Slashdot Mirror


China Plans Manned Space Flight October 15

epmos writes "As previously reported on /., China is working toward launching a manned space flight Real Soon Now(tm). Many news sites have stories suggesting it could be as soon as a week away. The flight is expected to last about 90 minutes and complete one orbit." According to some of these stories, though, there's speculation about the flight lasting up to 24 hours.

8 of 362 comments (clear)

  1. Good Luck! by bishmasterb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hope everything goes successfully for the Chinese, and I hope that this is only the beginning for a long Chinese manned space program.

    Additionally, let this serve as a wake-up call to us, that manned space exploration is a common goal and desire that we all share.

  2. Re:A scary concept by perly-king-69 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great, a repressive country that hates the entire planet, has nuclear weapons, is mentally unstable, and now can send people into orbit.

    Enough about the USA, what about China?

    --

    --
    This sig is inoffensive.

  3. Re:I've been wrong before, but ... by Zocalo · · Score: 5, Insightful
    True, mankind has been in space since the 1960's, but the fact remains that just *two* space programs have achieved this to date. Comments like "Hey China, welcome to the 1960's" are akin to saying "Hey Cortez, welcome to the 1490's" upon his return from America.

    I personally think this is the best news to happen to space exploration for ages; it might just scare enough people in the US/EU to kick a little more funding towards NASA/ESA.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  4. Re:I've been wrong before, but ... by dmaxwell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Done in the '60s or no, manned spaceflight is Very Hard and Very Expensive. Up till now, the manned spaceflight club only had two real members the USA and USSR/Russia. Anybody else pulling this off is news. It's especially news these days since the Russians can't afford to do the things they accomplished in their heyday and the US is infatuated with shuttles and mostly just plays in low Earth orbit.

    Manned spaceflight has needed aggressive new blood for some time now. If China starts accomplishing "Great Things", then it just might motivate the US a little.

  5. Re:I've been wrong before, but ... by skarmor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the first thing that occured to me when I saw this headline was "so f--ing what?". I am certainly not saying that the exploration of space and the science/efforts behind attempting to achieve it aren't anything short of fascinating, but that fact that China's doing something that was done over 30 years ago? Big deal. Or maybe I'm missing the significance? It wouldn't be the first time and I'm sure if I am, there will be no shortage of ./'ers to tell me so.

    Well, during the cold war the space program was really a demonstration of capability. If a state has the capabiltiy to put a person in orbit then it is inferred that they also have the capability to hit any country in the world with a missle carrying a good sized payload. This coupled with nuclear capability is a not-so-subtle "don't fuck with us" statement.

  6. Re:This is exactly what the world needs by Troed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They didn't develop their own space program, they bought some old russian parts.

    World War II. German scientists. USA.

  7. Chinese space program pics by finchman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is the Chinese space program in all its glory.

    The China Space Capsule (space.com)

    The China Manned launch vehicle (SpaceDaily.com)

    The China Manned Launch vehicle (SpaceDaily.com)

  8. Re:Well... by grozzie2 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It sounds callous, but life is a bit cheaper to the Chinese govt than it is to the US govt

    Actually, this is a very bad misconception. To governments, life is a propoganda tool, that is used to massage the 'will' of the masses. Reference recent history.

    The loss of 7 lives in a re-entry accident is used by the government to achieve a huge (and very subtle) shift if expenditures. This is being used very effectively behind the scenes to promote the concept of scrapping the shuttle program, in the meantime, no launches, so, no money being spent on launches.

    The daily loss of life overseas is being promoted as 'the cost' and a 'justifiable cost' of enforcing a foreign policy on a region that wants no part of it.

    It's all how you spin it, and how the press regurgitates the spin. If you can make the masses believe that losing 7 astronauts is 'to much', then you can gain political support for an objective that doesn't include a shuttle program. If you can make the masses believe hundreds of lives are 'worth the price' to support an overseas invasion, then you can gain support for huge expenditures on that program.

    Body count is just a propoganda tool, to be used when convenient, and to be swept under the rug when inconvenient. That applies to ALL governments, including the american government.