Corel Goes Private
prostoalex writes "Ottawa-based Corel, known for its CorelDRAW, WordPerfect, Painter and Bryce products, has been acquired by Vector Capital Corp. for $124 mln. with the intent to get de-listed from Nasdaq and Toronto stock markets and go private. 80% of shareholders approved the deal, according to the story. At certain points of its corporate history Corel was a Linux vendor and even partially owned by Microsoft. Microsoft paid $135M for 25% of the shares, so Vector Capital paying $124M for 100% stake looks like a pretty good deal." It's been over a month since this was first announced, but it's actually come to pass now.
Does this mean we get to keep Corel Draw? Maybe there will be a new Linux version in the future? That'll be soo cool!
-- Cheers!
How much did Corel contribute to Open Source projects? With all the problems SCO has been causing, the news about Corel going private makes me sort of uncomfortable. Could they start doing the same?
you should try Corel Painter
It's where Fractal Painter went
it is one of the best "natural media" packages available
Gimp will *never* catch up without massive input and to be honest, I'd rather Gimp was frozen and another application started.
There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
The only problem with CorelDraw for Linux was that it was rpm-based and therefore very difficult to install on my Slackware system. If they release a next version I hope it has a decent install program like OO and Mozilla.
-- Cheers!
Yes, Virginia, Corel sold hardware! The Netwinder lives on. For the unitiated, this originally was a StrongArm platform and there's a later Transmeta version.
Originally, these were available in Office Server, web server and desktop machine versions, different loads on the same hardware. Eventually a dual chassis rackmount appeared. With a couple of NICs and IPChains, they'd NAT an office. (No, I don't want to debate running Samba, etc. on the firewall just leave it at it was an inexpensive powerful small business solution).
It's got a strong developer base still. Went through a Rebel phase. When Rebel tanked, the CEOs new company used the customer list he brought but didn't own to spam people saying their Netwinders weren't secure and offered to sell them a blackbox firewall to plug in in front of it that wasn't secure. Ah, the scruples of a VC inspired world.
Anyway, these are great boxes that can be had new for cheap (~US$400) and less on eBay for used. Small, functional, reliable. I've got one running behind me running me.
You know, like Blender.
If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
I'm just wondering if the Open Source community should set up a fund to, in future, buy out companies like Corel, and release their intellectual property as open source under GNU. Perhaps not as much Corel as Adobe, and its ilk. Think '80s style corporate raiding, except we raid intellectual property. Stuff like offices and the like get sold on the market, funding more purchases. Or am I just insane?
http://amishthrasher.blogspot.com/
Anyone know of a port? This is the only thing I still use on Windows.
There's a huge market of lawfirms just waiting for this one. They are sick to death of M$ nonsense and know about free software now. Between a Linux Word Perfect for their documents and printing and Star Office for M$ translation, Microsoft does not stand a chance there. I don't have to mention that government offices would be happy to have this too, do I?
When free software makes it into those places, where everyone can see them, the myth of Microsoft dependence will be completely crushed. There's something about seeing free software running where you go for good advice that does way more than an IBM advert in the Wall Street Journal. Many good things will come from that.
Go Go, Vector!
Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.
I truly hope that nothing disasterous happens with Bryce or any of the other graphic software packages that Corel produced. For those who don't know, Corel acquired Bryce after Metacreations fell apart. Bryce is a relatively inexpensive "natural landscape renderer" similar to World Construction Set or other packages. Some very beautiful renderings were made with Bryce.
Hmmm...
I was a beta tester for this product and to me, it held a lot of potential. It just came a bit too early, ie. before
(1) KDE got a reasonnable end-user manageable print infrastructure, in version 2.2 and
(2) XF86 got fontconfig.
KDE has progressed since, CUPS is almost everywhere in the Free *nix world and XF86 now has a modern font management infrastructure. Heck, even WINE has apparently improved a fair bit since the time they were involved with it -- for those who don't remember, they used libwine to port their s/w to Linux. The improved underlying (sp?) layers could only help Corel in developping a "must have" upgrade to the Linux/*BSD port of their office suite.
I really hope that we could see WPO v11 out for Linux/*BSD, as there is no current FOSS OA software that can hold a candle to it. What is really holding the Free Unices from the desktop is more on the *application* side of things, *not the OS* side. With the current wave/rash of serious M$-centric virii & worms, the next wave of Linux distros (or even of the various BSDs) mated with a decent port of WPO v11 could be something many wary CIOs could no longer ignore. With the amount of time & money being wasted on fighting MSBlaster and co, how could anyone ignore a platform that would be immune to such malware?
When CNN is starting covering MS-Centric malware extensively (from what I've seen in the last 2/3 days), this could be a sales pitch hard to dismiss easily.
I would consider between $20 and $50 a fair price to pay for a one-person license to a linux version of Word Perfect 5.1. It should work just like the DOS version, including a graphical print-preview option, that could use SVGAlib.
I would give a lot more than that to a fund that would buy the source (well documented assembly, from what I understand) and put it under the GPL.
It can't be that much work; there was a version of this for the SCO unix, and there are even directions on how to get that binary to run on linux.