.W.
  32. Igloo White - 1966 Sensor Net (mildly OT) by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 3, Informative
    There's been suggestions by other posters about putting sensors in these cylinders and also questions about making the packages survive the drop. The fact is this has all been done before.

    The U.S. military actually used a lower tech version of the sensor net along the Ho Chi Minh Trail in 1966. The program was called "Igloo White" and involved a number of audio and seismic sensors. Check out this link and look at page 11 for details. Very interesting read.

    Some bits:

    • Initially unit cost was $2145 and battery life was two weeks. By the end of the program, the battery was improved (the paper doesn't say by how much, though) and the units costed as little as $15. Presumably, costs would drop similarly when the modern version gets fielded.
    • IBM 360-65 mainframes were used to correlate massive amounts of data and choose targets for strikes, although the effectiveness of the system (like almost everything deployed in Vietnam) was likely exagerated.
    • Some sensors were booby trapped to prevent tampering. Nevertheless, some North Vietnamese troops developed countermeasures - shooting dropped units out of trees, playing tape recordings of trucks near them, or (presumably for chemical sensors) placing bags of livestock urine nearby.
    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."