Slashdot Mirror


Movie Industry Blames Texting for Bad Box Office

cybercuzco writes "The movie industry is blaming poor sales of such movies as Gigli, The Hulk and Charlies Angels not on the fact that they were poor quality, but because people text message other people telling them that the movie stinks. Industry executives say that this undermines a carefully crafted marketing image. Expect texting to be banned by the MPAA in the near future."

16 of 1,197 comments (clear)

  1. uh yeah that's it by tlacicer · · Score: 5, Funny

    This article made me laugh more then Mario Cantone on the Denis Leary
    roast. Who thinks this stuff? Colin Quinn should get this writer on the
    payroll for tough crowd.

    --
    "A synonym is a word you use when you can't spell the word you first thought of." - Burt Bacharach
    1. Re:uh yeah that's it by B3ryllium · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think Darl McBride found a new gig as a "wild-ass-theory consultant".

    2. Re:uh yeah that's it by harley_frog · · Score: 5, Funny
      Funny, it seems like only a couple weeks ago the MPAA was blaming file sharing as the reason why Charlie's Angel's 2 tanked. What will be the MPAA's scapegoat next week? Power outages in the northeast?

      --
      It's all fun and games until someone loses the key to the handcuffs.
    3. Re:uh yeah that's it by gfxguy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your theory is all wrong, they are making bad movies so they can blame pirates for the drop at the box office. This text-messaging argument is just something to throw us off.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  2. News Flash by gurutechanimal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Word of Mouth Ruled Illegal - Film at 11

    --
    Governments are not necessary.
  3. Okay.... by X86Daddy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where's the foot icon?

  4. In other news... by Plix · · Score: 5, Funny

    Coke retroactively blames the touch-tone phone for poor sales of the New Coke.

  5. Re:Communication a problem? by bad_fx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, that's probably a lot easier than getting rid of bad movies. :)

  6. This "texting" sounds dangerous. by mcc · · Score: 5, Funny

    However, I would imagine that hollywood is by and large safe because the majority of people do not have cell phones that support "text-messaging".

    What we would really have to watch out for is if some technological renegade could come up with some way that "text messaging" messages could be encoded into normal speech, allowing people without even cell phones to "text mssage" each other warnings about bad movies simply by coming within a close physical radius. If that happens, Hollywood is doomed.

    Although I am a bit perplexed. They suggest people did not go to see Gigli because these "text messages" warned them it was a bad movie. However, I do not have a "text message" capable cell-phone, yet I knew Gigli was a bad movie anyway, becuase all the media outlets I follow had been consistently running stories for two weeks before Gigli was released warning me that it was going to be a bad movie. Perhaps this "text messaging" of which they speak has somehow hijacked cnn.com and nyt.com, causing "text messages" warning of bad movies to masquerade as normal news? Wouldn't that be illegal? Hmm.

    Clearly there is much to think about here.

  7. Re:The Movie Stinks by NivenHuH · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where is Jay Sherman when you need him.. *sigh*

    --
    Just when you make it idiotproof, some idiot builds a better idiot.
  8. Re:let's blame everything but the obvious.... by scalis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nah, people are just not doing what they are supposed to do. They listen to their friends instead of falling for the flashy commercial. I say we impose a MPAA tax on text messages to cover up the lost profits.
    Either that, or outlaw friendship.

    --

    True ravers don't need drugs
  9. Re:what I'm not going to do by mosch · · Score: 5, Funny
    This is slashdot, your response is supposed to be to download unlicensed mp3s of all 8 tracks, including the 6 that suck, download a 'FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION' divx copy of the movie, and then whine about how you'd pay for these things if they didn't suck.

    I hope you know that by reading a book, and going outside, you may lose your posting privileges.

  10. Re:Communication a problem? by Shoten · · Score: 5, Funny
    No, no, no, that couldn't be it. It must be something about the wireless gateways that translate between SMTP and SMS. For some unknown reason, the phrase
    "stunning performances by both Affleck and Lopez and masterful direction bring forth an epic of a quality not seen since 'Doctor Zhivago'"
    gets hashed into
    "Christ, I hope these two fuckwits don't breed, this movie blows dead monkeys!"

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  11. Re:This just in!!! by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 5, Funny

    More likely they'll pull a page from SCO and make anybody who actually wants to watch a movie sign a non-disclosure agreement before they can enter the theater....

  12. Re:This just in!!! by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Funny
    **We will actively be gagging people as they leave the theater" said the MPAA spokesperson.**

    People are already gagging as they leave the theater, after having paid $$ to watch the latest JLo POS.

  13. Re:Communication a problem? by VistaBoy · · Score: 5, Funny

    The irony about all this is that their slogan on that stupid "Respect Copyrights" commercial is

    "Movies. They're worth it."