Slashdot Mirror


Questions for Red Hat Co-Founder?

ConceptDog asks: "Co-Founder and current Director of Red Hat, Bob Young, is going to be conducting a presentation at my school. In addition to his presentation, there will be a question and answer session. Considering that my school is rather small (less than 3000 students at my campus), there is a good chance that I might be able to ask a question of Mr. Young. So I'd really like the Slashdot community's help in coming up with a good question to ask. If I get an answer, I'll post what it is, here."

6 of 32 comments (clear)

  1. A small omission by ConceptDog · · Score: 3, Informative

    Forgot to mention that he'll be speaking at my College on Oct. 8 So any response I get will be posted then.

  2. What Would You Do Different and More by MBCook · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If you had it all to do over again, what would you do different?

    What do you think of the emmese popularity of Gentoo?

    What's Linux's greatest failing, how do you intend to fix it?

    How hard is it to get your product bundled with PCs (like from Dell, who does sell RH, IIRC)?

    What do you think of the Athlon 64?

    Can Superman beat the Flash? (*woot monorail*)

    OK, so that last one is a little irrelevent, but I was just watching the Simpsons and I couldn't help it.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  3. Red Hat's Future/ SMBs by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Currently there's no plans to support older versions of Fedora core with errata and security updates, longer than 3 months or so after the next release is out. By the time a Fedora core is stable, the new one will be out, and you either upgrade or start patching everything by hand. It's deliberately not suitable for production use.

    Many of us don't need "support" in the sense of calling someone to help me do something. We are the support. Any company with in-house sysadmins that are competent is in the same position.

    What is of some value is errata and security backports and patches. That's what my company pays a good deal of money to Red Hat for several RHN seats for the standard Red Hat Linux. We can afford to have lots of servers, because the seats are a reasonable price.

    RHEL is not an option. My company is not going to pay $350 per year per server, and be subject to an EULA that is as bad as Microsoft's, that gives Red Hat the right to audit us for license compliance, to make sure we purchased support seats for every server/desktop, just to get security errata, something every other operating system (including most other Linux distros) give for free.

    Our other option is to consolidate servers, which presents technical compromises, and reduces the value of running Linux in the first place. One of the key benefits to free software is that we were free to pop it on a server without the license hassle, and fear of audit. If that server became a permanant addition, we could buy another seat for it.

    So it looks like we will be slowly moving to Debian on all Red Hat servers. After April, we'll have no reason to subscribe to RHN any longer. I really didn't want to do this. I really like a lot of things Red Hat has done. They have been a big help to the open source community, and with the Fedora project, it looks like they will continue to support the community. I admire them for that.

    Red Hat has just left people like me, who work for and consult for small to medium businesses, with no other viable options.

    Red Hat has made a liar out of me when I told consulting clients and my employer that a Red Hat 7.3 server would not need to be upgraded for at least a couple years. I do resent that also.

    Microsoft doesn't even treat their customers quite this bad. They at least have an EOL cycle that works for businesses, and don't stop providing security updates suddenly on a OS versions that are less than 2 years old with a huge install bases. TCO for Red Hat just shot through the roof.

    It's a testament to the value of open source, that I can drop in a replacement from Debian with very few issues. At least free software still beats the pants off MS, even if RH can't anymore.

    What are Red Hat's plans here? Why is Red Hat leaving small to medium businesses with so few option?

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  4. Bob, could you... by s88 · · Score: 2, Funny

    explain why I care to ask a question not of my own design solely for the purpose of posting the answer to my favorite nerd site?

  5. Re:Open to the public? by BadBrainDay · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It was announced on the Toronto Linux Users Group as an open talk, so anyone is free to attend AFAIK.

    See here for details including where it's happening, etc: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.org.user-groups.lin ux.tolug/865/match=young

  6. Personal story... by tm2b · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ask him to tell you about the time he stole a car.

    No, really. It's a hilarious story. I used to work at Red Hat and he told it at a company gathering.

    --
    "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny