Slashdot Mirror
Scientist Picks a Gem of a Star
UrgleHoth writes "According to a CNN report, the star
Gem 37 is the most likely candidate for alien life. Astrobiologist Maggie Turnbull of the University of Arizona in Tuscon has taken a list of most likely habitable planets and stars. Gem 37 topped the list. The deciding factor? 'Gem 37, the 37th brightest star in the constellation of Gemini, came out on top because it looks most like our sun.' This work was done for NASA's
Terrestrial Planet Finder."
Astrobiologist Maggie Turnbull of the University of Arizona in Tuscon has taken a list of football teams most likely to win the next Super Bowl. The Carolina Panthers topped the list. The deciding factor? 'The Panthers, one of the newest teams in the NFL, came out on top because I like the kitty cat on their helmets.'
The real reason they chose it is being similar to Earth is that because they picked up broadcasts of "Saved by the Bell" coming from the 3rd planet of the star.
New Scientist
And what kind of alien lifeforms will we find there? Gemtians?
DUKEY!
"This stable, middle-aged star is just a bit hotter and brighter than our sun. And if alien life is anywhere, it's likely to be there," New Scientist magazine said on Wednesday.
It's important to have a suitable star, but that's only one term of the Drake Equation.
A less sensational quote might have been, "And if alien life is anywhere, it's possible that it's there."
My God, it's Full of Source!
OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
I'll bet they have two heads.
They probably look a lot like this guy.
It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
I fucking LOVE Gem 37. Not what your thinking. I mean that I want to have sex with it.
ROAD TRIP!!!!!!!!!
Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
Whatever happened to that list of candidates that SETI@HOME found? Have those been thoroughly investigated yet? If not, when are they planning to do so? I remember hearing that they were going to have a look at them, but I don't recall when that was going to be.
do they insist in thinking that life developed elsewhere must be anything like earth's life?
I'm curious. Even if there is life on other planets, chances are that it will be in some form of marine life (asuming there are bodies of H2O). That said, how would you detect whether or not that H2O is harboring life?
Life is not for the lazy.
My 37 Gemini page contains several images from the POSS2/UKSTU and the HST Phase 2 digital plate stacks.
chongo (was here)
Cragen.
I can't seem to find the distance between here and Gem 37 in any of the mentioned links.
;)
Is it tens of light years, hundreds of light years, thousands, even?
Even if there were indeed some intelligent life in the Gem 37 system, only in the first case (tens of light years) could we hope to ever communicate with them. Unless if Einstein's theory somehow turns out to be wrong (or not entirely correct) and both mankind and the folks at Gem 37 eventually develop some sort of FTL communication and/or propulsion technology.
But then again, IANARS ('RS' standing for "rocket scientist").
"Oooh, does that mean we get to kick some puffy white mad zionist butt?"
We might also note that Earthly life might not be a median example of the life which may be strewn about the Universe (despite the humanoidocentrism of Star Trek).
If you don't see the parallels between the RCC and the Hindu religions, it is likely because you haven't studied the rituals of the RCC. They use idols, images, icons, rosaries (which came from both Hindu and Buddhist origins), and are increasingly embracing New Age concepts (which are purely Hindu in origin).
from where I sit all Christianity looks pretty full of images, icons, and idols. But I don't deny the link, but of course, it goes both ways, the Zoroastrians migrated to india from the Mediteranean 1500 years before Christ. Some say the worlds major religious actually have a long history of cross influence. Rare but regular and culture shattering events of contact.
God is self-existent; He created our time-space continuum. So to ask questions about His origin is asking about things literally outside our universe. He created time; so He is not subject to it. Therefore He has not a beginning, since He is not subject to time.
There is no reason that the laws of physics cannot have this same exception granted to them. After all the phenomenon of time which we percieve is a result of those laws and constants, according to science, just as according to you it's as a result of God's Will. I find the laws of physics beautiful in their dimplicity and divine in their complexity, so to speak, and there I can imagine them being in place forever. The Big Bang, btw, is just a theory and even if true does not talk about an origin. Time is compressed in this idea, the explosion explains an expansion seen in the universe by which the further away you get, the faster things are travelling away from us, and this is especially interesting since we are seeing light that left those places long ago. Things were separating fast a long time ago, explain. So since the constants really could be different as far as one could imagine, maybe everytime a universe bangs, it get's it's own set? Maybe every single possible set of physical laws gets a chance, and some don't exist very long. Having said that, of course there are scientists trying to derive such answers, on the hope that such a finding is at the root of a unified theory that explains all the fields and forces known to science.
Warps our brains to try and encompass that idea, but as David Moore says "I'd rather have a big God and little problems than a small God and big problems".
actually, science has the record right now for most warping-around hardness with Quantum Mechanics which makes General Relativity seem practically intuitive. The thing is, they have probed certain system and the results are consistent, and seem to imply strange things no one can really grasp as making sense. But the evidence keeps you from giving up or thinking it doesn't matter. It's as if you can do to things at once, like get a heads and a tails on a single flip of a coin, and then the two worlds can interact, where it's heads and where it's tails, and when you look at the coin, it becomes one or the other. If you don't look at the coin, but take a photo to look at later, wierdness can ensue. See, I admit that makes no sense. So we keep trying to make sense by looking at the information. It's hard to wrap your head around, but there is data to wrap it around. By the way, the data I'm refering to is regarding the famous "double slit experiments".
The whole probability wave thing of QM is kind of strange, I think. The idea that time is relative now makes sense to me, but I don't think it was intuitive originally, it's just that nature is like that. You can learn how nature really works, and in the end you can make sense of it because nature does make sense, it defines sense making, because we've grown up around it, our senses and brains and chemistry, our survival is all wrapped around how it works, how can it not make sense --- it defines sensible.
I have no trouble with the idea there is a conscious God. I'm inclined to think such a god would merely be the Universe, that would be it
-pyrrho
According to Simbad, 37 Gem has a parallax of about 50 milliarcseconds; this data is from the Hipparcos satellite. In other words, it's about 17 parsecs (56 light years) away.
No doubt, the inhabitants of 37 Gem are listening with interest to our broadcast stations from 1947. Perhaps they consider World War II a big "reality TV" show.
Protect your liberties. Donate to the ACLU