Slashdot Mirror


IBM Releases Compiler for Power4 and G5

davids-world.com writes "IBM offers its optimized XLC compiler not just for Intel CPUs, but also for its own G5 processor (article in German at Heise). Unlike gcc, it is optimized for the G5 and achieves a major boost in speed, as first results show. I guess we will have to compare the new benchmark data (once available) with the data we get with the optimized Intel compiler for Xeon. The compiler is available for download now."

21 of 471 comments (clear)

  1. All right! by Prince_Ali · · Score: 4, Funny

    So will this new compiler speed up the process of porting Duke Nukem Forever to the Mac?

    1. Re:All right! by Lxy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, it compiles vaporware in half the time.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    2. Re:All right! by rvaniwaa · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yes, it compiles vaporware in half the time.
      Thats nothing! I am coming out with a compiler next year that will compile vaporware in just 1/3 of the time as the IBM compiler! --Ron
      --
      main(i){(10-putchar(((25208>>3*(i+=3))&7)+(i ?i-4?100:65:10)))?main(i-4):i;}
  2. Duke Nukem Forever - you don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    >So will this new compiler speed up the process of porting Duke Nukem Forever to the Mac?

    Sorry to burst your bobble, but there's a reason why the game name's Duke Nukem *Forever*. That's the amount of time it will take to make it.

  3. IBM G5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new IBM overlords.

    Ok, now that's out of the way, let's get back to real comments.

  4. Re:why don't they just improve gcc? by levik · · Score: 4, Funny
    Is there some good reason why IBM doesn't just give away fre ThinkPads? I mean programmers use thinkpads... Managers use thinkpads. Thinkpads are pretty decent laptops...

    Why can't they just give them away for free?

    --
    Ñ'
  5. I can see it now... by fuqqer · · Score: 3, Funny

    The top 5 questions/posts from slashdotters:

    1) Is it open source, I didn't RtFA?
    2) Why isn't it open source?
    3) Will they release it for Linux on the ppc?
    4) What does this have to do with SCO?
    5) Apple is dead and these are flawed stats flamewar.

    I'm too lazy to come up with a sig that is good enough to be the same everytime, so you can just read this instead. You can try and rid your braincells of this text, but it's pretty much stuck there now.

    1. Re:I can see it now... by jared_hanson · · Score: 3, Funny

      You know a situation is bad when it becomes cliche to post a list of cliches.

      I, for one, welcome our incompetent moderator overlords.

      --
      -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
  6. Re:Here we go again: by Frymaster · · Score: 4, Funny
    Simple: $/MHz, the x86 architecture spanks the commercially available G-series (Mac).

    great! i'll give you my commodore 64 for FREE. that will have the best $/MHz ratio possible. i'm sure you'll love it.

  7. Re:Why? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Running WHAT in the real world?

    So you can compare Photoshop on the mac to Oracle database transactions on the x86 box?

    Why not something useful like comparing my gameboy to my cell phone?

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  8. Re:why don't they just improve gcc? by FroMan · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder why folks modded you insightful here. The cynic in me says they missed the sarcasm you laid down pretty thick and thought they should really get laptops for free.

    --
    Norris/Palin 2012
    Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
  9. A Question by 1000StonedMonkeys · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is the word "fanboy" used by anyone but fanboys?

  10. Re:G5 upgrade woes by kerry-buckley · · Score: 5, Funny
    My 486/66 with 8 megs of ram that has the SoBig and Blaster virus runs faster than this G5 dual 2GHz machine at times.
    But I bet whoever sold you the Quadra tower sprayed silver and with "G5" written on it in crayon is laughing.
  11. The speed could be infinite. by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 4, Funny

    The speed could be infinite. IBMs new complier is powered by rainbows, dreams, wishes, magic gumdrop sprinkles, and imagination. Theoretically speaking, you could bypass the rainbows, dreams, and wishes; while using a wrapper to off-load the burden of the magic gumdrop sprinkles to the flux capacitor. Then you could primarily focus your development on imagination... which would allow you to compile and run applications at a speed predetermined by your imagination.

    I've also heard that the wishes and dreams can be fairly powerful tools as well. However, results may vary due to unfulfilled wishes and crushed dreams.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  12. Re:Let's be objective by Lars+T. · · Score: 4, Funny

    IOW, the PC fanboys are just going to claim that SPEC was "developed natively for the mac".

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  13. poor compromise by nverse · · Score: 2, Funny

    The problem is that the increase in execution speed is matched by a corresponding inflation of Steve Job's ego.

  14. g4 logo for g5 stories? by zhevek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone else find it ironic that all the recent g5 stories are labeled with the picture of the g4 chip? =)

  15. Re:G5 upgrade woes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's taco that's doing this. Everyone knows that if they want to laugh, they read at -1. If everyone wants be mis-informed, they read at +5. If everyone wants to learn, they are told by Theo Teh Ratd to RTFM.

  16. Typical Slashdot reactions by epepke · · Score: 2, Funny


    Event: Somebody actually does something realted to some Apple product.
    Slashdot reaction: Unless it comes in GCC today and fixes me a martini and picks my nose and sings the Hallelujah chorus and comes with a big check, what damn good is it, anyway?

    Event: Somebody at Microsoft says that they might do something in a couple of years if they feel like it.
    Slashdot reaction: Hah! Luser! See, Microsoft already did it.

    Event: Somebody decides that it might be possible to do something cool if they could only get cheap enough buckytubes to wire the brains of ants to the FPU in Python emulated in Perl emulated in ELisp. And it will run on Linux. Except nobody is going to do it, really, but it would be cool.
    Slashdot reaction: Linux is ready for the desktop! Linux is ready for the desktop!

  17. Re:Here we go again: by Farley+Mullet · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is ESR's "Ultimate Linux Box" semi- or full-automatic?

    Also, if you look at the bottom of this page, you'll see that the specs on the so-called ULB's don't match what you're saying, and the prices start at about $900 more.

  18. Re:Here we go again: by FredFnord · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Have you ever actually listened to Chomsky on politics?"

    Translation: I heard him on NPR once, while I was flipping radio stations.

    "He's a loon. A nutcase."

    Translation: He deviates from Common Wisdom in a direction that I find highly disturbing.

    "A textbook example of the fact that a person can be both a genius and an idiot simultaneously."

    Translation: I wish he'd just go back to being inoffensive and leave my little world alone.

    "Only the most superficial sort of moron would assume, because he is well educated in one area, that he is qualified to comment in another."

    Corrolary: Being a techie (reading slashdot), you are clearly unqualified to comment on who is qualified to comment on a given subject.

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.