Slashdot Mirror


Joss Whedon's Firefly Coming To The Big Screen

lhouk281 writes "According to this article in the Hollywood Reporter, Universal is turning Firefly into a movie. Firefly lives!" This show deserved a chance to run a full season. If this comes out, I'll sure be there opening weekend.

23 of 572 comments (clear)

  1. GREAT NEWS! by bandy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Firefly is a prime example of how Fox is populated by PHBs. Fabulous show, great concept .. and they show the episodes out of order and at random intervals so the audience just can't get into it. They could have capitalized on Farscape's cancellation [SciFi: A channel for SF fans run by PHBs], but nooooooooo!

    --
    "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
    1. Re:GREAT NEWS! by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe it will be so good it will spawn a T.V. Series.

      Oh wait....

    2. Re:GREAT NEWS! by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would like to point out that, as I see it, the only network on the planet that is properly marketting itself to an audience of nerds is Cartoon Network. Adult Swim is such a great idea, and it's run in such a refreshingly honest manner that I sometimes catch myself watching stuff I don't even like *cough* Inuyasha *cough* *cough*.

      Realize to a lot of people, we're just people with money. They couldn't care less about our culture or lifestyle, so long as we watch their dumb tv shows. They come up with an idea for a market segment, one they aren't a part of, and appeal to the stereotype, not real people. This is how you can have a channel like G4, and have it be a colossal failure. Earth to MBA: gamers already know the Konami code. They don't need a team of fresh faced multiethnic twentysomethings on a stage somewhere screaming it at them. But they might watch a show with in depth strategies from experts, interviews with developers and reviews that weren't paid off...

      Of course, this is nothing new. Lifetime, MTV, VH1, even BET, have all made their niche appealing to the LCD of their particular market. Which makes me wonder what Williams' Street has done to be given the freedom to do something new and interesting...

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    3. Re:GREAT NEWS! by DCheesi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A lot of the early shows which made them great wouldn't last one season if they premiered on Fox now. The frustrating thing is that Fox still greenlights these innovative projects, but then turns around and kills them in their infancy. It would almost be better if they didn't buy these concept-shows in the first place. Then we wouldn't be tortured with the might-have-beens; and maybe the good ones would find an audience on cable or syndication.

    4. Re:GREAT NEWS! by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Firefly was not a good show.

      Just like that? No context, no explanation? What, your off topic rant about the crap that doesn't get cancelled is proof of that statement?

      Well then...

      You are not a good human being.

      P.S. Dear Moderator, get your finger off that "moderate" button and read his comment, then mine again. That's right, I'm using his own style to engage conversation. I want him to back his statement instead of riding an OT karma boost to pull a quick one with that lil' snippet.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:GREAT NEWS! by Wandering+Idiot · · Score: 5, Funny

      Firefly was not a good show.
      Die.
      Oh, wait, I should probably back that up with some sort of coherent response, hadn't I? Very well, then:

      ZOE: "Preacher, don't the Bible have some pretty specific things to say about killing?"
      BOOK: "Quite specific. It is, however, somewhat fuzzier on the subject of kneecaps..."

      ZOE: "Jayne...this is something the captain has to do for himself."
      MAL: "No! No, it's not!"

      MAN: "Gave him a peck of trouble for it."
      MAL: "What kind of peck is that?"
      MAN: "The kind where they hacked off his hands and feet with a machete, rolled him into the bog."
      WASH: "The peck pretty hard around here..."

      HARROW: "You didn't have to wound that man."
      MAL: "Yeah, I know. It was just funny."

      WASH: "Psychic, though? That sounds like something out of science fiction."
      ZOE: "We live on a space ship, dear."
      WASH: "So?"

      Plus, it had *no sound in space*. Firefly rocked. Deny it again and I'll shove you into the nearest convenient intake port...

  2. About time by ericdano · · Score: 4, Interesting
    About time damn it. This show should have been on another network. Fox is more interested in its lame reality TV shows than some interesting Sci-fi.

    Anyone know when the first "season" is coming out on DVD?

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
  3. A full season? by Rinikusu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My god, man. If "Everybody Loves Raymond" (lies! The title is a LIE! I hate that fucking show) can go on for how long now?, then Firefly deserves a run at least as long as Buffy.

    But, what do you expect? Great show, great premise, nice twist on typical plotlines, great writing, great "settings", great girls er actors and actresses.. It had all the recipes to be axed.

    "Hey, this show is too good. Gotta give it the axe."

    Remember, America doesn't want quality. We want convenience and entertainment that doesn't require thinking. Hence, Jackass.

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    1. Re:A full season? by Jonathan_S · · Score: 5, Informative

      as I could barely sit through one episode without cringing.

      You only watched the first episode "Train Job" didn't you?

      Leave it to fox to run the worst episode first and the pilot episode that introduces you to everyone last

      The rest of the series was much better than train job, and if fox had promoted it, led off with the pilot, and aired it in order it likely could have made at least till the end of the season.

    2. Re:A full season? by Rinikusu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Man, don't apologize for how you think about things. Your perception and decisions are yours, so be proud of them. You don't like Firefly. I'm grown up enough to admit that Firefly isn't for everyone, just like Linux isn't for everyone. You know what I mean? But that's what makes the world go 'round: The little differences. You know, like how Quarter Pounders with Cheese are called "Royales w/cheese" in France, or how women don't shave their legs in Germany. So, stand up and be proud fellow geek! You're an individual!

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  4. Re:Universal by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 4, Insightful

    lower costs to own a DVD?

    Are you kidding? With the exception of video games, DVDs represnt the best value in entertainment. What would *you* call a fair price to own a DVD?

  5. I won't be there by macemoneta · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I won't see this movie, because I was a fan of the series. I'm tied of being yanked around by the studios.

    Everytime I get interested in a program, it gets cancelled, usually without closure. Sometimes the cancellation occurs on a cliff-hanger, like "John Doe". That's a clear indication that the studios have no respect for the viewers; why should I have any respect for them? If they are not going to make a multi-year commitment, why should I?

    Firefly, FarScape, John Doe are all recent casualties. I'm pissed. I've decided to drop back, and wait for a few seasons before I start watching any new program. If it doesn't survive, then at least I wasn't impacted. If it's getting good buzz after a few seasons, then I'll watch the reruns or DVD to catch up.

    If this means that new shows won't get done, that's fine too. I'm old enough to know there are better things I should be spending my time on anyway (even /. qualifies in that regard). :-)

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  6. Best Sci-Fi show, Ever! by Mal+Reynolds · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What amazingly good news. Woot! For any who've not yet seen it, be sure to pick up the DVD of the first (and only, grumble) season when it hits the shelves this December. The DVD *will* have the unaired episodes and lots of commentary and gag reels and all shown in the correct order (Fox sucks so bad it isn't funny). Amazon was pre-soldout last I checked. For any who don't know why Firefly didn't make it, one phrase should answer it "Fox are Idiots". The idiots at Fox preempted the show for sports programming more for over half of it's episodes. Then there was the 2-hour premiere which cost something like 6 million dollars. The premiere introduced all the characters and set the story. Fox execs decided they didn't want to show the premiere first, they wanted it to be the 10th episode of the season. and had to be reworked into a "flashback episode" for that context... What a bunch of wankers, but we all know that already. The article says Universal bought a rights transfer from Fox, perhaps they'll never again influence anything to do with it. One can only hope that when the movie is successful they'll give thought to bringing back the show. A movie is nice and all, and it's Great that Firefly is back. But a movie will only give us 2 hours of Firefly a year. Compared to the 15 or more hours a year of Firefly we'd have if the TV show comes back. More = better. WOOT

  7. Re:length of run by Khomar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Most good shows don't start to click until at least the 2nd season.

    That was one of the more intriguing bits about the series for me -- the characters were already very good. The actors really seemed to be enjoying the show and doing a great job of breathing life into their characters. It was well written, and the plots were engaging. The big plot was just getting started when FOX cut them... even with the movie, we may never know where the show would have taken us.

    I am very happy to hear that they are at least going to try to get the entire cast on board. It was the full ensemble that really made the show work.

    --

    I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

  8. Re:no good by Jonathan_S · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Prostitutes will never be the top females in the social hierarchy of any civilization.
    If you fly a spaceship to colonize a new planet, you will never have to drive a chuckwagon pulled by a team of horses to get across a babbling brook on that planet.

    First of all she wasn't exactly a prostitute, but more importantly a companion is not the "top female in the social hierarchy", yes she ranks better than the semi-criminal/black-market/smuggler crew running around in their obsolete junker of a spacecraft, but that isn't exactly way up the social chain.

    And second, depending on how you got to the planet you might well drive a chuckwagon pulled by a team of horses. Just because you got dropped off in a spaceship doesn't imply that you are rich, or that the spaceship deposited a set of modern machine tools with the colony.

    A planet could be colonized much like Australia, a place to dump people that aren't wanted in the parent society. With a low level of trading between the parent planet and the colony, there wouldn't be much ability to import needed items, and maintaining or building up a technological society from near scratch isn't easy. You need a lot of energy, which you don't necessarily have, a lot of raw materials, and some expensive machining tools to even get as far as the 19th century tech.

    The nice thing about horses and wagons is that horses are self reproducing, you don't need a tech base to fix them when they break or build new ones. And grass or hay is easier to get than petroleum, or electric generation, or fission/fusion. And wagons can be build and maintained with little more that basic hand word working tools.

  9. Bunk by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great! Finally a reason to get out of my bunk! : )

    (You need to have seen the series to get this)
    P.S. Notice my .sig:

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  10. Re:Buffy? by sammy+baby · · Score: 4, Informative

    The original was goofy, and somewhat likeable, but not exactly what I'd call "excellent".

    Wheadon wrote the script for the original, and was pretty much horrified - or, at least, very disappointed - with the end result. When the opportunity came to turn the film into a series, he insisted on retaining ultimate creative control over the direction of the show. It was a smart move - he had great instincts, and the show rarely stumbled when he was responsible for the content. (Episodes written by others, on the other hand, didn't always turn out so well.)

    If the guy responsible for both the movie and the series says that the series is much better than the original, I don't think it's so strange to agree with him.

  11. New cast members announced! by LeiGong · · Score: 4, Funny

    Along with the original cast, 3 new members will be added to lure in the casual movie goer. The first new addition will be a stubborn and mean-spirited, yet loveable, robot named "Alvin." The 2nd character will be a 1-2' tall furry creature with a really "cute" name that always seems to get into trouble. The 3rd character will be a "superior" alien-being that will constantly remind the crew of their mistakes and point out the foolish of 80% of the captain's actions. This will help the movie attract more than just the show's 16-35 male demographic audience.

  12. Re:Good lord... by Frostalicious · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What the hell is a western and space fantasy doing on the same page?!

    Yeah, most westerns are about high adventure on the frontier of civilization. Whereas most sci-fi shows are about high adventure on the frontier of civilization. I don't see how they are compatible.

  13. Re:Geeky shows by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Informative

    A lot of people dont understand why Futurama got the axe while the Simpsons endure. They dont appreciate how much went into Futurama.

    Adult Swim has been putting little factoids into their commercial bumpers about it. It cost something like 2 million dollars per episode. The opening sequence has something like a dozen layers of animation and took months to complete. The animation in Futurama was really above-par, with multilayered hand animated characters mixed in with CGI and special effects and whatnot. It was all so subtle, though, that people didnt get it.

    Cartoon Network was negotiating with Groenig about continuing Futurama, but the price tag was just way to high. They'd have to animate it like any other cartoon, which would kill the shows feel and mood.

    The good news, however, is that they've struck an agreement for new Family Guy episodes.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  14. hate to break this to anyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
    but PHB's are only growing in number. Key decision making positions are increasingly placing brain dead (or just simply unqualified for that role) personnel into those positions and doing NOTHING to encourage good "business sense" decisions. As a consumer it is often annoying and frustrating.

    As an investor it is HIGHLY infuriating. (you can include "as an employee" here as well) As I mentioned in a post above... your dollar is your vote. Remember that when you get pissed at the stupidity you witness in business ask yourself if you helped create it.

    Oh, and one thing... don't confuse (or let yourself be confused by those who say this) the situation of being angry at a particular programming choice and that of obviously making a bad business decision. I have often been on the receiving end of decisions that were not favorable to me... however it was clear after a bit of thought and observation that I was in the minority. The real issue is when you have your major money maker and cancel it or as mentioned you take ANY show and simply mangle it so that you drive away revenue.

    Remember this bit of wisdom by Scott Adams, "Why are stupid managers there? Because they were themselves hired by stupid management" Until you break the chain then this will not magically go away. There is little incentive for managers with business sense. The drive is for buzz and other superficial element compliance. Yet here we have the problem of perceived causal relationships. If a PHB is around and money flows then his PHB will see it as a sign of good management. Trends and actual cause and effect analysis will be ignored.

    Personally this failure to do the job of an executive would lead me to fire them. I am glad I am a small company with no bloat. If anyone I outsourced to pulled this crap they would immediately be without money from me.

  15. vote with your wallet by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Insightful
    No one would watch the show when it was broadcast into the comfort of our living rooms for FREE.

    I watched it, but...
    I was willing to:
    • stay at home on friday nights to watch it.
    • spend the ENTIRE night watching FOX on mute absentmindedly (while killing time on the net) until it came on at 12:05am to then stay up until 1:05am to watch it.
    • spend the ENTIRE night watching FOX on mute absentmindedly (while killing time on the net) until it came on at 12:20am to then stay up until 1:20am to watch it.
    • Live with the frustration and disapointment of staying at home to watch it on friday night only to discover that its crap like Andromeda or Happy Gilmour that is playing in its time slot that week (sometimes with advance warning, sometimes not).
    • Stick to the show after having been promised in all the commercials all summer long that the first ep. would be the pilot featuring a Girl In A Box only to be shown ep2 in its place, with no girl-ina-box (the (quite excellent) pilot was the LAST show aired...go figure).
    • Watch episodes in first run OUT OF ORDER, seeing the "previously on firefly" segement showing something that was only seen the week after (and that completely fucked up the story, seeing as how important stuff had happen in the episode that they had not shown, screwing the viewer quite thouroughly).
    • endure the ads for Fox's crappy other shows during the commercial breaks.
    • etc


    Most people aren't THAT dedicated to a completly new show.

    And BTW, not only were people watching the show when it was on for free, but we also TOPPED OFF THE PREORDER LIMIT for the DVD in one day. Jeez, think about it for one second will ya...
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  16. JW + copyright by arpy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I wouldn't be so sure about Joss Whedon's attitude to copyright/file sharing issues and MPAA scum.

    For example: "If there's one thing the Buffy Powers That Be should have learned by now, it's that you can't stifle demand by choking the supply. When The WB pulled 'Graduation Day, Part 2' off the air in June, 1999, because of Columbine, fans got bootleg tapes from Canada (with creator Joss Whedon's blessing, no less)" (From here)

    I.e. Joss Whedon actually sanctioned copyright violation by fans in at least one case (admittedly there were exceptional circumstances).