Learning Robots
carnun writes "The NewScientist is reporting on a new snakelike robot that uses genetic algorithms to change its motion pattern so that it can still function after sustaining damage." Roland Piquepaille sends in a report about another "learning" robot, named Adam, which is designed to seek out and feed from "flowers".
I wonder if they could extend this to create a worm type robot that if it got cut in two it could still carry on. Say a brain in each segment
Rus
Cheap UK and US VPS
Damn Damn Damn, try as i might i cant find anytihng funny to write for this. I think the snake idea is inspired (imagine the fun aspects of a robo-whacking day hehehe)
:)
Imagine and earthquake scenario or anything along those lines (911) a van turns up and releases several hundred robotic snakes all able to sense heat, movement etcetc..
Bless the Brits and their fabulous snakes
see got a funny line in the end
S
Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
Given that we will increasingly use robots to do the work that's too dangerous for humans to do, self-healing robots that can get the job done, damage or no, sound like a nice step forward.
If you find that interesting it's worth reading about a robot called WISOR that was built by a company called Honeybee Robotics. WISOR is uses for inspection and repair of high temperature and pressure steam pipes under the city of New York. It moves through the pipes like a very large inch worm.
There's even a movie (a really odd movie in fact) about it.
John.
Humans will go to great lengths to avoid getting injured (well, most sane ones). However, robots will just do what they are told. While they may be told to avoid any hazards, they just don't have that instinct that says I *really* don't want to get my limb chopped off today.
So to compensate, all robots in hazardous or isolated situations should have this self-healing built in, as well as redundant limbs. A robot could be built with 2 legs, but why not make it 4 or 6 and have a couple to spare. The same goes for sensors. Only two are needed for stereoscopic vision, but 4 or 6 would be better.
--
Luck is just skill you didn't know you had.
"Once the robot was mobile, the team disabled some of its segments to see if it could adapt to injury. Initially it was immobilised, says Bentley, but as the GA continued to try to improve the locomotion, it gradually worked out how to move again, albeit more awkwardly and with an ungainly, dragging gait - but it was still good enough to get the robot to its destination."
If the GA is running onboard the robot, then how does it know whether it's successfully moving (let alone in the right direction)? Is there a sensor that's providing information on distance to a target?I think that true AI will result from this "survival instinct" - because robots will eventually learn that in order to survive/continue they will need to be loved, to fix themselves (eat, be healthy), and to have shelter (come out of the rain)
Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
So? Sounds like a good solution to the problem. In this case, the goal is to get to the end of the maze, not to see the maze.
Many AI and robotics researchers seem to fall into the trap of modelling human cognition rather than designing an intelligent artifact. Both approaches have their place, but it's a shame when someone who's trying to design AI gets blinded by experience as a human being and tries to program an agent to make decisions the same way.
That being said, computer vision is an important field in AI, but vision isn't necessarily the best way to avoid walls.
Matt