Slashdot Mirror


More on BTX Motherboards

venger writes "Anandtech has an article on the new standard of cases and motherboards that is soon to be released. Looks like they are trying to cater for the increase in heat devices are now producing while keeping the noise levels down!" We mentioned BTX earlier.

19 of 260 comments (clear)

  1. you use cases? by Brahmastra · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just have the board lying on the table and a bunch of wires going all over the place. Have a pedestal fan blowing right on it for cooling. That is the sign of true geekiness.

    1. Re:you use cases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just have the board lying on the table and a bunch of wires going all over the place.

      You use boards? Weak.

      I solder the chips together, directly. Barefoot. Everyday. 30 Miles. In the snow. With a knife in my thigh. And I like it.

  2. Since dust can be a problem by zymano · · Score: 5, Interesting

    why not a air filtration system ?

  3. Nice but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Will these cases/board/supplies work with 64 bit CPUs or are those another ball of wax? Apple's got their 64 bit desktop machines for sale already, any i386 ones I've seen are rack mounted or sold as "big ass servers" meaning "you canna build yer own cheap, laddy"

  4. it's great, improved layout.. three models to pick by peculiarmethod · · Score: 4, Funny

    but..

    'graphics will use a x16 PCI Express implementation that offers 8GB/s of bandwidth. '

    will it be able to handle doom 3?

    pm

    --
    ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
  5. Big Water by geoffspear · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ooh, they're going to start making the cases out of water? That's even better than making them out of cheese graters.

    --
    Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  6. I see a pattern developing !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am going to be proactive in registering "CTX.com" through "ZTX.com"

    Nothing to do now but sit back and wait for the checks to arrive

    1. Re:I see a pattern developing !! by bhtooefr · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ATX.com - ATX Communications (no relation to Intel's ATX)
      BTX.com - BTX Technologies (A/V equipment)
      CTX.com - CTX Corporation (down, but I think they're a monitor company)
      DTX.com - DTx (an embedded computer manufacturer)
      ETX.com - ETX (down)
      FTX.com - Drug portal
      GTX.com - GTX Corporation (CAD software)
      HTX.com - Marksmen (down)
      ITX.com - ITX Design (web design/hosting)
      JTX.com - Farrier Marine (boat manufacturer - second server for downloads)

      There's the first ten from A, so you'll need to be quick if you want one...

  7. why? by obsid1an · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the adoption of BTX is going to come very slowly. For the 90% of computer users out there, a 3Ghz P4 is already a huge overkill to browse the net and check email. What are these BTX computers going to run that will make them appeal to current users.

    Gamers, like usual, will be the biggest target for BTX. They are the only ones that will need the higher bandwidth bus for gfx and the faster cpus.

    1. Re:why? by sweetooth · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This has less to do with processor speed and computing capabilities than it does with size and noise. There are a great many people buying smaller cases like the shuttle xpc because computers do everything they want and footprint, noise, and style are the things lacking now.

      Gamers won't care much about BTX unless there is a killer video card that will only be released in PCI Express form factor. At least initially.

  8. Maybe someone knows by Apreche · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The big change that I see with this new BTX spec is video cards will be PCI Express and not AGP. I think I can safely assume that PCI Express has a bandwith that is much faster than that of AGP can ever have, which is why it would be desireable. But isn't the point of AGP that it allows you to set an arperture and use some of the system RAM as an extension of the memory on the graphics card? So unless every PCI Express Video card has like 256MB plus video ram on it, wont AGP still be better? I really know nothing about this PCI Express thing except that expansion cards go in it, and it's fast.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:Maybe someone knows by Zathrus · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think I can safely assume that PCI Express has a bandwith that is much faster than that of AGP can ever have

      The AGP 8x spec has a max bandwidth of 2.1GB/s, while PCI Express x16 has a bandwidth of 8 GB/s. It might be theoretically possible to create a AGP 32x spec (although I doubt it), but the obvious question would be why?

      . But isn't the point of AGP that it allows you to set an arperture and use some of the system RAM as an extension of the memory on the graphics card?

      No, the point of AGP was to give a single slot increased bandwidth that's needed for modern graphics cards. PCI just isn't fast enough. Intel wrote into the spec that you could get away with sharing main memory as video memory in order to reduce system costs, but in practice nobody does this except for the absolute bottom tier PCs. The performance hit is huge.

      wont AGP still be better?

      No. Although it's questionable that PCI-X will really provide any speed increases. AGP 8x has a negligible speed improvement over AGP 2x, and quadrupling the bandwidth again isn't likely to do much either. I'm pretty sure PCI-X can still do the main memory-as-video memory trick, but there's really no need or desire to do so. If your card doesn't have enough memory to hold the textures then you're going to have a massive speed hit when you need to get them from memory. In practice this speed hit is so severe that the amount of bandwidth has relatively little impact on things -- it's the latency that kills.

    2. Re:Maybe someone knows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      pci-x != pci express

      pci-x has been around a while

  9. I'm gonna have a hard time programming my AVRs... by mofochickamo · · Score: 4, Interesting
    without a serial port. I use ATMEL's STK500, which uses the serial port to program the microcontrollers.

    From article: The move to BTX will also bring us closer to a fully legacy-free PC, with PS/2, serial and parallel ports already beginning to disappear from prototype motherboards.

    --
    Honk if you're horny.
  10. Something to include in BTX by jerw134 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One thing I want to see is a standardized case connector for the power and reset switches, LEDs, and speaker. Having each of them on a separate cable is just stupid. If they standardize that, I will be very happy.

  11. Re:I'm gonna have a hard time programming my AVRs. by anubi · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Ohhh yes... I have AVR capability too. I love Atmel's products - they make really neat stuff for us embedded guys who don't wanna wanna use a sledgehammer to tap a tack into place.

    And a helluva lot of other legacy stuff.

    But, you know, a lot of those old machines were designed very conservatively. I even have some old 286 running, and will continue to run them until they no longer function. Don't replace your legacy system... kinda like replacing your old SUV with the latest sports car should the bobbling heads start advocating it. Sure, the later one may be faster, but the old SUV will tote the kids.

    In a pinch, a USB to serial converter will probably work. If its works, great, otherwise, its another case of having to do yesterday's work all over again, instead of doing today's work. Remember, you already got paid for yesterday's work... you don't get paid again for doing it again.

    I did yesterday's work yesterday. I built my foundation years ago. Today, I use it. Kinda like years ago I put copper pipe in the house because I did not wanna mess with it ever again. I pour concrete foundations, because I know the wood one, albeit cheaper, will rot, and force me to do all my work over again. Some people have the money to do yesterday's work over and over and over again. Sure, they have the latest foundation in the neighborhood. But even I wonder how they economically justify such a paradigm.

    Once I invest in a good solid foundation, I intend to use it for the lifetime I designed it for. Its not like I wanna design the Grand Coulee Dam, and demolish it every couple of years because someone came up with a different mix of concrete... Once I go through the trouble of building the thing, I intend it to perform its intended function from then on, usually indefinitely. Kinda like those Romans did things, where their aqueducts and roads still function as originally designed to this day.

    I really take no thrill in developing the capability to sign checks to pay others to do the work... I take great pride in having the capability to do it. ( And also take comfort in knowing how my stuff works, as well as what to do if it doenn't work the way I want it to work. I think almost all Open-Source guys have this same mental picture. )

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  12. Re:Anandtech reviews... by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 4, Informative


    Solution:

    1) Go to an Anandtech review
    2) Click on "Print this article" link at bottom of page
    3) Read the review in one page with no ads

    It helps to have a decent browser (ala Firebird), as the "print article" link is a java pop-up window. You can force it to a new tab with the correct settings.

  13. Planned obsolescence at its best by foonf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The advantages of moving the CPU to the front of the case, defining thermal zones, and so on, are clear, but overall this does look to me more like just another excuse to obsolete the cases already in use and add another marketing buzzword for manufacturers.

    The most serious change to BTX versus ATX is switching the side of the expansion slots. What possible advantage could this have, aside from making it incompatible with existing ATX cases? In the reference examples they show, it just means that everything is moved to the opposite side of the case. As for the specially defined locations for the CPU and motherboard north and southbridges, they are pretty similar to a lot of boards already on the market (just reversed of course), and as the sizes of components change few BTX boards in the future will follow these specs exactly anyway. And the rest of the "advantages" (riser cards for horizontally-mounted video adapters, a sub-micro form factor, air ducts to chassis fans) already exist in practice with ATX anyway.

    In the mean time, I hope I'll still be able to get new-generation ATX mainboards for the next couple years, because I see nothing in this new format worth buying a new chassis over.

    --

    "(Man) tries to live his own life as if he were telling a story. But you have to choose: live or tell." --Sartre
    1. Re:Planned obsolescence at its best by cmowire · · Score: 4, Informative

      A few things.

      First, heat rises. Which means that you can use convection.

      Second, I think they are deliberately making it incompatable with ATX because they want to make sure that you put a BTX motherboard in a proper case. To be quiet, they are going to have to run with as little cooling as possible for a given configuration, thus little things like having the vent holes done up properly are going to count.

      Third, you are more likely to have short PCI cards than room in front of the CPU for hard drives. Sure the video cards are still huge, but most everything else is pretty small.

      Fourth, the main push is for tiny motherboards, not large motherboards. The full size format is there mostly so that there will be a large enough BTX audience to make a difference.

      It should be interesting to see how this plays out. From the looks of it, it doesn't look to be too dual-CPU friendly. There's not much that's strictly wrong with the ATX standard right now (There was major Baby-AT compatability problems and random headaches back in the day) so there's not as much of an incentive to switch form factors. The enthusiasts, who can be counted upon to upgrade regularly and choose whatever brightly colored, feature-filled motherboard is available, aren't going to find much of an audience. It doesn't look too friendly for 1 and 2 U rackmount systems.

      But it might do some good work on replacing the LPX form factor and many of the myriad not-particularly-standard tiny ATX standards.

      Of course, those who have been watching the computer market for a long time know that the case market has moved towards small cases, and then back to tower cases, several times so far. Apple didn't revolutionize the computing market with the iMac, the case has been part of your positioning ever since the who-knows-how-many colored Cray supercomputers. People loved C64-style keyboard-is-the-computer cases for a span of time. People wanted thin, sexy cases before almost everybody switched to tower cases that could be hidden under the desk. Beige Toasters like the early Macs and the PS/2 mod 25 were popular for a time, but there was a span where nobody made them.