Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Telcos Agree on WiFi Hotspot Standard

Jucius Maximus writes "As reported by Globetechnology, Canada's cellphone providers have agreed to create a common standard for their subscribers to connect to the Internet via public "hot-spots." The agreement became necessary because Canada's cellphone providers offer four different and incompatible connection technologies. The carriers will continue to vigorously compete with each other, both for customers and Wi-Fi hotspot locations, the CWTA said in a statement."

84 comments

  1. What an apt name! by bo0ork · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hot spot" -- a place where the radiation level is high. Oh I know, nothing has been proved, but then, smoking was harmless for decades, too.

    --
    Does everything include nothing?
    1. Re:What an apt name! by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 4, Informative
      Ever taken a look at the frequency the cell phones use? The energy these photons carry is nowhere near the limits required to disrupt the molecular bonds in DNA (which is the cause of the "radiation sickness" including the radiation induced cancer).

      It doesn't matter how intense the radiation is if the energy carried by the photons does not cross the threshold of actually doing something.

    2. Re:What an apt name! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real world is a stochastic process, where energy comes in intensity distributions, not levels. You should also consider other ways by which various forms of radiation may influence living organisms, for example resonance or temperature alterations.

    3. Re:What an apt name! by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 4, Insightful
      where energy comes in intensity distributions, not levels

      But that's my point and that's what people don't often understand when it comes to matters of radiation.

      Intensity does not matter because

      Damage(E) = Intensity * Damage per photon(E)

      If the energy (E) is too low to disrupt the DNA, "Damage per photon" goes to zero.

      A (high) school physics example of this is the photoelectric effect in which the incoming photons extract electrons from metals. If the energy of a photon is less than the energy between a free electron state (=ejected electron) and a binding valence state (=electron in an atom), electrons do not get ejected no matter how intense your radiation is. You can replace the free-electron - valence electorn bandgap with the energy required to disrupt the DNA and the same reasoning applies.

      The energy does not "accumulate" in the system either. The photon will only yield its payload of energy to the matter IF the payload is equivalent to the energy gap. Otherwise the interaction is negligible.

      It's well documented that natural temperature variations in the brain are larger than anything induced by a modern cellphone.

      The only way that I can imagine the cell phone radiation causing damage is an extremely unlikely chance of a interference peak of several fields inside the skull cavity. But even that would be short-lived because of the extreme sensitivity of the interference pattern on the dimensions and spatial location of the skull and the transmitters.

    4. Re:What an apt name! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, but you describe that "effects come in quantums". I wrote "energy comes in intensity distributions". Just because the peak is below the required energy doesn't mean the chance of an effect is zero, even though the effect only occurs if a certain energy level is reached. And the difference between natural influences and technical influences is that technology usually creates highly patterened influences whereas natural influences are usually very random. I'm not saying that there are negative side effects, but to discount them as practically impossible reminds me of the naivety of early nuclear physics.

    5. Re:What an apt name! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a sunny weekend, sit on the the side, the Windsor side, of the Detroit river with binocs, and study the position of the radar antennas (domes) on the power boats. It seems that about half of them are located so that the 30 degree vertical beam dispersion angle takes in at least the heads ot the helmsmen. Some are located ahead of the helm position at crotch level.
      These radars emit multi kilowatt pulses of energy

    6. Re:What an apt name! by lars-o-matic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Intensity matters... ever use a microwave oven? That's non-ionizing radiation too, but hardly irrelevant to organic materials (hint: cooking breaks molecular bonds, too).

      Also, as you point out, your physics properly applies only to metals. There are lots of lower-energy bonds one can excite in long organic molecules.

      As to total energy deposition, evidence suggests that bulk heating is not required in long-term exposure. I have read that highway cops who used to sit with traffic radars next to their heads had a scary incidence of brain cancers. Last I heard, there was no way to argue away the increased incidence of childhood leukemia, etc. for people living under power lines, either.

      How does non-ionizing, (relatively) low-power EM radiation affect overall health, immune disorders, incidence of cancer, etc.? I don't know, and neither do you.

      Empirical evidence beats hand-waving from a first-year physics course. I'll try to limit my unnecessary exposure to non-ionizing EM radiation until conclusions are in from long term studies, where maybe the biophysics will be more subtle than the photoelectric effect. There are lots of ways to affect (and damage) big, complicated molecules than knocking single electrons out of them.

      --
      je ne suis pas un fou
    7. Re:What an apt name! by Thunderman · · Score: 1

      How about continous exposure to these phones. Im sure radiation every day to your brain CANNOT be good for you.

      --
      "Man with bird in hand should not sneeze" - Confucious
    8. Re:What an apt name! by F34nor · · Score: 1

      Um? What about the Sun? Cosmic rays? etc. you are getting blasted ALL THE TIME. Ever drive under a high tension power line? It's all about how far the radiation can penetrate, how much enegry it delivers, if the target can be harmed, and of course if your even in phase to begin with.

      You could walk through a megawatt X-ray laser and have no side effects if the beam is generated by a phased array.

      You can walk through microwaves and not be harmed, e.g. 900mhz cordless phones and 802.11b hubs.

      This is why the FCC and UL etc. are out there. Its not like we live our lives in a Faraday cage inside a lead box burried 5 miles down in a salt mine. If your worried about radiation don't fly during high levels of solar activity.

      If your REALLY concerned with your health for GOD sake don't smoke, get some excersize, stop looking into the CRT, you know the electron gun that is facing your head RIGHT NOW, and above all don't get in a car.

  2. Hmm... by blitzoid · · Score: 1

    Canada - Savage Wasteland of the north, or model for the future?

    --
    I am a filthy pirate.
    1. Re:Hmm... by zhiwenchong · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The latter, I'm inclined to think.

      Savage wasteland, eh? Hmm.... but the weather in Minneapolis, Detroit, upstate New York, and the northern states aren't too different from other cities in Canada. The weather in Seattle isn't too different from Vancouver either.

      So how is Canada a savage wasteland? If you're talking about Yukon, NWT and Nunavut, well... Americans have Alaska.

    2. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shhh... Don't tell them what it's like up here. It's far too crowded as it is. :)

    3. Re:Hmm... by stu72 · · Score: 1

      Easy now... some of us grew up in those "wastelands" and consider themselves better for it...

      (Elsa YT 1972-1982 :)

    4. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I grew up in a wasteland and STILL LIVE THERE. In fact, I make a good living doing consulting in this wasteland.

    5. Re:Hmm... by GrassMunk · · Score: 0, Troll

      well, atleast we dont have wastelands like Alabama or any southern states where one could marry their brother/sister. Oh and BTW this model for the future has a higher broadband usage rate than the states ( but thats prolly cause of our low population... )

    6. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      S'okay at least we don't have planes falling on our heads in Canada.

      Fucking Americans.

  3. Standards by qorkfiend · · Score: 0, Redundant

    While Standards do not really promote competition, standards make it easy for laypeople to access the 'Net. As a Verizon subscriber, and as a "alaunt" member, I would like nothing more than to see the Alaunt run beside us in battle. All Glory to Those who Came First.

    1. Re:Standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Standards do not really promote competition
      What do you mean they don't promote competition? Of course they promote competition. When you have a standard, anyone who wants to can implement that standard. When you have nonstandard, proprietary connection technologies, each company has a monopoly over its own version. That doesn't sound very competitive to me; it means that any new players in the field will have to make their own incompatible technology, enlarging the barrier to entry. So make no mistake about it, standards do promote competition.
    2. Re:Standards by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Did you see your rant get moderated +1 when you posted it as an AC then decide to vary it ever so slightly and repost it to grab some of that oh so sweet karma?

    3. Re:Standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joke's on him. Needless profanity just made himself look stupid.

  4. Re:Emigrating to Canda by term0r · · Score: 2, Funny

    I believe one of the pre-requisites to living in Canada is being able to spell Canada.

  5. Somewhat Slasdotted... Ob. Repost by Michael's+a+Jerk! · · Score: 1, Informative

    Canadian cellphone carriers rally around Wi-Fi

    By JACK KAPICA
    Globe and Mail Update

    Canada's cellphone providers have agreed to create a common standard for their subscribers to connect to the Internet via public "hot-spots."

    The 12-million people who own cellphones, personal digital assistants or any wireless device and subscribe to Bell Mobility (with Aliant Mobility), Microcell Solutions (Fido), Rogers AT&T Wireless or Telus Mobility will be able to use all Wi-Fi hot-spots operated by any one of those companies.

    The plan is to create "a common identity" in which Wi-Fi subscribers would be recognized by the other companies' hot spots and would have to pay for on-line time only to their own carriers.

    "It will work just like Interac," said a spokesman for the Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association, referring to debit and credit cards working at any automated teller machine regardless of where the customer has an account.

    The agreement became necessary because Canada's cellphone providers offer four different and incompatible connection technologies.

    The carriers will continue to vigorously compete with each other, both for customers and Wi-Fi hotspot locations, the CWTA said in a statement.

    "Wi-Fi is a natural extension to the ubiquitous wireless voice and data services offered by the licensed public wireless carriers across Canada," CWTA president and CEO Peter Barnes said. "By developing standards of service and interconnection, the carriers will ensure Canadians have secure and convenient access to Wi-Fi hotspots without requiring new network identities or billing arrangements."

    Common standards introduced by the national Canadian cellphone carriers would help to eliminate the development of redundant authentication and billing methods and will lead to consistent, simplified access, the group said.

    The announcement is a step toward the development of standards and cross-carrier roaming capabilities for Canadian Wi-Fi users and wankers like michael. It is also expected to pave the way for future interoperability between the carriers' wireless data networks and their Wi-Fi hotspots.

    The carriers said they expect to have standards and agreements in place by the end

    of the year, and have them operational in 2004.

    "Much like the Canadian inter-carrier messaging agreement provided a tremendous boost to adoption of text messaging in Canada, today's announcement is expected to significantly increase the adoption rates of Wi-Fi in Canada," Mr. Barnes said.

    --

    I'm not Seth.

    1. Re:Somewhat Slasdotted... Ob. Repost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderators, please pay attention:

      Michael's a Jerk! "quotes": The announcement is a step toward the development of standards and cross-carrier roaming capabilities for Canadian Wi-Fi users and wankers like michael. It is also expected to pave the way for future interoperability between the carriers' wireless data networks and their Wi-Fi hotspots.

      The site's not really slashdotted either, but if you feel the urge to mod up a copy of the article, don't give the points to a trolling karma whore. An anonymous repost is here.

    2. Re:Somewhat Slasdotted... Ob. Repost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What the fuck is your problem?

      Are you so hung-up on karma that you just can't bear the throught of someone getting moderated up "unfairly"?

    3. Re:Somewhat Slasdotted... Ob. Repost by Doom+Ihl'+Varia · · Score: 1

      The announcement is a step toward the development of standards and cross-carrier roaming capabilities for Canadian Wi-Fi users and wankers like michael

      Good to see the moderators are reading these posts first!

  6. Standards Nice, Now they'll Lose Money on Location by Bruha · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These guys may have interoperability going for them but they'll definately have a pitched battle for all the good locations. I can see the regular locations making some good profits off how greedy these Welcos as they toss more and more money at companies for lucrative locations. My advice to any potentials is to not sign extremely lenghty contracts so you can have a bidding war every few years.

  7. Rogers & Wi-Fi by Zro+Point+Two · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just hope that Rogers isn't the one who develops the network layout. I get to deal on a daily bases with what they have done with the cable internet, and man does it suck.

    I wonder if they'll roll Wi-Fi into a service offered to their highspeed internet customers? Small extra fee, but you'll be able to access the internet without being at home. This would be great for the business guy who's doing meetings all over town constantly.

    --
    Zro . two

    "I come from Canada...they say I'm slow....eh?"
  8. Re:Emigrating to Canda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Damn. Oh well.

    I've also thought about emigrating either to New Zealand or Australia.

  9. Telus: Future outpost of Hell? by Cordath · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does anybody remember a T.V. show called "Space: Above and Beyond"? It was pretty derivative and was cancelled after one season, but it did have one thing going for it... All the evil government conspiracies back home were tied to an evil megacorp named Telus... Telus just happens to be the dominant Telco in my province, and yes, they are EVIL.

    You should see my bill. Enron should have taken lessons from Telus's billing department when it comes to creative accounting. I pay twice what I agreed to pay in the five-year cellphone contract I unwittingly signed in suspicious smelling red ink. I have no clue why, and they aren't about to tell me.

    My cellphone inexplicably dies in my basement while other cellphones on other providers get crystal clear reception. I regularily receive phonecalls at 3AM from people who say things like "What the @#$%!! Stop calling this number you @#$#tard!" or "Hello? Hello? STOP CALLING ME YOU PERVERT!" Of course, the number displayed from these calls is my own, which makes it somewhat difficult to know who I should stop being woken up by calls from at 3am. Is there an evil prankster at work, or are Telus' phone-lines possessed by a minion of the Dark one who relishes the creation minor annoyances? Perhaps it's the same minion who came up with Britney Spears and reality TV...

  10. Re:Telus: Future outpost of Hell? by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 4, Insightful
    3AM from people who say things like "What the @#$%!! Stop calling this number you @#$#tard!" or "Hello? Hello? STOP CALLING ME YOU PERVERT!"

    Maybe your cellphone has been cloned. That would explain the huge bills and these calls. Have you ever asked for a listing of the calls made with your phone?

  11. Re:MOD DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Haha. That was pretty funny.

    Mod the original poster up for that - and thanks for the chuckle!

  12. MOS PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent is a troll that goes arond claiming the stories been altered, when it hasn't.

    Please mod him down (offtopic) to discourage him.

    1. Re:MOS PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh...except it REALLY DOES say "and wankers like michael". I'm not making it up, dude, go back and read it!

  13. To Divide or To Unite - Does Money Decide ?? by leoaugust · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Common standards introduced by the national Canadian cellphone carriers would help to eliminate the development of redundant authentication and billing methods and will lead to consistent, simplified access, the group said.

    It seems interesting to me that to really tap into the market, different companies are uniting in Wi-Fi. But, on the other hand in the "Instant Messaging" market, it seems that the companies have thrived by dividing the market amongst themselves ... why does "uniting" work in the Wi-Fi market, while "dividing" work in the IM market ...

    Looking at the quote from the article (on top of this comment) it seems that the driving force to common standards in Wi-Fi is to eliminate the development of redundant authentication and billing methods viz. that it is about money.

    It makes me wonder if the IM packages became "pay only" would it lead to a set of open and common standards in the Instant Messaging market to eliminate the development of redundant authentication and billing methods. I don't think that many people would relish having to pay for five different IM's .... Personally, I think free is better than not free - but I couldn't help noticing this relationship of money and dividing/uniting ..

    --
    To see a world in a grain of sand, and then to step back and see the beach where the sand lies ...
    1. Re:To Divide or To Unite - Does Money Decide ?? by Kingsly · · Score: 1

      o Because if they were not interoperable.. you would be tied down to a single ISP. o If IM were as interoperable as say email... they would be much cheaper. It is very much a doable thing.(see jabber ) but the IM companies don't see any profit in being interoperable with everyone even if they went paid... they'd rather be selectively interoperable amongst each other for a price that way the market would still be split 4-5 ways instead of a million way split if we went for something like jabber.

  14. Re:Emigrating to Canda by fuhaihai · · Score: 1

    here you go.

    http://canadainternational.gc.ca/view-en.asp?Grp =0 0EB00F3&act=1&tbID=1

  15. Re:Emigrating to Canda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Citizenship and Immigration Canada

    It's not very hard to immigrate to Canada as long as you have a job that would qualify you as a skilled worker.

  16. Re:Telus: Future outpost of Hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? You hate a company that uses endangerd animals in their advertising campaign? Why, I should report you to the PETA.

  17. Mods: Read this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've been caught out, just give up. Better luck next time.

    Mods, Please mod this post, parent, grandparent and great-grandparent as 'offtopic'. Thankyou.

  18. Re:Telus: Future outpost of Hell? by Surak · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Does anybody remember a T.V. show called "Space: Above and Beyond"? It was pretty derivative and was cancelled after one season,

    Derivative (or inspired, however you want to put it) off of the longest-running WWII-based TV series, Combat! from 1962.

  19. Re:Emigrating to Canda by Cordath · · Score: 4, Funny

    The current model for emigration to Canada for people with your qualifications is this:

    1. Apply for refugee status.
    2. Get rejected.
    3. Marry a Canadian.
    4. Get a Visa, head on over, and apply for landed immigrant status.
    5. Hire an Immigration Lawyer. Start filling out forms.
    6. Six months later you will still not have a work permit. This will begin to worry you because you will be almost done filling out forms and the staff at the local government offices now know to run and hide as soon as you enter sight.
    7. Bribe, threaten, or blackmail your immigration lawyer into submitting the lynchpin form he was supposed to submit the day you started paying him. He will not want to do this because it will mean allowing you to pass out of his power. Read some Anne Rice novels to more fully understand his or her motivations.
    8. Congratulations! Work permit! Your can now use your PHD in physics to find employment in our nation's fine eating establishments, convenience stores, and, if you take night-school, perhaps a mechanic shop. Of course, you will be competing with Canadian PHD holders for many of these positions, so don't expect an easy go at it. (This is one of the downsides to being a member of the most over-educated population on the planet) If you feel discouraged, visit the local pizza hut and laugh at the waitresses holding PHD's in 18th century Russian Poetry who are even more hooped than you!
    9. Employment. Now that you're making money it's time to pay 60% of what you earn in taxes. Being from a Scandinavian country you should be used to this.
    10. After a few years you will be able to apply for Canadian citizenship. After this point you will be fully qualified to criticize americans and be completely ignored instead of being bombed back into the stone age. By this point in time you should also feel the beginning of a massive inferiority complex setting in and should also be experiencing uncontrollable urges to hold doors open for people while constantly apologizing for everything.

  20. MOD DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent is a troll... Said text is not really in the grandparent post.

    And I couldn't get though to the site.

  21. Re:Emigrating to Canda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Damn. Oh well.


    I've also thought about emigrating either to New Zealand or Australia.

    Are their spelling requirements less stringent?

  22. DNA, schmee-en-ay. by Sunnan · · Score: 1

    How about the studies supposedly linking cell phone radiation to immune system deficiency? There are more parts and particles in the body that can be disrupted than just DNA.

    Not saying cell phone radiation is harmful, but I am saying I don't know yet and I'm glad research is still being done (if it is).

  23. oh, it's the photons! by millette · · Score: 1

    Thanks for clearing that up :) Now all I have to do is prevent the photons from disrupting my molecular dna bonds and I'm safe from cellphones? This is wonderful news!

    Sorry, just couldn't help myself...

    1. Re:oh, it's the photons! by jo42 · · Score: 1

      ...prevent the photons from disrupting...

      Tin foil beanie

  24. Re:Telus: Future outpost of Hell? by $$$$$exyKrout · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You know what...YOU are fscking dork. No change that. You are an asswipe. A dirty, filthy, shit-smeared and dripping off asswipe. That's how insignifcant you are, you mindless twit.

    --
    I'm ekrout. I'm a girl. Read my journal
  25. More competition for locations? all the better. by immel · · Score: 1

    Because these companies are scrambling to get in as many good locations as possible, there will inevitably be an increase in the number of "hot spots" across the nation. Access points will appear in locations they never thought of before. This will make it easier to find a good wireless internet connection and improve the value and versatility of owning a wireless device.

    --

    10 Bits= $.25
    100 Bits= $.50
    110 Bits= $.75
    1000 Bits= 1 byte
  26. Nothing new by JohanV · · Score: 3, Informative

    European NRENs are already doing this on an international scale. With credentials from participating local university students and employees can already log on to the WiFi hotspots of other participating universities and research institutions in both their own and other countries.
    The authentication mechanism is based on IEEE 802.1x and uses a RADIUS backend to enable cross domain authentication. Currently this is in operation (machine translation) between the Netherlands, Portugal and England, and Croatia is next.

    SURFnet is also working (machine translation) with local hotspot operators in the Netherlands to make sure Dutch students can roam their networks as well. Initially this will offered as a free service fro students.

  27. Re:Emigrating to Canda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot the other method....

    1. Become a warlord in a third world country.
    2. Apply for refugee status.
    3. Wait 6-9 days for the mail.
    4. Welcome to Canada!

  28. Re:Emigrating to Canda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    11. ??? 12. Profit!

  29. Is this number really right??? by mark-t · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    ... 12-million people who own cellphone ...
    This is Canada, right? A country with just over 30 million people *IN TOTAL*... 12 *MILLION* cell phones???

    I would have expected the number to be no more than 5 or 6 million, personally. There are, after all only 30 million people in total, and this includes infants and elderly people that are somewhat cautious about new technology (my gramma was one of them before she passed away last year at 99).

    1. Re:Is this number really right??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      30 million people, 12 million cell phones, 11 million guns. We only have another 7 million to outfit with something dangerous.

    2. Re:Is this number really right??? by Nex · · Score: 0

      In the US, estimates point to about 128 million cell phone customers. That's roughly half the population. Nex

      (from http://www.consumervoiceusa.com)

  30. Text messaging already interoperates by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nearly two years ago the Canadian cell companies got together and created a text message centre to allow interoperation of their text messaging services. Now, I can message a Telus, Fido or Rogers customer from anyone of the competing services.

    The Wi-Fi move is just another logical step. We have three competing national companies in a market that really only seems able to support two profitably. This is a reality of a country with a small population covering a large geographic area.

  31. Re:Emigrating to Canda by pigscanfly.ca · · Score: 1

    Bah .
    Emigrating to canada is nothing like that.
    You need 2 PHDs to work in a pizarrea .
    More seriously though , the provincial goverment of ontario and the federal goverment (probably some other provinces as well) are currently working to have forieng credientials more easily recognized by the professional organizations with witch one must be registered with . Right now they are focusing on engineering , nursing and doctor stuff ; but they plan to include other professions as well .

  32. Re:Emigrating to Canda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canadians paying high taxes is a myth perpetrated by right wing morons who think the world owes them something. In fact, Canadians (and more importantly, Canadian corporations) pay only slightly more taxes than their American counterparts and on a global scale, Canada pretty much falls in the center of the pack, only slightly ahead of the US, in tax load.

  33. Re:Telus: Future outpost of Hell? by slappyjack · · Score: 1

    I just wanted to chime in with the fact that I LOVED Space: Above and Beyond

    It was cool, whereas i am not.

    Thank the Lord SciFi occationally reruns it.

  34. Re:Emigrating to Canda by PressureDemon · · Score: 1

    The top % of tax is close to the same but where does the top rate start? In Canada is about $60000 Canadian ($40000 US) in the States its $250,000. The lower middle class carries the brunt of the tax burden.

  35. Canada is second in the World I'll have you know by Hal+The+Computer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, we're second in the world for broadband per capita. Even though we're also the second largest country in the world.

    Betcha didn't know that, eh? ;-)

    --

    int main(void){int x=01232;while(malloc(x));return x;}
  36. Probably by Hal+The+Computer · · Score: 1

    This is Canada. Lotsa cellphones not quite as many guns as the USA. Judge for yourself. ;-)

    BTW: I don't have any actual statistics, but then again 73% of all statistics are made up anyway.

    --

    int main(void){int x=01232;while(malloc(x));return x;}
  37. Actually it sounds about right. by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    There are indeed about 30 million people in about 13 million households in Canada...and being I was born and raised here I can tell you that the majority of households have a cellphone here (both in the city and in the surrounding rural communities)--and it is very common to see a family where there are two or more (parents give their teenagers cellphones for emergency use and/or to keep tabs on them). I've seen kids as young as 10-12 on cellphones and some of my own relatives in their 80s have them as well. Yep--I think 12 million could be a reasonable estimate.

    I've also had extended stays in the US, and I's have to say that with the exception of large metropolitan areas that overall per-capita cellphone usage is slightly lower in the US than in Canada (and from what I've heard western Europe and Asia outstrip us both by far).

    This is just personal observation so if anyone has data to prove or disprove my observation let me know...

    PS...and the comment about the elderly being cautious about new technology--overall that is a false assumption. I have found personally (and recently read a study on the subject) that the demographic most resistant to adopting new technology are those from 40 to 65 years of age (oddly enough although women of that age find high-tesh stuff intimidating, it is men of that age that are more resistant to it). After retirement people tend to become MORE willing to try out new technology. I have an aunt who I never imagined would learn to use a computer take to it like a fish to water--and she didn't so much as press a key until she was in her 80s.

  38. Re:Emigrating to Canda by pigscanfly.ca · · Score: 1

    It depends actually .
    If you are coming here to set up a business its not that hard . If you are comming here to work for some one or the goverment make sure you have a job before you come over. If you show the immigration people the job offer they are a lot more likely to let you in and you are a lot more likely to have a nice job when you get here (a lot of people who dont plan end up spending a year or 2 looking for work , it is very hard to get certain credentials recognized , it all depends) .It is very important to make sure your credentials can be recognized .
    What university is your PHD from?
    If you have a certain amount of capital and a good education (it sounds like you do) and a good idea for a business it very easy to get in .

  39. Re:Canada is second in the World I'll have you kno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to whom ? American per capita usage is about half that of canada, and a quarter to a third that of Korea.

  40. Re:Emigrating to Canda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lower middle class? Here are some typical salary in Canada:

    30-40K -- Office workers/tech support
    45-55K -- programmers in small companies and government
    60-70K -- programmers in large companies
    100K -- doctors

    Seems to me that the lower middle class has nothing to worry about and that the upper middle class get a larger percent of the burden....But you get what you pay for. Among other things, Canada no longer has a deficit and is paying down it's debt. It's social security system is well funded and ready for the boomers to retire. And that cost includes public health care we don't have to worry about private health insurance. It's called sound fiscal management. You can't keep living off your credit cards, no matter how rich that extra credit makes you appear to be.

    It's too bad Clinton is out of office. He had the right idea about a lot of things.

  41. Cost of living by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot the difference in cost of living

    According to this link:
    http://www.cita.utoronto.ca/webpages/living in.shtm l

    The cost of living in Toronto is 75% of the cost of living of Chicago. Although there are lower salaries, the cost of living is less since people live in the "inner cities" in Canada so services can be concentrated instead of distributed like U.S. cities. And the Canadian "inner cities" are actually safe for women and children, even at 11pm (unlike american cities).

  42. Nice change... no GSM vs CDMA choice. by WoTG · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After years of deciding between GSM and CDMA (and I think we had a TDMA provider...) I'm glad that won't be a problem this time around. I'm definitely glad that they're not choosing some proprietary protocol... so at least getting a wireless card will remain as easy as hopping into your local computer store.

    Now the first question I have, is how much is this going to cost? Data rates on the cell-networks were ridiculously high for non-necessary useage... hopefully it won't be the same with WiFi.

    1. Re:Nice change... no GSM vs CDMA choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We still have a TDMA carrier, Rogers AT&T.

    2. Re:Nice change... no GSM vs CDMA choice. by WoTG · · Score: 1

      I think Roger's is all GSM now. At least that's all they sell for NEW phones... I suppose the old network is still running, for now.