Slashdot Mirror
No Grand Theft Auto In Prison?
Thanks to Frictionless Insight for pointing to an Australian article discussing a judge's suggestion that Grand Theft Auto-style games not be available in prison. According to the report, "Bradley Scott McConkey... led police on a 200km car chase at speeds of up to 180 kilometres per hour, as well as stealing cars at knifepoint and committing armed robbery on two businesses", and additionally, "...a psychologist's report said McConkey had played Playstation's Grand Theft Auto during a previous jail term." Due to the similarity of the games and the crime, the judge suggested "...the appropriateness of Grand Theft Auto-style games in a prison environment was questionable", since it "provides opportunities for rehearsing their destructive activities."
Why is my money paying for this? They shouldnt have tetris, let alone GTA. Hell, I dont have a playstation 2, why should a bank robber in jail?
/usr/games/fortune
You're dealing with an adult who has demonstrated that they are irresponsible and a danger to society, not a minor who has avoided screwing up in real life even though he loves playing GTA. You're also dealing with a guy who is in prison: he doesn't get the bennies the good guys do. This is hardly a case of The Man being scared that video games will create monsters. The judge realized that with normal people that isn't going to happen, but with people who have demonstrated they can't manage their behavior and steal cars at knifepoint and lead police on high speed chases, it's a valid concern.
I am Jack's writable stack pointer.
Actually, going to prison means at its base that you DO lose human rights, though not quite all of them. Furthermore, depending on what kind of prison you're in, there are many things that you cannot own and possess inside the place - were owning and possessing property in one's cell a right in prison, I expect there would be a lot of Ginsu products sold there. I suppose it's possible that there are prisons where you can own and possess your television in prison, but it's certainly not a standard and would in most states be subject to the warden/superintendant's decision.
The bigger issue is... I can play video games in prison? What the hell's with that?
For us slashdotters with computers, homes, internet, and probably a lot more, prison still is a deterrent, but when I look at a guy I saw at the Oxford Circus Underground station a couple of weeks ago, white as a sheet, thin as a rake, looked really bad (I gave him all the change in my pocket, if I went that way frequently I'd be taking him sandwiches), and I wonder why the system fails. If you're out on the streets, genuinely starving, just throw a brick through a window and confess police station, at the very least you get a bed for the night.
And books....you can't forget the books. We wouldn't want someone reading some murder mystery while in for a dime on manslaughter. Why don't we just cage them up in bamboo cells, call them animals, and set them all loose in Australia after they complete their term. GTA is whats happening in the real world, and if you keep your inmates secluded and sheltered from real life not only do you run the risk of culture shock when they get out, you make them less efficent in society. If you want to ban someone from playing GTA even after they run out their term, well, I suppose the ACLU would have something to say.
Even more indicative of especially the American public's specific fascination with the equation "prison=punishment" is that you actually think it is the death penalty is a conversation topic when all of the developed world has understood that when the establishment chooses to murder one of its subjects, the battle is lost. Also, as far as I know, federal prisoners automatically lose their right to vote and to be elected. In many western democracies, taking away these rights is reserved for only of the worst of criminals and, specifically, ones convicted of high treason or political crimes.
Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
They let inmates play video games, lift weights etc etc to keep them from rioting and raping each other. The same people whining about all these perks are the same people who would raise hell if any more money went into fixing the prison system; making them secure institutions that are harsh yet humane instead of a candyland for gangs.
...the problem is that violent crime is a successful option in the game. It's teaching - reinforcing gently but over and over and over again - that "violent crime can get you stuff".
When David Birnie, serial killer along with his wife Catherine, was given a computer in prison to write up his life story as a warning to others, he promptly began turning out sick porn which bore an uncanny resemblance to the perversions and murders he and his wife had actually committed. It's not the computer's fault, but the computer certainly helped to propagate Birnie's lethal sickness rather than provide a catharsis or a useful warning. Nobody will be surprised that his computer was taken away again.
Given the proportion of inmates service time for violence and/or stealing, a game like GTA could most moderately be described as a bloody stupid choice for a prison. The console is not really a problem, although you could argue with some justification that part of the intent of imprisoning someone is to make the consequences of their crime unattractive to them and that the console is frustrating that intent. But given that the US Army is using first-person role-playing games as part of their troop training (and as a recruiting tool), it seems amazingly stupid to allow anything like GTA there. Any violent or destructive game hardly furthers any of the purposes of a prison, but the gobbledok who let GTA in needs his head read.
BTW, posting this from Western Australia.
Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
This is off topic but as a Londoner I feel strongly about it (and for the record, I don't think any adult in jail should have access to a games console unless they are, for example, in a minimum security facility, in which case it's not really relevent if they have access to violent games or not, because volient criminals and those likely to re-offend should not be in minium security jails (IMO)).
But I digress. On beggers...
You same the very same people year after year at places like Oxford Circus, going their way down the tube asking for money and stinking up the carrage and pestering people for money.
I keep running into these fuckers, they are quite happy to pick fights and shout out 'Cunt!' and 'Motherfucker!' at members of the public just because they don't hand over cash to them. I'm fed up with it and would like to see the lot of them doing hard labour, jail or the army. They are NOT simply nice people on the inside. They are NOT all down on their luck. Some of them (most of them, being relatively fit, young, 20-30 year olds) are violent, drug addicted, criminals who will quite happily rob you at knife point if they think they will get away with it. By these people a sandwich (suckered!) and they will very often *throw it at you!* and ask for money, not food (I've seen this happen more than once, and usually accompanied by swearing). Please, if you visit London, don't give money or food or ANY sympathy to these scum, some of us have to live with them. DO buy a copy of the Big Issue however - it provides gainful employment while rasing money for the homeless, it's quite respectable.
Some of these people are mentally ill and need to be cared for, most of the ones I see just need a swift kick up the arse to get in line with the rest of society and stop leeching of the state (to which we pay such high taxes in the UK), stinking up the city, putting off visitors and getting in the way (and being abusive to, and commiting crimes against) tax paying residents. I consider myself left wing, but I still strongly think people have a duty to the state.
There are LOTS of options in country like the UK, who's state employs more people in heath care and social services then any other government in Europe (dispite us not having the largest area, or the largest population), it even has more employees than any other *company* in Europe. Our state apparatus is a sociallist legacy, and very extensive.
Our homeless housing projects are by and large excellent. There are plenty of hostels in the UK, with beds that go empty every night. The waiting list is about 2 weeks (max) for a perminant place. There is no shorting of housing, but to see the same people, month after month, year after year, you wouldn't think it. A one bedroomed flat in London will easily set you back 1,500 USD a month, that's what people on the streets in London say they want, well no, tough shit, go and live somewhere else, they can get a job, work hard and come back in a few years and pay for one themselves - they have no right to expect the state to put them up for gratis in what is the 3rd most expensive city in the world.
If your living on the streets for years in a country like the UK (which, for those who don't know, has a huge excess of housing in the north). In many cities in Scotland the council *advertise* hosing vacancies ('Contact us, get council housing, no waiting list!') in reasonable areas. I had a friend, a young fit ~22 year old single white male with no dependants, who was employed and quite happily living at home apply to the council for housing (it's cheaper, he was curious to see if he could get anything), and got council housing within the *week*. He must have been the lowest priority canidate, and he still got something right away, he's know bought the house from the council because he liked it so much (and they have too many, so are trying to sell them off).
I bought a Scottish drunk in north London breakfast in a cafe and asked him how long he had been in London (I refused t