Slashdot Mirror


Mini-ITX AmigaONE Board

bhtooefr writes "When I was checking Mini-ITX.com, I found this little gem, info on the AmigaONE Lite board that will be coming out. It's a Mini-ITX compliant motherboard, so you'll be able to throw an Amiga in a Cubid case. Pictures are here (first two - first is without CPU, second is with)."

14 of 335 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Great, another place to throw an Amiga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    My trash? Yes.

  2. Finally..... by moodswung · · Score: 3, Funny

    Lemmings, the way it was meant to be played!

  3. again? by Lxy · · Score: 4, Funny

    First I'm told my C64 can be be modded for broadband.

    Then an Amiga runs at 900Mhz. /me dusts off his Apple ][

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
  4. An Amiga with a Radeon and VIA chips? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Denise and Agnus are spinning in their silicon landfills.

  5. "This little gem"? by psyconaut · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, GEM was on the Atari ST ;-)

    -psy

    1. Re:"This little gem"? by shplorb · · Score: 2, Funny

      So? Everybody knows Atari sux! Amiga kicks ass! =]

  6. Testing for full vaporware compliance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I've only got 4 questions:

    Is the processor 64-bit?
    Does it support IPV6?
    Will it run Enlightenment 17?
    Will it run Duke Nukem Forever?

    If so, I'll buy a million!

  7. What is it with you Mac fanatics? by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Funny
    I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you Amiga fanatics? I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of an Amiga (a A500+ with 1Mb of RAM) for about 20 minutes now while it attempts to copy a 17 Meg file from one folder on the hard drive to another folder. 20 minutes. At home, on my Pentium Pro 200 running NT 4, which by all standards should be a lot slower than this Amiga, the same operation would take about 2 minutes. If that.

    In addition, during this file transfer, AMosaic will not work. And everything else has ground to a halt. Even Cygnus Edit is straining to keep up as I type this.

    I won't bore you with the laundry list of other problems that I've encountered while working on various Amigas, but suffice it to say there have been many, not the least of which is I've never seen an Amiga that has run faster than its Wintel counterpart, despite the Amiga's faster chip architecture. My 486/66 with 8 megs of ram runs faster than this 7.1 mhz machine at times. From a productivity standpoint, I don't get how people can claim that the Amiga is a superior machine.

    Amiga addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use an Amiga over other faster, cheaper, more stable systems.

    [I've been waiting to post this for ages. Just kidding btw, I really, really, miss my A500+, with 6Mb of RAM and a 45Mb SCSI HD. :-(]

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:What is it with you Mac fanatics? by benzapp · · Score: 3, Funny

      Quite a few places still use it for television production. I just saw one of the public access channels in NYC get stuck at the AmigaDOS prompt for a whole afternoon.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
  8. With Gigabit Ethernet too.... by billstewart · · Score: 3, Funny

    Seemed a bit like overkill for playing Frogger, though I suppose if you want a networked MMORPG version of it where you're trying to frag everybody else's frogs before they cross the road, I guess it'll help...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  9. Re:Just like the dodo... by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 3, Funny

    It isn't dead until it runs BSD.

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  10. Go ahead knock Amiga..... by Shifty_McWriteoff · · Score: 1, Funny

    But in 10 years lets see if
    Windows XP or OSX
    can still play ball like
    AmigaOS3 can - from 1991!

    The real strength of Amiga
    was in the people. Development
    kept on for a decade after
    the platform died!

    At the very least
    it should serve to illustrate
    why upgrading to MS-WindowsX.X
    is generally only good
    for MS..

  11. Re:Who actually still uses amigas? by mig0 · · Score: 1, Funny

    I've thought about buying another amiga, and I'd have to have 1 fall in my lap to own one again. I'd own one for nostalgic purposes- the 4000s are/were grotesquely overpriced and the A1200s require too much expensive jury-rigging to get on the net & just be a nice, useful machine. (a $140 or so scan doubler, a NIC for the same price, a $200 or so expansion board to put a 1200 into a standard PC case...).

    My dream would be to retool the A1200 (or A4000) so as to produce a machine that supported some more current standards (USB 1.1/2.0, firewire, Compact Flash, SD cards) in order to make the classic amigas more useful/nice to use daily.

  12. Re:Amiga Forever and ever and ever and... by jpop32 · · Score: 2, Funny

    stick a floppy into Drive A.

    Drive A? Infidel! That's df0: to you!