Slashdot Mirror


BeOS Max Edition v3.0 Released

JigSaw writes "After Be went down, 2-3 "distros" of BeOS 5 PE (the free version of BeOS) were created and continued making releases by literally tweaking the internals, patching the kernel etc. in order to bring BeOS up to speed with new hardware. Additionally, these distros include lots of third party software. BeOS Max Edition is the most popular of the bunch, and version v3.0 came out today. The BFS ISO installs in its own BFS partition, however it requires a bit of attention in the way you have to burn it."

17 of 268 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Nobody cares about BeOS by darien · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Woo hoo. If only they hadn't discontinued the PPC edition, we could have run this on our AmigaONE boards.

    Which may sound like a troll, but actually I'd love that. BeOS is everything I used to love about AmigaOS, and loads more besides. Seriously, if anyone out there hasn't tried it, I really do urge you to give it a whirl. It's (IMO) what MacOS X should have been.

    (No apps, of course. Ho hum.)

  2. Aaah! My Eyes!! by tweder · · Score: 5, Informative

    Good Lord! There should seriously be a disclaimer attatched to the link to BeOS Max Edition website.

    1. Re:Aaah! My Eyes!! by smackjer · · Score: 5, Funny

      At least I wasn't the only one... This Wednesday on Fox: When Web Designers Attack!

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:Aaah! My Eyes!! by Otter · · Score: 5, Funny
      At least on Mac IE, the dark background tile loads well after the electric blue and canary yellow text. It's still hideous but not actively dangerous. You may not have noticed if you instantly closed the page to shield your eyes from the yellow-on-white initial rendering.

      Fortunately, a few years of clicking Slashdot links develops one's window closing reflexes to a superhuman level.

      BTW, I like the "Informative" you got...

    3. Re:Aaah! My Eyes!! by sharkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Damn straight. From this day forth, any who claim that $LINUX_DESKTOP is just too ugly, will be required to use BeOS Max Edition.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  3. BeOS by VAXGeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    BeOS used to be so much fun, but two things really held it back when I used it. One, NetPositive was the best browser. That sucked. It was like Netscape 3.0 compatible. I know that's not really valid anymore. There is a Mozilla port now. The second thing, which is probably still an issue, is the fact that BeOS wasn't totally POSIXified. All kinds of hacky stuff had to be done to get stuff to port. Compare this with OS X, which for all intents and purposes, is FreeBSD. Stuff compiles so good on there. I think the next time I will give BeOS a second try is when one of the free BeOS projects starts to come along. I kind of think of BeOS as OS X for i386.

    --
    this sig limit is too small to put anything good h
    1. Re:BeOS by Adelvillar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      BeOS has never been and will never be open sourced. There are several open sourced projects to try reproduce its functionality and some go as far as to try to achieve binary compatibility. However those projects are far from complete.

      Regarding your question why would anyone...? Hell 'cause they want to, 'cause they fell like doing it, 'cause they like the OS.

      Don't dismiss people's efforts and projects because in your narrow mind you don't find a use for whatever they are doing?

      Linux would not exist if everyone would think in such a near sighted terms.

      --
      "In God we trust, all others must bring data" - W. Edwards Deming
  4. BeOS by pagercam2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I understand that BeOS is well done and some say that it advances the state-of-the-art is OS design and usability and its great that it has been open sourced to allow code and apps to the public. That said, why would anyone want to start using an effectively end of life OS, is there that much that can be done with the OS? I see all these people putting effort into reviving BeOS or AmigaOS or C64 OS's with TCP/IP and ethernet is this at all useful. If the best features of BeOS live on in Linux I do see that as a benifit but what gain is there in spending the time and effort in reviving a dead horse?

  5. Burning it... by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 5, Funny
    The BFS ISO installs in its own BFS partition, however it requires a bit of attention in the way you have to burn it."

    What? You can only burn it in the night of February 29/March 1 when it's a full moon, the CD is plated with mithril, the burner in sanctified with the blood of a virgin and Duke Nukem Forever is released? When you burn it, might it cause a rip in time or a quantum instability?

    Man, BeOS is some scary stuff. I can imagine reading about it in the newspaper already... "Kid installs BeOS, blows up universe. God sues for damages."

    1. Re:Burning it... by ryanvm · · Score: 4, Funny

      the CD is plated with mithril, the burner in sanctified with the blood of a virgin...

      Well, at least the virgin blood should be easy to come by here on Slashdot.

    2. Re:Burning it... by B3ryllium · · Score: 4, Funny

      They usually mean female virgins when they say that.

  6. Re:CDRTools Windows by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 4, Informative

    You need to get an ASPI layer for your system.

    Click HERE for the tool forceASPI.

    Click HERE to see where Roxio's software should go.**

    **Dont click if you value your sight. It nasty.

    --
  7. Support for modern hardware yet? by poopie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last time I was in my kick to use as many different OSes as possible, I found the hardware support for BeOS terribly lacking. Does it support modern graphics cards now? What hardware *won't* work with BeOS?

    Is BeOS still stuck in the gcc 2.95 world due to c++ libraries?

    At one time, I cared. BeOS could have beaten OSX to the punch. It could have been a kick-a$$ multimedia box.

    Now, though, aside from the coolness factor of it being yet another OS that runs on Intel hardware, what exactly does BeOS have that makes it a desirable platform for users? Or put more succintly, Is there anything in BeOS that is not available in Linux?

  8. jeeeeeez..... by kaan · · Score: 4, Funny

    for a group that works with one of the nicest looking operating systems ever, they've really produced a horrible website. my "nice" guess is that they're either colorblind, or a group of teenagers who still lament the loss of the tag (or both).

  9. Re:Just curious, but by Sillypuddy · · Score: 4, Informative

    in the true slashdot fashion, you didn't read the faq:

    Many of you have asked us to create ISO images for BeOS Installations. This article comes to clear out some misconceptions about BeOS Installations.

    BeOS images are ISO images. But not ISO Images in the sense Windows sees them. Those ISO contain FAT32 or FAT16 compliant filesystems. ISO9660 compliant is a FAT32 system. BeOS uses BeFS which is a 64bit journaling filesystem that stores a lot of the file info in different places such as Attributes. If we where to create an installation of BeOS using a classic ISO image (one that can be read by IsoBuster) it wouldn't Install !!!! If you copied files out of it to BeOS, some of them would be useless.

    Installation of BeOS requires BeFS Images. THAT'S IT.

    And we won't fix it. It's not a bug, it's a feature.

    NOTE: YOU CAN ASK THE COMPANIES THAT CREATE ISOBUSTER AND WINIMAGE TO SUPPORT BeFS.

    -joe

  10. BeOS AbiWord Port by uwog · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since I saw AbiWord already in the 3rd screenshot, I figured there might be some interest left for an AbiWord 2.x port for BeOS as well. If anyone is interested in such a port, he/she should stand up now and contact the AbiWord Developers Mailing List. If we find no active BeOS developers within the next 2 weeks, we'll drop the currently unmaintained and outdated BeOS port from our tree.

  11. Mini FAQ on BeOS by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know this article will generate a ton of "BeOS is dead, who cares" and "Who the hell uses BeOS anymore?" or "What is BeOS?" style posts, so as an avid user of BeOS I will attempt to explain some things:

    (1) You'd be surprised how much hardware is supported by BeOS, Athlon XP CPUS, P4s, firewire cards, SCSIs, Magneto Optical, scanners, etc. If it's not natively seen, www.bebits.com (as well as bedrivers.com) is the place to go.

    (2) BeOS is a refreshing change of pace from the "Big Brother" of Windows, the "Here's a million bits, put them together yourself" of Linux or the "Our way, the only way" of Apple. BeOS relies on the "less is more" viewpoint. Software packages range in the hundereds of k, as opposed to the hundereds of megs in size, yet still do what they need to do.

    (3) I have yet to see a GUI is clean, useful and *consistant* as BeOS.

    (4) It just works.

    (5) The user base is friendly, enthusiastic and you won't get any of the typical *nix attitudes of "lamer" or "rtfm" in the BeOS user forums.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.