Anonymous User Challenges RIAA Subpoena
Arclightfire writes "First there was the setback of a New England judge throwing out an attempt to uncover the names of students at MIT accused of piracy and now CNet is reporting that a 'Jane Doe' is arguing that the subpoena violates her right to due process." There's also a Reuters story.
"Anonymous User Challenges RIAA Subpoena" ...And he still cant post at score above 0 on slashdot. I didnt give much for this anonymous coward person until now. He should be a hero!
True ravers don't need drugs
That's right, leechers should go to prison!
codegolf.com - smaller *is* better.
It seems like the RIAA wants to become another department of the US and hold a cabinet position with the President. I can just see it now, The Department of the RIAA, an army of us.
Obviously.. this 'anonymous' user is Georgy ;)
I'm always unclear about the due-process and what it really means. Even if the (censored) wanted to get your name, address, etc from your ISP or even if you get your phone service from (censored), (censored), or (censored); can they just storm in like (censored).
This is like 1984's (censored-police, where even thinking bad thoughts can get you on a list. I mean that doesn't happen these days, does it?
Sincerely,
(censored)
"This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
so who wants to set up an RIAA honeypot?
" She's my heroin on white horse. I want to marry her. Now I just need to contact her... hrm."
;)
um, you meant heroine right?
> Well, atleast here in the US, ignorance is no defence.
Well duh. If they allowed that defence no one would ever be convicted.
Can you see them standing there in their tighty whities? I can.