DivX Making Hollywood Inroads
worm eater writes "CNet news reports that DivX is doing its best to become a digital video compression standard, and has been very successful in courting DVD manufacturers to adopt the DivX format. But will that be enough to beat out competing compression methods as a new Hollywood standard? It faces tough competition, such as MPEG-4, RealVideo and Windows Media. Who will win the standards race and what will that mean for the companies that push the various compression methods?"
whoever has the most cripling DRM built in.
...is going to be in their abillity to abuse their monopoly to force out the other codecs.
:(
I don't foresee technical merit being a factor, unfortunately.
libertarianswag.com
I'm more just curious why DivX has come closest to "hitting the big time."
porn industry.
How about Theora? . . . I know.. but maybe someday.
I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
Better yet, how about upgradable players? Add whatever codecs you like/get invented?
"A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
There seem to be 3 factors that will eventually determine who wins out:
1. Quality - If it is compressed it still needs to be good quality
2. Widespread adoption - If you can't encode and decode it wherever you want to use it, then it won't work for you.
3. Portability/Restrictions - Finding the right balance between copy protections wanted by the MPAA/RIAA and the portability wanted by the consumers.
It performs well on low end hardware, and has excellent video quality(best I've seen in compressed video). Divx is significantly slower at high quality settings, and with slightly more artifacts. I believe xvid is LGPL too! Too bad without some lobbying money it doesn't stand a chance for Hollywood.
True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.