Slashdot Mirror
Computer Game Improves Children's Hearing
wiredbeat2000 writes "The BBC is running a story that claims children who play video games increase their hearing skills. There have been several studies over the last few months extolling the virtues of games and education. For example, Wired News ran a roundup of college programs, and USA Today published a recent story on Daphne Bavelier's findings that playing games could help children develop hand-eye coordination, in addition to Professor James Gee's Slashdot-covered video transcript and article on 'games that teach'." Things have come a long way since the time when schoolkids were dumped in front of a computer and left to play Oregon Trail.
This makes even more sense with surround sound coming into play in a lot of recent games. Kids concentrating on where the sound is coming from; do this for hours a day, every week, and soon enough their directional sound navigation (if you will) is increased.
This does not change the fact that kids only listen to what they want to hear
Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
What truth?
There is no dupe
How old are your children? If they are all past the age of 5 when they started to develop hearing loss, then count yourself lucky.
By age 5, they will have learned how to speak well enough that they won't have any trouble picking up new words or even languages with hearing aids. Of course, that depends on the severity of the hearing loss. If they start to slip in their speech, then get them on speech therapy as early as you can. They would also have a good basic grasp of the English language and it's grammatical structure. Most deaf children struggle with this area.
Additionally, if you choose to get them fitted with hearing aids, then I highly recommend they get some musical training. Violin, piano, trumpet or even a recorder. Playing those instruments will help tune their hearing, for both tone and notes. This will help in their listening and speech skills. Let them play it through middle school, and it's their choice if they want to continue through high school.
I am deaf myself, though my situation differs from your children. I'm born with a severe-to-profound sensori-neural hearing loss, an approximately 95% hearing loss. With powerful hearing aids, I make the best use of my remaining hearing.
This is basically what my parents and I've done. Though, I got fitted for hearing aids at a VERY early age (1 1/2). My parents made the choice to put me on an oral education and they stuck with it. I didn't learn sign language until I met a few deaf students in high school. By then, my speech and writing skills were indistinguishable from that of a hearing teenager.
This is only my experience and what I grew up with. I count myself lucky that I even have any speech skills at all. This was only because of years and years of regular speech therapy, starting at age 5.
If you care enough about your children, they can be just as productive in society as a hearing person can.
Now, to be on topic with this slashdot discussion, I will say that video games has helped me, mostly in hand-eye coordination.
The first video game I played was Super Mario Brothers on the NES. I loved that game so much that I managed to learn the timings well enough to beat the game in one sitting (worlds 1 through 9). That hand-eye coordination has served me well in my touch typing and juggling skills.
A 24 year old deaf man says,
Sincerely,
-Cyc
/.'s 10 Millionth
That headline should probably read:
Since children are probably born with all of the physical hearing capabilities they will ever have, the video games would increase their ability to interpret the signals sent by their hardware (ears). In other words, they are capable of recognizing more sounds.All data is speech. All speech is Free.
This just in: Participating in activities that involve repeatedly exercising action X tends to improve children's X abilities! I'm pretty sure I was tought this in high-school physiology and that it was one of the fundamental rules of development. It continues to amaze me that people are actually getting grants, paychecks, and royalties to document the obvious. What justification do the signers of these checks have to endorse such studies? Are there really people that out of touch with learning and physiology? Is there a great legal need for documented proof of such theorems? Is this some kind of academic circle of life where those signing the checks were once those recieving the checks and now feel compelled to continue the tradition?