Slashdot Mirror


Galileo, Consumed by Jupiter

Conceived in 1977, launched in 1989, the spacecraft Galileo ends its 34th orbit exactly one hour from now, hitting the atmosphere at 48 kilometers a second. In its long history, it taught us much, despite the failure of its main antenna that left only its tiny backup to send data, but its enduring legacy will always be the discovery that Europa's icy crust hides a planetary saltwater ocean. That ocean's potential for alien life is why the craft will self-vaporize: to avoid possible terrestrial contamination. The JPL's webcast starts roughly now, and should last about two hours (light delay). Don't miss the view from the prow and impact animations. If you're into these spacecraft and the people who build them, read Journey Beyond Selene. And while we grieve for Galileo today, remember, orbital insertion for Cassini-Huygens is only 283 days away!

We ran stories about Galileo's impending incineration earlier this month and last November when the plan was decided.

Here is a typical passage from Journey Beyond Selene, about the worst glitch in Galileo's mission, and the beginnings of how it would be worked around. Failures and the engineers who salvage them are the recurring tragic, triumphant story of our missions into space. Reproduced without permission:

With such triply redundant hardware built into their spacecraft, mission planners could feel confident that they had designed a communications system that was almost completely resistant to failure, and for the first eighteen months after Galileo's 1989 launch, there was no reason to assume anything would fail. Finally, on April 11, 1991, when the ship's trajectory had spiraled out as far as the edge of the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, JPL planners decided it was at last probably safe to unlock the high-gain antenna and spread its ribs. It was only then that they'd learn if triply redundant was redundant enough.

Though the deployment of the high-gain system was not a complicated exercise, it was a critical one, and for that reason the chieftans of the Galileo project made sure they were there to watch it happen. On hand at the flight director's console that afternoon were mission director Neal Ausman, deputy mission director Matt Landanow, and project manager Bill O'Neil. O'Neil and Ausman were far and away the higher ranking of the three men, but Landanow, they all knew, was far and away the most knowledgeable. As chief engineer during the Galileo design phase, he had familiarized himself with every strut, nut and rivet of the ship, and could practically describe their placement and purpose from memory alone. If anything went wrong this afternoon, Landanow would likely be the first person to recognize it -- and the first person to come up with a way to fix it.

For the first forty minutes or so after the deployment command went up, O'Neil, Ausman and Landanow had little to do. Like so many other JPL controllers before them, they knew they would have to tolerate the nonnegotiable limits of light speed, waiting twenty minutes as their signal traveled from Pasadena to the spacecraft and then another twenty minutes as it traveled back again. For that entire time their screens told them nothing, flickering merely with the self-evident information that their command had indeed been sent. Finally, after just over the anticipated forty minutes had elapsed, a column of numbers began to blink on the glass. Landanow gave the figures a quick scan and immediately noticed something amiss. He read them again -- a bit more closely -- and this time started to feel downright queasy. The antenna, from all indications, was pulling what the engineers called stall current. The motor was drawing power, the deployment gears were engaged, but the ribs of the umbrella appeared to be going nowhere at all.

"We're stuck," Landanow said flatly.

"How can you tell?" O'Neil asked.

"The current is saturated, something is jammed," Landanow said. "In any event, the antenna's not budging."

Ausman gave the numbers on the screen a read of his own, confirmed what Landanow was saying, and immediately called out to his flight controllers, instructing them to send a second deployment command up to the ship. The engineers complied, and forty minutes later another stall signal came down. A third command yielded a third signal, and a fourth a fourth. With each new report Landanow winced. If he knew this ship -- and he surely did -- he could all but guarantee that whatever was hanging up the antenna was not much: a single too-tight fitting, perhaps, a single protruding bolt, one that was situated in just such a way that it managed to jam all eighteen ribs. If it were somehow possible to transport the Galileo spacecraft to a hangar in Pasadena, Landanow knew he could probably roll over a stepladder, climb up to the antenna, and spring it free with his hands alone. But Galileo was not in a hangar in Pasadena; it was tens of millions of miles away, at the edge of the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, and more elaborate measures would be necessary.

37 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. transcript from last time this happened in 1995 by andy666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Time Event
    ________ _____
    11:04 a.m. Coast timer initiates probe operation
    12:46 p.m. Orbiter flyby of Io (~1000 km) (No imaging or spectral data collected)
    2:04 p.m. Energetic Particles Investigation (EPI) begins measuring trapped radiation in a region previously unexplored.
    5:04 p.m. Probe entry and data relay
    5:05:52 p.m. Pilot parachute deployed
    5:05:54 p.m. Main Parachute deployed
    5:06:02 p.m. Deceleration module jettisoned
    5:06:06 p.m. Direct scientific measurements begin
    5:06:15 p.m. Radio transmission to orbiter begins
    ~5:08 p.m. Visible cloud tops of Jupiter reached
    5:12 p.m. Atmospheric pressure the same as Earth's sea-level pressure
    5:17 p.m. Second major cloud deck is encountered (uncertain)
    5:28 p.m. Water clouds entered (uncertain)
    5:34 p.m. Atmospheric temperature equal to room temperature on Earth
    5:46 p.m. Probe enters twilight
    6:04 p.m. End of baseline mission. Probe may cease to operate due to lack of battery power, attenuation of signal due to atmosphere, or being crushed.
    6:19 p.m. Orbiter ceases to receive probe data (if still transmitting)
    7:27 p.m. Ignition of Galileo main engine (49 minute duration) to insert into Jovian orbit

  2. Goodbye by c_oflynn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well it has served well - long past how long it was supposed to.

    It's history has been plagued with problems, ones it has overcame.

    If any spacecraft would show the history and power of space travel, I think this probe is one of them.

  3. Outstanding achievement by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was reading this article earlier and I was thinking what a sickening feeling it must have been when they realised that the main antennae was not going to deploy properly leaving them up the creek so to speak. I think its a brilliant achievent that they managed to recover from this huge setback, reprogram the vehicle, retask the mission to focus on the Jovian moons and still get so much useful information. A very cool piece of engineering improvisation.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Outstanding achievement by s20451 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The quest to get usable data out of Galileo has driven some of the world's most advanced communication and signal processing algorithms over the past few years. AS a result they were able to achieve a better than ten fold increase in data rate from 10 bps to a maximum of 120 bps, a pretty spectacular achievement that saved the mission. You can read the technical details here

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
  4. Watching online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    FYI, NASA TV has a live webcast here. UATV is another place to watch as they are rebroadcasting the NASA channel...

    1. Re:Watching online by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 4, Funny

      Cheers, didn't know which was going down faster... Galileo or the NASA webcast...

  5. Re:Wow, I was worried by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apparently there was also a possibility that Mission Control would be trampled to rubble by a herd of stegosaurs. Glad that didn't happen, either...

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  6. It's probes like this... by kevinatilusa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    that show that "faster, better, cheaper" shouldn't mean cutting as many corners as possible while earthside. Galileo was probably one of the top few probes ever on a measure of information learned per dollar spent NOT because we saved money while building it, but because it was built so well that it just kept on transmitting when by all rights it should have gone quiet a long time ago.

  7. Live webcast? by Chicane-UK · · Score: 4, Funny

    The JPL's webcast starts roughly now, and should last about two hours (light delay).

    Hehe.. and just so that it doesn't feel left out, that JPL webserver is currently experiencing what its like to get smashed into Jupiter at 48km/s :)

    Good old Slashdot.

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  8. HOW DID YOU FIND OUT! by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Funny

    How did you find out my master plan!!!

    PINKY! Here, NOW!

  9. Re:a new Sun? by WTFmonkey · · Score: 4, Funny
    Maybe it will turn jupiter into a mini-sun, and the ice on Europa will start to melt, and the moon (now a planet) would slowly become habitable, and we'd discover that life (which was already there, but not very advanced) would start to evolve faster, and finally be able to come out of the oceans...

    Man, that would make a great book.

  10. The suspense is unimaginable! by Dan+Weaver · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've been looking forward to Galileo's collision with Jupiter for weeks. I can't wait to see which one wins!

    1. Re:The suspense is unimaginable! by jd · · Score: 3, Funny

      The planet was found to be using an illegal hold, and disqualified.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  11. Alternate feeds of NASA TV by deglr6328 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Since Jamie rather thoughtlessly posted a direct link to the JPL real stream and now none of us can see it; please visit NASA's website listing all the alternate feeds for NASA TV and use one of these instead.

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  12. Re:a new Sun? by jandrese · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, good thing the didn't try to land it on Pluto and set the whole planet on fire. You might want to take some nuclear physics at some point as well, it is quite enlightening to learn what being nuclear really means. Hint: It doesn't involve the magical ability to blow up everything it touches.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  13. Slashdot saves Galileo! by cybermace5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    NASA Press Release: Due to an unprecedented amount of web traffic on the announcement of the Galileo space probe's imminent plunge into the Jovian atmosphere, the Galileo comms computing center was brought to its knees. NASA engineers showed their ingenuity once more, as the flood of internet traffic was directed to the Galileo probe itself, heating Transistor QB-2542a, allowing the main antenna to unfold and allow the original planned communication range, in addition to acting as a miniature solar sail to push Galileo on a recovery arc around Jupiter. NASA Galileo Command would like to extend appreciation to Slashdot and its readers for allowing the unqualified successes of the Galileo mission to continue.

    --
    ...
  14. RealBad by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Funny

    The JPL's webcast starts roughly now

    Crap. All NASA offers is RealPlayer.

    Miss seeing Galileo crash into Jupiter
    or
    Spend thirty minutes clicking half a dozen hidden, misleadingly named submenu checkboxes to retain my privacy. And then spend three days un-doing RealPlayer's attempt to take over my entire system and all file extensions.

    Screw it. I won't download any insertions into bodies no matter how heavenly if it's in RealPlayer format. Definitely not gonna start with something's that not porn. I'll catch the 2 minute recap on the news.

  15. Re:a new Sun? by orthogonal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe it will turn jupiter into a mini-sun, and the ice on Europa will start to melt, and the moon (now a planet) would slowly become habitable

    I'm sorry, haven't you heard that Europa is forever off-limits to us?

  16. Re:a new Sun? by Jerf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Plunging into ever increasing pressure, no one knows for sure if this will cause a chain reaction, but the potential energy and temperatures are enormous.

    Are you fucking nuts? Talk about "argument from ignorance"! "I don't understand the first bit of what I'm talking about, but I'm going to babble on anyhow!"

    I will personally guarentee you that vast quantities of plutonium, and for that matter every other known element, already exist in Jupiter. Just because it's a "gas planet" doesn't mean it's made entirely of gas.

    Moreover, if anything was going to "set Jupiter off" it would have been set off already! Remember Shoemaker-Levy 9 smacking in Jupiter? That's huge quantities of energy, large enough to roil up clouds larger then Earth itself! And that's nothing compared to what even Earth has seen in its history, let alone the King of Planets. (There's no way to know but personally I'd bet at least one moon-sized impact has hit Jupiter in the past. Your choice of "Jovian moon-sized" or "Earth moon-sized".)

    The only "danger" from forty pounds of plutonium several light minutes away are the quantities of hot air it can still generate here back on earth. Get over your pathetic 1950's-era nuclear fears already. It's just matter, not black magic!

  17. Re:a new Sun? by Dan+Weaver · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hi, no offense, but this is the most laughable thing I have ever heard.

    a) The main fissionable form of plutonium is Pu-239, not Pu-238.

    b) Even if this was Pu-239 on board, forty pounds thereof is a borderline critical mass. You would need tampers to make it a good bomb.

    c) Even if this was Pu-239 on board and there was enough of it for a critical mass, it is not arranged in a critical geometry that will produce good fission under a Jovian pressure crush.

    d) Even if this was Pu-239 in a critical mass in a critical geometry, Galileo lacks the tritium primer required to kickstart a fusion reaction from a fission reaction.

    e) Even if Galileo had a working thermonuclear weapon on board, a thermonuclear detonation on Jupiter would not blow up Jupiter, because there isn't enough of an oxygen fraction in the Jovian atmosphere to set the hydrogen afire. Think about it. Jupiter has collided with large asteroids and comets before now. These collisions give off heat considerably in excess of any nuclear detonation. The huge pressures at Jupiter's interior produce heat considerably in excess of any nuclear detonation. If Jupiter could have turned into a star (it cannot) it would have done so by now.

    f) Learn more about physics.

  18. Re:Wow, I was worried by CGP314 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I heard on the radio that there was a chance the plutonium in the probe was going to ignite Jupiter into a second star, and it would kill/sterilize most humans on Earth! Glad that didn't happen.

    I heard that you can't get radio reception in a room lined with tinfoil.

  19. Re:a new Sun? by theycallmeB · · Score: 5, Informative

    Short version: There is absolutely nothing to worry about. Read on for the long version.

    That is because throwing 48 pounds of Pu-238 (which is useless as weapons grade material, Pu-239 is much better for sustaining fission chain reactions) into Jupiter is like tossing a salt shaker into the ocean. Jupiter already has massive radition belts generated by its interactions with the solar wind. It has surely ingested more than 48 pounds of the various isotopes of Uranium from the thousands or millions of meteorite strikes Jupiter has sustained. And the total energy that could be released by complete fission of all of that plutonium into stable elements would insignificant next to the gravitational-potential energy released by the steady contraction of Jupiter's gas clouds that results from the planet's massive gravitational pull. Because of this contraction, Jupiter already releases significantly more energy back into space that it absorbs from the sun.

    Finally, with a total mass that is about 0.0001 times that of the Sun, Jupiter is too small to support fusion reactions in its core by about two (2) orders of magnitude. The smallest stars are about 0.08 times the Sun's mass.

  20. Sad News by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Funny

    I heard on the radio that there was a chance the plutonium in the probe was going to ignite Jupiter into a second star, and it would kill/sterilize most humans on Earth!

    I just heard some sad news on talk radio - NASA probe Galileo was incinerated in Jupiter's atmosphere this afternoon. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss it - even if you didn't enjoy its transmissions, there's no denying its contributions to popular culture. Truly an American icon.

  21. from a telemetry station in JPL... by lone_marauder · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hey, look we finally got the antenna open.. oh, wait, never mind."

    --
    who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.
  22. Last post! by clovis · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's gone. Nothing to see here folks, just move along.

  23. Re:Why? by applemasker · · Score: 5, Informative
    Because of Galileo's extemely elliptical orbit -- think of a comet around the sun -- (required because it's mission was to visit most of Jupiter's moons), it's constantly in need of tweaking in the form of thruster firings to keep it from blundering into something (besides Jupiter) while still keeping its antennae pointed towards Earth.

    The maneuvering fuel is nearly gone, and the spacecraft components have sustained many tens of times their design tolerances of radiation. Taken together, it's entirely possible that Galileo would soon become uncontrollable and crash somewhere like Eurpoa, where we may one day send probes to search for life. Because Galileo was not sterilized before launch, it would contaminate wherever it ended up, and could cast doubt of any future test results from expeditions there.

    (As a testimony to the hardiness of life, microbes on a camera lens or something were brought to and back from the moon, it wasn't until later that they realized someone sneezed on the lens or some nonsense and the damn bugs survived the whole round trip).

    While it would be nostalgic to have left Galileo in orbital purgatory around Jupiter, it's not possible to do this with any assurance that it won't later be a hazard. It is fitting, in a way, that Galileo will become part of Jupiter, the target of so much of its (and his) focus. If only NASA would bring the success of this mission into the public spotlight as a way to raise awareness as to its more successful programs.

    Coming soon to Saturn - Cassini, July 4, 2004. (Alas, the last of the "great explorer" probes.)

    --
    Bush Lies On the Record.
  24. Just great, another 'lost' planetary probe. by dzurn · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yah, sure, they crashed this one *on purpose*. They forgot Jupiter was so big is my guess.

    Tell me another story, Grampa.

    I ain't buyin' it. NASA just screwed up again and arranged the phony paper trail on their website, complete with press releases, as a massive coverup. Hey, if they can make up a Moon Shot (Capricorn One? Galileo 2003? Sure!) then they can definitely cover up a screwup like this one.

  25. USA Attacks Jupiter!?!?! by ferrellcat · · Score: 4, Funny

    First, Afganistan, then Iraq, and now JUPITER!!!

    When will this administration stop?!?!?!?

  26. Requiescat 1802 by panurge · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Some of my earliest development work for embedded systems was done on the old 1802 processor. The intended environments were transportation related and pretty hostile. It's nice to know that we made such a good choice, and that an 1802 holds the record for the longest traveled microprocessor ever built.

    You may not have had a proper subroutine mechanism, you may have had a bizarre instruction set (with a SEX instruction no less), but you were the first processor for which I ever wrote a set of floating point routines. Rest in peace, old friend.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  27. Re:Why? Life (?) at risk! by Frodo420024 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Could somebody tell me the logic of why we destroy probes after their useful life is over?

    Briefly, it's because it might otherwise crash into Europe (the moon, not the continent). It has itself discovered that conditions (water) exists on Europe that might habour life (however primitive), and crashing a sattelite from Earth with possible bacteria might contaminate Europe (the moon) with lethal bacteria.

    It might sound like far-fetched science fiction - it ain't. It's the official reason for the Jupiter crash.

    --
    I'm in a Unix state of mind.
  28. Re:a new Sun? by RayBender · · Score: 4, Informative
    No comet fragment can reach Jupiter's core. The only way to reach the core is by sinking slowly, but then by definition you don't have kinetic energy. If the plutonium inside Galileo explodes, it won't compare with SL9 in terms of megatons, but it will be the first time an explosion occurs so deep inside Jupiter. I hope you can see the qualitative difference.

    Bzzt. You fail physics. 1) the probe will likely be vaporized into a 1000-km trail of dust by the impact with the atmosphere at 48 km/s. It won't slow down intact and then sink into the core of Jupiter. 2) The temperature reaches the melting point of metal a few thousand kms down into Jupiter. Even if the probe was intact by the time it sank that far, it would melt/dissolve long before it reached the core. 3) The RTG's contain Pu-238, which as has been stated repeatedly, is not suitable as a nuclear explosive. 4) Even if there was an explosion, it is so incredibly miniscule compared to the mass/size of Jupiter that it simply would not matter. 5) Jupiter CANNOT sustain nuclear fusion - it simply lacks the mass. The pressure in the core is far too low to overcome Coulomb repulsion between protons so that they can fuse. The minimum mass of a star that can sustain fusion is approximately 75 Jupiter masses. That is very, very well-understood physics (look up the astronomical tem "brown dwarf").

    --
    Human genome = 3 billion base pairs = 6 GBit. Windows + Office = 20 Gbit. Which is more impressive?
  29. Re:Relative to ...? by imnoteddy · · Score: 3, Insightful
    So, that's 48 km/s relative to what? If it's correct to assume the writer meant "relative to Jupiter," then that is ridiculously fast. IIRC, typical orbits around Earth manage only ~8-10km/s.

    Metis [MEE-tis] is the innermost known satellite of Jupiter. According to this page Metis orbits at a mean distance of 127,969 km with a Mean orbital velocity of 31.57 km/sec. So 48 km/sec is not so ridiculous.

    --
    No electrons were harmed creating this post, though some may have been subjected to electrical and/or magnetic fields.
  30. Re:Wow, I was worried by Noren · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nonsense. Apparently you missed all the other quotes on this thread, or didn't believe them. Just in case it'll help, here is the math. Note that Jupiter is not even close to half of the mass required for sustained fusion.

  31. Well... by mike3k · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least it didn't get stuck in Uranus.

  32. Fox news by rodionpunk · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think my favorite commentary on it was from Fox news here last night, which noted that if the plutonium core exploded, then "it would disrupt the entire galaxy." This, after a perfectly fine report on Galileo. It was the last sentence of their blurb -- something to give you warm fuzzies, I guess.

    I was wondering what level of disturbance would be required before the entire galaxy was "disrupted" -- simply being visible across the entire galaxy, a tremor like an earthquake, or something more sinister? Perhaps Fox needs a galactic Richter scale to better scare the masses. "It's a 0.00009 on the Asimov scale, which doesn't seem like much and we won't feel any effects; but if you were there, you'd be killed, alright!"

  33. Re:Wow, I was worried by SEWilco · · Score: 5, Informative
    That was obviously from the "Radioactive things will explode easily" believers with a sense of "If I haven't seen it before, it is something new" for history.

    • The plutonium is too little for a bomb, and arranged to only warm a device which converts heat to electricity.
    • There is plutonium in those cinder blocks around your basement, and in the lawn and rock garden. BOOM!
    • Someone forgot those big comet pieces which hit Jupiter a few years ago. If a fireball was going to ignite Jupiter we would have seen it happen then.
    • No matter how much hydrogen is in Jupiter's atmosphere, it won't catch fire or explode. Not enough oxygen.
    • A fire, even on a planetary scale, won't give off enough heat or light to bother our planet.
    • Even amateur astronomers know that Jupiter is well known for affecting asteroid orbits, and undoubtedly has been hit by many asteroids. Even a small metallic asteroid has many more fissionable elements than have been mined or that we can reach to mine them. So huge amounts of radioactives have already hit Jupiter.
    • Those asteroids also created fireballs bigger than Texas. The little heat is less than nothing.
    • Life is dangerous. Jupiter isn't a threat. A few days ago we got blasted by a star far across the Milky Way with more power than the Sun hits us with. If a nova or another magnetar like that one nearby hits us, then we either have something to worry about or we won't have anything to worry about ever. All our eggs are in this one basket.
  34. Re:picture of the last minute... by EverDense · · Score: 3, Funny

    That picture is all brown, I guess Gallileo landed in the shit.

    --
    http://jesus.everdense.com/