Slashdot Mirror


Apple Sets Oct. 24th Release For Mac OS X 10.3

dricci writes "Yahoo! has posted a press release from Apple, regarding the release date of the next major Mac OS X update, 10.3 ('Panther'). The update will be available 8:00 p.m. on October 24th at Apple Retail Stores and Authorized Resellers for $129.00 US (Family Pack for up to 5 users will be $199). Pretty much the same pricing structure they had for Jaguar. It looks like 'old world' Beige G3 support has been discontinued -- the update requires a Mac with built in USB."

5 of 696 comments (clear)

  1. Re:rediculous by LemonYellow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Judging from the features that have been demoed so far, this is an upgrade of a similar size to that from Win2k to WinXP. So, paying for it isn't too unreasonable, is it?

  2. Re:Countdown clock by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You don't believe it?

    Run an OS 10.0.4 box along side of a 10.1.0 box or a 10.0.4 along side a 10.2.0 box and then do a file copy or a browse to a network server and fart around with the machine at the sametime.

    Or fire up IE and browse /. articles with more than 50 comments.

    The OS does get *that* much faster.

  3. Re:MacOS 10.3 by CountBrass · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Two fallacies in one post - way to go.

    Fallacy one. How many different word processing/spreadsheet/paint packages do you use ? how many does anyone need? There's a slection of the best from free to costly available on the Mac. Some of the best aren't available on Windows...

    Fallacy two. OSX (and Linux and Unix) aren't just more secure because not so many people hack them - they're more secure because they're built that way. They don't by default execute attachments when you read email, they don't leave ports open all over the place etc etc. OSX has fewer security problems because its built that way and Windoh!s isn't. Edward

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
  4. Enough with the "point" release by mariox19 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I will stipulate that Apple went ahead and violated a convention in computing for the sake of marketing; but people criticizing the $129 price in the context of the upgrade being a "point" release are way off the mark.

    Panther is OS XII -- but I guess Apple wants to stick with the mindshare that the big "X" has created.

    I stuck with 10.1 until only last month. Know what? When I finally installed Jaguar on my machine, I was kicking myself for waiting so long.

    These are major upgrades.

    --

    quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

  5. Re:Old World Support by LookSharp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is yet another example of Apple trying to screw the user...

    Yeah, man! Fight the power! I want to run the latest and greatest OS on my six year old computer! Even though I bought into the proprietary platform, knowing full well that Apple goes through hardware generations and OSes every 3-5 years! For the past 15+ years!

    No more Apple screwing us over! I want OS 10.4 to support my Mac SE! I put 4 megs of RAM and an ethernet card in that thing... it cost me a bundle in 1989! I want some return on that investment! Damn Apple for screwing the user!