Slashdot Mirror
Carmack on New id Game, Game Theory
An anonymous reader writes "CNN/Money interviewed id Software wizard John Carmack at the recently completed QuakeCon. Among the topics discussed is Nintendo's recent announcement that today's games are too complicated and hard for players. Carmack, surprisingly, agrees, saying 'I agree strongly with that point of view, but I'm in the minority in the PC space. I want a game you can sit down with, pick up and play. [Role playing games], for example, got to where they had to have a book ship with the game.'"
If you really want a game where you see how fast you can press buttons, you should try WarioWare, Inc..
Um...don't you remember in Doom? You had to activate switches and open doors with the space bar. You don't just run up to the door.
There is a much longer and more in-depth interview with the Carmack over at Gamespy. Basically the source for the CNN article.
Just for kicks, check the latest Gamespy Grudge: Strategy vs. Blowing Stuff Up
If you "slightly twitch the joystick," Link doesn't jump. He hangs off the edge. If you ram the freaking joystick, then yeah, he'll jump. It's pressure-sensitive.
"Sufferin' succotash."
If you haven't played Ikaruga for the Cube Or Dreamcast you should really try it out. Great game, but I doubt it's humanly possible to beat.
Vote for global prefs bug
What's your definition of "low-end?" There are really very few games available, even today, that aren't playable with a GF2. The fact of the matter is that graphics hardware is way ahead of the game manufacturers. Most of us would rather spend our money on toys that we can use.
How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
Part of this was exacerbated by the fact that the camera was "active" so "straight forward across the bridge" kept on moving slightly. The solution was to repeatedly "Z-target" or whatever to bring the camera back behind you so that forward remained up on the joystick and you didn't accidently find your "move forward" joystick position become "move slightly to the right and off the bridge."
I can't recall being quite as frusterated with the Wind Waker controls, so I think they improved it for that game. But in Zelda 64, Link just loved to jump off ledges into bad places.
In any cases, I wish game designers would remember that jumping puzzles suck. They're just frusterating, especially in third-person games when the camera likes to move and change your "run straight across the bridge" to "run straight for a bit then veer right and into the lava." In the case of the Wind Waker, this means no more stupid rope swinging puzzles. Nintendo: I'm glad you think manipulating the camera is an important skill, I find it to be a big nuisance!
(Also annoying are FPS games where it's hard to judge when you're at the ledge so you can make your best leap across the gap, instead of falling into the lava below.)
Any, the basic point I want to make, besides that jumping puzzles suck, is that the control in Zelda 64 and some of the puzzles were such that even moving the stick very little could accidently cause Link to jump off a cliff into the raging river below - mainly due to the camera having this annoying tendency to pan when you're moving slowly.
You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
ry Elder Scrolls 3: Morrowind. with both expansions. as close to an RPG as youre going to get. the least linear story line (to the point that you can forget what story line youre on) of any RPG ever. the interworkings of the guild memberships, reputation, stats actual affects on the game, and a few other key features make the story the most diverse ever. Yes, in the end the conversation and story options are static, but they are so diverse that you might never notice it even if you play through the game 3 or 4 times (it takes hundreds, if not thousands, of hours to complete the entire game, but you can 'win' after playing only 5%).
Bah. Elite had that in 1984. Two books, in fact!
-- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
Morrowind has one of the best game starts, it will suck you in effortlessly and teach you everything you need without it really even feeling like being taught. In a way, it feels as great as beginning to play Half-Life back then. Something totally new yet strangely compelling.
I begun playing Morrowing half a year ago and still play it. It feels much more than a game, it's another world. And when you get bored, take up the very easy to use editor and make up what you want to, add it to the existing world.
There's really nothing else like Morrowind on the market right now. But do purchase the add-ons too, as they add some much needed technical improvements to the game. (Warning: the Tribunal expansion pack sucks for its gameplay in the "Clockwork City", kind of a low point of the whole Morrowind really, but the improvements it adds to the game interface are much needed.)
Exactly right, and keyboards essentially work the same today.
Try setting up a MAME cabinet using keyboard-based input only, and a game such as one of the later Street Fighters. You'll have a field day with all of the multi-button combinations - keyboard simply cannot distinguish all of those individual keys being pressed at the same time.
In fact, it's actually a bit worse than you describe. Because of how input signals are pulled from a keyboard (think of a big matrix of crossed wires), if you mash enough keys together, you can end up with keypresses detected that you never actually hit at all, a phenomenon known as 'ghosting'.
Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
Not really. You have to learn the movement patterns of each piece, castling, en passent, check and checkmate, fifty-move draws, repitition draws, touch-move, and a few other rules. And even then, you'll still suck at it. Chess is the sort of game you do need a manual for (or a tutor).
It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.