Slashdot Mirror


New Nano-ITX 12cm Motherboards

Kris_J writes "mini-itx.com have exclusive pictures of VIA's new 12cm x 12cm motherboard standard they're terming 'Nano-ITX'. VIA have removed the legacy ports, moved to mini-PCI and SODIMMs and now a new batch of custom PC projects can be produced where previously there wasn't quite enough room for the motherboard. I already have an idea..."

26 of 439 comments (clear)

  1. Government doing the right thing for once... by Bame+Flait · · Score: 5, Funny

    VIA have removed the legacy ports, moved to mini-PCI and SODIMMs

    Good thing Sodimmy is no longer illegal.

  2. Photos? Don't bother. by zedmelon · · Score: 5, Informative

    The idea is pretty interesting. I can only hope that it turns out better than this article suggests.

    The pics are arranged in a three by three grid, but don't bother. Pics one and two are decent, three is okay, and nine is passable, but the rest are so blurry that once you've heard the board is 120 mm square, they're nothing you can't get from just viewing the thumbnails.

    :\

    --
    Mom says my .sig can beat up your .sig.
  3. Ah-ha! by tds67 · · Score: 5, Funny
    VIA have removed the legacy ports, moved to mini-PCI and SODIMMs...

    So that's where Sodimm Hussein has been hiding! It's now the mother of all boards!

  4. Bring back the serial port! by grub · · Score: 4, Insightful


    VIA have removed the legacy ports

    I wish these companies would leave just a single RS-232 or RS-422 port. Sometimes you need a simple serial connection to connect through if the network is down. The lack of serial also limits the use for these boards for controlling other pieces of hardware if embedding is your thing.

    Maybe an online petition to bring back the RS-232 is in order :)

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Bring back the serial port! by a_ghostwheel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That is why you have mini-PCI there - just install appropriate card.

    2. Re:Bring back the serial port! by grub · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Just get a USB->RS232 cable.

      That's another layer of complexity. It may work fine for Rube Goldberg but the less things to break, the better.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re:Bring back the serial port! by capsteve · · Score: 5, Informative

      use a keyspan usb-to-serial adapter.
      that's what mac users have been doing for years...

      --
      three can keep a secret, if two are dead - benjamin franklin
    4. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Maybe an online petition to bring back the RS-232 is in order :)

      I know this was tongue in cheek, but please... RS-232 hasn't disappeared in any way, shape, or form. Virtually every PC motherboard out there still has at least one (and usually two) serial ports. About the only ones that don't are the Abit MAX series (which has removed all legacy ports), this one, and some miniITX form factor boards.

      If you need a real serial port, then just avoid buying one of the 1% of boards that doesn't have one.

      Every time a story is posted to /. about a board that doesn't have serial the RS-232 freaks crawl out of the woodwork. If you're smart enough to know all the uses for RS-232, then you should damn well be smart enough to buy the right board.

      Oh, and I like serial too... my remote control is programmed via it (although it works fine w/ a USB->serial dongle if needed).

    5. Re:Bring back the serial port! by ikkonoishi · · Score: 4, Funny

      The fun part comes when the only way to get data off a computer is to hook a serial port up to a usb adapter up to a firewire adapter up to a cyber-link to your brain up to the vast alien mind net in order to play pong with our new alien over lords in the year 30001!

      Now that is the ultimate hack.

  5. Wonderful! by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't say how many times I've wanted to make a small, embedded controller system, but couldn't do it. Most projects need the ability of pc, but can't handle the space requirements for a desktop sized box. These little babies aught to make my life much more fun, and possibly fully automated.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
  6. Re:Specs... by mopslik · · Score: 4, Informative

    I guess we would see the 800Mhz and 1 GHz Via C3 chips to start

    While not the full specs, the screenshot page says...

    The secret of Nano-ITX is the Nano-BGA (Ball Grid Array) package, which has allowed VIA to squeeze a 1Ghz C3 CPU into just 15mm square.

    So, yep.

  7. So please please can we have.. by adeyadey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Genuine cheap DIY clone portables/laptops with interchangable parts - if a component fails, you dont have pay the earth to replace it? Anyone have good links/experience on that? :-)

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  8. Drive bay mounting? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    12 by 12 centimeters (120 millimeters) is the same size as a CD... I wonder if one could squeeze one of these machines into one or two drivebays... I could definetly use a nice little dev box inside my regular box!

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    1. Re:Drive bay mounting? by DragonWyatt · · Score: 4, Informative

      here ya go:

      TerraSoft's briQ

      Been around for a long time, based on powerpc (350 or 800mhz G3, or 500mhz G4), 168pin DIMMs, VFD display included, and runs linux to boot!

      --
      Don't sweat the petty things. But do pet the sweaty things.
  9. Woohoo! by CausticWindow · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I can make that ammo canister pc come true. I could even make Linux run on my MP5!.

    Or what about using a US marines trooper helmet as a webserver! Or maybe I can equip a clip with a fileserver.

    W00t. My Death/Linux dreams have finally come true.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    1. Re:Woohoo! by LookSharp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Roll your own notebooks!

      Where is the power circuitry? To run from/charge a battery?

      The controller to run a native LCD?

      Be sure to include some room for converters to step down the big IDE down to notebook harddrives and optical drives.

      Oh and that "1 GHz C3?" It has roughly the computational power of a Celeron 600.

      Feel free to invest $1200 in making one of these into a notebook with an LCD, but I'd just assume spend $1000 on a Dell 2GHz and plenty more expansion and connectivity options.

  10. more info by klocwerk · · Score: 4, Informative

    Mini-itx was 17x17 centimeters, this is 12x12, so 5cm (or about 2 inches) smaller than a mini-itx.

    The RAM slot looks like it takes laptop ram, not stadard desktop DIMMs.
    The cpu is a 1Ghz C3 processor, hardwired in (no upgrading that once purchased).
    3 sound jacks, ethernet (mini-itx vias are 10/100, i assume this is), 2 USB, video out, PS2 keyboard jack, and a TV output. mouse would have to be via USB.

    I love my mini-itx server, which is completely silent running, this thing is even tinier, but with a 1ghz cpu i'll be interested to see if they can make a fanless model. the 1ghz mini-itx boards don't passively cool without gluing on a Zalman flower heatsink.

    [/itx-geek]

    --

    "You worthless post!"
    -Shakespeare, 2 Gentlemen of Verona, 1. 1. 147
  11. Mirror here! by bazik · · Score: 5, Informative
    --


    --
    One by one the penguins steal my sanity...
  12. Size by Txurlo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, that's exactly the size of a CD jewel case.

    Pretty nifty, huh?

    --
    Txurlo
  13. Re:Call the office for fair trading! by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 4, Funny

    1 centimeter = 1x10^-2m, 1 nanometer = 1x10^-9m.

    FALSE ADVERTISING.



    But they never specified their units. They only used the prefix nano. But they never said nano-whats. Their unit of distance could be root acres, or astronomical units, or in this case, the unit of measurement is 12cm*10^9

    Heh heh, the devil is in the details my friend.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
  14. Better pictures here by EriktheGreen · · Score: 5, Informative
    Better pics of a nano-itx board from VIA

    Google - it's not just for breakfast any more.

    Erik

  15. More more info - Re:more info by bazik · · Score: 5, Informative


    According to this page, the shown Nano-ITX board got the following details:

    - VIA CN400 Chipsatz (FSB 200 Support)
    - 1 GHz VIA C3
    - VIA VT8237 Southbridge (support for S-ATA)
    - Mini-PCI on the back (maybe for WLAN)
    - 1x SODIMM RAM Slot
    - 1x S-ATA (one Channel)
    - 2x IDE (ATA 133)
    - TV-Out
    - 6-Channel Sound
    - DOC (disk-on-chip)
    - Size: 12x12 cm
    - CPU-Size: 15x15 mm

    --


    --
    One by one the penguins steal my sanity...
  16. Slashdotted... by jargoone · · Score: 5, Funny

    I got a connection refused when trying to connect. Here's an ASCII-art mirror of the motherboard:


    []


    Man, that's small!

  17. Worst legacy PC item is still there. by Cheetahfeathers · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They haven't removed the worst offender of the old legacy PC, however. The BIOS is still there. PCs need to ditch BIOS and go with something decent like openboot. Also, console on an out of band management line needs to be stardand, so you can administer things remotely or when the network is down.

    It doesn't need to be legacy serial, though that's what everything else uses. Put it on USB for all I care. Just make sure I can get to the system outside the network, and boot/reset/configure it from there.

  18. Wrong font size by bluGill · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nice ascii art, but the font size is wrong leading me to get a wrong impression of the size. However it is easy to convert. There are by definition 2.54 cm to an inch, so the 12cm board = 4.72 inches - lets round that to the nearest quarter = 4.75. By definition there are 72 point to the inch, so you need to adjust your browser to a 342 point font. Note that I'm assume that your monitor properly scales fonts to actual size, odds are it does not (generally only macs try, and not all of them get it right), but that is implimentation specific.

    I rounded the inches measurement up a little because in most fonts [] does not take up all the pixels it could, and thus isn't exact size. I'm hoping this adjustment brings us to a better average. (likely width still a little small, hight a little big)

  19. Not so good! by FrostedWheat · · Score: 4, Funny

    You might loose your computer down the back of the sofa!