Slashdot Mirror


Wendy Seltzer Interviewed

mpawlo writes "Wendy Seltzer was recently appointed staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Seltzer is also a fellow with the Berkman Center. Greplaw has picked Seltzer's brain on her new position with the EFF, Chilling Effects and the greatest opera tunes."

72 comments

  1. But.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Are there any pictures?

    1. Re:But.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep

    2. Re:But.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hubba hubba!

    3. Re:But.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's her? She's famous! I see her pic all the time on Slashdot and IRC.

    4. Re:But.. by The+Salamander · · Score: 1

      In the spirit of fark and smokinggun:

      pic!

    5. Re:But.. by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1

      Thanks... I was trying to figure out whether this was the EFF lawyer I saw make an ass of herself on CNN a few weeks ago defending file sharing, and it was.

      I have to say, I always thought that being a lawyer required a modicum of public speaking skills, but she has none. She stuttered incoherently for a couple of minutes and made the RIAA guy look good.

      -a

    6. Re:But.. by dipipanone · · Score: 1

      That's a terrible toupee that she's wearing. She should bite the bullet and go full-on slaphead.

  2. Hey... by supertsaar · · Score: 1

    Never knew Alka had a sister....

    --
    The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
    1. Re:Hey... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Never knew Alka had a sister

      Okay, I'll admit it's the first thing I thought too.

      How much do you bet she got so tired hearing that all day long all her life that it has something to do with her wanting to become a lawyer ? I mean, why else would someone want to be hated ?

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Hey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I've got to be a major CS geek, since my first thought was - any relation to Margo Seltzer?

  3. fap....fap....fap..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    leave me alone!

  4. Dude, that joke was so freakin' obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thou shall beg us pardon ya creep.

    1. Re:Dude, that joke was so freakin' obvious by supertsaar · · Score: 1

      Okay okay... should have added the following line: *ducks rotten tomatos*

      --
      The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
  5. Good choice by Empiric · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A lawyer with coding experience. Very nice selection for the EFF. She certainly seems to a very good perspective, based on the interview.

    I would think her background would give her a decided advantage in court against opposition such as SCO's legal team. Non-technical lawyers I'd expect would be rather limited in their ability to see the proverbial trees as well as the forest, leading to egregious, easily-destroyable assertions such as SCO's claim that, in effect, "Linux" is one particular whole, when a moment's consideration from one with a technical background would suggest it's actually a very dynamic, variable thing, and that to claim all Linux deployments violate a given set of supposed "infringments" is rather absurd.

    I'd expect Ms. Seltzer will be able to bring good arguments to the table on this and many other Open Source challenges. Kudos to the EFF's fine choice.

    --
    ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
    1. Re:Good choice by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Funny

      A lawyer with coding experience. Very nice selection for the EFF.

      Yes indeed. Thank goodness they didn't pick up a coder with lawyer experience, like Kevin Mitnick ...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Good choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lawyer with coding experience

      I wonder what she looks like naked?

  6. It's not about 'lost jobs', it's about attitude. by WegianWarrior · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How about focusing on "equal oppertunities" instead, and hire the best person for the job, with no regard to gender, skincolour, cultural background or religion? I'm sure that will work out better, while at the same time makeing sure the rest of us don't have to hear people whine about how the new co-worker was hired just because she sits down when she pees (instead of standing up, like most guys do).

    Just my 2 cents.

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
  7. Re:It's not about 'lost jobs', it's about attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure that will work out better, while at the same time makeing sure the rest of us don't have to hear people whine about how the new co-worker was hired just because she sits down when she pees (instead of standing up, like most guys do).

    i've known a few ladys who stand up while peeing. where do they fit into this?

  8. openlaw by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seltzer used to be quite active on a couple of mailing lists dedicated to preparing legal briefs in a Universal v. Remierdes Eldred v Ashcroft and similar legal cases.The lists were (and still are) idealistic and noisy, but the legal discussion (archived by Lexis-Nexis at one point) was a lot of fun.

    1. Re:openlaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Universal v. Remierdes

      Yep. Univerval is thrown shit at once more ...

    2. Re:openlaw by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Er, that's Reimerdes as in Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes. The mailing list archives might also be of interest.

  9. Re:Surprising for a female. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please don't clone her

    Ick!

  10. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  11. Plagiarism by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1, Interesting
    As it happens too often here, the editor allowed through a story that is plagiarized. The submitted text was cribbed verbatim from the site (the gratuitous addition of links do not excuse the crime), which fit the definition of plagiarism to a tee.

    If one cannot bother to paraphrase, then perhaps one might consider deferring one's submission, as a courtesy to the original author. After all, some folks work hard to craft the words that we enjoy reading. Why not provide them the common courtesy of respecting their hard work?

    Cheers.

    --
    Yeah, right.
    1. Re:Plagiarism by mpawlo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think self-plagiarism is okay. After all, I am the author of both stories...

    2. Re:Plagiarism by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
      For the sake of argument, I'll assume that your account here and on Greplaw are the same person. That being the case it wouldn't necessarily be plagiarism (depends upon either sites' policy), but as a courtesy to your readers, it would have been helpful to have some sort of disclaimer, or words to the effect of "As I mentioned in my post at Greplaw..."

      In effect, you crossposted and you didn't add any value to the post here. Why even post the link to GrepLaw, when you could've crossposted the entire article (the Q&A) here?

      --
      Yeah, right.
    3. Re:Plagiarism by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Luckily, most of us don't attend the University of Melbourne. Usually, readers stop trying to impose academic discipline on ./ right around, say, day one.

    4. Re:Plagiarism by scubacuda · · Score: 1
      I'm guilty of that too, Mikael. :)

    5. Re:Plagiarism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is an idiotic argument.

      It is nearly impossible to plagiarize oneself (I'll agree you can crib part of your article somewhere else, but frankly this is a poor example).

      Just apologize for being wrong and obnoxious. Or go away

    6. Re:Plagiarism by mpawlo · · Score: 1

      "For the sake of argument, I'll assume that your account here and on Greplaw are the same person."

      Paranoid are we?
      There is only one of us and that's me. Your point is null and void since one can not plagiarize oneself. I could be in breach of contract should I have promised to Greplaw to not submit the intro to any other website (which I have not), but one can never plagiarize oneself.

      Since you have falsely accused me of plagiarism I have a hard time taking lessons from you on 'courtesy', but I will be a good sport and I will try to rephrase my future submissions to Slashdot if others agree with your position.

      Mikael

    7. Re:Plagiarism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "For the sake of argument, I'll assume that your account here and on Greplaw are the same person."

      Paranoid are we?


      Considering how many Bruce Perens impostors there were here, he may not be.

      Other than that, you are spot on.

    8. Re:Plagiarism by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Since you have falsely accused me of plagiarism I have a hard time taking lessons from you on 'courtesy', but I will be a good sport and I will try to rephrase my future submissions to Slashdot if others agree with your position.

      His position is about as nonexistent as a position gets. Please save your valuable time for something useful.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  12. Re:It's not about 'lost jobs', it's about attitude by klueless · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can't solve the social problem of sexism/racism with this, although it *sounds* ideal. People are born into categories that are inequal, and equal opportunities aren't enough to give them what they deserve - a fair chance.
    I know that as a white male I'll gladly give up my spot at the state univ. if it will mean the university becomes less segregated. Then and only then, after the situation of unequal footing due to race/sex has been improved through getting to know people of other backgrounds more personally, we can say an equal opportunity is enough.

  13. No lawyer with coding experience by SHEENmaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    would ever work for today's SCO.

    Judging by the quality of OpenServer, I'd say no one with coding experience has worked on it for a decade.

    I'd post a torrent file for my SCO discs, but they aren't worth the bandwidth.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  14. Re:It's not about 'lost jobs', it's about attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "rest of us don't have to hear people whine about how the new co-worker was hired just because she sits down when she pees"

    Here in lies the problem, SHOULD she be hired because she takes a pi$$ sitting down?!?!?! Just give me her wage (as I`ll end up doing her job anyway to make up for her) and I`ll squat to take a pi$$ also.

  15. Re:With so many jobs being lost. by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why don't you look her up on Lexis/Nexis, read her articles, and then come to your conclusions?

  16. More pics plz! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She has nice, pipe-fitter lips. No disrespect, but trust me, my boy. There's two things I'm good at. That's pulling dents, and spottin' good blow jobs. And that sweetie has world-class blow job lips. Am I right, skipper?

    1. Re:More pics plz! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice Sopranos reference!

    2. Re:More pics plz! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She has nice, pipe-fitter lips. No disrespect, but trust me, my boy. There's two things I'm good at. That's pulling dents, and spottin' good blow jobs. And that sweetie has world-class blow job lips. Am I right, skipper?

      Well, studies have shown that the more educated a person is, the more oral sex they tend to give/receive. Given she is a graduate of Harvard Law School (pretty hard to be more educated than that), well, you get the picture... practice makes perfect. ;)

  17. Typical Slashdot Integrity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you expect from Michael Sims? He is the one who stole someone else's work and made it his own.

  18. Re:With so many jobs being lost. by rbullo · · Score: 1

    We're sorry. The Slashdot crowd does not have that capibility. If you would like this feature to be added, please email CmdrTaco.

    --
    OH NOES!!! IT APPEARS YUO DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO PAY FOR DIS HERE PIZZA! WAHT EVER ARE YOU GOING TO DO!?!?
  19. What diffrence does it make? by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I get most if this information via text anyway... It doesn't matter to me if the staff attorney has their reproductive organs externaly or otherwise, nor if they can see their feet if standing upright.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  20. What the? by helix400 · · Score: 2, Funny

    from the need-a-brane-for-my-master dept.

    Heh, ya michael, I do think you need one.

  21. Haven't read the article, but by Sphere1952 · · Score: 1

    Wendy was really sharp on the dvd-discuss mailing list. Good for her.

    --
    Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.
  22. Yes [Re:openlaw] by Sphere1952 · · Score: 1

    Wendy was good at getting us to refocus without being overbearing.

    --
    Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.
  23. More Info by DorkHead · · Score: 0

    Here is some more background information on our new fighter:

    Her BLOG
    Her homepage
    Her Harvard homepage
    and her Picture

    --
    Head of the Dorks
  24. test by diesel66 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    testhttp://www.apple.com/server/clustering.html

    --



    eleven plus two / twelve plus one
  25. What??! by jvollmer · · Score: 1
    She doesn't mention Rigoletto?
    What sort of savage is she?


    If it's not Consolidated Lint, it's just fuzz.

  26. Where's her picture? by dbullock · · Score: 1

    Well?

    --
    http://www.bullnet.com
  27. Re:It's not about 'lost jobs', it's about attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit. After you have managed to equalize race and sex, I suppose that next you will tackle intelligence, beauty, weight, height, and all of the other irrelevant categories that people use to discriminate. Affimative action is nothing more than a political tool used by some to garner favor from minority groups and those who sympathize with them.

  28. It HAS to be said... by kzinti · · Score: 1

    "A little song
    A little dance
    A little seltzer
    Down your pants"

    --Chuckles the Clown, Mary Tyler Moore show, funniest episode ever.

    Score: -1, Tasteless

  29. Re:It's not about 'lost jobs', it's about attitude by dipipanone · · Score: 1

    How about focusing on "equal oppertunities" instead

    Damn... are those the dulcet strains of 'Dualling Banjos' that I hear being played as a soundtrack to this post?

    Clearly there's no chance of *you* ever being hired over Wendy Seltzer -- unless they introduce affirmative action for hillbillies, anyway.

  30. In the long run, we're all dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If she really believes that crap about things looking up in the long term, she's going to die an angry, bitter old woman waiting for that long term to come. The EFF is King Canute railing against the tide.

  31. Re:It's not about 'lost jobs', it's about attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a guide for women who want to pee standing up.

  32. Just like in Thailand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple: tell everywhere you are ready to switch to open source, and you will get better prices from MS. There are so many (sometimes) good free (open) OS, its hard to believe this kind of declaration. Don't trust them, it all about propaganda...

  33. Pic is here by Geek+Dash+Boy · · Score: 1
    --
    I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.