Slashdot Mirror
Sun Mad Hatter Linux Desktop Revealed
magellan writes "Sun has released screenshots of its upcoming Mad Hatter Linux desktop. Mad Hatter includes GNOME, StarOffice, Evolution, and Mozilla. Sun has made minor modifications to Gnome to make it more familiar to Windows users. Sun's Mad Hatter, along with SuSE's new push on the desktop, could make Linux on the corporate desktop and laptop a bigger reality."
If windows is so bad why do we keep trying to copy it?
fp
I'm not so worried about Sun being a nice player. They've contributed some to GNOME development already.
The idea is to let Sun do the not-so-fun-but-profitable work of pulling people over to GNOME from Windows. Sun goes after Microsoft, and we get to keep making fun software.
A lot of the folks Sun's after aren't coders. There's lots of good software for coders out there, because OSS people like writing stuff that they can actually use themselves. Sun likes making money, so Sun does their thing.
I wish Sun had more of a Linux movement, but I suppose Solaris and BSD are really the only things out there that can compete with Linux and more, and Sun wants to keep their sunk investment in place.
May we never see th
I really doubt that a company that current has more than 90% market share, and focuses it's products on 90% of the populace are going to worry about an obscure feature such as regular expressions that only 1% of the populace uses.
But hey, that's just me.
this is Insightful?
People do NOT care about "freeing themselves from MS", they don't care about speed (we have insanely fast CPUs now), and they certainly don't want anything other than what they already are used to.
People HATED XP when it first came out (and most still do) because it was "different" and they couldn't find anything.
We have seen plenty of articles on here about how people are finding applications easily when switching from Windows-based OSs. They find the "start menu", they then find applications that are "familiar".
You think that a "freed desktop look" is going to have easy to find applications that are familiar?
We want people to switch but we don't want to make that switch easy? Get real.
Ok, I know I'm going to be flammed for this one, but here goes:
Please, Gnome developers, switch Cancel and Ok to a consistent Ok(LHS) and Cancel(RHS)... Please?!!!
So annoying! I'd use Gnome, be proud of it and recommend to all, if not for this one, single, pull-my-hair-out irritation.
As it is, every time I try to introduce Gnome to someone (Mac or Windows user), that's the first place they stumble. Then I have to say, "Well... Eheh... Why don't we try KDE. Mk?".
Look, it sure seems that the whole left-to-right-reading world thinks this way. I think Gnome is a terrific windowing environment, otherwise.
[puts asbestos suit on, real fast]
All flammable opinions aside, this is a very sad fact (I don't know if 1% is correct, but the point is still valid).
To some extent, regexps suffer from the same problem many Free Software projects do, and it's that a lot of people simply don't want to get very far along the learning curve. We tend to live the moment and try to get the job done as fast as possible, so investing time learning something useful is usually pretty hard, no matter how blatantly obvious the potential benefits are.
Imagine how much efficiency could be gained from teaching at least some basic regexp skills to secretaries, just to mention one example.
Actually, many of us who use regexps everyday, still do it poorly sometimes.
Jeffrey Friedl put it clearly in his book "Mastering Regular Expressions":So? I've been quitting programs for a decade or so using the "File" menu. Since when has quitting a program been a file operation?
The semantics of "Start" is that to do anything, you "start here". That actually makes more sense to me than putting Quit under the File menu.
sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});