Posted by
michael
on from the one-step-forward-two-steps-back dept.
computx writes "I just recieved an email from Barnes and Noble that they will no longer sell ebooks and I have 1 month to download the books I have purchased. Wow!"
No, no, no. It's a million monkeys typing on a million typewriters that you use to reproduce eBooks, not a million monks.
That said, I've had luck finding monks on google:
Results 1 - 10 of about 1,420,000
-- 'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
Bathroom Reading
by
Brahmastra
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
E-books aren't popular because they are inconvenient. Have you ever tried reading in a bathtub or on your toilet seat with an e-book?
Re:Bathroom Reading
by
Uksi
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
With my Palm, yes! Must've read four books w/ it in locations ranging from subway to bed to toilet.
Re:Bathroom Reading
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 4, Funny
Yes i have, and with a laptop it's easy!
The only real complaint i have is when i get back to the board room, my laptop smells like shit.
However, I would have to say that is an invovenience for others, and not myself. So no big deal.
Re:Bathroom Reading
by
M.C.+Hampster
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
I think this is defniately the holdup for eBooks. Without a portable device, you are tied to a computer to read them, and even with them you are tied to battery life plus the possible eye strain associated with looking at a little screen to read.
I know some people that talk about the allure of paper, and the sentimentality they have for holding a book with paper, but personally if I could buy eBooks and download them into a nice sized reader that had acceptable battery life and a nice, easy to read screen, I'd prefer that. I'm guessing the device exists out there, I'm just not willing to pay a few hundred bucks for it yet.
-- Forget the whales - save the babies.
Re:Bathroom Reading
by
Just+Some+Guy
·
· Score: 4, Funny
Except that it's somewhat more expensive to drop it...
I don't know. I managed to drop my old Palm IIIxe into the can one weekend when I was working by myself. A split-second decision to throw my pride (and revulsion) by the wayside, a few paper towels, and a couple of shots of Lysol later, and everything was good.
Net cost: $0 (assuming that you can't put a dollar value on lost self-respect)
I "canned" a paperback years earlier. Ain't no way I was fishing that out.
Net cost: $5.95
-- Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
Re:Bathroom Reading
by
CGP314
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
The palm is the only device I find comfortable to read. Why? Because it doesn't shine bright, white light into my eyes. Reading on a computer screen is like looking into a floodlight that someone has taped letters over. I wish more webpages defaulted to a black background with light text. Much easier to read.
Re:Bathroom Reading
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 4, Funny
With my Palm, yes!
At first I thought you meant something else involving using your palm in the bathroom.
Re:Bathroom Reading
by
Zathrus
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
I know some people that talk about the allure of paper, and the sentimentality they have for holding a book with paper, but personally if I could buy eBooks and download them into a nice sized reader that had acceptable battery life and a nice, easy to read screen
The "nice, easy to read screen" cannot be emphasized enough.
Most portable electronics have tiny screens with low resolutions, horrible DPI, and glare issues. And they suck down batteries.
Newspaper print is generally the worst in terms of DPI for printed material, and even it exceeds 2400 DPI. I distinctly recall talking to a friend of my father who was in the newspaper business. He was wondering when I thought traditional printed newspapers would be in significant danger from portable devices, home printing, etc. I, as a know-it-all geeky CS student, said it'd probably be about 10 years before the display technologies got there.
Well, it's roughly 10 years later and we're really no closer than we were. Printing has certainly improved, but not as dramatically as I expected. Display technologies have gone more or less nowhere -- LCD has come down in price and power consumption, but the resolutions haven't gone up dramatically and there's been no really new technologies in that time period. Sure, OLED and similar are on the horizon now, but they don't promise a solution to the resolution issues. Printed circuits, electronic paper, and other technologies are also closer, but still probably a decade or more away.
Paper is here to stay for quite some time.
Re:Bathroom Reading
by
OrangeTide
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
Black backgrounds also cause eye strain. You should strive to have a more neutral background that is closer to your ambient environment.
You could crank the brightness down on your monitor so bright white was closer to the ambient environment, but then everything else is too dark.
A piece of paper does fine since it only reflects the light available in the room, it doesn't create any additional light (obviously) and even absorbs a little bit of light.
We need displays that can match this much more closely, of course people have abandoned reflective displays on laptops. Since they are impossible to read in low-light, even if they are much easier to read in direct sunlight. This is pretty much the kind of display your palm uses. I don't think this OLED thing is going to fix anything either, maybe the electronic ink might be the future for reading a lot of text on a display.
When programing either do a fairly neutral gray on black. or a somewhat interesting color on a dark grey. The later seems to cause me fewer problems on my CRT. (my LCD's "black" is pretty bright still:)
-- “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
Re:Bathroom Reading
by
mgg4
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
I also use a "Palm" device (Sony Clie). I have over 90 books stored on one memory stick, including a full dictionary and NIV Bible, and the chip is just over half full.
Having the ability to read the unabridged text of these books without having to drag a bookcase around is VERY COOL.
-- --
This space for rent.
Re:Bathroom Reading
by
Lesrahpem
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
I can say that I've found a great use for e-books. I have pdf's of several very large and obscure books like the Lesser Key of Solomon, Crowley's Equinox, 777, The Golden Dawn, and other books (whose names I won't mention since few people would recognize the names). I've found this to be very useful, since these books are expensive, mostly available only as hard back, and a pain in the ass to carry around or store. Having them as e-books saves a ton of space and time, especially when looking for something in them.
I think the best market for e-books are libraries. Imagine going to the library and being able to grep the entire contents of the library to find books related to the subject you're looking for. Libraries have been lacking any really effective way of indexing since the concept of library came about. If they used e-books it would eliminate the problems almost entirely. Honestly, use grep, sed, awk, and a sql database and there you go. That's what I do for the books I have.
Reading on a computer screen is like looking into a floodlight that someone has taped letters over.
Who are you, Gollum?
Re:Bathroom Reading
by
gladed
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
Just got back from a 3-day Christian men's camp this weekend. A group of us were debating a particular point of theology and someone said "now what's that verse...".
Naturally, I whipped out my Zire 71, did a full text NASB search and found and quoted the verse. In about 10 seconds. While we were walking. In the dark.
I'm sure people resisted the move away from rolled-up animal skins, too...
At least they gave one month of service... Still, that's not very long to "support" your products, even if they were a flop.
They must have stopped selling them because Everyone was pirating copies of Light in August, Huck Finn, and Robinson Carusoe. Poor BN couldn't make enough money:(
--
Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
eBooks...
by
FileNotFound
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
...would have been great had readers been umm readable and cheap and had the format been widley available.
I'd love nothing more than having all my college books in eBook format, and preferably for half the price... But it doesn't make sense to pay $300ish for a reader with fairly limited battery life and the pay prices for books which in my opinion are still unreasonable.
-- In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
Inconvenient at best
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
I recall my one experience purchasing ebooks. It seemed like a fantastic idea. I saved on shipping, and would get it right away.
The DRM management in both the Microsoft and Adobe Readers made it so annoying that it took days for me to be able to read what I purchased. A combination of buggy software and lousy online support ended my enthusiasm. In the end, I decided to go back to good, old-fashioned books.
It depends on the format, but they could be searchable. Ever have a book where you want to find the exact wording of a quote, or want to look up something in a book that has a crummy index? Just search. Also convienience; if I had a good reader (very clear screen) I'd much rather carry that around than a couple 1000-page textbooks.
B & N and Computers/Technology
by
chia_monkey
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
I wonder what's really going on at Barnes and Noble. My roomie is a manager there and she said they were reducing the size of the computer section big time. Now they're dropping eBooks. Is this just an odd coincidence or is B & N moving more toward a "traditional" bookstore and coffeeshop mix (meaning does management think computer related stuff isn't "traditional")? Does anyone know?
--
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
Until they get e-Paper its a dead deal anyways
by
PierceLabs
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
Noone really wants to download a PDF and page through it at their desk and I don't know too many people taking laptops to the toilet, bathtub, or park in order to read. The problem isn't really with eBooks per-say, its that there really isn't a convenient way to view the content.
Some of the new OLED technology may make eBooks more practical for consumers, but right not they just aren't convenient enough and the eBook readers only add insult to injury as many consumers (myself included) just don't see the point in buying a device to read a book as opposed to just buying the paper book and not having to worry about charging it up before making a coast-to-coast flight.
Who cares if B&N drops 'em? Blackmask has the good stuff, everything's free, and they're in six (at least) different formats for nearly every device under the sun. Plus no stupid DRM.
The eBook isn't dead - it's just immature. Anyone remember the Apple Newton? I don't mean to offend the legions of devotees that the machine apparently has, but the fact of the matter is that it was too young an idea to succeed, and we had to wait until US Robotics came out with the PalmPilot to see that kind of computer enter the mainstream. The same thing happened with Windows 1.0. I could go on and on. The problem with these kinds of things is that some solid ideas are lacking things - battery life, maybe, or size or reliability.
I think the same thing is happening with eBooks - they're too bulky, expensive, battery-hungry, difficult to read, and just generally inconvenient to read when compared with books. Not to mention that I don't like shelling out a few hundred dollars for a machine to read eBooks when I could use that money towards twenty or thirty paperbacks. And as many people have said, paper does have its charm.
I can see the convenience of eBooks, and it seems like some early adopters have, too. But they're just not ready for widespread adoption yet.
-- I produce electronic music and write little games. Have a look.
The basic problem is straightforward. The public believes that the prices that they charge for e-books are too high.
When you do not recieve a hardcopy of a book, you don't feel that it is of the same value. Just today, I was reviewing a book on Amazon that I was interested and found that it is available in electronic format for 2/3 the price. However, that is TOO MUCH MONEY for what you are getting. Without a physical book:
- you cannot read it elsewhere - you can lose it with an accidental keystroke - it is more difficult on your eyes (in most cases) - At times, you are not in control of the media. In cases of some digital music, DRM allows another company to possibly "disable" your music at a later date, if they decided to change the purchase terms.
Those are major downfalls. If a book cost $20, I would be much more willing to purchase an e-book if it were $5 instead of the more likely $15. That, however, is probably below the cost of "manufacture" for the book, which is unacceptable to most publishers. However, the product they are selling is not equal in value to what they are trying to charge.
What I suggest is making the e-book an incentive 'add-on' to a physical book. Sell the physical book for $20, but then throw in the e-book as a bonus, or for around $2-$3 extra. That way you not only have the physical volume, but also a searchable e-book.
Electronic books that work
by
StenD
·
· Score: 4, Informative
Baen Books has an electronic publishing program that works for them and their authors. For $15 you get all of their books for a month (generally 6 titles, although 2-3 are usually reissues or the paperback release of a previous hardcover). If that's too much of a committment, individual books are available for $4-5. You can download the books in HTML, Palm Pilot, Rocketbook, RTF, and MS Reader formats. There's no DRM involved - Jim Baen figures that if he makes the books available at a reasonable price, people are generally honest and will pay for them rather than pirating them. They even give away electronic books in the Baen Free Library, and their authors have reported that they're seeing increased sales in their backlist, even from other publishers, that they can only attribute to appearing in the BFL.
Why eBooks?
by
Spazmania
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
I see a lot of posts complaining about how eBooks aren't so great. I've put close to $400 into eBooks in the past couple years which is a lot more than I've put into dead trees. Perhaps I can explain why.
You see, I read a lot and I go different places. 50 books is a lot to haul around if I'm not sure what I want to read next. A laptop is a lot less so. An Internet-enabled computer at the other location where I can get back to the secured section of my home page is even less cumbersome.
"Ah ha!" some of you are now saying. "Most eBooks are locked down so you can't just pick them up from the password-protected part of your web page!" Well, that was true of Barnes and Noble's offerings. That's why I spent very little money there.
I spent quite a bit of money at places like Fictionwise and Baen's webscription service. All of Baen's stuff comes wrapped in a pleasant HTML format that's easy to use. Some of Fictionwise's stuff is still locked down, but you know what? Most of that is available in the Microsoft Reader format, and the cracking program discussed on Slashdot a while ago is easy and quick to use and it does a reasonably competent job of converting to HTML.
So, while I am sorry to see Barnes and Noble drop out, I want the folks at Baen and Fictionwise to know that they can expect more cash from me. A lot more.
-- Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
B & N and bn.com are not the same
by
dasboy
·
· Score: 4, Informative
Barnes and Noble booksellers (NYSE symbol BKS) is not the same as bn.com (NASDAQ symbol BNBN). They are separate companies with separate management. BKS does however own about 38% of BNBN's stock. BNBN is a joint venture between BKS and Bertelsmann. Don't feel bad, the fools (Motley and otherwise) at Fool.com and Forbes magazine don't seem to know the difference either -- and they are both selling investment advice!
Re:E books??? Why
by
Lumpy
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
E-books could of had a future. but it certianly was not in recreational reading.
Textbooks and refrence books were the killer-app for e-books. unfortunately the textbook and tech book makers are very against technology.
I would kill to be able to carry around my 30 some college refrence books easily in my pocket or in one book sized device. but it's impossible as the companies and people that write those books do not want them in any format but dead trees.
I agree, white is not the best color for reading on a computer, but black is not the solution.
Try this out: 255 255 240 or #FFFFF0
It's close enough to white that it looks "normal" but doesn't cause as much strain. Also, with the way our eye work, when it's the closest color to white on the screen our eyes fool us into thinking it's acctually white.
Try it sometime. Works best to make your document editor paper this color and then place a white picture farther into the doc. On a blank page let your eyes get used to the color then scroll down to the white pic. You'll be amazed at how the colors seem to shift though you know they didn't change.
-- ------
A warning to everyone out there...
by
WIAKywbfatw
·
· Score: 4, Funny
Don't buy a used Palm IIIxe off of eBay from this guy. Unless, of course, you want to get cooties...
--
"Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
A couple years back, one of my co-workers dropped her pager in the toilet. This would have been fine if she hadn't pressed the flush lever seconds before she dropped it. Whoosh! Her pager was gone!
One of our mutual friends wrote this up after hearing the story:
Oh, btw. My toilet beeped at me last night. I was in the living room when it went off, and I thought/I/ was getting paged. Nope. Mine was set on vibrate mode. Then I noticed the beep had a watery sound to it and I tracked it down to the bathroom. Now I was really confused. Here my toilet was beeping at me. It was a sad and mournful beep. Actually, it was a meep.
I took pity on the toilet and said, "What? Do you want to be cleaned?"
*Meeeep*
"Do you need more water?"
*Meeeep*
"Did I forget to flush?"
*Meeeep*
"Did you spring a leak?"
*Meeeep*
Perplexed, I pondered my predicament while my toilet meeped at me some more. It obviously wanted something. But what? I also tried to think what could have caused this sad, mournful meeping noise. Did I possess a dual-purpose toilet that served both as a normal toilet, and a seismic device for detecting earthquakes? That was a possibility. This/is/ California, and it would make sense to put earthquake warning devices on toilets to give someone enraptured in the latest issue of "Field and Stream" to get moving in a hurry!
*Meeeep*
A careful examination revealed no obvious seismic sensor arrays affixed to the toilet. Besides, I think I might have set off any seismic sensor arrays through more "natural causes" in the past. As far as my toilet was concerned, the "big one" should have hit last week after that meal of burritos and refried beans. But anyway...
*Meeeep*
Now I was getting distressed. My toilet was obviously suffereing some awful affliction, and the meeping sound was becoming weaker and weaker. After a moment's thought, I decided that calling 911 was not an option. I couldn't think of a good way to explain the emergency. I was going to have to do this myself. Out of frustration I exclaimed "Damnit Jim! I'm a computer scientist, not a plumber!"
*Meeeep*
My toilet was definitely sick. I had to rescue it. I needed to take action fast. So, with rubber gloves on, and plunger in hand, I lifted the lid of the bowl and saw......nothing. That was good. Whew. What a relief. With no other obvious course of action, I put the plunger into good use. I felt sorry for my toilet, as I was inflicting discomfort on it on the magnitude of taking a throat culture to test for strep. The toilet held up like a champ though and lo-and-behold, what floated into the toilet bowl? A pager! Would ya believe it? It still worked! I reached in and pulled it out (with rubber gloves on, mind you) and examined it closely. I was pretty impressed that it still was emitting meeps that sounded much more like beeps out of the water. I noticed some numbers on the pager. The numbers were slightly faded, but I could make out the following: ??0-42?-770? ?in: 52?8?
*beep*
Well, that didn't do much good, so I dropped it back into the toilet and flushed. The toilet gurgled happily as the pager returned from whence it came with one last parting, mournful meep. I have to say, that was a pretty bizarre evening. However, one positive is that I have this cool idea for a start-up company. It seems to me that Californians would have a vested interest in investing in toilets with seismic warning devices.:)
The reason I bothered to metion all of this was in case your toilet starts meeping one day. I thought I'd save you the trouble of having to diagnose the problem by giving the advice to simply go straight to the plunger. Chances are, it's a pager.:)
You must have a really slow internet connection.
"I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey
E-books aren't popular because they are inconvenient. Have you ever tried reading in a bathtub or on your toilet seat with an e-book?
At least they gave one month of service...
Still, that's not very long to "support" your products, even if they were a flop.
They must have stopped selling them because Everyone was pirating copies of Light in August, Huck Finn, and Robinson Carusoe. Poor BN couldn't make enough money
Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
...would have been great had readers been umm readable and cheap and had the format been widley available.
I'd love nothing more than having all my college books in eBook format, and preferably for half the price... But it doesn't make sense to pay $300ish for a reader with fairly limited battery life and the pay prices for books which in my opinion are still unreasonable.
In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
I recall my one experience purchasing ebooks. It seemed like a fantastic idea. I saved on shipping, and would get it right away.
The DRM management in both the Microsoft and Adobe Readers made it so annoying that it took days for me to be able to read what I purchased. A combination of buggy software and lousy online support ended my enthusiasm. In the end, I decided to go back to good, old-fashioned books.
It depends on the format, but they could be searchable. Ever have a book where you want to find the exact wording of a quote, or want to look up something in a book that has a crummy index? Just search. Also convienience; if I had a good reader (very clear screen) I'd much rather carry that around than a couple 1000-page textbooks.
I wonder what's really going on at Barnes and Noble. My roomie is a manager there and she said they were reducing the size of the computer section big time. Now they're dropping eBooks. Is this just an odd coincidence or is B & N moving more toward a "traditional" bookstore and coffeeshop mix (meaning does management think computer related stuff isn't "traditional")? Does anyone know?
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
Noone really wants to download a PDF and page through it at their desk and I don't know too many people taking laptops to the toilet, bathtub, or park in order to read. The problem isn't really with eBooks per-say, its that there really isn't a convenient way to view the content.
Some of the new OLED technology may make eBooks more practical for consumers, but right not they just aren't convenient enough and the eBook readers only add insult to injury as many consumers (myself included) just don't see the point in buying a device to read a book as opposed to just buying the paper book and not having to worry about charging it up before making a coast-to-coast flight.
...but reading on the computer stinks.
That explains all of the RTFAs on Slashdot.
But, it doesn't explain Slashdot.
Go to http://www.blackmask.com.
Thousands of *free* ebooks.
Who cares if B&N drops 'em? Blackmask has the good stuff, everything's free, and they're in six (at least) different formats for nearly every device under the sun. Plus no stupid DRM.
The eBook is too young to die.
The eBook isn't dead - it's just immature. Anyone remember the Apple Newton? I don't mean to offend the legions of devotees that the machine apparently has, but the fact of the matter is that it was too young an idea to succeed, and we had to wait until US Robotics came out with the PalmPilot to see that kind of computer enter the mainstream. The same thing happened with Windows 1.0. I could go on and on. The problem with these kinds of things is that some solid ideas are lacking things - battery life, maybe, or size or reliability.
I think the same thing is happening with eBooks - they're too bulky, expensive, battery-hungry, difficult to read, and just generally inconvenient to read when compared with books. Not to mention that I don't like shelling out a few hundred dollars for a machine to read eBooks when I could use that money towards twenty or thirty paperbacks. And as many people have said, paper does have its charm.
I can see the convenience of eBooks, and it seems like some early adopters have, too. But they're just not ready for widespread adoption yet.
I produce electronic music and write little games. Have a look.
The basic problem is straightforward. The public believes that the prices that they charge for e-books are too high.
When you do not recieve a hardcopy of a book, you don't feel that it is of the same value. Just today, I was reviewing a book on Amazon that I was interested and found that it is available in electronic format for 2/3 the price. However, that is TOO MUCH MONEY for what you are getting. Without a physical book:
- you cannot read it elsewhere
- you can lose it with an accidental keystroke
- it is more difficult on your eyes (in most cases)
- At times, you are not in control of the media. In cases of some digital music, DRM allows another company to possibly "disable" your music at a later date, if they decided to change the purchase terms.
Those are major downfalls. If a book cost $20, I would be much more willing to purchase an e-book if it were $5 instead of the more likely $15. That, however, is probably below the cost of "manufacture" for the book, which is unacceptable to most publishers. However, the product they are selling is not equal in value to what they are trying to charge.
What I suggest is making the e-book an incentive 'add-on' to a physical book. Sell the physical book for $20, but then throw in the e-book as a bonus, or for around $2-$3 extra. That way you not only have the physical volume, but also a searchable e-book.
Baen Books has an electronic publishing program that works for them and their authors. For $15 you get all of their books for a month (generally 6 titles, although 2-3 are usually reissues or the paperback release of a previous hardcover). If that's too much of a committment, individual books are available for $4-5. You can download the books in HTML, Palm Pilot, Rocketbook, RTF, and MS Reader formats. There's no DRM involved - Jim Baen figures that if he makes the books available at a reasonable price, people are generally honest and will pay for them rather than pirating them. They even give away electronic books in the Baen Free Library, and their authors have reported that they're seeing increased sales in their backlist, even from other publishers, that they can only attribute to appearing in the BFL.
I see a lot of posts complaining about how eBooks aren't so great. I've put close to $400 into eBooks in the past couple years which is a lot more than I've put into dead trees. Perhaps I can explain why.
You see, I read a lot and I go different places. 50 books is a lot to haul around if I'm not sure what I want to read next. A laptop is a lot less so. An Internet-enabled computer at the other location where I can get back to the secured section of my home page is even less cumbersome.
"Ah ha!" some of you are now saying. "Most eBooks are locked down so you can't just pick them up from the password-protected part of your web page!" Well, that was true of Barnes and Noble's offerings. That's why I spent very little money there.
I spent quite a bit of money at places like Fictionwise and Baen's webscription service. All of Baen's stuff comes wrapped in a pleasant HTML format that's easy to use. Some of Fictionwise's stuff is still locked down, but you know what? Most of that is available in the Microsoft Reader format, and the cracking program discussed on Slashdot a while ago is easy and quick to use and it does a reasonably competent job of converting to HTML.
So, while I am sorry to see Barnes and Noble drop out, I want the folks at Baen and Fictionwise to know that they can expect more cash from me. A lot more.
Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
Barnes and Noble booksellers (NYSE symbol BKS) is not the same as bn.com (NASDAQ symbol BNBN). They are separate companies with separate management. BKS does however own about 38% of BNBN's stock. BNBN is a joint venture between BKS and Bertelsmann. Don't feel bad, the fools (Motley and otherwise) at Fool.com and Forbes magazine don't seem to know the difference either -- and they are both selling investment advice!
E-books could of had a future. but it certianly was not in recreational reading.
Textbooks and refrence books were the killer-app for e-books. unfortunately the textbook and tech book makers are very against technology.
I would kill to be able to carry around my 30 some college refrence books easily in my pocket or in one book sized device. but it's impossible as the companies and people that write those books do not want them in any format but dead trees.
Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
I agree, white is not the best color for reading on a computer, but black is not the solution.
Try this out: 255 255 240 or #FFFFF0
It's close enough to white that it looks "normal" but doesn't cause as much strain. Also, with the way our eye work, when it's the closest color to white on the screen our eyes fool us into thinking it's acctually white.
Try it sometime. Works best to make your document editor paper this color and then place a white picture farther into the doc. On a blank page let your eyes get used to the color then scroll down to the white pic. You'll be amazed at how the colors seem to shift though you know they didn't change.
------
Don't buy a used Palm IIIxe off of eBay from this guy. Unless, of course, you want to get cooties...
"Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
One of our mutual friends wrote this up after hearing the story: