Slashdot Mirror


Send an Open Source Project to COMDEX

chromatic writes "O'Reilly & Associates is working with COMDEX to create an Open Source Innovation Area. We've nominated 21 important, interesting, and useful applications. Here's your chance to vote on the six most deserving applications. Steve Mallet has more details in his weblog." There's lots of good choices for applications on the list as well. Chances are that you've used one of them at least once.

144 comments

  1. "Choose up to three projects" -- Why so hard :'( by OneNonly · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With apps I use every day like OpenOffice.org, Gaim, SquirrelMail - and those that save me loads of time, phpMyAdmin and TightVNC it's such a hard choice!!

    Now if only PHP-Nuke was on the list - it's what has revolutionalised my life as a webmaster!!

  2. "Sorry..." by Doomrat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "We're sorry, you need to be logged in to vote for this contest."

    Thank you for telling me that after I'd carefully chosen my votes. "To keep track we ask that you please log in to your O'Reilly Network account." wasn't a fair warning, you made it sound optional.

    1. Re:"Sorry..." by Sir+Haxalot · · Score: 1

      To keep track we ask that you please log in to your O'Reilly Network account.
      I think this was plenty warning, and if you'd read it carefully you would have relised you were being _politely_ being told that if you don't log in, you can't vote.

      --
      I have over 70 freaks, do you?
    2. Re:"Sorry..." by Doomrat · · Score: 1

      I read it as "We can't track your vote if you don't log in.", 'cos that's what it says.

    3. Re:"Sorry..." by Sir+Haxalot · · Score: 1

      I read it as "We can't track your vote if you don't log in.", 'cos that's what it says.
      What would be the point in voting if they can't keep a record of it? :)

      --
      I have over 70 freaks, do you?
    4. Re:"Sorry..." by Doomrat · · Score: 1

      I thought that tracking was something to do with cookie-style user tracking.

    5. Re: "Sorry..." by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > "We're sorry, you need to be logged in to vote for this contest."

      At least you didn't have to use a Diebold machine...

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    6. Re:"Sorry..." by SunPin · · Score: 1

      There's nothing quite like a secret ballot.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    7. Re:"Sorry..." by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Why even give people the illusion that they might be able to vote without having logged on first? It should have put up the login check before serving up the voting screen. In short, the web site "jumped the gun".

  3. Mozilla by Sir+Haxalot · · Score: 1

    Where's Mozilla

    --
    I have over 70 freaks, do you?
    1. Re:Mozilla by smd4985 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and where is LimeWire? Sure it doesn't have the numbers like Kazaa, but if you check out their technology they've got some fairly sophisticated protocols and a pretty large open-source support community....

      --
      smd4985
    2. Re:Mozilla by kale77in · · Score: 1

      Heck yeah! Where IS Mozilla. It's by far the easiest-to-understand argument for open source.

      Better overall email and browsing than ANY closed source product. Exhibit as Firebird/Thunderbird on Mac, PC and Linux side-by-side for maximum effect. Demonstrate the click-a-link skins and extensions (for gestures!), tabbed browsing (multi-page homepages), integrated searching, mouse-free navigation, bayesian spam filtering, quirks-mode for all of IE's layout bugs, -- heck even some CSS3 already.

      The only closed-source thing it still needs is the CodeWeavers QuickTime plug-in, sadly (AFAIK -- I'd be happy to find I'm wrong on this).

    3. Re:Mozilla by damiam · · Score: 1
      The only closed-source thing it still needs is the CodeWeavers QuickTime plug-in, sadly (AFAIK -- I'd be happy to find I'm wrong on

      mplayer and Xine both have Mozilla plug-ins supporting most Internet audio/video. They're not quite as slick as Crossover, and they don't do Shockwave or other Windows plugins, but they can be quite handy.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    4. Re:Mozilla by rmohr02 · · Score: 1

      I was looking for Mozilla and VLC. But I guess it is pretty hard to limit the voting to 20 projects.

    5. Re:Mozilla by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With that argument, then... Where is Linux? Where is Apache? Some open source applications should be so known that showing them there would be a waste of space.

      If I would to choose just by popularity on that list, I would show KDE, gimp and OpenOffice, they are not new and are fairly known, but are between the more known open source applications of that list and won a lot of times awards like in LinuxJournal.

      But, in the other hand, I would like to give some light to not so known applications to a wider audience, things could change. I surely would put there mplayer, but about the others is less clear. Maybe phpMyAdmin and GNUCash to cover different areas.

      Also, the proposed projects are not so uniformly dispersed in the open source space. There are 3 projects that manage content in the web, like MoinMoin, Plone and Zope, instead of this I would propose TikiWiki that have a bit of each one. There are 2 that are just for developers, like SubVersion and Eclipse, and not sure if that will count for the "general public" or whatever goes to that kind of events. And there a some proposed programs that are fairy similar to widely know ones in the windows world, like Evolution and XMMS, that the general public will think that are Outlook and winamp and will not ask, and could give the false impression that open source is just copying other program features and not creating things completely new.

    6. Re:Mozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozilla has alreay been offered a stand. They may even be interested in more help manning it, so you might like to get in touch with the marketing team if you are avaliable and have some knowledge of mozilla.

  4. Re:"Choose up to three projects" -- Why so hard :' by Doomrat · · Score: 1

    Isn't PHP-Nuke one of those systems which helps webmasters create faceless, identical websites with little customisation and content beyond a colour scheme and a forum?

  5. Who is your audience? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you're dealing with an office worker, OpenOffice and Evolution are good candidates. Home users would like to see XMMS, mplayer, GAIM, and SpamAssassin. Admins would be interested in Tight VNC and SpamAssassin. The creative types would want GIMP and Audacity.

    As for the desktop, it might be a good idea to stick with one for all your demonstration boxes (all KDE or all GNOME) but of course mention that alternatives exist.

    1. Re:Who is your audience? by erktrek · · Score: 1


      I'd also add IPCOP to that Admin's list.

    2. Re:Who is your audience? by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Much as I like (and use) XMMS, it's not the best project to put forward as it is, for the most part, just a clone of Winamp.

      --
      The cake is a pie
  6. Slashdot poll by mukund · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It would be nice if Slashdot ran this poll. Internet polls like this are not so useful I suppose, but still it would be cool to see how various projects rank out. The three leaders could be the chosen ones.

    My choices in the O'Reilly list are Subversion, OpenOffice.org and SpamAssassin. None of these projects have known patent issues or issues with 3rd parties such as MSN, AOL, Yahoo (the related projects such as mplayer and GAIM do an *excellent* job however).

    --
    Banu
    1. Re:Slashdot poll by mukund · · Score: 1

      I wanted Slashdot to run the poll as the O'Reilly one needs an account there. On hindsight, the Slashdot poll would just allow for vote on one project only, whereas I would really like to vote for over 3 projects in the O'Reilly poll. Good set of software projects there.

      --
      Banu
    2. Re:Slashdot poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention there would have to be a CowboyNeal option. ;)

    3. Re:Slashdot poll by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Subversion? But why isn't Tom Lord's Arch nominated? It's IMHO a MUCH better designed revision control system. It allows for wholly new development styles!

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    4. Re:Slashdot poll by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Well at least we'll know one person who'll be going to Comdex. :o

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    5. Re:Slashdot poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It would be nice if Slashdot ran this poll. Internet polls like this are not so useful I suppose, but still it would be cool to see how various projects rank out. The three leaders could be the chosen ones."

      Howabout we ask Diebold to run the poll?

      It turns out that the top software project is... "George W. Bush, by 3 votes"

  7. Have any of you actually *read* the GPL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Hello,

    Consulting for several large companies, I'd always done my work on
    Windows. Recently however, a top online investment firm asked us to do
    some work using Linux. The concept of having access to source code was
    very appealing to us, as we'd be able to modify the kernel to meet our
    exacting standards which we're unable to do with Microsoft's products.

    Although we met several technical challenges along the way
    (specifically, Linux's lack of Token Ring support and the fact that we
    were unable to defrag its ext2 file system), all in all the process
    went smoothly. Everyone was very pleased with Linux, and we were
    considering using it for a great deal of future internal projects.

    So you can imagine our suprise when we were informed by a lawyer that
    we would be required to publish our source code for others to use. It
    was brought to our attention that Linux is copyrighted under something
    called the GPL, or the Gnu Protective License. Part of this license
    states that any changes to the kernel are to be made freely available.
    Unfortunately for us, this meant that the great deal of time and money
    we spent "touching up" Linux to work for this investment firm would
    now be available at no cost to our competitors.

    Furthermore, after reviewing this GPL our lawyers advised us that any
    products compiled with GPL'ed tools - such as gcc - would also have to
    its source code released. This was simply unacceptable.

    Although we had planned for no one outside of this company to ever
    use, let alone see the source code, we were now put in a difficult
    position. We could either give away our hard work, or come up with
    another solution. Although it was tought to do, there really was no
    option: We had to rewrite the code, from scratch, for Windows 2000.

    I think the biggest thing keeping Linux from being truly competitive
    with Microsoft is this GPL. Its draconian requirements virtually
    guarentee that no business will ever be able to use it. After my
    experience with Linux, I won't be recommending it to any of my
    associates. I may reconsider if Linux switches its license to
    something a little more fair, such as Microsoft's "Shared Source".
    Until then its attempts to socialize the software market will insure
    it remains only a bit player.

    Thank you for your time.

    1. Re:Have any of you actually *read* the GPL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, funny stuff!

    2. Re:Have any of you actually *read* the GPL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you compile something with gcc you have to release the sources?

      I don't think that is true, as long there is no GPL code in the sources being compiled.

      Can someone clear this up?

    3. Re:Have any of you actually *read* the GPL? by RayAlmostAnonymous · · Score: 1

      You are not required to 'publish' your source code - you just have to give it to anyone you have given the binary to, i.e. your investment firm customers. They can do what they want with it of course .... but then they asked you to do it with GPLed Linux in the first place. From the GPL FAQ (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLRequi reSourcePostedPublic):

      '...the GPL requires you to make the modified source code available to the program's users, under the GPL'

      Note the 'to the programs users' bit.

      Compiling with gcc does *not* place the compiled code under the GPL, as long as any linked libraries are not GPLed (they can be LGPLed). See, again, the GPL FAQ, http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#CanIUseGP LToolsForNF

      HTH

    4. Re:Have any of you actually *read* the GPL? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What dumb arse modded this up?
      It's a blatent troll.

      I hope I metamoderate this

  8. Re:"Choose up to three projects" -- Why so hard :' by jokkebk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah the problem is, that the programs with most users will definitely get most votes. Audio editing is not so common task, and most of the people haven't heard from Eclipse, so even if they were great programs, they won't be faring well in this vote.

    Using some kind of grading combined with the amount of votes would perhaps solve this problem, but I guess it's too late now..

    --
    http://codeandlife.com
  9. Re:"Choose up to three projects" -- Why so hard :' by beacher · · Score: 1

    One thing that makes it much easier is the fact that some of the project names are not very good. MoinMoin?

    This was the first time I've heard of Subversion and I can appreciate the clever file naming reference, but no PHB will have an app named subversion because I'm sure he'll believe it's already being used.

    Those are the only 2 project names that really stand out as being bad ....
    -B

  10. Is this a cruel joke? by RecoveredMarketroid · · Score: 1

    In my previous life in marketing, I was an exhibitor in many Comdex shows. We stopped attending because so many of the 'customers' were job seekers...

  11. sourceforge by seriv · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know it is not a software package (I know the scripts can be downloaded, but let me gat to what I am getting at), but the site provides a home to many of these projects i feel that COMDEX needs to add it as an honorary member of the list.
    -Seriv

    1. Re:sourceforge by henriksh · · Score: 1

      Except that Sourceforge keeps their code secret. You should use savannah.gnu.org instead, which was born because SF closed their source.

      Google around for more info.

  12. Dear sir Haxalot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thankyou for the mizilla link. We slashdot readers have never before heard of it, and your commment has been insightful, informative and interesting at the same time.

    Please contine to post your riviting comments.

    Regards,

    Slashdot readers everywhere

    1. Re:Dear sir Haxalot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thankyou for the mizilla link
      It's Mozilla, and I think he/she was trying to make the point that Mozilla is absent from the vote.

    2. Re:Dear sir Haxalot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look at your keyboard, you will notiver the 'i' key is right next to the 'o' key. It was probably a typo Haxalot you fucktard. Stop the assclownery

  13. Re:"Choose up to three projects" -- Why so hard :' by beacher · · Score: 2, Funny

    PHP nuke lets you choose a theme so it's not that bad... but the default themes need a visit from that tv show... Queer Eye for the straight GUI.

  14. mplayer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    # Removed crap from list
    sed 's/mplayer/xine/g'

    1. Re:Mplayer? by synonymous · · Score: 1

      One thing is for sure however, Mplayer is something that should succeed. In addition, it seems as if you might not be as informed as the developers in the legalities of the game.

  15. Wait a minute... by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

    I thought Slashdotters always say that open source doesn't innovate? All I hear all day from Slashdotters is how open source should stop copying Microsoft and start innovating. And how we suddenly get a story that implies open source *does* innovate?
    You Slashbots really have a double standard.
    I'm sure I'll get moderated down to this but that only shows what kind of an anti-open source zealot place Slashdot has become.

    1. Re:Wait a minute... by Doomrat · · Score: 1

      No, Slashdotters say "OMG! Microsieve is gay!".

    2. Re:Wait a minute... by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone is arguing that in general open source software doesn't innovate. I think the argument is that when it comes to GUIs, they copy everything from Microsoft.

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    3. Re:Wait a minute... by rmohr02 · · Score: 1
      All I hear all day from Slashdotters is how open source should stop copying Microsoft and start innovating.
      I think open source and Microsoft should stop copying the Mac UI.
    4. Re:Wait a minute... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I don't think anyone is arguing that in general open source software doesn't innovate

      Um no, that's a very common refrain.

      Look at Linux, Apache, OpenOffice, KDE, Mozilla...
      for each of them, there is a pre-existing closed-source project that it can be called a "clone" of.

      In fact, when RMS was initially starting the "Free Software" movement, he explicitally declared they would clone Unix:

      1. Individual programmers can contribute by writing a compatible duplicate of some Unix utility and giving it to me. For most projects, such part-time distributed work would be very hard to coordinate; the independently-written parts would not work together. But for the particular task of replacing Unix, this problem is absent. Most interface specifications are fixed by Unix compatibility. If each contribution works with the rest of Unix, it will probably work with the rest of GNU.

      That seminal message suggests that cloning an existing program will be vastly easier than making a new one, because since there's little original thinking involved, the communication needs between distributed developers are much, much smaller.
    5. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And, oh my god, the thing Apache cloned is a clone of something else. Of course Apache, OpenOffice, and Mozilla are clones. You need to view websites, edit documents, and serve websites regardless of the operating system.

      So, not every project is an innovation. If they were, we'd only have one of any type of application, and no matter how much it sucked we'd be stuck with it. I'd rather see competition. We might be "duplicating effort", but low and behold the power of capitalism is competition. Communism could be seen to fail because it lacks this. Really, an open source alternative to a commercial good increases competition on the commercial good (they have to innovate more because otherwise they can't make up a good reason why you'd buy their products).

      The funny thing is, open source is just a paradigm for code release. Without a strong backing of a few strong leaders, open source will fail. In that regard, open source is exactly like any other development model. And there's been tons of innovation in commercial, shareware, freeware, and open source code. I think that the distinction on innovation isn't relevant to a design model. It's relevant to competition. If open source is the only means of competiting against a monopoly, then in that open source spurs innovation on both sides of the fence.

    6. Re:Wait a minute... by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      I agree. Every OS should have a totally different way of showing programs (none of this "windows" crap) using the mouse and keyboard, and not copy any features at all from each other.

      Dumb ass.

    7. Re:Wait a minute... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      I think that the distinction on innovation isn't relevant to a design model.

      OpenSource is not only a design model, but a business model. It's a business model that says "Money isn't highly important to me". In a capitalist economy, most people's actions are guided by profit, forming a disincentive to release useful innovations under Open Source.

      Some recent programs I'd term highly innovative, and which were either successful themselves, or spawned major fields:
      ICQ, Quake, RealAudio, Fraunhofer MP3, Macromedia Flash, Napster, Sun Java.
      All of them developed and released as closed-source.

      You see, if you have a new, amazing idea, it still requires a lot of programming effort to make it workable. That effort can be obtained by finding a corporation or VC to fund workers to come listen to you. They'll do what they're paid to, even if they don't grasp the insight of how the idea will really turn out to be great.

      It's much harder to get geographically distributed volunteers to be even INTERESTED in the project. Not to mention understand the new ideas fully enough to work on them coherently. (And any potential volunteer who DOES learn enough to understand the grand implications can go find his own VC, hire 6 assistants, and beat you to market)

      If an Open Source project is going to be innovative and successful, the inventor must not only have a great idea, but also a Grade A programmer who can make a robust implementation by herself.

      And there's been tons of innovation in commercial, shareware, freeware, and open source code.

      Ok, if there's been a ton of innovation, then please name an Open Source project that's innovative, and also mildly successful. (Psst: Shareware and freeware are subcategories of commercial)

      The closest I can come up with is CVS, which is used by programmers worldwide and had substantially different behavioral style than the competitors at the time of it's release. (Of course, in the Revision Control field, closed-source BitKeeper can be argued to be much more innovative than CVS, and nearly as successful)

    8. Re:Wait a minute... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      I think open source and Microsoft should stop copying the Mac UI.

      Yeah! I hate how Microsoft only sells one-button mice. And that huge "Dock" takes up too much space at the bottom of the Windows XP screen. You can't even put windows under there!

      And don't even get me started on why you must to drag a CD-R into the Recycle Bin to burn it...

    9. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bittorrent.

      Apache.

      LateX.

      GCC (no, a C compiler isn't impressive -- but the world's most portable compiler is. It runs on more platforms than any other compiler even builds for, and it builds for more platforms than every major competitor put together).

      Gnutella.

    10. Re:Wait a minute... by Trillan · · Score: 1

      I think it was a fair statement, too.

      At first, Mozilla really was an imperfect clone at best. When I first started using it, it wasn't really an alternative to IE. I was just doing it out of sheer bloody mindedness.

      Now, though, it has added enough of IE's features that it is an alternative. And it has added enough features that it isn't a clone anymore.

      Basic functionality comes first -- and that's all IE ever really had. So of course it started life as a clone at one point.

    11. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > OpenSource is not only a design model, but a business model.
      Ask Linus Torvalds how true that is. Open source is a design decision because by being open source it is assumed that to some extent parts of a project will be handled by others if there is enough interest. Freeware assumes the same, but it relies on a closed circle. And businesses rely on money to hire employees to continue development. There being a "Business model" is in general not a programming decision. Business majors have just usurped what programmers like to do, program, and given them the money to allow them to pursue that end.

      > Some recent programs I'd term highly innovative...: ICQ, Quake, RealAudio, Fraunhofer MP3, Macromedia Flash, Napster, Sun Java

      None of those are recent, and ICQ wasn't innovative. Nor was Quake really (if you do want to claim Quake as innovative, then so is Mozilla, Internet Explorer, Gimp, Linux, and most other clones which progress beyond being simple clones of the original). The idea of "messaging" people is in IRC and *nix's talk.

      > Ok, if there's been a ton of innovation, then please name an Open Source project that's innovative, and also mildly successful. (Psst: Shareware and freeware are subcategories of commercial)

      First, freeware isn't a form of commercial software. Freeware doesn't involve trade.

      Second, you make the leap throughout your post that something has to be innovative *and* successful. Innovative things aren't always successful.

      A few innovative things which have arisen include BSD and perl. Unfortunately, a lot of the innovation I've seen has come more in things that have started or become freeware/public domain (X, various language/OS specifications done in academia (EROS, ruby, scheme), various emulators (yay pocketnes for gba) and winamp). Innovation in video codecs and audio codecs are too late for open source. Without a strong backing (either by money or a strong leader), I don't think another C/C++ clone (ala Java) will emerge nor a C/C++ replacement (there have been various languages to come out that try to replace C, and still C reigns supreme).

      Open source hasn't made recent massive innovations, but I believe it will soon.

    12. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozilla isn't a clone of IE. Mozilla (aka Netscape) is a clone of NCSA Mosaic. MS licensed Mosaic at a rate of some percent of the sale of IE. Netscape, in the early years, was far ahead of MS until MS started giving IE away free. After Netscape basically collapsed because of lack of income (hard to outsell a competitor giving away a product), AOL bought them out and started redoing Mozilla from scratch. The fact that Mozilla has been constantly on release during it's several years of development might be why it look like it was a poor IE clone. In any case, I've come to prefer Konqueror a lot of the time.

    13. Re:Wait a minute... by rmohr02 · · Score: 1

      I'm just annoyed that everybody claims KDE and GNOME are copying Windows, when all three are copying the Macintosh. There's not necessarily anything wrong with that.

    14. Re:Wait a minute... by rmohr02 · · Score: 1
      I think open source and Microsoft should stop copying the Mac UI.
      Yeah! I hate how Microsoft only sells one-button mice.
      I never said anything about mice. You can plug a three-button mouse into a Mac and select text merely by highlighting it, then use the middle button to paste it. Does the Windows UI support that?
    15. Re:Wait a minute... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      I'll agree that BitTorrent is innovative, not quite as much as CVS. (I'm not sure if BT is 100% open source, but it kinda looks that way)

      Apache is a clone of NCSA httpd.

      LateX is not succesful.

      GCC is not innovative. It's yet another C complier. It may be impressive, but that's a separate category from innovation.

      Gnutella is a closed source program, written by Justin Frankel during his employment at AOL-Time Warner. A few Source clones of Gnutella were written, but they're just clones.

    16. Re:Wait a minute... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      ICQ wasn't innovative. Nor was Quake really

      No, they were both hugely innovative. If you don't think so, then your standards must be set really high.

      The idea of "messaging" people is in IRC and *nix's talk.

      The innovation of ICQ isn't the messaging, but the non-invasive online presence-indicator.

      First, freeware isn't a form of commercial software. Freeware doesn't involve trade.

      Microsoft IE is freeware. But I'm pretty sure it was developed for commercial purposes. "Freeware" means that the set per-copy price is zero dollars.


      Second, you make the leap throughout your post that something has to be innovative *and* successful. Innovative things aren't always successful.


      I mentioned that because innovation is trivially meaningless without some success. I could write 5 innovative failures in the next hour. You need some filter of overall quality to make any interesting judgements.

      If you were to look at innovative failures, they'd be preponderantly non-commercial efforts, as funding guys can smell the truely bad ideas coming a long way off.

      A few innovative things which have arisen include BSD and perl.

      BSD is a clone of Unix. Perl is a combination of AWK, GREP, and C.

      various emulators (yay pocketnes for gba

      Uhm, any kind of emulator is not innovative! It's a CLONE.

      The X Window system was innovative, but it's not Open Source. The open source version is, once again, a clone of the original. It happens to have superceded the original in popularity, but that's not where the innovation came from.

    17. Re:Wait a minute... by Trillan · · Score: 1

      I was referring to clone in terms of features, not in terms of development path or ordering. Now that I think of it, it was a lousy term to use. I should have said "equivalent" or somesuch.

    18. Re:Wait a minute... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      You can plug a three-button mouse into a Mac and select text merely by highlighting it, then use the middle button to paste it. Does the Windows UI support that?

      No, it does not. Which is another great example of how Microsoft(tm) is not copying the Mac UI! (If anything, Apple copied that one from "Open Source")

      Prehaps they copied it once, but Apple's UI developments in the past 4 years haven't made their way into Windows(r).

  16. The Obligatory Anti-Troll Response by Effugas · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    With Windows, you can't touch anything up, no matter what.

    With Linux, you don't have to, but have the opportunity to if you like. And as long as the changes aren't publically released in any form, you still don't have to release changes.

    Not even Microsoft makes rights claims on software compiled with their tools. Why would you expect GCC to?

    --Dan

  17. The IP Innovation Award goes to.... SCO! by orthogonal · · Score: 1

    I nominate SCO's corporate policy: on the basis of dubious reasoning, lay claim to the work of thousands of Open Source programmers, while simultaneously ensuring that if your claims are accepted, you'll kill the Golden Goose in the act of getting your hands on it!

    I'm sure we'll all miss SCO (soon), even if you weren't a fan of their thievery there's no denying their contribution to popular culture. Truly an American icon.

  18. I vote for Gimp and mplayer by Jacek+Poplawski · · Score: 0

    IMHO Gimp and Mplayer are most important projects on list.
    GNOME and KDE are something everyone is talking about, but not really using (you think you use GNOME or KDE? what except *libs or *wm? do you know how large are these projects?). You can say many good things about OpenOffice, but it's similiar to MS Office: huge and slow. BTW Where is Mozilla? Evolution is MS Outlook replacement. Well... MS Office, MSIE, MS Outlook, where the hell is any innovation?
    No Blender. No games/emulators. No LyX. No X-Chat.

    1. Re:I vote for Gimp and mplayer by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      They missed Nethack, too.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    2. Re:I vote for Gimp and mplayer by sketerpot · · Score: 1
      Aieee! Tainted meat KILLED MY SAMURAI! I didn't have a unicorn horn, Amaterasu Omikami (sp?) was mad at me and decided to write me off because he has the morals and manners of a spoiled child, and now I'm dead.

      Ulch - that meat was tainted! You feel deathly sick. Do you want your posessions identified?

    3. Re:I vote for Gimp and mplayer by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1
      Amaterasu Omikami (sp?) was mad at me and decided to write me off because he has the morals and manners of a spoiled child,

      Well, maybe that's because you called her a 'he' one too many times? :)
      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    4. Re:I vote for Gimp and mplayer by sketerpot · · Score: 1
      Yes, that might be it. I worried about that.

      Then again, I could just say that my finger slipped as I was typing "she". They put the S key so close to the no-op key....

  19. Offtopic by g8oz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Click on the definitions of the projects and you get a MySQL 'too many connections error' from osdir.com.

    Which is using PHP. Its interesting given the recent PHP vs Java scaling article. The situation at osdir.com right now highlights the real world need for connection pooling, which PHP is currently very much lacking in.

  20. Re:Why would I want to vote? by ArkiMage · · Score: 1

    Yeah... It's the Open Source folks stealing code from the Closed Source products... Uh huh. Um, did you ever stop to think how difficult this would be? In comparison to say a closed source software company freely downloading the source to an open source project and taking a peek under the hood? Hmm... Look at all these nice open source products proudly shipping with SCO OpenServer 5.0.7:

    http://www.sco.com/products/openserver507/featur es /

  21. Mplayer for one by Fastball · · Score: 1
    Having to deal with all flavors of streaming media in my job, no player impresses me more than Mplayer. Is there any media format that Mplayer will not play? It is exactly what I want and nothing else from a media player.

    That said, I'm just impressed with this short list. All of these are good options. This really shows how far Linux on the desktop has come. So much so I'm running Linux on my work-issued laptop in a Windows environment now. Many thanks to all the developers who have made this possible.

    1. Re:Mplayer for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      smacker and bink :p

  22. "Send an Open Source Project to COMDEX" by michiel.h · · Score: 1

    That's what it tells me to do.
    But..
    I don't have any...

    Excuse me while I go to my room and cry a bit..

  23. Re:"Choose up to three projects" -- Why so hard :' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, that's called a web designer.

  24. XMMS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have never really understood what is so great about an unstable, GTK1 (!)-utilizing clone of one of the worst Windows audio players ever.

    1. Re:XMMS? by magnum3065 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I still use XMMS since it gets the job done, but I'd like to see something better. I've tried Rythmbox, but it seems to screw up on some of the ID3 tags on my files and it can't edit them. I'd like to see a media library app integrate with MusicBrainz, not just for getting info for CD ripping, but also to check the tags on existing music files.

    2. Re:XMMS? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      RB is getting a lot of active contributions. I think you'll see some very interesting changes coming. We're hoping that RB will be a part of GNOME 2.6.

      sri

  25. corepirate nazi ?pr? ?firm? scriptdead whoredoggIE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they're all over. LIEk the "grass roots" letters from yOUR soldiers.

    this is what you waNTed?

    the rest of the wwworld looks on in disgust/sympathy/dismay, not neccessarily in that order.

  26. Re:Why would I want to vote? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha, funny stuff! Real funny.

  27. Hey! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny


    I can't find the Cowboy Neal option!

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because that software doesn't work at all. :-)

  28. Re:"Choose up to three projects" -- Why so hard :' by budgenator · · Score: 1

    Gee I thought phpNuke was long dead, I remember submiting patches to fix some trivial errors, (years ago) and the maintainer acted like I had personaly insulted him; next release had the same errors. The postnuke people forked off and have completely rewritten a fairly versital and more secure system. give it a look.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  29. HAXALOT?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's Sir Haxalot, we need a Google Cache of the poll in case it gets /.'d!!!

  30. Re:"Choose up to three projects" -- Why so hard :' by saden1 · · Score: 1

    I choose:
    -OpenOffice
    PHBs don't know about it. They should and I guarantee you when people see it they'll be impressed.
    - Eclipse
    Showed this IDE to mid-level managers the other day as part of our processes for choosing an IDE for a new project we are starting. All they kept saying it can do all of this and its what? Free? Are you sure we don't have to pay for something?
    -Gimp
    We are already using this and if its good enough for the special effect guy in Hollywood by god its good enough for your average joe shmuck GUI developer.

    --

    -----
    One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
  31. Why COMDEX? by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    These are all great applications. But why do any of them want to go to COMDEX? COMDEX tends to show off cool new technology like PDAs, video game hardware, and anything flashy. The fanboys won't care about a great email client. I like the idea of these projects getting exposure, but this may not be the best place.

  32. Re:"Choose up to three projects" -- Why so hard :' by madfgurtbn · · Score: 1

    Yeah the problem is, that the programs with most users will definitely get most votes.

    It's for COMDEX, so that's probably a good thing. This is a chance to demonstrate mainstream apps to the mainstream.

    --
    Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
  33. My votes by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

    GAIM: we need a killer,compatible IM with all features

    MPLAYER: we need a media player that plays everything

    OpenOffice.org: we need a document viewer that views and does everything.

    See a trend in my choices? Repeat after me:

    I-N-T-E-R-O-P-E-R-A-B-I-L-I-T-Y

    1. Re:My votes by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      GAIM: we need a killer,compatible IM with all features

      All the features, huh? Until Gaim gets a barely functional file transfer ability, it won't even match a 1997 release of ICQ.

    2. Re:My votes by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      That's why the "need" part. The one closest to being 100% functional is openoffice

    3. Re:My votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, mplayer is closer. Mplayer will play all natures of video formats I'll through at it (a lot more than any other player I've seen). Try handing it saturn cinepak files, and it might have problems.. Still, rm, mov, avi, and mpg/mpg2 isn't bad.

  34. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Toothfairies have recently complained about Windows users.

  35. Revenge of the BSD users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know that Linux is dying. It almost goes without saying. Yes, ever hapless Linux continues to be mired in an irrecoverable and mortifying tangle of fatal trouble. It is perhaps anybody's guess as to which distro is the worst off of an admittedly suffering Linux community. The numbers continue to decline for Linux but Debian may be hurting the most. Look at the numbers. The erosion of user base for Debian continues in a head spinning downward spiral.

    Linux leader Linus states that there are 7000 users of Debian. How many users of Linux are there? Let's see. The number of Debian versus Gentoo posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 Gentoo users. Red Hat posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of Gentoo posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of Red Hat. A recent article put Debian at about 80 percent of the Linux market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 Debian users. This is consistent with the number of Debian Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles from SCO, abysmal sales and so on, Debian went out of business and was taken over by IBM who sell another troubled OS. Now IBM is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major marketing surveys show that Linux has steadily declined in market share. Linux is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If Linux is to survive at all it will be among hobbyist dilettante dabblers. In truth, for all practical purposes Linux is already dead. It is a dead man walking.

    Fact: Linux is dying
    1. Re:Revenge of the BSD users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gentoo users don't post on usenet

      http://forums.gentoo.org/

      Number of users 31094

      Posts per day 1043.73

      Users per day 55.72

  36. Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As we all know, Linux is dying. It almost goes without saying. Yes, ever hapless Linux continues to be mired in an irrecoverable and mortifying tangle of fatal trouble. It is perhaps anybody's guess as to which distro is the worst off of an admittedly suffering Linux community. The numbers continue to decline for Linux but Debian may be hurting the most. Look at the numbers. The erosion of user base for Debian continues in a head spinning downward spiral.

    Linux leader Linus states that there are 7000 users of Debian. How many users of Linux are there? Let's see. The number of Debian versus Gentoo posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 Gentoo users. Red Hat posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of Gentoo posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of Red Hat. A recent article put Debian at about 80 percent of the Linux market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 Debian users. This is consistent with the number of Debian Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles from SCO, abysmal sales and so on, Debian went out of business and was taken over by IBM who sell another troubled OS. Now IBM is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major marketing surveys show that Linux has steadily declined in market share. Linux is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If Linux is to survive at all it will be among hobbyist dilettante dabblers. In truth, for all practical purposes Linux is already dead. It is a dead man walking.

    Fact: Linux is dying
  37. Re:Blatent Sexism in Open Source Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    never a read a more confused badly formed rant.

    you are implying that women dont have the intellectual capacity to handle the linux command set and that because theres no cartoon dog jumping around the screen women cant use it. most womens groups would probably take offense at such a two faced ignorant opinion which does more to damage womens adoption of IT in the workplace than better it.

  38. GNU Enterprise...the PHBs will love it by Spoing · · Score: 1
    GNU Enterprise is both a toolkit (think SAP) and a shelter for related programs such as my current favorite DCL (call tracking and trouble ticket system), or the more widely known Bayonne telecommunications application server.

    Some of the projects are highly usable now as they are, though the core tools are available to create your own customized company-wide applications.

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  39. My votes and why by Tomster · · Score: 1

    I voted for Evolution, the Gimp, and OpenOffice. I picked them for the marketing potential. These three products have mass-market potential, and COMDEX is a good way to get them in front of people who would otherwise perhaps never know there are alternatives to Exchange/Outlook and MSOffice.

    1. Re:My votes and why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Remember though, you have to vote every day, or it won't even matter.

      What a retarded process.

  40. Mplayer? by FullCircle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oh, great, let's send a legally questionable program to COMDEX and get it in the spotlight. MS , Real, Intel and Apple won't care that we ignore the EULA's and strip out dll's from their applications in order to make it work.

    Maybe do a dual booth with Mplayer and DeCSS just to really make certain two of our most important desktop apps get removed.

    Great thinking guys...

    --
    If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. - James Madison
  41. Re:"Choose up to three projects" -- Why so hard :' by AeiwiMaster · · Score: 1

    Yes, this is a commen problem with this type of polls.

    That is why I have made eigenpoll
    which try to solve this.

  42. Re:Open Source Inovation? What a novel idea! by synonymous · · Score: 1

    Out of all the folks that I have ever known, those that use MS for an OS have stolen something to put on it, often times the whole OS is stolen. Let me think here if I know of anyone who hasn't,,,, hmm nope. My dad, my wife, random folks met at school, friends, enemies, you name it. It's many times a brag to see how much monies worth and who has most. Crazy though that all that P2P that just works flawlessly with MS. So far as illegal activity among Linux users, I am the only one in my area I know of that even knows what the heck it is,, now thats a crime, your right I guess. The font issue I never had any trouble with, knowing of course that there was't much that could be done about it considering those pixels were taken from all us by the big dogs. SCO is irrelevant, cept that they are shed more light on the true intentions of corporate lack of cooperation with people. SCO is flappy flappish maybe because they are lose and playing the stock fools and cash out bye bye. Blatant in front of the whole worlds trained to be blind eyers. I shouldn't even comment for you show clearly that you, Mr. Anonymous, have a similar limited view and no personal experience a subject of human science.

  43. ReactOS by myg · · Score: 1
    Probably one of the most interesting Open Source projects is ReactOS. As much as the Slashdot crowd dislikes Microsoft, the Win32 API has a tremendous amount of applications behind it.

    The chance for us to demonstrate such a direct competition to Microsoft at COMDEX would be well worth leaving leaving another project behind.

    1. Re:ReactOS by snilloc · · Score: 1

      I think they should stick with apps that can actually be deployed in a meaningful way.

  44. Choosing projects that are cross platform... by stienman · · Score: 1

    I'm choosing projects that are cross platform, such as Gimp, OpenOffice, and tightVNC.

    As important as it may be to move away from Windows, it is just as important to support it and show people what open source can do for them now with no long term investment.

    You can't replace the OS until all the Apps are in place and equivilant, and it'll be so much easier to convert people if they are already using popular opensource/free software on their current platform.

    When the next round of office upgrades come around, they'll look at the price and switch. When the next round of OS upgrades come along, they'll look and switch.

    -Adam

  45. My 3 choices by Maxhrk · · Score: 0

    for me... 1) OpenOffice 2) GAIM 3) GIMP

  46. Re:"Choose up to three projects" -- Why so hard :' by sketerpot · · Score: 1
    MoinMoin: because PikiPiki wasn't hard enough to pronounce.

    It looks like a good Wiki, though.

  47. Gnumeric?! by xjqkojqxj · · Score: 0

    What about Gnumeric? It's one of the most powerful + useful Free s/w apps. I don't know where I'd be without it.

  48. Re:"Choose up to three projects" -- Why so hard :' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "if only PHP-Nuke was on the list - it's what has revolutionalised my life as a webmaster!!"

    Funny that out of the countless open source cms projects, only plone was included in the list.

    Meanwhile, my vote would go for Drupal!

  49. Re:"Choose up to three projects" -- Why so hard :' by realdpk · · Score: 1

    It also lets you vote more than once - that is, once per day. That right there throws the whole concept out the window.

  50. Account requried? by _Logic_ · · Score: 1

    Gee, I vote, they get an account. Lets run this poll on Slashdot instead!

  51. Sig reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The usefulness comes from what is not there; the profit comes from what is there.

  52. Where is Samba? by AELinuxGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd agree with all of the apps on this list as being very worthy of nomination, but I am shocked that Samba is not there.

  53. keep on looking by hpavc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i would take gnuCash off that list and put something like Compiere. gnuCash is nice and all but at comdex it would look silly. it would be like taking Amanda there.

    same with Xmms, 'wow it looks like just winamplinux has a winamp clone, how cute.'

    MoinMoin? twiki blows this project away, you lost me on this nomination.

    spamassassin? wont mcafee already have spamassassin there in the form of spamkiller? but seriously ... maybe you could toss that into my qmail mix below somehow.

    how about showing off snort? or swan interopering with some real world hardware

    how about setting up five little machines running qmail and blast a million delivered mail messages between the machines per hour and have a big led bank sign as a counter? then add and import thousands of users dynamically using ldap.

    --
    members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
  54. Re:"Choose up to three projects" -- Why so hard :' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell is a Wiki?

  55. Where's BitTorrent? by Troll_Kamikaze · · Score: 1

    Isn't it among the most innovative open source applications of recent times?

  56. Re:"Choose up to three projects" -- Why so hard :' by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

    I had no problem hitting Evolution, GIMP and OpenOffice. Of course mortals aren't allowed to vote.

    Put the serious apps up front and the rest will follow. Gotta put on a good show against the competition too. All IMHO.

    --

    Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  57. I've got one... by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't be very much on-topic, per se, but it could be really funny...

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

    1. Re:I've got one... by mhesseltine · · Score: 1

      I know I'm also offtopic, but that was one of the funniest things I've read in a long time. Thank you for pointing that out.

      Now, to try to venture into the realm of on-topic: A blimp might cause problems in a trade show booth. The show managers are kind of relentless about what gets put where, floating things, etc. I was at one trade show where a customer, located at a "T" intersection on an aisle, used a light projector with custom lenses to project their logo down the aisle carpet. Show management came by and told them either they could pay for the additional square footage, or change to logos in the projector to show logos (which they did.)

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
  58. It should be called the "Open Source Copycat Area" by greggman · · Score: 1

    Are even 2 of those titles innovative? The majority of them are copies of commerical software and poor copies at that.

  59. Funny you should ask, since it says right there by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The audience is anyone attending COMDEX - therefore you don't want development or admin tools, no matter how good they are.

    I actually chose OpenOffice, Evolution, nad Gimp to give more exposure to them to the general public. But on reflection Audacity would have been a much better choice than Evolution for that crowd.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  60. very good you cleared that up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...this guy's company must have had some stupid people in their legal dept.
    mod parent up please. clears a lot up.

  61. Mplayer: #1 illegal open source application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there any media format that Mplayer will not play?

    When you're using warez codecs, nope.

  62. Suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is PHP-Nuke?

    Or the biggest and the most popular CMS/Portal software ever wrote isn't so important?

    There are project on that list that I never heard about. Just FYI.

  63. Innovation? by melted · · Score: 1

    99.5% of Linux apps are blatant rip-offs from Windows/MacOS. What innovation are we talking about here?

  64. Vote for Plone! by LibrePensador · · Score: 1

    It's the most mature content management system that I have ever come across, built on top of the mature zope application server. I am dismayed at how few people actually know of this project or have used it.

    I am in the plone mailing list and I am reading about 50,000 user installations and larger. I have been using it to create a cognitive map of everything I read and it's an incredible tool. In the context of a knowlege base or knowledge sharing in academia or in a company, it makes it easy to decide who is a contributitor, who is a reviewr, who is an editor.

    Anyway, enough, just check it out.

    Zoe is also very, very cool.

    And both applications have tremendous enterprise and home user appeal.

    --
    Pragmatism as an ideology is not particularly pragmatic in the long term. Keep it in mind when you dismiss Free Software
  65. Re:Who is your audience? MOD Parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of the best open source projects are the Jakarta projects if you ask me. Although, PHB folks wont find the real open source very interesting.

  66. Re:"Choose up to three projects" -- Why so hard :' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey... I just thought you might want to know there's a typo in your sig.

  67. Your face, my face, our faces. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you open your pudgy little bubble lips at me once more, so help me God, I'll teach you what it's like to be violently raped.

  68. I nominate by jo42 · · Score: 1


    I nominate FreeBSD and OpenBSD.

  69. Where are the enterprise options? by wemmick · · Score: 1
    While the desktop makes for better demos, the real strong players are still the enterprise options. These are the tools which will get noticed by CIO-types. I'm talking about apache, samba, sendmail/postfix/exim, jboss, etc.

    Then send them to David Wheeler's report on quantitative data which shows the strength of open source projects.

    --
    ___
    Cognitive Overflow
    more than yo