Slashdot Mirror


FCC Ponders Removing Morse Code Reqs for Amateur Radio Licenses

Nalez writes "This story on the ARRL website outlines six petitions currently in front of the FCC to drop the Morse code requirement for the amateur radio license exams. Currently the ability to do Morse code at 5 words per minute is required to operate on the high frequency bands (below 30Mhz), which are the bands that propagate best around the world." While this may or may not attract more people to ham radio, it will make it easier for the novice to use packet radio devices.

19 of 341 comments (clear)

  1. About time! by InterruptDescriptorT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know the old-timers don't want to hear this, but it's really about time that this outdated modulation and transmission scheme no longer be required. They old-timers won't admit it to others, but they know that their hobby isn't growing because of the code requirements.

    Kids these days--the very people you want to get excited about ham radio--have absolutely no interest in pounding the brass, fumbling over the differences between A and N and trying to copy what others have to say via Morse. Remember, they're growing up in a HDTV, 500-channel, broadband Internet world. It's absolutely no surprise that they think sending letters with dits and dahs is draconian. It is.

    Let's give the customary 2-meter and 6-meter privileges to new tickets and push the cutting-edge technologies like PSK31 on the newbies. Show them that ham radio can truly be exciting and modern. But it really is about time the code went the way of the dinosaur. Don't outlaw it--just make it optional.

    --
    Karma: Excellent Birds (mostly as a result of listening to Laurie Anderson)
    1. Re:About time! by Karamchand · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Perhaps the old-timers don't want their hobby to grow (for example to grow like the internet grew!) Perhaps they want to keep it like it is - rather clean, a bit of the elite-touch.

      And for this to continue there have to be some off-putting requirements. If you want to transmit radio waves without learning anything one should choose citizien band.

      (Apart from the fact that morse code is still one of the most reliable kinds to communicate world wide even under worst conditions)

    2. Re:About time! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Perhaps the old-timers don't want their hobby to grow (for example to grow like the internet grew!) Perhaps they want to keep it like it is - rather clean, a bit of the elite-touch. And for this to continue there have to be some off-putting requirements. If you want to transmit radio waves without learning anything one should choose citizien band.

      But there's already a fairly extensive written test. It's not like the morse-code exam is the only thing preventing the FCC from handing out licenses to anyone with five dollars and a heartbeat. If they want to make the written test more technical, that's fine with me. Just get rid of the requirement for learning a stupid monkey trick. It should be about knowledge, not rote-learning a silly cipher.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:About time! by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Perhaps the old-timers don't want their hobby to grow (for example to grow like the internet grew!) Perhaps they want to keep it like it is - rather clean, a bit of the elite-touch.

      I hate to break it to the old-timers who have this opinion, but if amateur radio continues to dwindle in users you're not going to have it pretty soon. The government will take away those frequencies and sell them off to the highest bidder for commercial communications. There's already VERY strong support for doing that. I'd be very sad to see that happen which is why I hope that they can do something to increase interest and decrease the amount of meaningless hoops you have to jump through to obtain broadcast privileges on certain bands. I'm not about to take a morse code test, but I'd certainly go learn the extra material required to pass a written test for general or advanced/extra (whatever) license.

  2. The inevitability of it ... sigh by freeio · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We knew that sooner or later this requirement would be removed. Those of us who love CW (Morse Code) still use it, and others will continue to do so, if only because it is simple, it works, and it overcomes real language barriers.

    Still, even though we may love it, it is an anachronism, and the requirement will be dropped, like it or not.

    73
    W4TI

    --
    Soli Deo Gloria
  3. This was going to say "First Post" in Morse Code by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 3, Insightful
    In fact, I was going to post this in Morse code, but the lameness filter caught me. I hereby suggest that Slashdot switch to Morse code entirely.

    Ahem...anyhow, you could argue that being a ham operator is like joining the Army: you're making yourself and your abilities available to your country/neighbours/fellow humans if necessary. Morse code is intelligible when packet radio and voice are not. Multiple, redundant channels of communication are Good Things, especially when disaster strikes...why allow one of those channels to wither and die?

  4. 2-Meter Packet ... by ProfMoriarty · · Score: 3, Insightful
    While this may or may not attract more people to ham radio, it will make it easier for the novice to use packet radio devices.

    There's already packet for 2-Meter ... so changing the Morse requirement would only allow it on different frequencies.

    As an Amateur Extra class holder, I can see both sides of this ... if you drop the requirement, then more people would be able to get the General or AE license.

    However, if there is a roadblock (not a very high one), that would limit the number of poor operators on HF frequencies that would travel around the world.

    If BPL does come to fruition, it really won't matter on HF anymore.

    BTW, what type of communication would prevail if aliens invade?

    --
    Karma? Karma? I don't need no stinkin' karma.
  5. Clarification .. by peatbakke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Three questions for all you hams:

    - Why was morse code originally required for amatuer radio operators?

    - How often is morse code used today?

    - What advantages does morse code have, vs other forms of radio communication?

    1. Re:Clarification .. by niko9 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Three questions for all you hams:

      - Why was morse code originally required for amatuer radio operators?

      - How often is morse code used today?

      - What advantages does morse code have, vs other forms of radio communication?


      Most of the early gear was built by operators. There was no commercially avaible gear. You built everything by scratch, and the first radios were CW, then voice.

      Despite what most non hams would love to tell you, CW is widley used on the HF bands. Why?
      It is a highly efficient way of operating.

      When band conditions are not optimal for voice or othe rmodes, CW usually gets through, and usually with less power. Morse is universal, so talking to that Japanese will not be a problem. When I first became licensed as a No Code Novice (teenager at the time) I too thought CW was moronic and for old times, and thought I would never use it. Then I started to read more about things like QRP (5 watts or less) and home brew gear and my interest in CW grew.

      Go visit sites like Small Wonder Labs or Nor Cal QRP kits and take a look at some of these high quality CW battery operated kits. Were talking a handfull of parts, battery operated, less than a couple of watts and you could literally work the world all within a few Khz of band space. Some of these kit's are availble for under 40 bucks, and can be built in one night with some hand tools and a low wattage soldering iron. Now go read the reviews of some of these "kits" compared to high priced, bells and whistles laden, rush to market, poor quality control, consumer rigs.

      Some of the younger people (ages 9-18) trying to get into the hobby today just don't have thousands to spend on a new all-in-one 100 watt radio. Some of these people are also turned off to the fact that they'll become appliance operators. They could just surf the net at 1Mb instead.

      So in respects to CW, some folks don't look at the BIG picture when it come to this antiquated mode.

      Some of our worst nightmares came true on Sept. 11, and it was a disaster on a grand scale. But what if there was a disaster on a national or even planetary scale? Isn't bulletproof, battery operated worldwide communications with a simple wire antenna sound like a great idea?

      I don't have any objections to having CW dropped as a requirment, but I do think that if it does happen, people will eventually want the CW portions of the HF band turned over to other modes, which I object to.

  6. Looks like I'm in... by doppleganger871 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm all for dropping the CW req. but I understand why it's there... It's low-tech, and can be received a lot further than any other type of transmission... very little of the actual signal needs to make it thru in order to get the message. High-tech relys on more equipment, and therefore, usually has a higher risk of malfunction, and more difficult repair. Pretty easy to make a cw switch... any two pieces of electrically conductive materials would work in a pinch.

  7. Keep the requirement by Alton_Brown · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Look - everyone wants to try to bend over backwards to help people feel welcome these days. Instead of changing the rules they should look for alternatives. Maybe create their own spectrum for those who want to participate but don't know morse code. The rules of golf have been around a long time. However recently to make people feel accepted or to try to capture a larger audience those rules have been changed. Cases in point: Casey using a golf cart and Annika Sorenstam playing a PGA event without having earned a proper PGA Tour card. In both these cases the end result was disappointing even though it was done with the best of intentions.

    We have to respect the rules and understand the subtle details of the hobbies we choose (be it morse code or where to drop an out-of-bounds shot). What's next - do we change chess because people can't remember that the knight has to move in that crazy 'L' shape? Yeah, that's it - we'll protest the Internation Chess Federation for that - it's not fair to those who don't want to or can't learn how to use the piece correctly!

    Sorry for the rant, but at some point you have to stand up and say no!

    --AB

  8. Re:Restrictions on use of the Ham bands by Detritus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's an issue of national security. There are many countries that would not issue any amateur licenses if encryption was allowed. Although they have more modern toys today, the stereotypical spy used a hidden transmitter to send his reports back to his case officer in encrypted morse code. Amateur radio was shut down completely during World War II due to concerns about espionage. Even today, the more paranoid countries restrict amateur radio to club stations that can be easily monitored for subversive activities. In the worst cases, amateur radio is prohibited and unauthorized possession of radio equipment is considered proof of espionage, resulting in death or imprisonment.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  9. Re:probably too late to save the hobby by 3dr · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I had a no-code tech license until 2001. Back in 1990 or 1991 is when they first allowed this license. I've let it expire. Oh, I did learn the 5wpm but got the nocode license instead.

    But anyway, as friendly and interesting as the "old farts" are in amateur radio, many have war experience, and this hobby is their outlet for the training they received. That's fine. But the ideology behind licensing is the problem, that only by learning code (and up to 16 or 20 wpm for advanced licenses) can one fully appreciate amateur radio. This has reduced amateur radio's numbers, even though licensees have discussed this ad nauseum. "How do we build up the ranks?" "How do we make it interesting?" Simply put, the code requirements, a severe blockade to the other amateur radio technologies entirely unrelated to dit-dah-dit (like satellite, amateur TV, etc) is what's gating the wider acceptance to amateur radio. The "old farts" have not gotten it yet.

  10. Why? For very good reasons by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Because Morse code is a technique that is long past beeing needed in ham radio, it's now only the old farts way of hazing new members to ham radio.

    There are actually much better technologies for doing anything Morse code claims to do now. PSK31, for example, is a far better digital modulation system than Morse. Even Morse could survive if it was desired, but why keep a very knowledgable ham (perhaps one that has even passed the Expert class written exam) off the bands just because they can't learn an ancient 19th century audio encoding technique? There is plenty of computer technology that would allow a ham to both send and receive code much better than someone doing it by hand and ear. You need some technology to receive a radio signal anyway, why arbitrarly draw that line short of letting a ham put a morse-to-speach converted in a set of headphones? (Which, of course, is perfectly legal for all use, just not for qualifying for a license in the first place. In fact I know many hams who learned code to get their license and never used it again afterwards, and, although they have renewed their licenses since then, could not use morse code now if they had to.)

    Most importantly, a frequent argument the old farts like to make is the "importance" of Morse code in emergency situations. But keeping people out of the hobby and having less stations able to monitor and respond in emergency situations because people who can not learn morse code have been kept out does not make sense. In this sense the morse code license requirement actually keeps many hams (like myself) from having HF equipment that they could provide aid with when a disaster hits.

    And yes, although some people have no problem with it, there is a significant barrier for Morse code for many. It's not just learning what the patterns are and what letters they match up to, it's being able to hear them and do that translation in real time while signals continue to come in. Easy for some, hard or imposiable for others, even though they have tried all of the tricks many times.

    Forcing new hams to learn Morse code would be like a teacher forcing new computer students to learn the Hollerith code for punch cards, saying "I had to learn it so you have to learn it". The information shouldn't be lost, but new programmers no longer need to be able to look at rectangular holes in a punch card and read the information on sight. The same should be the case for Morse code.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  11. Re:probably too late to save the hobby by carndearg · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I had my (G7CKF)UK Class B licence, that's the no-morse VHF and above one from the late '80s to the early '90s. And like the original poster I gave it up because I got sick of the old farts.

    At the time the amateur radio community in the UK was run mostly by people who got their G3 licences in the 1950s and spent most of their time sitting on 80M(3.5MHz) talking about their gardens and what they did in tne war. These people were anti anything that they percieved to threaten the way amateur radio had been for them all those years ago (73 OM and all that) and the morse test was a key(sorry:) bastion of their defence against what they saw as an advance of CB-ers into 'their' patch. The fact that most of the code-less licencees (a) really had no interest in HF communications and (b) had never used a CB in their lives obviously escaped them. In fact the class B licencee building 23cm TV gear is a lot closer to the cutting edge than the G3 with his gbp1000 Icom multi-band HF rig.

    So like a lot of licencees in the '90s faced with a load of arrogant and rude old gits on one side and the internet just starting to look interesting on the other I just let my licence lapse and turned to my PC.

    Amateur radio is a warning to the open source movement, I hope we dont see a load of 60-something OS coders in 30 years time excluding a new generation because they perceive that their patch is being encroached upon.

  12. Re:Technician class? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 4, Insightful
    While CW may have dubious value any more for "real world" work, it's still in use by a lot of Hams worldwide, and is one of the best ways to do QRP (low power) work. It takes minimal bandwidth and power to communicate with CW

    Considering that one of the main justifications for amateur radio is to provide a means of communication when other systems fail, doesn't this mean that keeping a minimal code requirements is good? In an emergency, with limited power, and perhaps cobbled together equipment, something you can send Morse code with is the easiest to get working.

  13. Re:About time! - what no one has mentioned by kc8kgu · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I am a ham. I have a general class license. I passed the 13wpm exam before the requirements were dropped to 5wmp a few years ago. I just wanted to mentions a few points that no one seems to be making.

    A similar rule change has been made before, and MANY MANY hams felt that it had a negative effect. Around 1989, I believe, the morse code requirement for the technication class license was removed. After that, there was a flood of bad, inconsiderate, and disrespectful new hams. Many of them were CBers who didn't want to take the time and effort to learn the code. It let in the riff raff, more Anonymous Cowards and first posters if you will.

    The are several good reasons why the cw requirement should still kept after all these years. Apologies to Bruce Perens.

    Think of morse code as a candle. Sure, we have lightbulbs, flashlights, glow sticks, and the sun. But, if something bad happens - the lights go out, the flashlights batteries are dead, your out of glowsticks, and its the dead of night, wouldn't it be nice to have a candle. It might be boring, plain, ugly, smelly, near useless in the modern world - but when the s*** hits the fan, you'll be glad you have it.

    It is a good filter. Most people have to really give an effort to learn the code. Not all but some. I studied for a couple of weeks to pass my 5wpm test. I studied a few days for the 13wpm test. Some people claim it takes them years to learn it. Maybe, i don't know. The point is, if you want to just talk to you buddy down the street, you can get a cb for $40 at radio shack and not even think twice about a license. Think of the bad operators as spam. If you had a chance to have a really good spam filter or not, would you take it. Don't get me wrong, not all no coders are bad guys and they should have a chance to use ham radio - and they do. They can get a no code tech license and use frequencies above 30mhz. What this would change is give them frequecies priviledges below 30mhz. These frequences are special because of physics and the ozone in that they can propogate thousands of miles instead of the couple hundred of the uhf (50mhz) freqencies and above.

    History. Morse code and ham radio have been together since the beginning. Its almost disrespectful in my mind to push the code to the wayside. Like putting an old dog down just because he isn't good for fetching the papers anymore.

    Anyway, im fairly confident that cw will be around for a long time after its required. If i had to bet, I would say that the requirement will be dropped. I'd say at least 50 years (hopefully i'll make it to my 80th birthday)

    As an aside, several people have mentioned that the written tests themselves are an appropriate filter. I disagree. All the questions that appear on every test are known in advance. I could teach my 10 year old daughter the answer to the questions without her having a clue what the questions actually mean.

  14. Enlighten thyself by LinuxGeek · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Even carrier wave radio has a place for Morse. But in these days of 10 MIPs per dollar microcontrollers that can convert Morse and any other code to ASCII characters (and then translate its language), it's hard to justify requiring Morse proficency in order to get a radio licence. Seems like just a means of radio geeks keeping the riff-raff away from their little hobby.

    This has nothing to do with the no-code tech license. At the moment you must pass a 5wpm morse test to gain access to the HF (international) bands or to go beyond tech and get your general or extra class ticket. If you want to work below 6m then you will certainly encounter lots of morse communication and will need to know it anyway.

    If someone wants to be a ham and only do packet, 2m and 70cm, then they don't need access to the HF bands and I don't understand the complaining about the test.

    Liken this to requiring people to understand the international standard highway signs (stop, yield, do not pass, etc...) before giving them the privelege of traveling on international roadways. Instead of saving lives by preventing wrecks, this is a courtesy that we still extend even though several other countries let hams that can't understand morse loose on the HF bands.
    --

    Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
  15. Re:probably too late to save the hobby by Wansu · · Score: 4, Insightful


    What do the old farts do that ruins the hobby for new/young people?

    Too many of them are G.D. knowitalls. Others fancy themselves as some sort of emergency officials. I just wanted to chat on 2 meters while I commuted to and from work. I found that unless I got involved with the clubs, upgraded my license and volunteered to work hamfests, Skywarn/EMS/whatever, my welcome wore thin. I lost interest.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor