Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Google Bombers?

muirhead asks: "As a proud new dad, I made a web site to share some baby photos. Having seen this article about Google Bombing, I gave it a go and posted comments to Slashdot, Newsforge, Kuro5hin and LinuxWorld. Some of the pages have a high enough PageRank to show up as links into my site. Now, there are quite a few phrases that I can tell folk to google, and know my site will show top of the list. My favourites are Ruby Orange and Mutley Sleeps, but of course, I want more. What other free sites and means do you know of that I can use to further increase the visibility of my website?"

109 comments

  1. Well... by Rysc · · Score: 5, Funny

    You could submit it as a story to Slashdot.

    --
    I want my Cowboyneal
    1. Re:Well... by skaffen42 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah. And then realise that your kid ain't going to college after the bill arrives for your excess bandwith usage.

      --
      People couldn't type. We realized: Death would eventually take care of this.
    2. Re:Well... by FroMan · · Score: 1

      I don't think he needs to worry about how to get higher google ratings. I think he needs to find a way to keep his kid from finding out "Mutley Sleeps" will bring up his baby pictures.

      I for sure would aquit a child for killing his parents for doing such a foolish thing.

      I can picture in highschool, thanks mom and dad, all the kids are jealous of me for having the highest google pagerank for "Mutley Sleeps."

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    3. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is ridiculous. I have been trying to post an Ask Slashdot for weeks involving a specific question about recycling old hardware. My question doesn't see the posts, but some guy wanting his family album to be seen does. What the f*ck are the editors thinking?
      The only remotely redeeming possibility I can think of for this original article is that geeks can get laid too.

  2. Why why why by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why can't you just give a URL out to your friends? Why would you want to publicize a site which will only be of interest to people you know AND sick perverts that want to look at your child in a much different way than you intended? I understand the desire to share pictures of your new child with family and friends but you might want to reconsider sharing it with the whole world. If I were to create a Internet photo album, I would keep it low-key. Why pay bandwidth bills so strangers can look at your kid?

    --
    I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    1. Re:Why why why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This strikes me as the exact opposite of the situation a while back where a woman blamed Google for publicizing a web page about her children.

    2. Re:Why why why by Hard_Code · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, WTF is up with that. "HEY COMPLETE STRANGER DO YOU WANT TO LOOK AT MY BABY?!" No you fucktard, so you managed to reproduce, what do you want, a congressional medal of honor? Sheesh. Baby pictures and embarrassing habits should be kept to yourself.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    3. Re:Why why why by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 1

      Why can't you just give a URL out to your friends?

      Did you see his URL? Not everybody has spare domain names to throw around. So he tucks away some family snapshots in a small corner of a web server that serves a fair amount of other unreleated content. He then wants a quickly communicated and easy-to-remember way for friends and family to find the page. Who the hell else is gonna seach for "Ruby Orange" or "Mutley Sleeps" anyway.

      As far as Cliff getting trolled, all of the story links are to google, so the author is not getting any page-rank karma out of it.

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
    4. Re:Why why why by xeer · · Score: 1

      My dad knows about google. Anyone who's been online more than an hour knows about it. Not all of them know what a 'url' is or even remember a non-simple url when they do.
      "What's your email address? Oh! It's W W W dot ..."

      That's alright, because I tell people to go to google and search for my name, donncha and they'll find my blog!

    5. Re:Why why why by Alpha27 · · Score: 1

      There are other means such as .....

      Your ISP hosting webspace, or getting a company who offers vanity domains to point to the url. There are other options than poluting the net with your url.

      I'm especially surprised he hasn't thought about the sick pervs on the net.

    6. Re:Why why why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Did you see his URL? Not everybody has spare domain names to throw around.
      If he can afford a digital camera and diapers, he can afford a domain name with forwarding.
    7. Re:Why why why by Wolfrider · · Score: 2, Insightful

      --Yah, forget about all this free advertising; Slashdot Google Bombers sounds like a good name to start a BAND!

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    8. Re:Why why why by MattCohn.com · · Score: 1

      Or he could get free redirecting over at www.dot.tk.

      anything.tk... free.

    9. Re:Why why why by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      His question is of general interest to many people. One of the reasons I post to slashdot is to drive traffic to my site and to (hopefully) get feedback on my writing. The answer to his question applies to me (and others like me) as well.

    10. Re:Why why why by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1

      People who are directed to your site by Google by means of a search query that is entirely unrelated to your website, will not give you must positive feedback at all. It will not be constructive or helpful. Getting your website mentioned on Slashdot is a means of driving traffic where interested people may check it out. Getting your website listed high within a google search through a search term that is not related to your site is a means of driving traffic to your site of an audience that you cannot predict or even expect to be interested. BIG DIFFERENCE.

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    11. Re:Why why why by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      Well sort of. Getting a high page rank on my site does increase the number of people who find information they are looking for on my page. For example, ever since I started promoting my London journal, my pagerank increased. That allowed people looking for book reviews to more easily find mine.

  3. Talk to this guy... by setzman · · Score: 1

    This guy has done pretty well, why don't you check out the secret to his success?

    --
    C:\>
  4. That's It! by Zach+Garner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's it, I'm leaving slashing permanently! I can't believe this post made it here.

    I'm adding "127.0.0.1 slashdot.org" to my /etc/hosts and never coming back.

    1. Re:That's It! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my solution is to block all posts by Cliff. Look at the list of 'Also by Cliff'. Every one of them is stupid. I have never blocked an editor before despite some frustration with Michael, but Cliff definitely gets the boot now.

      Recently by Cliff:
      google bombing your baby photos
      touch typing
      whether to use 10.10xxx or 192.168.. for a private address

      My browsing will be much more intelligent with Cliff gone.

    2. Re:That's It! by Snowspinner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All three of those posts seem to be in the Ask Slashdot department.

      I can only assume that the problem is not with Cliff so much as with the idiot /.ers who send worthless questions in.

    3. Re:That's It! by Rheingold · · Score: 1

      You were clearly not around during the Jon Katz era then...

      --
      Wil
      wiki
    4. Re:That's It! by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      And considering the topic of this Ask Slashdot, it was probably sent in thousands of times.

    5. Re:That's It! by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      I blocked timothy quite a while ago. Maybe I should try putting his stories back again.

    6. Re:That's It! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm taking my ball and going home! *whine* *whine* *pout* *pout*

      Awww, poor baby didn't get his nap this afternoon? Poor thing, you must be so cranky...

    7. Re:That's It! by Nodatadj · · Score: 1

      What...he's gone?

  5. Another option by flikx · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why rely on google? You could always SPAM everyone about your site!

    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
    1. Re:Another option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or spam Slashdot...

  6. I hope your baby is infertile... by andrewski · · Score: 3, Funny

    Since you are obviously unfit to breed, one could only hope your filthy seed will be unable to reproduce. Too bad it wasn't born with a hairlip, which would indicate its decidedly inferior genetic crop. Maybe it has at least a weak chin to indicate its lact of breeding.

    Good luck on elementary education, and here's to ruining the one thing that could POSSIBLY lend some sense to the modern internet. I hope your testicles are crushed in a vice...

    Sincerely,

    Andrewski

    1. Re:I hope your baby is infertile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I agree to everything you just said. We don't want to need 'google-bomb filters' in order to use google like we need spam filters to use e-mail.

    2. Re:I hope your baby is infertile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like huge balls

    3. Re:I hope your baby is infertile... by Archangel_Azazel · · Score: 1

      Just one word: OUCH. Don't piss this guy off

      --
      Your mind is like a parachute. It works best when it's been opened.
  7. You don't need google by cloudless.net · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The best way to drive more traffic to your site is to make more interesting and original content.

    1. Re:You don't need google by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1

      Does that mean you want him to have a better looking kid?

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    2. Re:You don't need google by Read+Icculus · · Score: 1

      If he simply wants more traffic and to get to the top of google he should just strip his kids down to their birthday suits. The sexual deviants amongst us will do the rest.

      --
      Anti-social? My code is just platform-specific.
  8. Grah. by NegativeK · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know, I know, most of the posts have been unhelpful thus far.. But I have to ask, should they be? We rely on Google as a tool for relevance for specific searchs, and "Google Bombing," as it so blatantly suggests, undermines this. If you site is good and relevant, it should rise to the top without any such techniques. If it doesn't.. It probably isn't relevant to the searches.

    Sorry for going off on this, but Google is a touchy subject for me lots of others - mainly 'cause other things suck. =)

    --
    This statement is false.
  9. Oh, for fucks' sake. by WasterDave · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's wrong with the editors today? Hello?

    "Dear Slashdot, can you please advise me on how to more effectively screw over one of the few remaining useful resources? Yours, Johnny Spammer".

    Between this and the regular ocurrence of "does anyone know how I can promote my new shareware, LameView" I'm beginning to wonder if there's a dialog box I'm missing where I can type in my credit card details when submitting a story.

    Fucking hell. Read it, at the top, under the logo

    "Stuff that matters"

    Not

    "Shit marketing resources for lamers"

    Dave :(

    --
    I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
    1. Re:Oh, for fucks' sake. by crapulent · · Score: 1

      Agreed completely. This is about as useless and stupid an "Ask Slashdot" I've ever seen posted. What's next?

      Ask Slashdot: My Company Violates the GPL, How Can I Effectively Hide This?

      Ask Slashdot: What's Your Opinion on Fraud?

      Ask Slashdot: I'd Really Like To Get Into Spamming, Can I Have All of Your Email Addresses Please?

    2. Re:Oh, for fucks' sake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask Slashdot: My Company Violates the GPL, How Can I Effectively Hide This?

      Easy; Copy all you want from the GPL'd codebase, then turn around and accuse THEM of stealing from YOU.

      Ask Slashdot: My company's stock is at an all-time high and is about to fall precipitiously. If I sell most of it now, is that an "inside trade?"

    3. Re:Oh, for fucks' sake. by wfbush · · Score: 1

      Or,

      "News for Nerds"

      Not

      "Oversized baby pictures with a really hideous background"

    4. Re:Oh, for fucks' sake. by WasterDave · · Score: 4, Funny

      Heh.

      In Soviet Russia you sue SCO!

      Dave

      --
      I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
    5. Re:Oh, for fucks' sake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude. I'm totally there. -?

    6. Re:Oh, for fucks' sake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry for breaking old traditions ... in Germany you sue SCO

  10. So, to paraphrase... by thecampbeln · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...you're looking to us to advise you on how to contribute to the watering down of Google's search results? The /. article you mentioned was exposing this practice as a bad thing, and yet you used the article as a how-to and are adding to the problem, and now are asking us how to help you add to the problem?

    I've got 2 words for you, one guess on what they are...

    --
    "1984" was ment to be a warning, not a guidebook. You hear that Kim Jong-il!? BushCo?!
  11. Oh brother... by jpsowin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First, why is this on /. ?

    Second, this is really lame. Why do you want to bomb the engines for your baby site? Who really is looking for it when they search with those keywords?

    Third, why in the world is this on /. ?

    Maybe this will finally break my slashdot addiction ;)

  12. good dad by falsification · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Time you spend being a good dad will have a more positive effect on the child than maximizing your web site hits.

    1. Re:good dad by x+e+q+u+a · · Score: 1

      "Time you spend being a good dad will have a more positive effect on the child than maximizing your web site hits."

      I truly applaud the author of that line, and whole heartedly agree. The previous posts do largely sum up my sentiments, but this post was the first I've seen to constructively tell this guy that the world doesn't give a fuck about his kid.

    2. Re:good dad by muirhead · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Very true.

      Time to quit it.

  13. Oh, and by the way... by thecampbeln · · Score: 1

    Not that it'll do much good, but foe these bitch-asses up!

    --
    "1984" was ment to be a warning, not a guidebook. You hear that Kim Jong-il!? BushCo?!
  14. Does anyone else think it would be funny... by Ieshan · · Score: 5, Funny

    For everyone to pick their favorite spam email sender and sign up his posted email address?

    puppydog@mutley.uklinux.net

    1. Re:Does anyone else think it would be funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He shoots, he scores!

      Survey says:

      YES! Mods think it would be funny for puppydog@mutley.uklinux.net to be picked up by spam spiders, too!

      Yes, that's right: puppydog@mutley.uklinux.net

      Note to asshat: Get your fucking bomb out of my Google. At the very least, why the hell would you want to publicize it on Slashdot, of all places. You saw what happened to Ralsky, did you not? Good, good, good. All in the name of fun, too. Now, exactly how many pr0n/fag/grandma diaper catalogs would you like to receive, again?

      Someone set this fool up the bomb, please!

      Oh..wait...

      (This /. post brought to you by puppydog@mutley.uklinux.net)

    2. Re:Does anyone else think it would be funny... by Etyenne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Before you hurt that guy, have you considered the posibility that this muirhead troll is impersonnating somebody else ? That the site linked belong to an innocent bystander ? That this email addy is not his, but someone else ?

      --
      :wq
    3. Re:Does anyone else think it would be funny... by andrewski · · Score: 1

      Briefly.

  15. Today on Slashdot! by Zapper · · Score: 4, Funny
    How to get rich quick!!!!!!!^H^H^H^H^H^H (damn, those suckers just have a life of their own.)

    How to $hamele$$y plug your <spam/"shareware"/casino/pr0n/...> website for in$tant $$$$$$$$^H^H^H^H^H!!!

    All the devious tricks revealed by a website with over half a million users in one easy to access place.

    !!!

    !

    --
    So much to do, so little bandwidth.
    --
    Try Mozilla
  16. Yeah, sure, uh-huh by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

    Slashdot and the furry fandom have one thing in common: Angsty trollers who say "I'm fed up with you all and I'm never coming back" but then start flinging shit like a monkey six months later all over again.

    --
    Help us build a better map!
    1. Re:Yeah, sure, uh-huh by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      Sounds like they reformatted and reset the /etc/hosts file or something. Tho I dunno anyone who reformats linux very often....

      You know /. is like crack, you just can't get enough and you can't go away.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    2. Re:Yeah, sure, uh-huh by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 1
      Sir, I would submit that it is not healthy to see everything through a furry lens. Sir, it is not healthy, sir.

      What you need, Baloo, what you need, sir, is to broaden your horizons. I consider you a friend, sir. Sir, you are my friend. But you need to broaden your horizons, sir -- you need to broaden your horizons.

      Perhaps explore Christian furrydom, or furry shamanism, sir. Sir, either would make you complete in my book, sir.

    3. Re:Yeah, sure, uh-huh by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1
      Perhaps explore Christian furrydom, or furry shamanism, sir. Sir, either would make you complete in my book, sir.

      You mean this? And besides, I think my major malfunction is that I haven't had a decent vacation in three years.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    4. Re:Yeah, sure, uh-huh by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 1
      Well-played, kind sir! Well-played!

      You are a scholar and a gentleman, and I appreciate your openness. Thumbs up in my book, and I wish others were half as brave with their convictions.

  17. Oh that bastard! by Militant+Libertarian · · Score: 1

    Now why would anyone do such a thing...
    Gothfare
    uh... ignore that

    --

    I fear nothing but my government. Vote Libertarian.
  18. Liar! by schnits0r · · Score: 1, Troll

    As a proud new dad,

    How ca you reproduce? You are a slashdot nerd, you kopw they don't have sex! Well, at least not now that you have a kid to keep you up all night whining and crying.

    1. Re:Liar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A good punishment for google bombing.

      Of course, the crime occured because of the punishment, not the other way around.

  19. You searched for link:www.mutley.uklinux.net/... by MattCohn.com · · Score: 5, Informative
    You searched for link:www.mutley.uklinux.net/.

    Please tell us what specific information you were seeking. Also tell us why you were dissatisfied with the search results.
    I would like to point you to this story on slashdot, a popular technology news site, posted by the author of the website above. It discribes how he abused the page-rank system in order to have his page score high on unrelated searches.

    http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?si d=03/09/03/2211236&mode=nested&tid=126&tid=164&tid =185&tid=95&threshold=-1
    Lession for today: Screw the system (esp. the good system) and be screwed by its supporters.
  20. way to go jackass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Go ahead and fuck up google's search results even more to make it worse for those of us that actually use it to look up things that are useful.

    Why can't you just give your friends a URL like most normal people would? Hey, while your at it, you should just buy one of those cd's with millions of addresses on it, and then send a mass mailing telling everyone what to google for to find your site.

    Idiot.

  21. click here by austad · · Score: 4, Informative

    Click here to add this guy to your Foes list.

    How did this ever make the frontpage of Slashdot? Thanks for helping screw up the one decent search engine, jackass.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    1. Re:click here by Oscar_Wilde · · Score: 1

      Looks like some people are trying to screw up his work as well.

      I don't approve of this but its made me think about the motives of some slashdot trolls.

  22. Ouch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Man some of the comments posted here are pretty angry. I can't wait to see the fury tomorrow when Michael dupes this Ask Slashdot submission!

    1. Re:Ouch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic? Aw, come on! That was pretty damn funny.

  23. As a proud new dad... by MoodyLoner · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... I just put something in my .sig and left it at that.

    Oh, and I put up some baby pics in my cube.

    I'm sure your little one is cute, but I don't walk around inflicting my family photos on random strangers, and you shouldn't either.

    And to the guy who keeps posting that people with families aren't actual Slashdot readers: Married ten years, daughter is two and a half. And I call myself Moody Loner. If there's hope for me, there's hope for anybody.

    --
    No Longer a Menace to Society.
    Alexandria Morrigan born 2/22/01 l. 20.5in wt. 7 lbs. 5 oz.
  24. Destroy the value of the search engine by Slipped_Disk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Alright, I REALLY hate the fact that I'm starting to sound like those 80 year olds sitting on the porch of the retirement home kvetching about how it used to be in "The Good Old Days", but...

    I remember a better time - A long time ago - when the SPAM content of my inbox was GUARANTEED to be less than the archive of legit mail I have piled up. - Now, in the last 5 days I have 507 bits of spam, and 307 "archived" real mails sitting in my inbox awaiting (eventual) sorting into categories.

    But, far more on topic (or off depending on your point of view), I remember back when search engines were useful because their content was guaranteed to be SOMEWHAT relevant to what you searched for.
    Yes, I know they were never perfect. You could search for Reddywhip, innocently hoping to get a site about whipped cream and inadvertently wind up at reddywhip.org (not your intended destination I'm sure), but now with the clutter from blogs that don't have the common sense to have a NOINDEX in their META tags or an appropriate robots.txt file, the damn things are becoming saturated with CRAP! Add to this the result of "googlebombing" (admittedly a much smaller effect, but still something that gets noticed - obviously or it wouldnt be done) and things are really starting to get out of control.

    Honestly, "nerds" should know better than to abuse search engines like this, and slashdot editors should know better than to post stories like this one - where the only "nerdly" bit is the link to the googlebombing article - itself already a story on slashdot (one with a great deal of merit in and of itself) - which will only serve to encourage more googlebombing and further degrade the quality of search results.

    Moderators: Go ahead, I know it's offtopic, but this kind of stuff SERIOUSLY pisses me off. Nothing personal against Clif & his article selection, I happen to like some of his articles, but this one just serves to inflame an already bad situation.

    --
    /~mikeg
  25. Talk to Suze by !3ren · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Forget all this high tech stuff, talk to Suze and get something 'revealing' posted in your gallery.

    No, seriously...

  26. You asked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you want to vastly increase web traffic to your site, I suggest that you post more naked pictures of your wife. Also, add some click-through disclaimers and pop-ups, so people know they're getting the *really* good stuff. Also, enter into some mutually beneficial advertising partnerships with any other similar sites.

    And if all that doesn't work, then go to a high-profile event, and kill the speaker and yourself. Don't forget to leave a suicide note with the URL to your website; it'll be in major newspapers everywhere!

  27. Re:You searched for link:www.mutley.uklinux.net/.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Thanks for providing the insight into that which is "Google Metamod."

    Don't like the results of the dweebs Google Bombing?

    Follow these links and report the PageRank manipulation:

    Google Quality Form : Ruby Orange

    Google Quality Form : Grumpy Watkins

    Google Quality Form : Mutley Sleeps

    Google Quality Form : Uncle Philip

    Be sure to cite www.mutley.uklinux.net

    and

    This story.

  28. On the other hand..... (WARNING: GOATSE.CX) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
    1. Re:On the other hand..... (WARNING: GOATSE.CX) by EMIce · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but when I mod up a post like this one and it gets meta-moderated, I lose Karma. I have modded down posts that were blatantly plagiarized from other threads and sources on the internet, only to get a post meta-moderation letter from slashdot telling me my karma has been "penalized". Replies to posts tip me off to this sort of behavior, but meta-moderators don't read into context before judging a post. The system is imperfect and often the best and most knowledgeable moderators lose their karma.

  29. The Second Most Impressive Slashdot Troll Ever by 0x0d0a · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All right, we should all clap and move on. This may be the single most impressive Slashdot Troll Story I've ever seen (the first, of course, being the hillarious take on the goat.cx link).

    You successfully managed to get a story posted that:
    * has nothing to do with nerds
    * Is a meta-joke (the fact that you have a story up at all means that there is no question)
    * contains obvious and highly visible links to a crappy personal webpage of pictures
    * contains a direct plea to Slashdot to assist in spamming.
    * was posted from an account that wasn't built up at all with legitimate postings, but had been used for just trolling.

    So, I say we should clap momentarily and move on. I suspect that many trolls have tried over the years, but pulling the wool so completely over editors' eyes cannot possibly be easy.

  30. two words for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "dynamic DNS"

    TZO will sell you a cheap domain name that can be associated with your ever-changing DHCP address.

    Earlier this year TZO came out with a bundled webserver that has a photo-gallery built in. It's limited but very easy to use. Plus you can feel secure knowing you're not running Microsoft IIS server :))

    They also have clients for Linux, and a bunch of languages and platforms I didn't think anyone used anymore.

  31. et tu Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this becomes common, Google will have to continuously modify their page rank system. At least it'll funnel research into mining complex data systems.

  32. Contents, contents, contents - or contents by yabHuj · · Score: 1

    Simple: provide good content that other people are interested in. The better and/or unique your content, the higher your visibility. Remember: visibility != number of hits.

    Other question: why do you want more traffic? Just to have a higher hit count? Except if you are hosting a number of paying web-advertizements, I don't see any benefit in that.

  33. This isn't Google bombing by Shiifty · · Score: 3, Informative

    Google bombing is a co-ordinated attack to increase rankings, usually by blogging. It requires many different sites. Simply posting comments to websites with your website in your .sig or something isn't 'bombing'. Try posting your website to relevant Usenet groups to increase exposure. http://groups.google.com

  34. Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...don't let the door hit ya / where the good Lord split ya!, as we say out here.

  35. hot momma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That Jeannie chick is hot man. can I have her number? I mena you already posted her image to tens of strangers, might as well post her phone number. She might get some action too.

  36. Favourites?? by penguin_punk · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't believe your favourites are 'Ruby Orange' or 'Mutley Sleeps'. If I was you, I'd definately be telling people to google for the Tit Tree

    Dang.

    --
    HURD - Hurd's Under Research & Development
  37. Where's the "-1: Offtopic" for stories? by (trb001) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, Taco, can we start modding stories? I would gladly give all 5 of my moderator points for the chance to z0t stories like this. It's amazing that someone managed to post a "-1: Offtopic", "-1: Troll" and "-1: Flamebait" story all in one.

    --trb

  38. Retards! by themassiah · · Score: 1

    Among the bellowing "I can't believe this made it to the front page" trumpeters, I'd like to issue the clarion call of a "Congrats!". Fatherhood is something to be proud of!

    --
    - Sometimes you're the pidgeon, sometimes you're the statue.
    1. Re:Retards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really don't think you should be encouraging people like this to breed - surely not being able to keep it in your pants is not worthy of congrats.

  39. Mod point abuse and the mods that love it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moderators are clearly not reading the moderation faq.

    This comment is either:

    "+0 Normal"
    "+1 Underrated"
    "-1 Overrated"
    "-1 Offtopic"
    "+1 Funny"
    or
    "-1 Flamebait"

    It's not "-1 Troll." It may be a hostile way to solve something (in the poster's mind), hence the validity of the Flamebait mod (ie. BAITING for FLAMES), but there's no information that has been falsified (Re: BSD is dying...), no hot grits, no GNAA... It even warned you of the goatse.cx link in the title. It simply gave an example of how Google's page ranking system could be used to poision the already manipulated search phrases.

  40. 75 Freaks and counting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    holy crap! and this guy is totally unrepentant too!

    do the right thing and add this assclown to your foes list RIGHT NOW!

  41. Get a good domain name by jbrayton · · Score: 1

    I agree with many of the critical comments, but I'll try to be somewhat helpful anyway. Here's my advice:

    Get the kid a good domain name. Ideally "[firstname][lastname].com".

    Then, set up the web site on that domain name. It is perfectly legitimate to email pictures to your *friends*. But I doubt anyone outside of your address book really cares.

    The memorable domain name will help *interested* users remember the URL, so they won't even need to go to Google to search for it.

    The domain name will also come as close as possible to guaranteeing that the kid will have a permanent email address for life, provided that the domain name is renewed annually.

    The domain name may even help search engine ratings, if search engines are smart enough to take "www.[something].com" more seriously than "www.[something].uklinux.net".

  42. Ruby by sfraggle · · Score: 1

    You know you're a geek when you name your daughter after a programming language..

    --
    were you expecting to see a sig here? perhaps you'd rather see the inside of an ambulance!
    1. Re:Ruby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know you're a geek when you think the programming language came before the name.

  43. Un Poco Ayuda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me help your visitors out: Ruby Orange and Mutley Sleeps

  44. Pls Send link to pervs@nambla.org by queenb**ch · · Score: 1

    Title says it all.....

    For the ignorant....

    www.nambla1.de

    LOOSER!

    QueenB

    --
    HDGary secures my bank :/
  45. it is so funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..that you think you've accomplished something with all this. When you're old and dying, are you going to list this as a great triumph?

    "For one glorious month in later summer 2003, I had the search phrase 'ruby orange' locked down on google. It was my proudest moment!"

    I bet your wife is really happy that you're bothering with this and not changing diapers and doing other proper father things.

  46. Going with a theme... by Valdrax · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ask Slashdot: How do I get moderators to like me?
    Ask Slashdot: How does one get on national TV?
    Ask Slashdot: Gimme Attention! NOW!

    ... or going with the theme of destroying a public commons instead of being attention-starved ...

    Ask Slashdot: PC dumping-friendly states?
    Ask Slashdot: Cheap ways to set up a 10 kW ham radio antenna?
    Ask Slashdot: Hacking ILECs for better bandwidth?

    But really, I don't think you can top this question for both sad, pathetic attention cravings and deliberate attempts to ruin a public resource combined together. I can try, though...

    Ask Slashdot: Using USENET to advertise my webcam site?

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  47. Maybe... by shish · · Score: 1

    Many have said that the story shouldn't have been posted, but what if the point of posting was to make a public example of the flamage you get for google-bombing?

    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  48. reality check by iamhassi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i know this is -1 flamebait but I don't care: reality check, no one gives a damn about your baby. Your friends and family might, so register a simple domain and give them the url, but don't force the rest of us. Hundreds of thousands of babies are born daily, why is yours special? Because it's yours, so you think everyone should care? We don't, and the last thing I want is for your baby's site to pop-up as the first link on google everytime I do a search.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  49. no offense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    but that is one fucked up looking baby. Are you sure the hospital didn't accidently switch it with a monkey?


    PS - how old is Jeannie?

  50. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BTW if you read the article's comments do not forget to use the quotation marks when searching for "autistic paraplegic donkey porn" on google. It's a virus ridden smut page. I know I know a lot of you like that kind of thing but...

  51. Just an Experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sure this guy isn't trying to spam or ruin Google. This is just an experiment to point out a big problem in Google's PageRank system. Making this work on his baby's site just proves how bad the system can be, not because he wants us all to see his baby.

  52. Think Before You Act by dbretton · · Score: 1
    Do you really want the WHOLE WORLD to visit your web site?

    Your bandwidth bill will be extraordinary, and you will get some perverts looking at your baby with alternative thoughts....

    Actually, I just visited your site. Nix that last remark. That baby's do damn ugly that even the most depraved of sick-o's would have only one thing on their mind: nausea. And that family! Fugly fugly fugly! I need image filtering software to prevent me from viewing it!

    ...Oh, and you'll also get a lot of people who will flame you, too.

  53. Check out my Daycare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If thats the case:
    www.sproutsdaycare.com Sacramento's newest and best childcare. Great Rates!

  54. And.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how many times have you hit Google and clicked the "Google Search" button after having typed,

    "I feel like browsing a bunch of photos of people I'll probably never meet in my entire life." ?

  55. Here's why: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    CGP314: "One of the reasons I post to slashdot is to drive traffic to my site and to (hopefully) get feedback on my writing."

    Here's a tip: If you drive me to read your material, you are NOT likely to garner a favorable/constructive review.

    I'd be willing to read what you've done, but if you trick me into hitting your page, the best you can hope to get is my leaving without crapflooding your guest book. Someone looking for a book review finding your site would be a good thing, probably for all involved, but this is not a desirable reason to Google bomb. This guy wanted the phrase "ruby orange" to point to his page, based on a photo of the kid (named Ruby) having just had her foot dipped in orange paint. For something as simple as a baby photos page, it would probably be cheaper/easier to register a domain name, or even to have a couple hundred cards printed up with a URL. How about creating an emailing list and telling people where to sign up?

    I've got a few pages on the web, and several of them are loaded with photos of my son, who will be a year old in three weeks. I haven't plastered his web site all over creation using a method that's just likely to draw tons of strangers in to view them. I tell people I see when I know they'd be interested, and I email or call people that I don't see. As many creeps are on the 'net, I sometimes consider putting passwords on the pages. If I had a daughter like this guy, I'd be nervous to even POST photos at all.

    And what about the people who



    Google bombing may be a viable tactic in some cases, but this guy needs to find better ways to do what he's doing.
  56. iMac account by v_1matst · · Score: 1

    1) get a mac and get a .mac account
    2) take whatever pictures you want
    3) import them into iPhoto
    4) create an album of photos to share
    5) export the album to your .mac account
    6) profit ?!?! (optional)

    Seriously, if sharing your pictures is all you want to do, then this (or something like it) is the way to go.